Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 32(4): 369-375, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27516608

RESUMEN

Preventable medical errors in the operating room are most often caused by ineffective communication and suboptimal team dynamics. TeamSTEPPS is a government-funded, evidence-based program that provides tools and education to improve teamwork in medicine. The study hospital implemented TeamSTEPPS in the operating room and merged the program with a surgical safety checklist. Audits were performed to collect both quantitative and qualitative information on time out (brief) and debrief conversations, using a standardized audit tool. A total of 1610 audits over 6 months were performed by live auditors. Performance was sustained at desired levels or improved for all qualitative metrics using χ2 and linear regression analyses. Additionally, the absolute number of wrong site/side/person surgery and unintentionally retained foreign body counts decreased after TeamSTEPPS implementation.


Asunto(s)
Auditoría Clínica/organización & administración , Comunicación , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Lista de Verificación , Auditoría Clínica/normas , Humanos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración
2.
J Crit Care ; 35: 7-11, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27481729

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite the growing acceptance of palliative care as a component of high-quality care for patients with serious illness, it remains underutilized in the surgical critical care setting. This article provides insight into a model for palliative care integration into the surgical intensive care unit (SICU), using triggers. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study after the implementation of a new set of palliative care triggers in the SICU of an 1170-bed tertiary medical center over the course of 9 months. We aimed to determine the ability of these triggers to identify patients who would benefit from palliative care consultation. RESULTS: There were 517 SICU admissions during the period of interest. Of this cohort, patients who had not yet been discharged at the time of analysis were excluded (n=25), and the remaining underwent analysis (n=492). Factors significantly associated with hospital death or hospice discharge were repeat SICU admission, metastatic/advanced cancer, SICU physician referral, and the matching of 2 or more secondary criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A series of triggers can help identify patients who may benefit from palliative care consultation. This approach can be used in intensive care settings to facilitate palliative care integration.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos , Admisión del Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA