ECMO Support in Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary Analysis of Hospital Charges in the United States.

BACKGROUND: There is little in the literature pertaining to cost associated with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in lung transplantation. We sought to evaluate charges associated with the index hospitalization among recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO to identify factors that increase hospital charges in these patients. METHODS: With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we reviewed data pertaining to patients who received a lung transplant between 2000 and 2011 and stratified them into ECMO and non-ECMO groups based on use of ECMO. Regression modeling was used to identify differences in charges. RESULTS: Data pertaining to 15,596 recipients of a lung transplant were evaluated, 658 (4.2%) of whom required ECMO. ECMO recipients were more likely to have a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (3.5% versus 1.3%, p = 0.007) or pulmonary hypertension (PH) (9.1% versus 3.0%, p < 0.001). Patients who received a bilateral lung transplant had 32.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.2% to 37.9%, p < 0.001) higher charges. Recipients with PH had 28.7% (95% CI: 14.9% to 42.4%, p = 0.001) higher charges. Median charges for recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO were $780,391.50 versus $324,279.80 for non-ECMO recipients of a lung transplant and were 50.3% (95% CI: 33.0% to 67.5%, p < 0.001) higher. Hospital charges among Medicare enrollees were 6.6% (95% CI: 0.7% to 12.5%, p = 0.028) higher than privately insured recipients of a lung transplant. Black recipients had approximately 34.2% (95% CI: 3.2% to 65.0%, p = 0.030) higher charges. The ECMO group had longer median length of stay (LOS) (25 versus 15 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO support had longer LOS and higher hospital charges, specifically among black recipients, recipients with PH, and Medicare enrollees.

Pharmacokinetics of Posaconazole Suspension in Lung Transplant Patients with and without Cystic Fibrosis.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Posaconazole is an important antifungal agent for both prophylaxis and treatment of IFIs; however, detailed pharmacokinetic data are limited among LTRs, particularly those with cystic fibrosis (CF). Our objective was to conduct a pharmacokinetic study of posaconazole oral suspension among LTRs, with particular attention to patients with CF. We enrolled 20 LTRs, 7 with CF and 13 with other underlying lung diseases. Average daily doses in CF and non-CF patients were 829 and 862 mg, respectively. After ≥5 days of treatment, only 4 patients had average plasma concentrations of >0.7 µg/ml. Average steady-state plasma concentrations were 61% lower in CF patients (0.233 µg/ml) than in non-CF LTRs (0.594 µg/ml; P = 0.03). The average dose-normalized plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were also lower in CF (0.007 h·µg/ml) than in non-CF LTRs (0.02 h·µg/ml; P = 0.02). The weight-normalized apparent oral clearance values were 2.51 and 0.74 liters/h/kg among CF and non-CF LTRs, respectively (P = 0.005). Despite significant interpatient variability, plasma trough concentrations were strongly correlated with posaconazole AUC across all LTRs (r(2) = 0.95, P < 0.0001). Taken together, our study highlights a critical need to incorporate new formulations of posaconazole into prophylaxis and treatment strategies for LTRs, particularly those with CF. Future pharmacokinetic studies of both tablet and intravenous formulations must consider LTR-specific factors and incorporate a therapeutic drug monitoring plan in this patient population.