Chromatin compartmentalization regulates the response to DNA damage.

The DNA damage response is essential to safeguard genome integrity. Although the contribution of chromatin in DNA repair has been investigated1,2, the contribution of chromosome folding to these processes remains unclear3. Here we report that, after the production of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in mammalian cells, ATM drives the formation of a new chromatin compartment (D compartment) through the clustering of damaged topologically associating domains, decorated with γH2AX and 53BP1. This compartment forms by a mechanism that is consistent with polymer-polymer phase separation rather than liquid-liquid phase separation. The D compartment arises mostly in G1 phase, is independent of cohesin and is enhanced after pharmacological inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) or R-loop accumulation. Importantly, R-loop-enriched DNA-damage-responsive genes physically localize to the D compartment, and this contributes to their optimal activation, providing a function for DSB clustering in the DNA damage response. However, DSB-induced chromosome reorganization comes at the expense of an increased rate of translocations, also observed in cancer genomes. Overall, we characterize how DSB-induced compartmentalization orchestrates the DNA damage response and highlight the critical impact of chromosome architecture in genomic instability.

The Material Properties of the Cell Nucleus: A Matter of Scale.

Chromatin regulatory processes physically take place in the environment of the cell nucleus, which is filled with the chromosomes and a plethora of smaller biomolecules. The nucleus contains macromolecular assemblies of different sizes, from nanometer-sized protein complexes to micrometer-sized biomolecular condensates, chromosome territories, and nuclear bodies. This multiscale organization impacts the transport processes within the nuclear interior, the global mechanical properties of the nucleus, and the way the nucleus senses and reacts to mechanical stimuli. Here, we discuss recent work on these aspects, including microrheology and micromanipulation experiments assessing the material properties of the nucleus and its subcomponents. We summarize how the properties of multiscale media depend on the time and length scales probed in the experiment, and we reconcile seemingly contradictory observations made on different scales. We also revisit the concept of liquid-like and solid-like material properties for complex media such as the nucleus. We propose that the nucleus can be considered a multiscale viscoelastic medium composed of three major components with distinct properties: the lamina, the chromatin network, and the nucleoplasmic fluid. This multicomponent organization enables the nucleus to serve its different functions as a reaction medium on the nanoscale and as a mechanosensor and structural scaffold on the microscale.

LEAFY homeostasis is regulated via ubiquitin-dependent degradation and sequestration in cytoplasmic condensates.

The transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) plays crucial roles in flower development by activating floral homeotic genes. Activation of LFY targets requires the combined action of LFY and the E3 ubiquitin ligase UFO, although the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that LFY accumulates in biomolecular condensates within the cytoplasm, while recombinant LFY forms condensates with similar properties in vitro. UFO interacts with LFY within these condensates and marks it for degradation. LFY levels in the nucleus are buffered against changes in total LFY levels induced by proteasome inhibition, UFO overexpression, or mutation of lysine residues in a disordered region of LFY. Perturbation of cytoplasmic LFY condensates by 1,6-hexanediol treatment induces the relocalization of LFY to the nucleus and the subsequent activation of the LFY target AP3 in flowers. Our data suggest that nucleocytoplasmic partitioning, condensation, and ubiquitin-dependent degradation regulate LFY levels in the nucleus to control its activity.

Phase transitions in heterochromatin organization.

Heterochromatin formation has been proposed to involve phase transitions on the level of the three-dimensional folding of heterochromatin regions and the liquid-liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Here, I outline the hallmarks of such transitions and the current challenges to detect them in living cells. I further discuss the abundance and properties of prominent heterochromatin proteins and relate them to their potential role in driving phase transitions. Recent data from mouse fibroblasts indicate that pericentric heterochromatin is organized via a reordering transition on the level of heterochromatin regions that does not necessarily involve liquid-liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Evaluating key hallmarks of the different candidate phase transition mechanisms across cell types and species will be needed to complete the current picture.

Epigenetic signals that direct cell type-specific interferon beta response in mouse cells.

The antiviral response induced by type I interferon (IFN) via the JAK-STAT signaling cascade activates hundreds of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) across human and mouse tissues but varies between cell types. However, the links between the underlying epigenetic features and the ISG profile are not well understood. We mapped ISGs, binding sites of the STAT1 and STAT2 transcription factors, chromatin accessibility, and histone H3 lysine modification by acetylation (ac) and mono-/tri-methylation (me1, me3) in mouse embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts before and after IFNß treatment. A large fraction of ISGs and STAT-binding sites was cell type specific with promoter binding of a STAT1/2 complex being a key driver of ISGs. Furthermore, STAT1/2 binding to putative enhancers induced ISGs as inferred from a chromatin co-accessibility analysis. STAT1/2 binding was dependent on the chromatin context and positively correlated with preexisting H3K4me1 and H3K27ac marks in an open chromatin state, whereas the presence of H3K27me3 had an inhibitory effect. Thus, chromatin features present before stimulation represent an additional regulatory layer for the cell type-specific antiviral response.

Assessing the Phase Separation Propensity of Proteins in Living Cells Through Optodroplet Formation.

Phase separation is emerging as a key mechanism to describe the formation of membraneless organelles in the cell. It depends on the multivalent (self-) interaction properties of the macromolecules involved and can be observed in aqueous solutions under controlled conditions in vitro with purified components. However, to experimentally demonstrate that this process indeed occurs in the complex environment of living cells remains difficult. Here, we describe an assay based on light-induced association of proteins into complexes termed optodroplets that are in the hundred nm to µm size range. The formation and dissociation of these optodroplets can be followed over time in living cells by fluorescence microscopy to evaluate the propensity of proteins to demix and to form phase-separated subcompartments. The optodroplet assay is based on the fusion of a protein of interest with the photolyase homology region (PHR) protein domain from Arabidopsis thaliana, which can undergo reversible homo-oligomerization upon illumination with blue light. Using this approach, candidate proteins and their interaction-deficient or interaction-enhanced variants can be compared to each other or to reference proteins with known phase separation features. By quantifying the resulting microscopy images, the propensity of a given protein construct to assemble into a phase-separated subcompartment can be assessed.

Detecting and quantifying liquid-liquid phase separation in living cells by model-free calibrated half-bleaching.

Cells contain numerous substructures that have been proposed to form via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). It is currently debated how to reliably distinguish LLPS from other mechanisms. Here, we benchmark different methods using well-controlled model systems in vitro and in living cells. We find that 1,6-hexanediol treatment and classical FRAP fail to distinguish LLPS from the alternative scenario of molecules binding to spatially clustered binding sites without phase-separating. In contrast, the preferential internal mixing seen in half-bleach experiments robustly distinguishes both mechanisms. We introduce a workflow termed model-free calibrated half-FRAP (MOCHA-FRAP) to probe the barrier at the condensate interface that is responsible for preferential internal mixing. We use it to study components of heterochromatin foci, nucleoli, stress granules and nuage granules, and show that the strength of the interfacial barrier increases in this order. We anticipate that MOCHA-FRAP will help uncover the mechanistic basis of biomolecular condensates in living cells.

Transcriptional Activation of Heterochromatin by Recruitment of dCas9 Activators.

The transition from silenced heterochromatin to a biologically active state and vice versa is a fundamental part of the implementation of cell type-specific gene expression programs. To reveal structure-function relationships and dissect the underlying mechanisms, experiments that ectopically induce transcription are highly informative. In particular, the approach to perturb chromatin states by recruiting fusions of the catalytically inactive dCas9 protein in a sequence-specific manner to a locus of interest has been used in numerous applications. Here, we describe how this approach can be applied to activate pericentric heterochromatin (PCH) in mouse cells as a prototypic silenced state by providing protocols for the following workflow: (a) Recruitment of dCas9 fusion constructs with the strong transcriptional activator VPR to PCH. (b) Analysis of the resulting changes in chromatin compaction, epigenetic marks, and active transcription by fluorescence microscopy-based readouts. (c) Automated analysis of the resulting images with a set of scripts in the R programming language. Furthermore, we discuss how parameters for chromatin decondensation and active transcription are extracted from these experiments and can be combined with other readouts to gain insights into PCH activation.

DNA length tunes the fluidity of DNA-based condensates.

Living organisms typically store their genomic DNA in a condensed form. Mechanistically, DNA condensation can be driven by macromolecular crowding, multivalent cations, or positively charged proteins. At low DNA concentration, condensation triggers the conformational change of individual DNA molecules into a compacted state, with distinct morphologies. Above a critical DNA concentration, condensation goes along with phase separation into a DNA-dilute and a DNA-dense phase. The latter DNA-dense phase can have different material properties and has been reported to be rather liquid-like or solid-like depending on the characteristics of the DNA and the solvent composition. Here, we systematically assess the influence of DNA length on the properties of the resulting condensates. We show that short DNA molecules with sizes below 1 kb can form dynamic liquid-like assemblies when condensation is triggered by polyethylene glycol and magnesium ions, binding of linker histone H1, or nucleosome reconstitution in combination with linker histone H1. With increasing DNA length, molecules preferentially condense into less dynamic more solid-like assemblies, with phage λ-DNA with 48.5 kb forming mostly solid-like assemblies under the conditions assessed here. The transition from liquid-like to solid-like condensates appears to be gradual, with DNA molecules of roughly 1-10 kb forming condensates with intermediate properties. Titration experiments with linker histone H1 suggest that the fluidity of condensates depends on the net number of attractive interactions established by each DNA molecule. We conclude that DNA molecules that are much shorter than a typical human gene are able to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation, whereas longer DNA molecules phase separate by default into rather solid-like condensates. We speculate that the local distribution of condensing factors can modulate the effective length of chromosomal domains in the cell. We anticipate that the link between DNA length and fluidity established here will improve our understanding of biomolecular condensates involving DNA.

Tracing Reversible Light-Induced Chromatin Binding with Near-infrared Fluorescent Proteins.

Blue light-induced chromatin recruitment (BLInCR) is a versatile optogenetic tool to enrich effector proteins at specific loci within the nucleus using illumination in the 400-500 nm range. The resulting chromatin binding reaction is reversible on the time scale of minutes. BLInCR is advantageous over ligand-binding induced methods since it does not require a change of growth medium for the relatively slow depletion of the inducer from the nucleus. However, applying BLInCR for reversibility experiments is challenging because of the need to spectrally separate light-induced activation from visualization of the chromatin locus and effector and/or reader proteins by light microscopy. Here, we describe an improved BLInCR protocol for light-dependent association and dissociation of effectors using the near-infrared fluorescent protein iRFP713. Due to its spectral properties, iRFP713 can be detected separately from the red fluorescent protein mCherry. Thus, it becomes possible to trace two proteins labeled with iRFP713 and mCherry independently of the light activation reaction. This approach largely facilitates applications of the BLInCR system for experiments that test the reversibility, persistence, and memory of chromatin states.

Biophysical mechanisms of chromatin patterning.

Cells compartmentalize their genome into active and inactive parts that contain distinct histone marks and are differently packaged. Recent work has shed new light on the mechanisms that drive this type of chromatin patterning and the properties of the resulting domains. Biophysical concepts such as liquid-liquid phase separation, polymer looping and collapse, molecular crowding and viscoelasticity are increasingly used to describe experimental observations. Accordingly, it is becoming clear that the physicochemical properties of the nuclear interior are relevant for understanding chromatin compartmentalization. Here, I discuss recent insights into the properties of chromatin subcompartments obtained with complementary techniques on different scales, and relate them to models for functional chromatin patterning.

Mouse Heterochromatin Adopts Digital Compaction States without Showing Hallmarks of HP1-Driven Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation.

The formation of silenced and condensed heterochromatin foci involves enrichment of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). HP1 can bridge chromatin segments and form liquid droplets, but the biophysical principles underlying heterochromatin compartmentalization in the cell nucleus are elusive. Here, we assess mechanistically relevant features of pericentric heterochromatin compaction in mouse fibroblasts. We find that (1) HP1 has only a weak capacity to form liquid droplets in living cells; (2) the size, global accessibility, and compaction of heterochromatin foci are independent of HP1; (3) heterochromatin foci lack a separated liquid HP1 pool; and (4) heterochromatin compaction can toggle between two "digital" states depending on the presence of a strong transcriptional activator. These findings indicate that heterochromatin foci resemble collapsed polymer globules that are percolated with the same nucleoplasmic liquid as the surrounding euchromatin, which has implications for our understanding of chromatin compartmentalization and its functional consequences.

SIRT6 is a DNA double-strand break sensor.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are the most deleterious type of DNA damage. In this work, we show that SIRT6 directly recognizes DNA damage through a tunnel-like structure that has high affinity for DSB. SIRT6 relocates to sites of damage independently of signaling and known sensors. It activates downstream signaling for DSB repair by triggering ATM recruitment, H2AX phosphorylation and the recruitment of proteins of the homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining pathways. Our findings indicate that SIRT6 plays a previously uncharacterized role as a DNA damage sensor, a critical factor in initiating the DNA damage response (DDR). Moreover, other Sirtuins share some DSB-binding capacity and DDR activation. SIRT6 activates the DDR before the repair pathway is chosen, and prevents genomic instability. Our findings place SIRT6 as a sensor of DSB, and pave the road to dissecting the contributions of distinct DSB sensors in downstream signaling.

DNA is a double-stranded molecule in which the two strands run in opposite directions, like the lanes on a two-lane road. Also like a road, DNA can be damaged by use and adverse conditions. Double-strand breaks ­ where both strands of DNA snap at once ­ are the most dangerous type of DNA damage, so cells have systems in place to rapidly detect and repair this kind of damage. There are three confirmed sensors for double-strand break in human cells. A fourth protein, known as SIRT6, arrives within five seconds of DNA damage, and was known to make the DNA more accessible so that it can be repaired. However, it was unclear whether SIRT6 could detect the double-strand break itself, or whether it was recruited to the damage by another double-strand break sensor. To address this issue, Onn et al. blocked the three other sensors in human cells and watched the response to DNA damage. Even when all the other sensors were inactive, SIRT6 still arrived at damaged DNA and activated the DNA damage response. To find out how SIRT6 sensed DNA damage, Onn et al. examined how purified SIRT6 interacts with different kinds of DNA. This revealed that SIRT6 sticks to broken DNA ends, especially if the end of one strand slightly overhangs the other ­ a common feature of double-strand breaks. A closer look at the structure of the SIRT6 protein revealed that it contains a narrow tube, which fits over the end of one broken DNA strand. When both strands break at once, two SIRT6 molecules cap the broken ends, joining together to form a pair. This pair not only protects the open ends of the DNA from further damage, it also sends signals to initiating repairs. In this way, SIRT6 could be thought of acting like a paramedic who arrives first on the scene of an accident and works to treat the injured while waiting for more specialized help to arrive. Understanding the SIRT6 sensor could improve knowledge about how cells repair their DNA. SIRT6 arrives before the cell chooses how to fix its broken DNA, so studying it further could reveal how that critical decision happens. This is important for medical research because DNA damage builds up in age-related diseases like cancer and neurodegeneration. In the long term, these findings can help us develop new treatments that target different types of DNA damage sensors.

Light-Induced Transcription Activation for Time-Lapse Microscopy Experiments in Living Cells.

Gene expression can be monitored in living cells via the binding of fluorescently tagged proteins to RNA repeats engineered into a reporter transcript. This approach makes it possible to trace temporal changes of RNA production in real time in living cells to dissect transcription regulation. For a mechanistic analysis of the underlying activation process, it is essential to induce gene expression with high accuracy. Here, we describe how this can be accomplished with an optogenetic approach termed blue light-induced chromatin recruitment (BLInCR). It employs the recruitment of an activator protein to a target promoter via the interaction between the PHR and CIBN plant protein domains. This process occurs within seconds after setting the light trigger and is reversible. Protocols for continuous activation as well as pulsed activation and reactivation with imaging either by laser scanning confocal microscopy or automated widefield microscopy are provided. For the semiautomated quantification of the resulting image series, an approach has been implemented in a set of scripts in the R programming language. Thus, the complete workflow of the BLInCR method is described for mechanistic studies of the transcription activation process as well as the persistence and memory of the activated state.

Linking aberrant chromatin features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia to transcription factor networks.

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a diverse set of genetic mutations is embedded in a deregulated epigenetic landscape that drives cancerogenesis. To elucidate the role of aberrant chromatin features, we mapped DNA methylation, seven histone modifications, nucleosome positions, chromatin accessibility, binding of EBF1 and CTCF, as well as the transcriptome of B cells from CLL patients and healthy donors. A globally increased histone deacetylase activity was detected and half of the genome comprised transcriptionally downregulated partially DNA methylated domains demarcated by CTCF CLL samples displayed a H3K4me3 redistribution and nucleosome gain at promoters as well as changes of enhancer activity and enhancer linkage to target genes. A DNA binding motif analysis identified transcription factors that gained or lost binding in CLL at sites with aberrant chromatin features. These findings were integrated into a gene regulatory enhancer containing network enriched for B-cell receptor signaling pathway components. Our study predicts novel molecular links to targets of CLL therapies and provides a valuable resource for further studies on the epigenetic contribution to the disease.

Formation of Chromatin Subcompartments by Phase Separation.

Chromatin is partitioned on multiple length scales into subcompartments that differ from each other with respect to their molecular composition and biological function. It is a key question how these compartments can form even though diffusion constantly mixes the nuclear interior and rapidly balances concentration gradients of soluble nuclear components. Different biophysical concepts are currently used to explain the formation of "chromatin bodies" in a self-organizing manner and without consuming energy. They rationalize how soluble protein factors that are dissolved in the liquid nuclear phase, the nucleoplasm, bind and organize transcriptionally active or silenced chromatin domains. In addition to cooperative binding of proteins to a preformed chromatin structure, two different mechanisms for the formation of phase-separated chromatin subcompartments have been proposed. One is based on bridging proteins that cross-link polymer segments with particular properties. Bridging can induce a collapse of the nucleosome chain and associated factors into an ordered globular phase. The other mechanism is based on multivalent interactions among soluble molecules that bind to chromatin. These interactions can induce liquid-liquid phase separation, which drives the assembly of liquid-like nuclear bodies around the respective binding sites on chromatin. Both phase separation mechanisms can explain that chromatin bodies are dynamic spherical structures, which can coalesce and are in constant and rapid exchange with the surrounding nucleoplasm. However, they make distinct predictions about how the size, density, and stability of chromatin bodies depends on the concentration and interaction behavior of the molecules involved. Here, we compare the different biophysical mechanisms for the assembly of chromatin bodies and discuss experimental strategies to distinguish them from each other. Furthermore, we outline the implications for the establishment and memory of functional chromatin state patterns.

Real-time observation of light-controlled transcription in living cells.

Gene expression is tightly regulated in space and time. To dissect this process with high temporal resolution, we introduce an optogenetic tool termed blue light-induced chromatin recruitment (BLInCR) that combines rapid and reversible light-dependent recruitment of effector proteins with a real-time readout for transcription. We used BLInCR to control the activity of a cluster of reporter genes in the human osteosarcoma cell line U2OS by reversibly recruiting the viral transactivator VP16. RNA production was detectable ∼2 min after VP16 recruitment and readily decreased when VP16 dissociated from the cluster in the absence of light. Quantitative assessment of the activation process revealed biphasic activation kinetics with a pronounced early phase in cells treated with the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA. Comparison with kinetic models of transcription activation suggests that the gene cluster undergoes a maturation process when activated. We anticipate that BLInCR will facilitate the study of transcription dynamics in living cells.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

How Communication Between Nucleosomes Enables Spreading and Epigenetic Memory of Histone Modifications.

Nucleosomes "talk" to each other about their modification state to form extended domains of modified histones independently of the underlying DNA sequence. At the same time, DNA elements promote modification of nucleosomes in their vicinity. How do these site-specific and histone-based activities act together to regulate spreading of histone modifications along the genome? How do they enable epigenetic memory to preserve cell identity? Many models for the dynamics of repressive histone modifications emphasize the role of strong positive feedback loops, which reinforce histone modifications by recruiting histone modifiers to preexisting modifications. Recent experiments question that repressive histone modifications are self-sustained independently of their genomic context, thereby indicating that histone-based feedback is relatively weak. In the present review, current models for the dynamics of histone modifications are compared and it is suggested that limitation of histone-based feedback is key to intrinsic confinement of spreading and coexistence of short- and long-term memory at different genomic loci. See also the video abstract here: https://youtu.be/3bxr_xDEZfQ.

CHD3 and CHD4 form distinct NuRD complexes with different yet overlapping functionality.

CHD3 and CHD4 (Chromodomain Helicase DNA binding protein), two highly similar representatives of the Mi-2 subfamily of SF2 helicases, are coexpressed in many cell lines and tissues and have been reported to act as the motor subunit of the NuRD complex (nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase activities). Besides CHD proteins, NuRD contains several repressors like HDAC1/2, MTA2/3 and MBD2/3, arguing for a role as a transcriptional repressor. However, the subunit composition varies among cell- and tissue types and physiological conditions. In particular, it is unclear if CHD3 and CHD4 coexist in the same NuRD complex or whether they form distinct NuRD complexes with specific functions. We mapped the CHD composition of NuRD complexes in mammalian cells and discovered that they are isoform-specific, containing either the monomeric CHD3 or CHD4 ATPase. Both types of complexes exhibit similar intranuclear mobility, interact with HP1 and rapidly accumulate at UV-induced DNA repair sites. But, CHD3 and CHD4 exhibit distinct nuclear localization patterns in unperturbed cells, revealing a subset of specific target genes. Furthermore, CHD3 and CHD4 differ in their nucleosome remodeling and positioning behaviour in vitro. The proteins form distinct CHD3- and CHD4-NuRD complexes that do not only repress, but can just as well activate gene transcription of overlapping and specific target genes.