Efficacy and safety of sympathetic mapping and ablation of renal nerves for the treatment of hypertension (SMART): 6-month follow-up of a randomised, controlled trial.

Background: Previous trials of renal denervation (RDN) have been designed to investigate reduction of blood pressure (BP) as the primary efficacy endpoint using non-selective RDN without intraoperatively verified RDN success. It is an unmet clinical need to map renal nerves, selectively denervate renal sympathetic nerves, provide readouts for the interventionalists and avoid futile RDN. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of renal nerve mapping/selective renal denervation (msRDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) and determine whether antihypertensive drug burden is reduced while office systolic BP (OSBP) is controlled to target level (＜140 mmHg). Methods: We conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. The study combined two efficacy endpoints at 6 months as primary outcomes: The control rate of patients with OSBP ＜140 mmHg (non-inferior outcome) and change in the composite index of antihypertensive drugs (Drug Index) in the treatment versus Sham group (superior outcome). This design avoids confounding from excess drug-taking in the Sham group. Antihypertensive drug burden was assessed by a composite index constructed as: Class N (number of classes of antihypertensive drugs) × (sum of doses). 15 hospitals in China participated in the study and 220 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio (msRDN vs Sham). The key inclusion criteria included: age (18-65 years old), history of essential HTN (at least 6 months), heart rate (≥70 bpm), OSBP (≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, 24-h SBP ≥130 mmHg or daytime SBP ≥135 mmHg or nighttime SBP ≥120 mmHg), renal artery stenosis (＜50%) and renal function (eGFR ＞45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The catheter with both stimulation and ablation functions was inserted in the distal renal main artery. The RDN site (hot spot) was selected if SBP increased (≥5 mmHg) by intra-renal artery (RA) electrical stimulation; an adequate RDN was confirmed by repeated electronic stimulation if no increase in BP otherwise, a 2nd ablation was performed at the same site. At sites where there was decreased SBP (≥5 mmHg, cold spot) or no BP response (neutral spot) to stimulation, no ablation was performed. The mapping, ablation and confirmation procedure was repeated until the entire renal main artery had been tested then either treated or avoided. After msRDN, patients had to follow a predefined, vigorous drug titration regimen in order to achieve target OSBP (＜140 mmHg). Drug adherence was monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis using urine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02761811) and 5-year follow-up is ongoing. Findings: Between July 8, 2016 and February 23, 2022, 611 patients were consented, 220 patients were enrolled in the study who received standardized antihypertensive drug treatments (at least two drugs) for at least 28 days, presented OSBP ≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In left RA and right RA, mapped sites were 8.2 (3.0) and 8.0 (2.7), hot/ablated sites were 3.7 (1.4) and 4.0 (1.6), cold spots were 2.4 (2.6) and 2.0 (2.2), neutral spots were 2.0 (2.1) and 2.0 (2.1), respectively. Hot, cold and neutral spots was 48.0%, 27.5% and 24.4% of total mapped sites, respectively. At 6 M, the Control Rate of OSBP was comparable between msRDN and Sham group (95.4% vs 92.8%, p = 0.429), achieved non-inferiority margin -10% (2.69%; 95% CI -4.11%, 9.83%, p ＜ 0.001 for non-inferiority); the change in Drug Index was significantly lower in msRDN group compared to Sham group (4.37 (6.65) vs 7.61 (10.31), p = 0.010) and superior to Sham group (-3.25; 95% CI -5.56, -0.94, p = 0.003), indicating msRDN patients need significantly fewer drugs to control OSBP ＜140 mmHg. 24-hour ambulatory SBP decreased from 146.8 (13.9) mmHg by 10.8 (14.1) mmHg, and from 149.8 (12.8) mmHg by 10.0 (14.0) mmHg in msRDN and Sham groups, respectively (p < 0.001 from Baseline; p > 0.05 between groups). Safety profiles were comparable between msRDN and Sham groups, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of renal mapping/selective RDN to treat uncontrolled HTN. Interpretation: The msRDN therapy achieved the goals of reducing the drug burden of HTN patients and controlling OSBP <140 mmHg, with only approximately four targeted ablations per renal main artery, much lower than in previous trials. Funding: SyMap Medical (Suzhou), LTD, Suzhou, China.

Sympathetic Pathophysiology in Hypertension Origins: The Path to Renal Denervation.

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss.

Long-Term Blood Pressure Reductions Following Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation is a recognized adjunct therapy for hypertension with clinically significant blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Long-term follow-up data are critical to ascertain durability of the effect and safety. Aside from the 36-month follow-up data available from randomized control trials, recent cohort analyses extended follow-up out to 10 years. We sought to analyze study-level data and quantify the ambulatory BP reduction of renal denervation across contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials and available long-term follow-up data up to 10 years from observational studies. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with data from 4 observational studies with follow-up out to 10 years and 2 randomized controlled trials meeting search and inclusion criteria with follow-up data out to 36 months. Study-level data were extracted and compared statistically. RESULTS: In 2 contemporary randomized controlled trials with 36-month follow-up, an average sham-adjusted ambulatory systolic BP reduction of -12.7±4.5 mm Hg from baseline was observed (P=0.05). Likewise, a -14.8±3.4 mm Hg ambulatory systolic BP reduction was found across observational studies with a mean long-term follow-up of 7.7±2.8 years (range, 3.5-9.4 years; P=0.0051). The observed reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate across the long-term follow-up was in line with the predicted age-related decline. Antihypertensive drug burden was similar at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Renal denervation is associated with a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in ambulatory systolic BP in both contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials up to 36 months and observational cohort studies up to 10 years without adverse consequences on renal function.

Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence.

AIMS: Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved for clinical use in the European Society of Hypertension guidelines and by the US FDA. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of RF RDN using contemporary evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A decision-analytic model based on multivariate risk equations projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs. The model consisted of seven health states: hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease, and death. Risk reduction associated with changes in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) was estimated based on a published meta-regression of hypertension trials. The base case effect size of -4.9 mmHg oSBP (observed vs. sham control) was taken from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial of 337 patients. Costs were based on NHS England data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the ON-MED subgroup on three medications and pooled effect sizes. RF RDN resulted in a relative risk reduction in clinical events over 10 years (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.72 for HF), with an increase in health benefit over a patient's lifetime, adding 0.35 QALYs at a cost of £4 763, giving an ICER of £13 482 per QALY gained. Findings were robust across tested scenarios. CONCLUSION: Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN can be a cost-effective strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the UK, with an ICER substantially below the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold. Funding: Medtronic Inc.

Salt sensitivity risk derived from nocturnal dipping and 24-h heart rate predicts long-term blood pressure reduction following renal denervation.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has been consistently shown in recent sham-controlled clinical trials to reduce blood pressure (BP). Salt sensitivity is a critical factor in hypertension pathogenesis, but cumbersome to assess by gold-standard methodology. Twenty-four-hour average heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) dipping, taken by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), stratifies patients into high, moderate, and low salt sensitivity index (SSI) risk categories. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether ABPM-derived SSI risk could predict the systolic blood pressure reduction at long-term follow-up in a real-world RDN patient cohort. METHODS: Sixty participants had repeat ABPM as part of a renal denervation long-term follow-up. Average time since RDN was 8.9 ±â€Š1.2 years. Based on baseline ABPM, participants were stratified into low (HR < 70 bpm and MAP dipping > 10%), moderate (HR ≥70 bpm or MAP dipping ≤ 10%), and high (HR ≥ 70 bpm and MAP dipping ≤ 10%) SSI risk groups, respectively. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA indicated a significant treatment effect ( P  = 0.03) between low ( n  = 15), moderate ( n  = 35), and high ( n  = 10) SSI risk with systolic BP reduction of 9.6 ±â€Š3.7 mmHg, 8.4 ±â€Š3.5 mmHg, and 28.2 ±â€Š9.6 mmHg, respectively. Baseline BP was not significantly different between SSI Risk groups ( P  = 0.18). High SSI risk independently correlated with systolic BP reduction ( P  = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation indicates that SSI risk may be a simple and accessible measure for predicting the BP response to RDN. However, the influence of pharmacological therapy on these participants is an important extraneous variable requiring testing in prospective or drug naive RDN cohorts.

The degree of engagement of cardiac and sympathetic arms of the baroreflex does not depend on the absolute value and sign of arterial pressure variations.

Objective.The percentages of cardiac and sympathetic baroreflex patterns detected via baroreflex sequence (SEQ) technique from spontaneous variability of heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and of muscle nerve sympathetic activity (MSNA) burst rate and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) are utilized to assess the level of the baroreflex engagement. The cardiac baroreflex patterns can be distinguished in those featuring both HP and SAP increases (cSEQ++) and decreases (cSEQ--), while the sympathetic baroreflex patterns in those featuring a MSNA burst rate decrease and a DAP increase (sSEQ+-) and vice versa (sSEQ-+). The present study aims to assess the modifications of the involvement of the cardiac and sympathetic arms of the baroreflex with age and postural stimulus intensity.Approach.We monitored the percentages of cSEQ++ (%cSEQ++) and cSEQ-- (%cSEQ--) in 100 healthy subjects (age: 21-70 years, 54 males, 46 females), divided into five sex-balanced groups consisting of 20 subjects in each decade at rest in supine position and during active standing (STAND). We evaluated %cSEQ++, %cSEQ--, and the percentages of sSEQ+- (%sSEQ+-) and sSEQ-+ (%sSEQ-+) in 12 young healthy subjects (age 23 ± 2 years, 3 females, 9 males) undergoing incremental head-up tilt.Main results.We found that: (i) %cSEQ++ and %cSEQ-- decreased with age and increased with STAND and postural stimulus intensity; (ii) %sSEQ+- and %sSEQ-+ augmented with postural challenge magnitude; (iii) the level of cardiac and sympathetic baroreflex engagement did not depend on either the absolute value of arterial pressure or the direction of its changes.Significance.This study stresses the limited ability of the cardiac and sympathetic arms of the baroreflex in controlling absolute arterial pressure values and the equivalent ability of both positive and negative arterial pressure changes in soliciting them.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: 9-Year Follow-Up Data on Safety and Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Recent sham-controlled randomized clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN). Long-term safety and efficacy data beyond 3 years are scarce. Here, we report on outcomes after RDN in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension with an average of ≈9-year follow-up (FU). METHODS: We recruited patients with resistant hypertension who were previously enrolled in various RDN trials applying radiofrequency energy for blood pressure (BP) lowering. All participants had baseline assessments before RDN and repeat assessment at long-term FU including medical history, automated office and ambulatory BP measurement, and routine blood and urine tests. We analyzed changes between baseline and long-term FU. RESULTS: A total of 66 participants (mean±SD, 70.0±10.3 years; 76.3% men) completed long-term FU investigations with a mean of 8.8±1.2 years post-procedure. Compared with baseline, ambulatory systolic BP was reduced by -12.1±21.6 (from 145.2 to 133.1) mm Hg (P<0.0001) and diastolic BP by -8.8±12.8 (from 81.2 to 72.7) mm Hg (P<0.0001). Mean heart rate remained unchanged. At long-term FU, participants were on one less antihypertensive medication compared with baseline (P=0.0052). Renal function assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate fell within the expected age-associated rate of decline from 71.1 to 61.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Time above target was reduced significantly from 75.0±25.9% at baseline to 47.3±30.3% at long-term FU (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RDN results in a significant and robust reduction in both office and ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP at ≈9-year FU after catheter-based RDN on less medication and without evidence of adverse consequences on renal function.

Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.

Beta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trials. Hypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rate. Beta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. This position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failure. Analogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertension. Beta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blocker first choices in clinical practice. Thus, beta-blockers should be regarded as relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice, particularly if characterised by a long half-life, highly selective beta-1 blocking activity and no intrinsic agonist properties.SUMMARYBeta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trialsHypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rateBeta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic propertiesThis position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failureAnalogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertensionBeta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blockers first choices in clinical practiceThese observations, in totality, inform our opinion that beta-blockers are relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice and this fact needs highlightingFurther, these arguments suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.

Measurement of Noradrenaline and Serotonin Metabolites With Internal Jugular Vein Sampling: An Indicator of Brain Monoamine Turnover in Depressive Illness and Panic Disorder.

In research spanning three decades we have estimated brain monoamine turnover (approximately equating with synthesis rate) with sampling from the internal jugular veins and measurement of trans-cerebral plasma monoamine metabolite concentration gradients. Here we report indices of brain noradrenaline and serotonin turnover in patients with major depressive illness (MDD) and panic disorder (PD). Brain noradrenaline turnover was assessed from the combined flux into the internal jugular veins of the metabolites dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) and 3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenylglycol (MHPG), and brain serotonin turnover from the overflow of the primary metabolite, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5HIAA). Comparison was made with matched healthy research participants. In both MD and PD the estimate of brain noradrenaline turnover provided by metabolite overflow was unremarkable. In contrast, in both patient groups the estimate of brain serotonin turnover provided by 5HIAA overflow was increased 3-4-fold (P < 0.01). This neurotransmitter abnormality was normalized in MDD and PD in clinical remission, during selective serotonin reuptake blocker (SSRI) dosing. We cannot be sure if the brain serotonergic abnormality we find in MDD and PD is causal or a correlate. Measurements in PD were not made during a panic attack. The increased estimated serotonin turnover here may possibly be a substrate for panic attacks; serotonergic raphe nuclei participate in anxiety responses in experimental animals. It is puzzling that the findings were identical in MDD and PD, although it may be pertinent that these psychiatric diagnoses are commonly comorbid. It is unlikely that activation of brain serotonergic neurons is driving the sympathetic nervous activation present, which contributes to cardiovascular risk, persistent sympathetic activation in MDD and episodic activation in PD during panic attacks. We have previously demonstrated that the mechanism of activation of human central sympathetic outflow in other contexts (hypertension, heart failure) is activation of noradrenergic brainstem neurons projecting to the hypothalamus and amygdala.

Individualized Beta-Blocker Treatment for High Blood Pressure Dictated by Medical Comorbidities: Indications Beyond the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Guidelines.

Several hypertension guidelines have removed beta-blockers from their previous position as first-choice drugs for the treatment of hypertension. However, this downgrading may not be justified by available evidence because beta-blockers lower blood pressure as effectively as other major antihypertensive drugs and have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications. Suspected inconveniences of beta-blockers such as increased risk of depression or erectile dysfunction may have been overemphasized, while patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or peripheral artery disease, that is, conditions in which their use was previously restricted, will benefit from beta-blocker therapy. Besides, evidence that from early to late phases, hypertension is accompanied by activation of the sympathetic nervous system makes beta-blockers pathophysiologically an appropriate treatment in hypertension. Beta-blockers have favorable effects on a variety of clinical conditions that may coexist with hypertension, making their use either as specific treatment or as co-treatment potentially common in clinical practice. Guidelines typically limit recommendations on specific beta-blocker use to cardiac conditions including angina pectoris, postmyocardial infarction, or heart failure, with little or no mention of the additional cardiovascular or noncardiovascular conditions in which these drugs may be needed or preferred. In the present narrative review, we focus on multiple additional diseases and conditions that may occur and affect patients with hypertension, often more frequently than people without hypertension, and that may favor the choice of beta-blocker. Notwithstanding, beta-blockers represent an in-homogenous group of drugs and choosing beta-blockers with documented effect in prevention and treatment of disease is important for first choice in guidelines.

Characterization of Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System and Inflammatory Activation in HFpEF Patients.

We have shown that systemic and cardiac sympathetic activation is present in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Conversely, whereas systemic inflammatory activation was also detected in HFpEF, we did not detect local myocardial release of inflammatory cytokines. Activation of the sympathetic system correlated with both hemodynamic and demographic factors that characteristically cluster together in HFpEF. Together these data suggest that there may be a role for antiadrenergic therapies in certain HFpEF patients. The study does not implicate locally derived cytokines in the myocardial biology of HFpEF, although systemic sources may contribute to the global pathophysiology of HFpEF.

Central and peripheral sympathetic activation in heart failure.

The sympathetic nervous system overdrive occurring in heart failure has been reported for more than half a century. Refinements in the methodological approaches to assess human sympathetic neural function have allowed during recent years to better define various aspects related to the neuroadrenergic alteration. These include (i) the different participation of the individual regional sympathetic cardiovascular districts at the process, (ii) the role of the central nervous system in determining the neuroadrenergic overdrive, (iii) the involvement of baroreflex, cardiopulmonary reflex, and chemoreflex mechanisms in the phenomenon, which is also closely linked to inflammation and the immune reaction, (iv) the relationships with the severity of the disease, its ischaemic or idiopathic nature and the preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and (v) the adverse functional and structural impact of the sympathetic activation on cardiovascular organs, such as the brain, the heart, and the kidneys. Information have been also gained on the active role exerted by the sympathetic activation on the disease outcome and its potential relevance as a target of the therapeutic interventions based on non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and invasive approaches, including the renal denervation, the splanchnic sympathetic nerve ablation, and the carotid baroreflex stimulation. The still undefined aspects of the neurogenic alterations and the unmet goals of the therapeutic approach having the sympathetic activation as a target of the intervention will be finally mentioned.

Renal denervation alters ambulatory blood pressure-derived salt sensitivity index in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has been proven in multiple sham-controlled trials to lower blood pressure (BP) in various forms of hypertension. RDN-mediated interruption of sympathetic signaling through its effects on renal blood flow, salt retention, and renin release are likely contributors to the BP-lowering effects. However, the impact of RDN on salt sensitivity in humans has not yet been explored. METHODS: We, therefore, investigated the effect of RDN on ambulatory BP monitoring-derived salt sensitivity in a cohort of patients with uncontrolled hypertension on habitual salt intake. RDN was performed in 153 hypertensive patients, who were categorized into low intermediate and high-salt sensitivity groups, based on the ambulatory BP monitoring-derived salt sensitivity index estimated prior to (baseline) and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure as previously described. Crude and adjusted mixed effects ordinal regression models were fitted to test for changes in the proportions of salt sensitivity risk during follow-up. RESULTS: The proportions of individuals in the intermediate and high-salt sensitivity risk group increased after RDN and the odds for being in a higher estimated salt sensitivity risk group at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up compared with baseline were highly significant during the 12 months follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Increased salt sensitivity after RDN may represent a compensatory mechanism to maintain renal capacity for adequate salt handling. This novel finding may have implications for patient management after RDN, such as prescription of salt moderation to further optimize RDN-induced BP-lowering efficacy.

Pivotal role of the sympathetic nerves of the human heart in mental stress responses and triggered cardiovascular catastrophes.

Mental stress can trigger cardiac catastrophes, explicitly evident during national disasters such as earthquakes. Activation of the cardiac sympathetic outflow and inhibition of the cardiac vagus are important mediating mechanisms. This manuscript describes efforts by the Human Neurotransmitters Research Laboratory of the Baker Institute in Melbourne to develop investigative methods to study the sympathetic nerves of the human heart, and to apply these in mental stress research. With laboratory mental stress, activation of the adrenal medulla was found to occur, accompanied by a regionalized sympathetic nervous response directed to the heart, but sparing the sympathetic outflow to the skeletal muscle vasculature. Patients with panic disorder are at increased cardiovascular risk. They exhibit high-level sympathetic activation during a panic attack, sometimes accompanied by coronary artery spasm. Patients with sudden ventricular arrhythmias causing collapse in the community were found to have as the predisposing substrate high baseline cardiac sympathetic activity, from previously unrecognized mild heart failure; it was surprising at the time that we did not find critical coronary artery stenosis as the substrate. In some the arrhythmia event had a behavioural trigger. In Takotsubo cardiomyopathy ("Broken Heart Syndrome") the myocardial stunning appears to represent a catecholamine cardiomyopathy, from astronomically high plasma adrenaline concentrations, rather than be caused by activation of the cardiac sympathetic nerves. Some diseases (essential hypertension, heart failure, panic disorder) have forms of sympathetic neural enhancement which contribute to cardiovascular risk: reuptake of noradrenaline by sympathetic nerves after release is faulty and single sympathetic fibres fire in multiple salvos within a single cardiac cycle. Paradoxically, obesity-hypertension does not share in this sympathetic neural augmentation, which is present only in normal-weight hypertensive patients, providing the possible basis for an observed "Obesity Paradox" (longer survival in obesity-hypertension than in normal weight hypertension). Community-wide specific prevention of cardiovascular triggering is not currently possible, due to there being no available simple screening tests which could be applied to the community at-large for the commonest substrates, silent coronary artery disease and mild heart failure. Standard medical preventive measures for coronary atherosclerosis will of course be helpful. Targeted prevention of triggering can be done in those with a detected predisposing substrate, such as genetic Long QT Syndrome, and in survivors of a serious triggered event, who need detailed, appropriate testing.

Assessing Correlation between Heart Rate Variability Markers Based on Laguerre Expansion and Direct Measures of Sympathetic Activity during Incremental Head-up Tilt.

Traditional frequency domain analysis of heart period (HP) variability allows the estimation of the parasympathetic modulation directed to the heart but the sympathetic one remains largely unknown. Recently, sympathetic and parasympathetic activity indexes (SAI and PAI) have been proposed to address this issue. SAI and PAI were derived from HP variability via the application of an orthonormal Laguerre expansion allowing the separation of HP variations driven by sympathetic and parasympathetic outflows. In this study, SAI and PAI were validated against tonic and variability measures of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and more traditional markers derived from HP variability. Indexes were calculated in 12 healthy subjects (9 females, age from 20 to 36 years, median 22.5 years) undergoing incremental head-up tilt. Results showed that traditional HP and MSNA variability markers as well as SAI and PAI were modified in proportion to the magnitude of the postural challenge. However, SAI was not correlated with any MSNA markers and PAI was not linked to respiratory sinus arrhythmia. SAI and PAI can capture modifications of cardiac control induced by the orthostatic challenge but they might be weak surrogates of vagal and sympathetic activities and/or modulations.Clinical Relevance- SAI and PAI markers are useful to characterize cardiac control but poorly linked with autonomic nervous system state.

Role of the sympathetic nervous system in cardiometabolic control: implications for targeted multiorgan neuromodulation approaches.

Sympathetic overdrive plays a key role in the perturbation of cardiometabolic homeostasis. Diet-induced and exercise-induced weight loss remains a key strategy to combat metabolic disorders, but is often difficult to achieve. Current pharmacological approaches result in variable responses in different patient cohorts and long-term efficacy may be limited by medication intolerance and nonadherence. A clinical need exists for complementary therapies to curb the burden of cardiometabolic diseases. One such approach may include interventional sympathetic neuromodulation of organs relevant to cardiometabolic control. The experience from catheter-based renal denervation studies clearly demonstrates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of such an approach. In analogy, denervation of the common hepatic artery is now feasible in humans and may prove to be similarly useful in modulating sympathetic overdrive directed towards the liver, pancreas and duodenum. Such a targeted multiorgan neuromodulation strategy may beneficially influence multiple aspects of the cardiometabolic disease continuum offering a holistic approach.

Plasma lipocalin-2/NGAL is stable over 12 weeks and is not modulated by exercise or dieting.

Amongst other immune cells, neutrophils play a key role in systemic inflammation leading to cardiovascular disease and can release inflammatory factors, including lipocalin-2 (LCN2). LCN2 drives cardiac hypertrophy and plays a role in maladaptive remodelling of the heart and has been associated with renal injury. While lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise are known to attenuate low-grade inflammation, their ability to modulate plasma LCN2 levels is unknown. Forty-eight endurance athletes and 52 controls (18-55 years) underwent measurement for various cardiovascular health indicators, along with plasma LCN2 concentration. No significant difference in LCN2 concentration was seen between the two groups. LCN2 was a very weak predictor or absent from models describing blood pressures or predicting athlete status. In another cohort, 57 non-diabetic overweight or obese men and post-menopausal women who fulfilled Adult Treatment Panel III metabolic syndrome criteria were randomly allocated into either a control, modified Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, or DASH and exercise group. Pre- and post-intervention demographic, cardiovascular health indicators, and plasma LCN2 expression were measured in each individual. While BMI fell in intervention groups, LCN2 levels remained unchanged within and between all groups, as illustrated by strong correlations between LCN2 concentrations pre- and 12 weeks post-intervention (r = 0.743, P < 0.0001). This suggests that circulating LCN2 expression are stable over a period of at least 12 weeks and is not modifiable by diet and exercise.