Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 144
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 149(3): 364-71, 2011 Jun 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20202706

RESUMEN

AIM AND METHODS: We assessed gender differences in variables related to B-natriuretic peptide (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), peak oxygen consumption (peak-VO2), and LV mass (LVM), among patients recently hospitalized for suspected heart failure (HF). RESULTS: Of 930 consecutive patients, 409 accepted follow-up after discharge, 221 of these had definite HF (90 women, mean age 74.5 [9.8]years). In 141 HF patients (61 women) with BNP data, women had lower BNP than men (43.9 [38.1] versus 76.3 [88.9]pmol/L, P=0.0193). LVEF (all HF patients) was higher in women (49.8 [13.4] versus 42.4 [13.9]%, P=0.0004). Peak-VO2 (147 HF patients, 48 women) was lower in women (13.9 [4.3] versus 16.3 [4.2]mL/kg/min, P=0.0093). LVM index (200 HF patients, 78 women) was lower in women (130.4 [46.5] versus 171.7 [57.6]g/m(2), P<0.0001). Among HF patients, variables independently related to BNP were body mass index (BMI) and peak-VO2 exclusively among men, mitral regurgitation, respiratory disease and angiotensin receptor blocker treatment only among women. Variables independently related to LVEF were resting heart rate, acetylic salicylic acid use and BNP exclusively among men. No variable was exclusive for women. Variables independently related to peak-VO2 were right ventricular size, BNP, resting and peak heart rate solely among men, BMI and stable angina pectoris exclusively among women. Variables independently related to LVM were left atrial diameter only among men, BMI exclusively among women. CONCLUSION: Among elderly HF patients, there were some important gender differences in BNP, LVEF, peak-VO2 and LVM, and in variables independently related to these factors.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/fisiología , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Caracteres Sexuales , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/metabolismo , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 62(10): 1484-98, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18691228

RESUMEN

AIMS: We assessed whether a novel programme to evaluate/communicate predicted coronary heart disease (CHD) risk could lower patients' predicted Framingham CHD risk vs. usual care. METHODS: The Risk Evaluation and Communication Health Outcomes and Utilization Trial was a prospective, controlled, cluster-randomised trial in nine European countries, among patients at moderate cardiovascular risk. Following baseline assessments, physicians in the intervention group calculated patients' predicted CHD risk and were instructed to advise patients according to a risk evaluation/communication programme. Usual care physicians did not calculate patients' risk and provided usual care only. The primary end-point was Framingham 10-year CHD risk at 6 months with intervention vs. usual care. RESULTS: Of 1103 patients across 100 sites, 524 patients receiving intervention, and 461 receiving usual care, were analysed for efficacy. After 6 months, mean predicted risks were 12.5% with intervention, and 13.7% with usual care [odds ratio = 0.896; p = 0.001, adjusted for risk at baseline (17.2% intervention; 16.9% usual care) and other covariates]. The proportion of patients achieving both blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets was significantly higher with intervention (25.4%) than usual care (14.1%; p < 0.001), and 29.3% of smokers in the intervention group quit smoking vs. 21.4% of those receiving usual care (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A physician-implemented CHD risk evaluation/communication programme improved patients' modifiable risk factor profile, and lowered predicted CHD risk compared with usual care. By combining this strategy with more intensive treatment to reduce residual modifiable risk, we believe that substantial improvements in cardiovascular disease prevention could be achieved in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Coronaria/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Comunicación , Enfermedad Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Pérdida de Peso
3.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 42(6): 383-91, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18615351

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: There are conflicting data on gender differences in survival among heart failure (HF) patients. We prospectively assessed gender differences in survival among 930 consecutive patients (464 [49.9%] women, mean age 76.1+/-10.1 years), admitted to hospital with suspected or diagnosed HF. RESULTS: Overall, women had lower unadjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) than men: HR 0.827; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.690-0.992; p=0.040. Adjusted HR was 0.786; 95% CI 0.601-1.028; p=0.079. Unadjusted mortality was significantly higher among patients with a discharge HF diagnosis, compared to those without: HR 1.330; 95% CI 1.107-1.597; p=0.002; adjusted p=0.289. Women and men with a discharge HF diagnosis had similar survival: unadjusted HR 1.052; 95% CI 0.829-1.336; p=0.674; adjusted HR 0.875; 95% CI 0.625-1.225; p=0.437. Women had lower mortality risk among patients without a discharge HF diagnosis: HR 0.630, 95% CI 0.476-0.833, p=0.001; adjusted HR 0.611, p=0.036. CONCLUSION: Prognosis was poor among patients hospitalised with suspected or diagnosed HF. Among all patients, women had better survival, whereas both sexes had similar survival when the HF diagnosis was certified.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Pacientes Internos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suecia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Int J Clin Pract ; 61(7): 1078-85, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17577295

RESUMEN

AIMS: Guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention cite high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as a major risk factor and recommend LDL-C goals for various risk groups. Lifestyle changes are advised as first-line treatment for patients with high cholesterol, and statins are recommended in high-risk patients. The From The Heart study investigated current practice for the diagnosis and treatment of high cholesterol, and attitudes towards management of the condition. METHODS: Physicians were randomly selected from 10 countries, and completed a confidential, semi-structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 2790 physicians agreeing to participate, 750 (27%) responded. Physicians rated CVD as the leading cause of death, although physicians (80%) perceived that cancer was the most feared illness among patients. Physicians (71%) believed smoking to be the greatest CVD risk factor, while only 50% thought high cholesterol was the greatest risk. Most physicians (81%) used guidelines to set cholesterol goals, primarily their national guidelines (34%) or the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (24%). Although only 47% of patients reached and maintained their cholesterol goals, 61% of physicians believed that a sufficient number of patients achieved goals, and 53% did not feel frustrated that they could not always effectively treat patients with CVD. CONCLUSION: Results indicate discrepancies between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Although physicians appreciate the risk of CVD, the importance of achieving healthy cholesterol levels for CVD prevention does not seem to be widely endorsed. There is a need for improved communication regarding the importance of cholesterol lowering and investigation of initiatives to improve goal achievement among physicians.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , LDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipercolesterolemia/terapia , Práctica Profesional , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 39(1-2): 50-4, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16097414

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We have investigated whether perceived quality of life has an impact on long-term survival after a cardiac event. DESIGN: Male (n = 316) and female (n = 97) patients were assessed by means of a self-administered quality of life questionnaire 1 year after either acute myocardial infarction (n = 296), coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (n = 99) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 18). Inclusion period was 1989-1991. Ten years after the last patient answered the 1-year questionnaire, mortality (status factor) up to census date was analysed using nine dimensions of quality of life as covariates (Cox regression). RESULTS: At 1-year assessment, subjective general health (RR = 3.15), perceived arrhythmia (RR = 1.72), experience of sex life (RR = 1.55), perceived breathlessness (RR = 1.50) and experience of self-esteem (RR = 1.48) were all significantly related to death within the period up to census date. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight that the patients' own experience of his or her quality of life, has a prognostic importance for long-term mortality after a cardiac event. Clinicians should be aware that a careful monitoring of perceived quality of life is an important part of good patient care.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Adaptación Fisiológica , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis de Supervivencia , Suecia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int J Clin Pract ; 59(5): 571-8, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15857354

RESUMEN

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a central role in the management of heart failure, reflecting the contribution of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to the pathophysiology of the condition. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) bind specifically to the angiotensin type 1 receptor and may offer further benefits compared with ACE inhibitors. Candesartan, losartan and valsartan have all been evaluated in large clinical outcome trials in heart failure. They display marked differences in pharmacokinetics and receptor-binding properties that may contribute to observed differences in outcome. ELITE II found no significant difference in outcome with losartan as compared with captopril. In the Val-Heft trial, valsartan reduced heart failure hospitalisations when added to conventional therapy including an ACE inhibitor in most patients, but had no effect on mortality. The CHARM programme showed that candesartan reduced morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced systolic function, both when added to ACE inhibitor therapy or when used as an alternative in patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Moreover, the CHARM-preserved study suggested that candesartan is beneficial in patients with heart failure and preserved left-ventricular systolic function. A growing body of evidence show that ARBs are an important contribution to the pharmaceutical management of patients with heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Captopril/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Losartán/uso terapéutico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valina/análogos & derivados , Valina/uso terapéutico , Valsartán
8.
J Intern Med ; 257(2): 201-7, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15656879

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with the development of stroke during long-term follow-up after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the LoWASA trial. PATIENTS: Patients who had been hospitalized for AMI were randomized within 42 days to receive either warfarin 1.25 mg plus aspirin 75 mg daily or aspirin 75 mg alone. DESIGN: The study was performed according to the probe design, that is open treatment and blinded end-point evaluation. SETTING: The study was performed in 31 hospitals in Sweden. The mean follow-up time was 5.0 years with a range of 1.7-6.7 years. RESULTS: In all, 3300 patients were randomized in the trial, of which 194 (5.9%) developed stroke (4.2% nonhaemorrhagic, 0.5% haemorrhagic and 1.3% uncertain. The following factors appeared as independent predictors for an increased risk of stroke: age, hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (1.07; 1.05-1.08), a history of diabetes mellitus (2.4; 1.8-3.4), a history of stroke (2.3; 1.5-3.5), a history of hypertension (2.0; 1.5-2.7) and a history of smoking (1.5;1.1-2.0). Most of these factors were also predictors of a nonhaemorrhagic stroke whereas no predictor of haemorrhagic stroke was found. CONCLUSION: Risk indicators for stroke long-term after AMI were increasing age, a history of either diabetes mellitus, stroke, hypertension or smoking.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
9.
Heart ; 90(10): 1151-5, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15367511

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine how left atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD), a widely used measure of left ventricular (LV) function, is related to presence and degree of aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac dimensions, LV filling, left AVPD, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and valve function were assessed by echocardiography/Doppler in 182 patients with various cardiac diseases (mean (SD) age 69 (12) years, 36% women), 49 consecutive with and 133 consecutive without aortic stenosis. In an analysis of covariance, neither left AVPD nor LVEF was independently correlated with the presence of aortic stenosis. However, looking separately at patients with aortic stenosis, left AVPD (p = 0.03) but not LVEF correlated independently with degree of aortic stenosis in multiple linear regression analysis. In patients with aortic stenosis, an abnormal left AVPD had 94% sensitivity and 90% negative predictive value with regard to severe aortic stenosis, compared with 56% and 62%, respectively, for LVEF. CONCLUSION: In patients with cardiac disease, neither left AVPD nor LVEF correlated independently with presence of aortic stenosis. However, in patients with aortic stenosis, left AVPD but not LVEF correlated with the degree of aortic valve obstruction and left AVPD but not LVEF had high sensitivity and negative predictive value with regard to severe aortic stenosis. Compared with LVEF, left AVPD is an earlier and more sensitive marker of LV haemodynamic load in patients with aortic stenosis.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
12.
J Intern Med ; 254(5): 479-85, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14535970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographically determined left atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) is strongly related to prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure and in postmyocardial infarction patients. We aimed at exploring whether AVPD, unlike ejection fraction, is related to mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrioventricular plane displacement was assessed by two dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography in the four and two chamber views, in 333 consecutive patients with stable CAD and an abnormal coronary angiogram. Patients were followed up for an average of 41 months. AVPD was lower in patients who died (n= 30, 9.0 %) compared with survivors (9.0 +/- 2.2 vs. 11.5 +/- 2.1 mm, P<0.0001). Amongst patients with prior myocardial infarction (n=184) AVPD was 8.7 +/- 2.3 mm in those who died (n=17) and 11.2 +/- 2.3 mm in the survivors (P<0.0001). In patients without prior myocardial infarction (n=149), AVPD was 9.4 +/- 2.1 (n=13) and 11.8 +/- 1.8 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). Age, AVPD and four other echocardiographical variables correlated significantly with prognosis in univariate logistic regression analysis. In multiple logistic regression analysis only AVPD (P<0.0001) correlated independently with mortality. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographically determined AVPDis a clinically useful, independent prognostic tool in patients with stable CAD. The presence of a documented previous myocardial infarction does not influence this observation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/patología , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Ecocardiografía Doppler en Color , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología
13.
Int J Clin Pract ; 57(5): 410-6, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12846347

RESUMEN

Levosimendan is a new agent for the treatment of acute heart failure. Levosimendan acts via complementary mechanisms; it enhances contractility by sensitising cardiac myofilaments to calcium and dilates blood vessels by opening ATP-dependent potassium channels. In contrast to traditional inotropes (beta-agonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors), levosimendan does not raise myocyte calcium levels and is therefore less likely to elicit arrhythmias or to impair diastolic relaxation. The clinical efficacy of levosimendan is supported by four key clinical studies, including more than 900 patients hospitalised for cardiac decompensation due to acutely worsened chronic heart failure or to heart failure following myocardial infarction. When given as short-term therapy, levosimendan enhances cardiac output, reduces systemic vascular resistance and lowers pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. At 31 days post-treatment, mortality rates were halved in decompensated chronic heart failure patients who received levosimendan, compared with those on dobutamine--an advantage sustained at 180 days. Similar survival gains were observed among acute failure patients treated with levosimendan following myocardial infarction. With its substantial haemodynamic and survival benefits, levosimendan is well suited to be part of routine management for patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidrazonas/administración & dosificación , Piridazinas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Cardiotónicos/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Hidrazonas/farmacología , Piridazinas/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Simendán , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Int J Clin Pract ; 57(3): 211-8, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12723726

RESUMEN

As a crucial regulator of vascular function the endothelium balances a complex range of actions. Accordingly, damage to the endothelium often precedes the development of clinically manifest vascular disease. This review surveys our current understanding of risk factors involved in causing endothelial damage and the effects of lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy on the endothelium. Our developing understanding of the intricacies of endothelial function and the effects of risk factors may aid in optimising cardiovascular prevention as well as therapy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Endotelio Vascular , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Endotelio Vascular/fisiología , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Lípidos/sangre , Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatación/fisiología
15.
Int J Clin Pract ; 56(9): 638-44, 2002 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12469975

RESUMEN

Little is known of the attitudes and behaviours of the general public with regard to their general and personal risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD), particularly in relation to cholesterol. This study attempted to determine patient perceptions of general population and personal risks regarding cardiovascular disease. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 5104 members of the public in five countries (France, Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK). Main results showed only 45% of the public correctly identified CHD as the leading cause of death in their country, and only 51% were aware that high cholesterol increases CHD risk. The presence of cardiovascular disease or risk factors in respondents did not appear to alter perceptions of risk compared with the public who had no existing disease. Of the different nationalities interviewed, the Swedes and the Germans appeared to be most aware of CHD risk factors. Awareness and knowledge of LDL-C and HDL-C were very poor in all countries except Italy Half of the general public (50%) reported they had never discussed their cholesterol levels with a physician and only 33% knew what their target level was. Despite this, the most common source of information on CHD and cholesterol was the physician (60%). Only 9% of the total sample reported that they were currently taking medication for high cholesterol, compared with 20% for hypertension. In summary the general public in several European countries has major lack of awareness of the risks of CHD. This gap in knowledge is particularly marked over the risks of high cholesterol. Significant public health education is required.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicaciones , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Salud Pública , Factores de Riesgo , Autoimagen
17.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 4(3): 373-6, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12034164

RESUMEN

Heart failure is a major concern to health care providers in Sweden due to its increasing prevalence and the rising health care costs. Heart failure affects more than 160000 Swedes, approximately 2% of the population. The costs for the management of heart failure have been calculated to be approximately SEK 2.500 million (Euro 275 million) which is 2% of the total health care budget. Most heart failure patients are managed by primary care physicians but hospitalisation is common and heart failure is the most common cause for hospitalisation in patients over 65 years of age. National diagnostic and treatment guidelines are not completely adhered to. Echocardiography is performed in a little more than 30% of patients in primary care probably due to poor access. In hospitals echocardiography is more easily available and routinely used for diagnosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers appear to be under prescribed. Nurse-led heart failure clinics are being widely established in an attempt to curtail costs and improve management.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Costo de Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Gastos en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/enfermería , Humanos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/administración & dosificación , Suecia
18.
Lakartidningen ; 98(44): 4846-52, 2001 Oct 31.
Artículo en Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11729798

RESUMEN

Regional programs for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease have been under development for nearly a decade in Sweden. To achieve maximum adherence these programs were created in close collaboration between hospital and primary care physicians. The programs are local applications of national guidelines and aim to support compliance among both patients and physicians. In January 1998 the Swedish Society of Cardiology and the Swedish Association of General Practice launched a program for quality control and quality assurance of these initiatives. So far, 51 of 79 districts have joined the program. Patients' diaries used for risk factor registration contain 7 report cards on the management of risk factors and medication. These cards are sent to a central registry upon release from the hospital, after 3-6 months, and annually for 5 years. Results from the first year point to differences between the various districts with respect to compliance with both local programs and European guidelines. Overall, results are promising and indicate that this program is successful and leads to improved management of patients with coronary artery disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/prevención & control , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Programas Médicos Regionales/normas , Enfermedad Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Internet , Estilo de Vida , Registros Médicos , Cooperación del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
19.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 3(4): 495-502, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11511437

RESUMEN

Surveys of prescribing in both hospitals and primary care have shown delays in translating improved survival data from clinical trials into clinical practice thereby denying patients the benefits of proven treatments, such as the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. This may be due to unfamiliarity with clinical guidelines and concerns about adverse events. Recent trials have shown that substantial improvements in survival are associated with spironolactone and beta-blocker therapy. In order to accelerate the uptake of these treatments, and to ensure that all eligible patients should receive the most appropriate medications, a clear and concise set of clinical recommendations has been prepared by a group of clinicians with practical expertise in the management of heart failure. The objective of these recommendations is to provide practical guidance for non-specialists in order to support the implementation of evidenced-based therapy for heart failure. These practical recommendations are meant to supplement rather than replace existing guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Espironolactona/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 35(1): 30-4, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11354568

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Left atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) is often decreased and abnormalities in left ventricular diastolic filling are common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was designed to assess the relationship between AVPD and diastolic filling in patients with CAD. DESIGN: AVPD was assessed by echocardiography and diastolic filling by transmitral and pulmonary venous pulsed Doppler in 170 consecutive patients (66 +/- 11 years) with proven CAD at coronary angiography. Diastolic filling was grouped as normal, mildly impaired and moderately to severely impaired. RESULTS: A simple linear regression analysis showed that AVPD decreased in relation to increased severity of diastolic filling impairment (r = -0.36, p < 0.0001). In a multiple regression analysis, ejection fraction, diastolic filling, age and body surface were independently correlated with AVPD. Each millimetre of decrease in AVPD increased the probability of impaired diastolic filling by 28%. CONCLUSION: AVPD was independently correlated with both left ventricular systolic function and diastolic filling in patients with CAD. Thus, given the same degree of ejection fraction, it was found that the greater the impairment in diastolic filling, the lower the AVPD.


Asunto(s)
Nodo Atrioventricular/anomalías , Nodo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Volumen Cardíaco/fisiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/fisiopatología , Diástole/fisiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Anciano , Nodo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA