A Mini-Review of In Vitro Data for Candida Species, Including C. auris, Isolated during Clinical Trials of Three New Antifungals: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, and Rezafungin.

This mini-review summarizes the clinical outcomes and antifungal susceptibility results, where available, for three new antifungals, including fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, and rezafungin, against Candida isolates cultured from patients in clinical trials. When reported, most of the data were generated by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method or by both the CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methodologies. For fosmanogepix, we summarize the in vitro data for C. auris isolates from 9 patients and for Candida spp. cultured from 20 patients in two clinical trials. Ibrexafungerp has also been evaluated in several clinical trials. From conference proceedings, a total of 176 Candida isolates were evaluated in the FURI and CARES studies, including 18 C. auris isolates (CARES study). However, MIC data are not available for all clinical isolates. Results from the ReSTORE rezafungin phase 3 clinical study also included in vitro results against Candida spp., but no patients with C. auris infections were included. In conclusion, this mini-review summarizes insights regarding clinical outcomes and the in vitro activity of three new antifungals against Candida spp. cultured from patients in clinical trials.

Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Saprophytic Molds: Can They Be Used to Detect Resistance?

Commercial tests are often employed in clinical microbiology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been defined in order to detect non-wild-type (NWT) isolates harboring resistance mechanisms. We reviewed the literature in order to find studies where commercial methods were used to evaluate for in vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungi and assess their ability to detect NWT isolates according to the available ECVs. Data were found for the gradient concentration strips Etest and MIC Test Strips (MTS), broth microdilution Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), Micronaut-AM and the agar dilution VIPcheck assays. Applying itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole Etest ECVs for A. fumigatus, Etest was able to detect 90.3% (84/93), 61.2% (90/147) and 86% (31/36) of isolates with known cyp51A mutations, respectively. Moreover, Etest also was able to detect 3/3 fks mutants using caspofungin ECVs and 2/3 micafungin mutant isolates. Applying the voriconazole and posaconazole SYO ECVs, 57.7% (67/116) and 100% (47/47) of mutants with known cyp51A substitutions were classified as NWT, respectively. VIPcheck detected 90.3% (159/176), 80.1% (141/176) and 66% (141/176)of mutants via itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively, whereas Micronaut-AM detected 88% (22/25). In conclusion, Etest posaconazole and itraconazole, as well as micafungin and caspofungin ECVs, detected A. fumigatus mutants. On the other hand, while the posaconazole SYO ECV was able to detect cyp51A mutants, similar data were not observed with the SYO voriconazole ECV.

Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections.

Antifungal therapy, especially with the azoles, could promote the incidence of less susceptible isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complexes (SC), mostly in developing countries. Given that these species affect mostly the immunocompromised host, the infections are severe and difficult to treat. This review encompasses the following topics: 1. infecting species and their virulence, 2. treatment, 3. antifungal susceptibility methods and available categorical endpoints, 4. genetic mechanisms of resistance, 5. clinical resistance, 6. fluconazole minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), clinical outcome, 7. environmental influences, and 8. the relevance of host factors, including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, in predicting the clinical outcome to therapy. As of now, epidemiologic cutoff endpoints (ECVs/ECOFFs) are the most reliable antifungal resistance detectors for these species, as only one clinical breakpoint (amphotericin B and C. neoformans VNI) is available.

Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii Complex: Strengths and Limitations.

When method-dependent categorical endpoints are available, namely either BPs or ECVs, MICs could aid in selecting the best treatment agent(s). BPs can categorize an isolate as either susceptible or resistant while the ECVs/ECOFFs can distinguish the wild type (WT, no known resistance mechanisms) from the Non-WT (NWT, harboring resistant mechanisms). Our literature review focused on the Cryptococcus species complex (SC) and the available methods and categorization endpoints. We also covered the incidence of these infections as well as the numerous Cryptococcus neoformans SC and C. gattii SC genotypes. The most important agents to treat cryptococcal infections are fluconazole (widely used), amphotericin B, and flucytosine. We provide data from the collaborative study that defined CLSI fluconazole ECVs for the most common cryptococcal species or genotypes and modes. EUCAST ECVs/ECOFFs are not yet available for fluconazole. We have summarized the incidence of cryptococccal infections (2000-2015) where fluconazole MICs were obtained by reference and commercial antifungal susceptibility tests. This occurrence is documented all over the world and those fluconazole MICs are mostly categorized by available CLSI ECVs/BPs as "resistant" instead of non-susceptible strains, including those by the commercial methods. As expected, the agreement between the CLSI and commercial methods is variable because SYO and Etest data could yield low/variable agreement (<90%) versus the CLSI method. Therefore, since BPs/ECVs are species and method dependent, why not gather sufficient MICs by commercial methods and define the required ECVs for these species?

Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Strengths and Limitations as Predictors of Resistance.

Susceptibility testing can yield variable results because it is method (commercial or reference), agent, and species dependent. Therefore, in order for results to be clinically relevant, MICs (minimal inhibitory concentrations) or MECs (minimal effective concentrations) should help in selecting the best treatment agent in the clinical setting. This is accomplished by categorical endpoints, ideally, breakpoints (BPs) and/or ECVs/ECOFFs (epidemiological cutoff values). BPs and ECVs are available by the reference methods (CLSI [Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute] and EUCAST [European Committee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing]) for a variety of species/agent combinations. The lack of clinical data precludes establishment of BPs for susceptibility testing by the commercial methods and ECVs have only been calculated for the Etest and SYO assays. The goal of this review is to summarize the variety of commercial methods for antifungal susceptibility testing and the potential value of Etest and SYO ECVs for detecting mutants/non-wild type (NWT) Candida isolates. Therefore, the literature search focused on publications where the commercial method, meaning MICs and ECVs, were reported for specific NWT isolates; genetic mutations have also been listed. For the Etest, the best performers recognizing the NWT were anidulafungin ECVs: 92% for the common species; 97% for C. glabrata and fluconazole ECVs, mostly for C. parapsilosis (45 NWT isolates). By the SYO, posaconazole ECVs recognized 93% of the C. albicans and 96% of the C. parapsilosis NWT isolates and micafungin ECVs 94% (mostly C. albicans and C. glabrata). Smaller sets, some with clinical data, were also listed. These are promising results for the use of both commercial methods to identify antifungal resistance (NWT isolates). However, ECVs for other species and methods need to be defined, including the C. neoformans complex and emerging species.

Special Issue: Antifungal Agents Recently Approved or under Development.

Many thanks to all contributors to the Special Issue on "Antifungal Agents Recently Approved or Under Development (Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives)" [...].

Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent Candida Non-albicans and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review.

Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility-EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent Candida and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging Candida spp., including C. auris, as well as two Cryptococcus spp., two Trichosporon spp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and five Malassezia spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common Candida species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other Candida species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents.

Antifungal Susceptibly Testing by Concentration Gradient Strip Etest Method for Fungal Isolates: A Review.

: Antifungal susceptibility testing is an important tool for managing patients with invasive fungal infections, as well as for epidemiological surveillance of emerging resistance. For routine testing in clinical microbiology laboratories, ready-to-use commercial methods are more practical than homemade reference techniques. Among commercially available methods, the concentration gradient Etest strip technique is widely used. It combines an agar-based diffusion method with a dilution method that determinates a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in µg/mL. Many studies have evaluated the agreement between the gradient strip method and the reference methods for both yeasts and filamentous fungi. This agreement has been variable depending on the antifungal, the species, and the incubation time. It has also been shown that the gradient strip method could be a valuable alternative for detection of emerging resistance (non-wild-type isolates) as Etest epidemiological cutoff values have been recently defined for several drug-species combinations. Furthermore, the Etest could be useful for direct antifungal susceptibility testing on blood samples and basic research studies (e.g., the evaluation of the in vitro activity of antifungal combinations). This review summarizes the available data on the performance and potential use of the gradient strip method.

In Vitro Activity of Fenticonazole against Candida and Bacterial Vaginitis Isolates Determined by Mono- or Dual-Species Testing Assays.

We determined the in vitro activity of fenticonazole against 318 vaginitis isolates of Candida and bacterial species and selected 28 isolates for time-kill studies. At concentrations equal to 4× MIC, fenticonazole reached the 99.9% killing endpoint by ∼10 h for Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Escherichia coli and by ∼17 h for Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis; and at concentrations equal to 8× MIC, by ∼19 and ∼20 h for Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis, respectively. At concentrations equal to 2× MIC, fenticonazole required ∼20 h to reach the above endpoint against C. albicans in mixed culture with S. aureus, S. agalactiae, or E. coli versus ∼17 h against C. albicans in pure culture. Supra-MICs are achievable in topically treated patients' vaginal surfaces.

Methodologies for in vitro and in vivo evaluation of efficacy of antifungal and antibiofilm agents and surface coatings against fungal biofilms.

Unlike superficial fungal infections of the skin and nails, which are the most common fungal diseases in humans, invasive fungal infections carry high morbidity and mortality, particularly those associated with biofilm formation on indwelling medical devices. Therapeutic management of these complex diseases is often complicated by the rise in resistance to the commonly used antifungal agents. Therefore, the availability of accurate susceptibility testing methods for determining antifungal resistance, as well as discovery of novel antifungal and antibiofilm agents, are key priorities in medical mycology research. To direct advancements in this field, here we present an overview of the methods currently available for determining (i) the susceptibility or resistance of fungal isolates or biofilms to antifungal or antibiofilm compounds and compound combinations; (ii) the in vivo efficacy of antifungal and antibiofilm compounds and compound combinations; and (iii) the in vitro and in vivo performance of anti-infective coatings and materials to prevent fungal biofilm-based infections.

Importance of Resolving Fungal Nomenclature: the Case of Multiple Pathogenic Species in the Cryptococcus Genus.

Cryptococcosis is a major fungal disease caused by members of the Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans species complexes. After more than 15 years of molecular genetic and phenotypic studies and much debate, a proposal for a taxonomic revision was made. The two varieties within C. neoformans were raised to species level, and the same was done for five genotypes within C. gattii. In a recent perspective (K. J. Kwon-Chung et al., mSphere 2:e00357-16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00357-16), it was argued that this taxonomic proposal was premature and without consensus in the community. Although the authors of the perspective recognized the existence of genetic diversity, they preferred the use of the informal nomenclature "C. neoformans species complex" and "C. gattii species complex." Here we highlight the advantage of recognizing these seven species, as ignoring these species will impede deciphering further biologically and clinically relevant differences between them, which may in turn delay future clinical advances.

The role of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) in antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation for uncommon yeasts and moulds.

The role of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is to aid in selecting the best agent for the treatment of bacterial and fungal diseases. This has been best achieved by the setting of breakpoints by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for prevalent Candida spp. versus anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) also has set breakpoints for prevalent and common Candida and Aspergillus species versus amphotericin B, itraconazole, and posaconazole. Recently, another interpretive category, the epidemiological cut off value, could aid in the early identification of strains with acquired resistance mechanisms. CLSI has postulated that epidemiological cut off values may, with due caution, aid physicians in managing mycosis by species where breakpoints are not available. This review provides (1) the criteria and statistical approach to establishing and estimating epidemiological cut off values (ECVs), (2) the role of the epidemiological cut off value in establishing breakpoints, (3) the potential role of epidemiological cut off values in clinical practice, (4) and the wide range of CLSI-based epidemiological cut off values reported in the literature as well as EUCAST and Sensititre Yeast One-ECVs. Additionally, we provide MIC/MEC (minimal inhibitory concentrations/minimum effective concentrations) ranges/modes of each pooled distribution used for epidemiological cut off value calculation. We focus on the epidemiological cut off value, the new interpretive endpoint that will identify the non-wild type strains (defined as potentially harboring resistance mechanisms). However, we emphasize that epidemiological cut off values will not categorize a fungal isolate as susceptible or resistant as breakpoints do, because the former do not account for the pharmacology of the antifungal agent or the findings from clinical outcome studies.

The role of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) in antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation for uncommon yeasts and moulds / Utilidad clínica de los puntos de corte epidemiológicos (ECVs/ECOFFs) para interpretar los datos de la sensibilidad antifúngica de los mohos y levaduras de poca prevalencia

The role of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is to aid in selecting the best agent for the treatment of bacterial and fungal diseases. This has been best achieved by the setting of breakpoints by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for prevalent Candida spp. versus anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) also has set breakpoints for prevalent and common Candida and Aspergillus species versus amphotericin B, itraconazole, and posaconazole. Recently, another interpretive category, the epidemiological cut off value, could aid in the early identification of strains with acquired resistance mechanisms. CLSI has postulated that epidemiological cut off values may, with due caution, aid physicians in managing mycosis by species where breakpoints are not available. This review provides (1) the criteria and statistical approach to establishing and estimating epidemiological cut off values (ECVs), (2) the role of the epidemiological cut off value in establishing breakpoints, (3) the potential role of epidemiological cut off values in clinical practice, (4) and the wide range of CLSI-based epidemiological cut off values reported in the literature as well as EUCAST and Sensititre Yeast One-ECVs. Additionally, we provide MIC/MEC (minimal inhibitory concentrations/minimum effective concentrations) ranges/modes of each pooled distribution used for epidemiological cut off value calculation. We focus on the epidemiological cut off value, the new interpretive endpoint that will identify the non-wild type strains (defined as potentially harboring resistance mechanisms). However, we emphasize that epidemiological cut off values will not categorize a fungal isolate as susceptible or resistant as breakpoints do, because the former do not account for the pharmacology of the antifungal agent or the findings from clinical outcome studies (AU)

Las pruebas de sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos tienen como finalidad ayudar en la selección del mejor fármaco para el tratamiento de las infecciones fúngicas y bacterianas. El establecimiento de puntos de corte para la anidulafungina, la caspofungina, la micafungina, el fluconazol y el voriconazol en las especies de Candida más prevalentes por parte del Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) permite alcanzar este objetivo. El European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) también ha establecido puntos de corte para la anfotericina B, el itraconazol y el posaconazol en las especies más comunes de Candida y Aspergillus. En los últimos tiempos se ha propuesto una nueva categoría, la de los puntos de corte epidemiológicos, que puede ayudar a identificar de manera temprana los aislamientos que han adquirido mecanismos de resistencia. Según el CLSI los puntos de corte epidemiológicos podrían, con la debida cautela, ayudar a los médicos en la selección del tratamiento en aquellas micosis causadas por especies para las que no se han establecido puntos de corte. Esta revisión repasa: 1) los criterios y la aproximación estadística seguida para establecer y estimar los puntos de corte epidemiológicos, 2) el papel de los puntos de corte epidemiológicos para establecer los puntos de corte, 3) el papel de los puntos de corte epidemiológicos en la práctica clínica, y 4) el amplio rango de puntos de corte epidemiológicos que aparecen en la literatura establecidos mediante los métodos del CLSI, EUCAST o Sensititre® YeastOne®. Se muestran también los rangos de las concentraciones mínimas inhibitorias (CMI) y concentraciones mínimas efectivas (CME) utilizados para el cálculo de los puntos de corte epidemiológicos. Incidimos de manera especial sobre estos últimos por tratarse de una nueva interpretación de los CMI y los CME que permite identificar aquellos aislamientos que no son salvajes y potencialmente resistentes. No obstante, insistimos en que los puntos de corte epidemiológicos no pueden utilizarse para calificar como resistente o sensible a un determinado aislamiento, como lo hacen los puntos de corte, puesto que los puntos de corte epidemiológicos no se rigen por las características farmacológicas de los agentes antifúngicos ni por la evolución clínica de los pacientes (AU)

Genotyping of Fusarium Isolates from Onychomycoses in Colombia: Detection of Two New Species Within the Fusarium solani Species Complex and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.

Fusariosis have been increasing in Colombia in recent years, but its epidemiology is poorly known. We have morphologically and molecularly characterized 89 isolates of Fusarium obtained between 2010 and 2012 in the cities of Bogotá and Medellín. Using a multi-locus sequence analysis of rDNA internal transcribed spacer, a fragment of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (Tef-1α) and of the RNA-dependent polymerase subunit II (Rpb2) genes, we identified the phylogenetic species and circulating haplotypes. Since most of the isolates studied were from onychomycoses (nearly 90 %), we carried out an epidemiological study to determine the risk factors associated with such infections. Five phylogenetic species of the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC), i.e., F. falciforme, F. keratoplasticum, F. lichenicola, F. petroliphilum, and FSSC 6 as well as two of the Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC), i.e., FOSC 3 and FOSC 4, were identified. The most prevalent species were FOSC 3 (38.2%) followed by F. keratoplasticum (33.7%). In addition, our isolates were distributed into 23 haplotypes (14 into FOSC and nine into FSSC). Two of the FSSC phylogenetic species and two haplotypes of FSSC were not described before. Our results demonstrate that recipients of pedicure treatments have a lower probability of acquiring onychomycosis than those not receiving such treatments. The antifungal susceptibility of all the isolates to five clinically available agents showed that amphotericin B was the most active drug, while the azoles exhibited lower in vitro activity.

Current trends in the prevalence of Cryptococcus gattii in the United States and Canada.

The incidence of Cryptococcus gattii infections in both Canada and the United States (US) is provided in this literature review beyond the British Columbia (BC) outbreak (1999-2013). Based on a search of the literature, case reports of C. gattii human infections including the prevalent molecular genotypes causing these infections in both Canada and the US have been documented since the C. gattii outbreak in BC. The literature reveals that: i) although C. gattii infections continue to be reported in both countries, the preliminary overall number of confirmed C. gattii infections may be decreasing in both Canada and the US (~23 cases each in 2012 versus ~17 and 20 cases, respectively in 2013); ii) C. gattii genotype distribution is region-dependent; iii) C. gattii is more frequently isolated from infections in the immunocompromised host (including acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS] infection) than previously expected; iv) although pulmonary disease is higher than in C. neoformans infections, central nervous system disease is also reported among patients infected with C. gattii.

Examination of the in vitro fungicidal activity of echinocandins against Candida lusitaniae by time-killing methods.

OBJECTIVES: Candida lusitaniae fungaemia, although infrequent (1%), is more common in immunocompromised patients than Candida albicans. Although infections produced by Candida spp. are therapeutic targets for treatment with echinocandins, little information is available regarding their killing kinetics against C. lusitaniae. The objectives of this study were to determine the killing kinetics of anidulafungin, micafungin and caspofungin against four blood isolates of C. lusitaniae by time-kill methodology. METHODS: Time-kill studies were performed in RMPI 1640 medium (5 mL, inoculum ∼10(5) cfu/mL). The number of cfu/mL was determined at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. The anidulafungin concentrations assayed were 0.03, 0.12, 0.5, 2 and 8 mg/L, while micafungin and caspofungin concentrations were 0.25, 1, 4, 16 and 32 mg/L. RESULTS: MIC ranges were 0.03-1 mg/L (anidulafungin), 0.016-0.06 mg/L (micafungin) and 0.03-1 mg/L (caspofungin). The mean maximum log decrease in cfu/mL was reached with 2 mg/L anidulafungin (1.85   ± 0.4 log), 32 mg/L caspofungin (5.5 ± 0.2 log) and 32 mg/L micafungin (2.65 ± 1.9 log). Only caspofungin and micafungin reached the fungicidal endpoint (99.9% growth reduction or a 3 log decrease) with 32 mg/L at 22.8 h (caspofungin) and 26.5 h (micafungin). Analysis of variance showed significant differences in killing activity among isolates, but not among concentrations reached in serum or echinocandins. CONCLUSIONS: Anidulafungin and micafungin exhibit greater killing rates than caspofungin. Caspofungin was the only echinocandin that reached the fungicidal endpoint before 24 h, but at drug concentrations (≥ 16 mg/L) not usually reached in serum. The echinocandin killing rate was isolate dependent and concentration independent.

Evaluation of disk diffusion method compared to broth microdilution for antifungal susceptibility testing of 3 echinocandins against Aspergillus spp.

We tested the susceptibility of caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin against Aspergillus spp. isolates by the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M51-A disk diffusion (DD) and the broth microdilution methods. A total of 65 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. were evaluated. The DD assay was performed on nonsupplemented Müeller-Hinton agar using caspofungin 2-µg, micafungin 1-µg, and anidulafungin 2-µg disks. Echinocandin minimal effective concentrations (MECs) and inhibition zones (IZs) were read after 24 to 48 (A. terreus) h at 35 °C. Caspofungin MECs for all Aspergillus spp. strains tested were ≤ 0.25 µg/mL; IZs were ≥ 15 mm for most species except for A. terreus (11-22 mm). Both micafungin and anidulafungin MECs were ≤ 0.015 µg/mL, but micafungin IZs were ≥ 14 mm while anidulafungin IZs were ≥ 22 mm. As for caspofungin, the DD method could be a useful method for susceptibility testing of micafungin and anidulafungin against Aspergillus spp.

Clinical breakpoints for voriconazole and Candida spp. revisited: review of microbiologic, molecular, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data as they pertain to the development of species-specific interpretive criteria.

We reassessed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for voriconazole. We examined i) the essential (EA: ±2 dilutions) and categorical agreement between 24-h CLSI and EUCAST methods for voriconazole testing of Candida, ii) wild-type (WT) MICs and epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) for voriconazole by both CLSI and EUCAST methods, and iii) correlation of MICs with outcomes from previously published data using CLSI methods. We applied these findings to propose new 24-h species-specific CLSI CBPs. Adjusted 24-h CBPs for voriconazole and C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis (susceptible, ≤ 0.125 µg/mL; intermediate, 0.25-0.5 µg/mL; resistant, ≥ 1 µg/mL) should be more sensitive for detecting emerging resistance among common Candida species and provide consistency with EUCAST CBPs. In the absence of CBPs for voriconazole and C. glabrata (and less common species), we recommend that their respective ECVs be used to detect the emergence of non-WT strains.

Comparison of micafungin MICs as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) and Etest for Candida spp. isolates.

Micafungin Etest and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) MICs were compared for 337 Candida spp. isolates. The performance of Etest for testing the susceptibilities of Candida spp. to micafungin was evaluated by the assessment of both categorical (CA) and essential (EA) agreements. The CA was evaluated 2 ways: (i) by the ability of Etest to separate resistant (nontreatable) from susceptible (treatable) isolates by using the newly adjusted species-specific micafungin clinical breakpoints (CBPs) that are available for most of the common species tested and (ii) by the ability to separate wild type (WT) from non-WT isolates or those harboring FKS mutations (with reduced echinocandin susceptibility) by using micafungin epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs). Etest and CLSI MICs were in EA when the MICs were within 2 log(2) dilutions. Based on agreement percentages, our data indicated that Etest is suitable to test micafungin for most of the Candida species evaluated (overall EA 94.7%; overall CA according to CBPs 97.2% and according to ECVs 97.3%). However, the number of resistant isolates was small, so further evaluations are needed with a higher number of such isolates including more resistant or those with known mechanisms of resistance (non-WT).