Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Gundula Povysil; Jack A Kosmicki; Elizabeth T Cirulli; Theodore Drivas; Simone Furini; Chadi Saad; Axel Schmidt; Pawel Olszewski; Urszula Korotko; Mathieu Quinodoz; Elifnaz Celik; Kousik Kundu; Klaudia Walter; Junghyung Jung; Amy D Stockwell; Laura G Sloofman; Daniel M Jordan; Ryan C Thompson; Diane Del Valle Del Valle; Nicole Simons Simons; Esther Cheng Cheng; Robert Sebra Sebra; Eric E Schadt; Seunghee Schulze-Kim Shulze-Kim; Sacha Gnjatic Gnjatic; Miriam Merad Merad; Joseph D Buxbaum; Noam D Beckmann; Alexander W Charney; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Timothy Chang; Tess D Pottinger; Ning Shang; Fabian Brand; Francesca Fava; Francesca Mari; Karolina Chwialkowska; Magdalena Niemira; Szymon Pula; J Kenneth Baillie; Alex Stuckey; Antonio Salas; Xabier Bello; Jacobo Pardo-Seco; Alberto Gomez-Carballa; Irene Rivero-Calle; Federico Martinon-Torres; Andrea Ganna; Konrad J Karczewski; Kumar Veerapen; Mathieu Bourgey; Guillaume Bourque; Robert JM Eveleigh; Vincenzo Forgetta; David Morrison; David Langlais; Mark Lathrop; Vincent Mooser; Tomoko Nakanishi; Robert Frithiof; Michael Hultstrom; Miklos Lipcsey; Yanara Marincevic-Zuniga; Jessica Nordlund; Kelly M Schiabor Barrett; William Lee; Alexandre Bolze; Simon White; Stephen Riffle; Francisco Tanudjaja; Efren Sandoval; Iva Neveux; Shaun Dabe; Nicolas Casadei; Susanne Motameny; Manal Alaamery; Salam Massadeh; Nora Aljawini; Mansour S Almutairi; Yaseen M Arab; Saleh A Alqahtan; Fawz S Al Harthi; Amal Almutairi; Fatima Alqubaishi; Sarah Alotaibi; Albandari Binowayn; Ebtehal A Alsolm; Hadeel El Bardisy; Mohammad Fawzy; - COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative; - DeCOI Host Genetics Group; - GEN-COVID Multicenter Study (Italy); - Mount Sinai Clinical Intelligence Center; - GEN-COVID consortium (Spain); - GenOMICC Consortium; - Japan COVID-19 Task Force; - Regeneron Genetics Center; Daniel H Geschwind; Stephanie Arteaga; Alexis Stephens; Manish J Butte; Paul C Boutros; Takafumi N Yamaguchi; Shu Tao; Stefan Eng; Timothy Sanders; Paul J Tung; Michael E Broudy; Yu Pan; Alfredo Gonzalez; Nikhil Chavan; Ruth Johnson; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Brian Yaspan; Sandra Smieszek; Carlo Rivolta; Stephanie Bibert; Pierre-Yves Bochud; Maciej Dabrowski; Pawel Zawadzki; Mateusz Sypniewski; Elzbieta Kaja; Pajaree Chariyavilaskul; Voraphoj Nilaratanakul; Nattiya Hirankarn; Vorasuk Shotelersuk; Monnat Pongpanich; Chureerat Phokaew; Wanna Chetruengchai; Katsuhi Tokunaga; Masaya Sugiyama; Yosuke Kawai; Takanori Hasegawa; Tatsuhiko Naito; Ho Namkoong; Ryuya Edahiro; Akinori Kimura; Seishi Ogawa; Takanori Kanai; Koichi Fukunaga; Yukinori Okada; Seiya Imoto; Satoru Miyano; Serghei Mangul; Malak S Abedalthagafi; Hugo Zeberg; Joseph J Grzymski; Nicole L Washington; Stephan Ossowski; Kerstin U Ludwig; Eva C Schulte; Olaf Riess; Marcin Moniuszko; Miroslaw Kwasniewski; Hamdi Mbarek; Said I Ismail; Anurag Verma; David B Goldstein; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Alessandra Renieri; Manuel AR Ferreira; J Brent Richards.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22273040

RESUMEN

Host genetics is a key determinant of COVID-19 outcomes. Previously, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative genome-wide association study used common variants to identify multiple loci associated with COVID-19 outcomes. However, variants with the largest impact on COVID-19 outcomes are expected to be rare in the population. Hence, studying rare variants may provide additional insights into disease susceptibility and pathogenesis, thereby informing therapeutics development. Here, we combined whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing from 21 cohorts across 12 countries and performed rare variant exome-wide burden analyses for COVID-19 outcomes. In an analysis of 5,085 severe disease cases and 571,737 controls, we observed that carrying a rare deleterious variant in the SARS-CoV-2 sensor toll-like receptor TLR7 (on chromosome X) was associated with a 5.3-fold increase in severe disease (95% CI: 2.75-10.05, p=5.41x10-7). This association was consistent across sexes. These results further support TLR7 as a genetic determinant of severe disease and suggest that larger studies on rare variants influencing COVID-19 outcomes could provide additional insights. Author SummaryCOVID-19 clinical outcomes vary immensely, but a patients genetic make-up is an important determinant of how they will fare against the virus. While many genetic variants commonly found in the populations were previously found to be contributing to more severe disease by the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, it isnt clear if more rare variants found in less individuals could also play a role. This is important because genetic variants with the largest impact on COVID-19 severity are expected to be rarely found in the population, and these rare variants require different technologies to be studies (usually whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing). Here, we combined sequencing results from 21 cohorts across 12 countries to perform a rare variant association study. In an analysis comprising 5,085 participants with severe COVID-19 and 571,737 controls, we found that the gene for toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) on chromosome X was an important determinant of severe COVID-19. Importantly, despite being found on a sex chromosome, this observation was consistent across both sexes.

2.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21264434

RESUMEN

Summary ParagraphTwo years into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the post-acute sequelae of infection are compounding the global health crisis. Often debilitating, these sequelae are clinically heterogeneous and of unknown molecular etiology. Here, a transcriptome-wide investigation of this new condition was performed in a large cohort of acutely infected patients followed clinically into the post-acute period. Gene expression signatures of post-acute sequelae were already present in whole blood during the acute phase of infection, with both innate and adaptive immune cells involved. Plasma cells stood out as driving at least two distinct clusters of sequelae, one largely dependent on circulating antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the other antibody-independent. Altogether, multiple etiologies of post-acute sequelae were found concomitant with SARS-CoV-2 infection, directly linking the emergence of these sequelae with the host response to the virus.

3.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254851

RESUMEN

BackgroundRecent efforts have identified genetic loci that are associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection rates and disease outcome severity. Translating these genetic findings into druggable genes and readily available compounds that reduce COVID-19 host susceptibility is a critical next step. MethodsWe integrate COVID-19 genetic susceptibility variants, multi-tissue genetically regulated gene expression (GReX) and perturbargen signatures to identify candidate genes and compounds that reverse the predicted gene expression dysregulation associated with COVID-19 susceptibility. The top candidate gene is validated by testing both its GReX and observed blood transcriptome association with COVID-19 severity, as well as by in vitro perturbation to quantify effects on viral load and molecular pathway dysregulation. We validate the in silico drug repositioning analysis by examining whether the top candidate compounds decrease COVID-19 incidence based on epidemiological evidence. ResultsWe identify IL10RB as the top key regulator of COVID-19 host susceptibility. Predicted GReX up-regulation of IL10RB and higher IL10RB expression in COVID-19 patient blood is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. In vitro IL10RB overexpression is associated with increased viral load and activation of immune-related molecular pathways. Azathioprine and retinol are prioritized as candidate compounds to reduce the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19. ConclusionsWe establish an integrative data-driven approach for gene target prioritization. We identify and validate IL10RB as a suitable molecular target for modulation of COVID-19 host susceptibility. Finally, we provide evidence for a few readily available medications that would warrant further investigation as drug repositioning candidates.

4.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21255443

RESUMEN

ImportanceThe ACE D allele is more prevalent among African Americans (AA) compared to other races/ethnicities and has previously been associated with severe COVID-19 pathogenesis through excessive ACE1 activity. ACE-I/ARBs may counteract this mechanism, but their association with COVID-19 outcomes has not been specifically tested in the AA population. ObjectivesTo determine whether the use of ACE-I/ARBs is associated with COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in AA compared with non-AA population. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this observational, retrospective study, patient-level data were extracted from the Mount Sinai Health Systems (MSHS) electronic medical record (EMR) database, and 6,218 patients with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from February 24 to May 31, 2020 were identified as ACE-I/ARB users. ExposuresPatients with an active prescription from January 1, 2019 up to the date of admission for ACE-I/ARB (outpatient use) and patients administered ACE-I/ARB during hospitalization (in-hospital use) were identified. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, assessed in the entire, AA, and non-AA population. ResultsOf the 6,218 COVID-19 patients, 1,138 (18.3%) were ACE-I/ARB users. In a multivariate logistic regression model, ACE-I/ARB use was independently associated with reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in the entire population (OR, 0.655; 95% CI, 0.505-0.850; P=0.001), AA population (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.249-0.779; P=0.005), and non-AA population (OR, 0.748, 95% CI, 0.553-1.012, P=0.06). In the AA population, in-hospital use of ACE-I/ARBs was associated with improved mortality (OR, 0.378; 95% CI, 0.188-0.766; P=0.006) while outpatient use was not (OR, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.375-2.158; P=0.812). When analyzing each medication class separately, ARB in-hospital use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in the AA population (OR, 0.196; 95% CI, 0.074-0.516; P=0.001), while ACE-I use was not associated with impact on mortality in any population. Conclusion and RelevanceIn-hospital use of ARBs was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality among COVID-19-positive AA patients. These results support further investigation of ARBs to improve outcomes in AA patients at high risk for COVID-19-related mortality.

5.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21255148

RESUMEN

ImportanceAlpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (1-blockers) can abrogate pro-inflammatory cytokines and may improve outcomes among patients with respiratory infections. Repurposing readily available drugs such as 1-blockers could augment the medical response to the COVID-19 pandemic. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between 1-blocker exposure and COVID-19 mortality DesignReal-world evidence study SettingPatient level data with 32,355 records tested for SARS-CoV-2 at the Mount Sinai Health System including 8,442 laboratory-confirmed cases extracted from five member hospitals in the New York City metropolitan area. Participants2,627 men aged 45 or older admitted with COVID-19 between February 24 and May 31, 2020 Exposures1-blocker use as an outpatient or while admitted for COVID-19 Main Outcomes and MeasuresIn-hospital mortality ResultsMen exposed to 1-blockers (N=436) were older (median age 73 vs. 64 years, P<0.001) and more likely to have comorbidities than unexposed men (N=2,191). Overall, 758 (28.9%) patients died in hospital, 1,589 (60.5%) were discharged, and 280 (10.7%) were still hospitalized as of May 31, 2020. Outpatient exposure to 1-blockers was not associated with COVID-19 hospital outcomes, though there was a trend towards significance (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.527-1.064; P=0.106). Conversely, inpatient use of 1-blockers was independently associated with improved in-hospital mortality in both multivariable logistic (OR 0.633, 95% CI 0.434-0.921; P=0.017) and Cox regression analyses (HR 0.721, 95% CI 0.572-0.908; P=0.006) adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and baseline vitals and labs. Age-stratified analyses suggested greater benefit from inpatient 1-blocker use among younger age groups: Age 45-65 OR 0.384, 95% CI 0.164-0.896 (P=0.027); Age 55-75 OR 0.511, 95% CI 0.297-0.880 (P=0.015); Age 65-89 OR 0.810, 95% CI 0.509-1.289 (P=0.374). Conclusions and RelevanceInpatient 1-blocker use was independently associated with improved COVID-19 mortality among hospitalized men. Clinical trials to assess the therapeutic value of 1-blockers in COVID-19 are warranted.

6.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20182899

RESUMEN

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) presents with fever, inflammation and multiple organ involvement in individuals under 21 years following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To identify genes, pathways and cell types driving MIS-C, we sequenced the blood transcriptomes of MIS-C cases, pediatric cases of coronavirus disease 2019, and healthy controls. We define a MIS-C transcriptional signature partially shared with the transcriptional response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and with the signature of Kawasaki disease, a clinically similar condition. By projecting the MIS-C signature onto a co-expression network, we identified disease gene modules and found genes downregulated in MIS-C clustered in a module enriched for the transcriptional signatures of exhausted CD8+ T-cells and CD56dimCD57+ NK cells. Bayesian network analyses revealed nine key regulators of this module, including TBX21, a central coordinator of exhausted CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Together, these findings suggest dysregulated cytotoxic lymphocyte response to SARS-Cov-2 infection in MIS-C.

7.
Preprint en Inglés | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-109124

RESUMEN

The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and high levels of viral RNA in the stool suggest active Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication within enterocytes. Here, in multiple, large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have studied the intersections between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), intestinal inflammation and IBD treatment. A striking expression of ACE2 on the small bowel enterocyte brush border supports intestinal infectivity by SARS-CoV-2. Commonly used IBD medications, both biologic and non-biologic, do not significantly impact ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptor expression in the uninflamed intestines. Additionally, we have defined molecular responses to COVID-19 infection that are also enriched in IBD, pointing to shared molecular networks between COVID-19 and IBD. These data generate a novel appreciation of the confluence of COVID-19- and IBD-associated inflammation and provide mechanistic insights supporting further investigation of specific IBD drugs in the treatment of COVID-19.

8.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20075788

RESUMEN

ImportanceThere is an urgent need to understand patient characteristics of having COVID-19 disease and evaluate markers of critical illness and mortality. ObjectiveTo assess association of clinical features on patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this observational case series, patient-level data were extracted from electronic medical records for 28,336 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 at the Mount Sinai Health System from 2/24/ to 4/15/2020, including 6,158 laboratory-confirmed cases. ExposuresConfirmed COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR assay from nasal swabs. Main Outcomes and MeasuresEffects of race on positive test rates and mortality were assessed. Among positive cases admitted to the hospital (N = 3,273), effects of patient demographics, hospital site and unit, social behavior, vital signs, lab results, and disease comorbidities on discharge and death were estimated. ResultsHispanics (29%) and African Americans (25%) had disproportionately high positive case rates relative to population base rates (p<2e-16); however, no differences in mortality rates were observed in the hospital. Outcome differed significantly between hospitals (Grays T=248.9; p<2e-16), reflecting differences in average baseline age and underlying comorbidities. Significant risk factors for mortality included age (HR=1.05 [95% CI, 1.04-1.06]; p=1.15e-32), oxygen saturation (HR=0.985 [95% CI, 0.982-0.988]; p=1.57e-17), care in ICU areas (HR=1.58 [95% CI, 1.29-1.92]; p=7.81e-6), and elevated creatinine (HR=1.75 [95% CI, 1.47-2.10]; p=7.48e-10), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (HR=1.002, [95% CI 1.001-1.003]; p=8.86e-5) white blood cell (WBC) (HR=1.02, [95% CI 1.01-1.04]; p=8.4e-3) and body-mass index (BMI) (HR=1.02, [95% CI 1.00-1.03]; p=1.09e-2). Asthma (HR=0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.98]; p=0.031) was significantly associated with increased length of hospital stay, but not mortality. Deceased patients were more likely to have elevated markers of inflammation. Baseline age, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, WBC count, creatinine, and ALT were significant prognostic indicators of mortality. Conclusions and RelevanceWhile race was associated with higher risk of infection, we did not find a racial disparity in inpatient mortality suggesting that outcomes in a single tertiary care health system are comparable across races. We identified clinical features associated with reduced mortality and discharge. These findings could help to identify which COVID-19 patients are at greatest risk and evaluate the impact on survival.

9.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20073411

RESUMEN

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has become the deadliest pandemic in modern history, reaching nearly every country worldwide and overwhelming healthcare institutions. As of April 20, there have been more than 2.4 million confirmed cases with over 160,000 deaths. Extreme case surges coupled with challenges in forecasting the clinical course of affected patients have necessitated thoughtful resource allocation and early identification of high-risk patients. However, effective methods for achieving this are lacking. In this paper, we use electronic health records from over 3,055 New York City confirmed COVID-19 positive patients across five hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System and present a decision tree-based machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality and critical events. This model is first trained on patients from a single hospital and then externally validated on patients from four other hospitals. We achieve strong performance, notably predicting mortality at 1 week with an AUC-ROC of 0.84. Finally, we establish model interpretability by calculating SHAP scores to identify decisive features, including age, inflammatory markers (procalcitonin and LDH), and coagulation parameters (PT, PTT, D-Dimer). To our knowledge, this is one of the first models with external validation to both predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients with strong validation performance and identify key contributors in outcome prediction that may assist clinicians in making effective patient management decisions. One-Sentence SummaryWe identify clinical features that robustly predict mortality and critical events in a large cohort of COVID-19 positive patients in New York City.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA