RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to summarize (1) the historical knowledge of the posterolateral elbow dislocation (PLED) pattern and the biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical data that engendered its evolution; and (2) to help clinicians better understand the management of PLED. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane Library, and the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary. Results are discussed as a chronologic review of the relevant literature between 1920-2022. RESULTS: In 1966 Osborn and Cotterill were the first to describe posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) causing the PLED. Several theories on PLED were then published by others surgeons as our understanding of elbow biomechanics continued to improve. Multiple treatment protocols have been designed based on the aforementioned theories. Conservative and surgical treatment for PLED provides excellent functional outcomes. However, high rates of persistent pain stiffness and instability have been reported long-term, and no single approach to treatment has been widely accepted. CONCLUSION: Despite a growing body of biomechanical evidence, there is no consensus surgical indication for the treatment of PLED. Both conservative and surgical management result in satisfactory functional outcomes after PLED. However, elevated rates of residual pain, and instability have also been described and may limit heavy labor and sports participation. The next challenge for elbow surgeons will be to identify those patients who would benefit from surgical stabilization following PLED.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones de Codo , Articulación del Codo , Luxaciones Articulares , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/historia , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/fisiopatología , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/fisiopatología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/historia , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Historia del Siglo XX , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radiografía , Historia del Siglo XXIRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The induced membrane technique, first described by Masquelet, is now well standardized, but little studied in post-traumatic forearm bone defect. The main aim of the present study was to analyze consolidation rates in this indication. The study hypothesis was that the induced membrane technique provides good consolidation results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective assessment of our experience with 10 cases of induced membrane forearm reconstruction. The two main etiologies were acute trauma or treatment for non-union. Functional impact was assessed on range of motion and QuickDASH. The complications rate was also examined. RESULTS: There were 3 cases of post-traumatic bone defect, and 7 of non-union treatment, including 6 septic non-unions. Mean defect size was 4.3cm. Mean interval between induced membrane stages 1 and 2 was 3.3 months. Pure cancellous iliac bone graft was systematic. Nine of the patients showed consolidation, at a mean 9.2 months; there was 1 case of non-consolidation, but no other complications. Range of motion was satisfactory; mean QuickDASH score was 22 at a mean 50.3 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: The induced membrane technique was reliable, reproducible and technically accessible, with good functional and radiographic results and few complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study without control group.