Contemporary Patients Have Better Perioperative Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 1272 Consecutive Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). METHODS: Data were analyzed for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with CN at 6 tertiary academic centers from 2005 to 2019. Outcomes included: Clavien-Dindo complications, mortality, length of hospitalization, 30-day readmission rate, and time to systemic therapy. Univariate and multivariable models evaluated associations between outcomes and prognostic variables including the year of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1272 consecutive patients were treated with CN. Patients treated in 2015-2019 vs 2005-2009 had better performance status (P<.001), higher pathologic N stage (P = .04), more frequent lymph node dissections (P<.001), and less frequent presurgical therapy (P = .02). Patients treated in 2015-2019 vs 2005-2009 had lower overall and major complications from surgery, 22% vs 39%, P<.001% and 10% vs 16%, P = .03. Mortality at 90days was higher for patients treated 2005-2009 vs 2015-2019; 10% vs 5%, P = .02. After multivariable analysis, surgical time period was an independent predictor of major complications and 90-day mortality following cytoreductive surgery. CONCLUSION: Postoperative major complications and mortality rates following CN are significantly lower in patients treated within the most recent time period.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Advancing Curricular Development and Recruitment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently, the increasing diversity of our society is poorly reflected in the urology workforce. In this review, we sought to address this disparity by highlighting key components involved in forming an academic urology department and training program that is focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as recruitment and retention of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) trainees and faculty. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified obstacles and provided approaches to enhance the ability of a department in creating a DEI-based curriculum and recruitment strategy with a key focus on understanding and addressing unconscious biases and microaggressions in the workplace. Substantive changes in the level of diversity within the urologic community can be made through the organization of a structured approach to increasing DEI. It starts with a commitment from each department to form achievable goals surrounding early mentorship of URiM students and trainees, an inclusive curriculum that is rooted in DEI, and targeted benchmarks for recruitment and retention of diverse staff.

NCCN Risk Reclassification in Black Men with Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer After Genomic Testing.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of genomic testing in risk-stratifying Black patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 63 Black men deemed eligible for active surveillance based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, who underwent OncotypeDx Genomic Prostate Score testing between April 2016 and July 2020. Nonparametric statistical testing was used to compare relevant features between patients reclassified to a higher NCCN risk after genomic testing and those who were not reclassified. RESULTS: The median age was 66 years and median pre-biopsy PSA was 7.3. Initial risk classifications were: very low risk: 7 (11.1%), low risk: 24(38.1%), favorable intermediate risk: 31(49.2%), and unfavorable intermediate risk: 1 (1.6%). Overall, NCCN risk classifications after Genomic Prostate Score testing were significantly higher than initial classifications (P=.003, Wilcoxon signed-rank). Among patients with discordant risk designations, 28(28/40, 70%) were reclassified to a higher NCCN risk after genomic testing. A pre-biopsy prostate specific antigen of greater than 10 did not have significantly higher odds of HBR (OR:2.16 [95% CI: 0.64,7.59, P=.2). Of favorable intermediate risk patients, 20(64.5%) were reclassified to a higher NCCN risk. Ultimately, 18 patients underwent definitive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of genomic testing in risk stratifying Black men with low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer resulted in overall higher NCCN risk classifications. Our findings suggest a role for increased utilization of genomic testing in refining risk-stratification within this patient population. These tests may better inform treatment decisions on an individualized basis.

Access and Representation: A Narrative Review of the Disparities in Access to Clinical Trials and Precision Oncology in Black men with Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To provide commentary on the disparities in access to clinical trials and precision oncology specific to Black men with Prostate Cancer (PCa) in the United States and lend a general framework to aid in closing these gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ideas, commentaries and data presented in this narrative review were synthesized by utilizing qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews, and randomized control trials performed between 2010 and 2021. We searched PubMed using the key words "Medicaid", "Medicare", "clinical trials", "African Americans", "Black", "underrepresentation", "access", "Prostate Cancer", "minority recruitment", "racial disparities", "disparity", "genomics", "biomarkers", "diagnostic" "prognostic", "validation", "precision medicine", and "precision oncology" to identify important themes, trends and data described in the current review. Keywords were used alone and combination with both "AND" and "OR" terms. RESULTS: Black men with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States have earlier onset of disease, present with more advanced stages, and worse prostate cancer-specific survival than their White counterparts. Potential causative factors vary from disparities in health care access to differences in tumor immunobiology and genomics along with disparate screening rates, management patterns and underrepresentation in clinical and translational research such as clinical trials and precision oncology. CONCLUSION: To avoid increasing the racial disparity in PCa outcomes for Black men, we must increase inclusion of Black men into precision oncology and clinical trials, using multilevel change. Underrepresentation in clinical and translational research may potentiate poorly validated risk calculators and biomarkers, leading to poor treatment decisions in high-risk populations. Relevant actions include funding to include minority-serving institutions as recruitment sites, and inclusion of evidence based recruitment methods in funded research to increase Black representation in clinical trials and translational research.