Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch ; 53(4): 1037-1050, 2022 Oct 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914020

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Children who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH), their parents, Teachers of the Deaf, and other community stakeholders were involved in co-designing a web-based resource to support students' social-emotional well-being. The resource was designed to provide families and teachers with strategies to enhance the social and emotional well-being of Grade 4-6 students who are DHH. This study reports outcomes of a pilot study of the web-based resource intervention. METHOD: A pre-post pilot study was conducted to quantitatively examine reported anxiety, well-being, social relationships, school experience, student-teacher relationship, and parent and teacher self-efficacy. A total of 37 students, their parents (n = 37), and their classroom teachers (n = 40) participated in the intervention program and were provided access to the resource. RESULTS: In total, 19 students, 22 parents, and 17 teachers completed both pre- and postsurvey measures. Paired t tests revealed that there was a statistically significant increase in parents' self-efficacy scores from pre- to posttest. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed a significant association between parent use of the website and student-reported improved peer support and reduced school loneliness. No other statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a web-based resource codeveloped with students who are DHH, their parents, and teachers could potentially be beneficial for the well-being of students who are DHH as well as parents' self-efficacy. Further research is needed to confirm the benefits.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva , Niño , Emociones , Humanos , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Maestros/psicología , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes/psicología
2.
Front Public Health ; 9: 636921, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33692984

RESUMEN

Introduction: Amidst the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, understanding the transmission dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is key to providing peace of mind for the community and informing policy-making decisions. While available data suggest that school-aged children are not significant spreaders of SARS-CoV-2, the possibility of transmission in schools remains an ongoing concern, especially among an aging teaching workforce. Even in low-prevalence settings, communities must balance the potential risk of transmission with the need for students' ongoing education. Through the roll out of high-throughput school-based SARS-CoV-2 testing, enhanced follow-up for individuals exposed to COVID-19 and wellbeing surveys, this study investigates the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the current psychosocial wellbeing impacts of the pandemic in school communities. Methods: The DETECT Schools Study is a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in 79 schools across Western Australia (WA), Australia. To investigate the incidence, transmission and impact of SARS-CoV-2 in schools, the study comprises three "modules": Module 1) Spot-testing in schools to screen for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2; Module 2) Enhanced surveillance of close contacts following the identification of any COVID-19 case to determine the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in a school setting; and Module 3) Survey monitoring of school staff, students and their parents to assess psycho-social wellbeing following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in WA. Clinical Trial Registration: Trial registration number: ACTRN12620000922976.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/psicología , Padres/psicología , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Australia Occidental/epidemiología
3.
Aggress Behav ; 46(3): 193-209, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32064639

RESUMEN

Despite the extensive evaluation of school-based interventions for bullying, victimization remains a significant problem in schools. Bullying victimization is significantly predicted by contextual (school-related) factors. As a consequence whole-school programs have been commonly used to prevent and reduce bullying victimization. Evidence also points to individual risk factors (such as emotional distress) in predicting victimization, yet programs to prevent bullying victimization by changing these individual risks are far less developed. Few studies have approximated "real-world" implementation conditions in their trials. The current effectiveness trial evaluated the combination of a whole-school program designed to prevent bullying perpetration and victimization together with a targeted intervention for at-risk students, teaching them individual and dyadic strategies to reduce their anxiety and manage victimization, allowing schools some latitude to implement programs as they typically would. Students from Grades 3 and 4 (N = 8,732) across 135 schools were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: combined intervention; whole-school intervention only; individual intervention only; and care as usual. Victimization decreased significantly and similarly across all four conditions at 12 and 24 months following baseline. Similar reductions and failure to discriminate conditions were found on other key constructs: anxiety; bullying perpetration; and depression. Possible reasons for the failure to demonstrate victimization prevention differences and lessons learned from this large, effectiveness trial are considered.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/psicología , Acoso Escolar/prevención & control , Acoso Escolar/psicología , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Acoso Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed ; 102(5): 249-253, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302733

RESUMEN

Continuing professional development (CPD) is changing. Once seen as flexible on the basis of personal choice and mainly consisting of conferences and lecture style meetings, it is now much more likely to be specified, mandatory and linked to specific regulatory or quality improvement activities. This may not be well aligned with how adult professionals learn best and the evidence of resulting change in practice is limited. Also there is a danger of losing out on serendipity in learning by pushing experienced professionals into focusing excessively on mandatory activities that seem to be increasingly 'ticking the box'. However, the previous impression of flexibility may have hidden poor education practice. This paper defines CPD and asks whether there are problems with CPD. It looks at how adults are thought to learn and places this in the context of current practice. It considers practical models of how to deal with a series of common challenges met by those who provide and undertake CPD.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Educación Médica Continua/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/psicología , Pediatría/educación , Adulto , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...