Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 29(3): 311-326, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31899977

RESUMEN

Background: Previous open-label studies showed that chronic post-stroke pain could be abated by treatment with perispinal etanercept, although these benefits were questioned. A randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted to test perispinal etanercept for chronic post-stroke pain.Research design and methods: Participants received two treatments, either perispinal etanercept (active) or saline (control). Primary outcomes were the differences in daily pain levels between groups analyzed by SPSS.Results: On the 0-100 points visual analog scale, perispinal etanercept reduced mean levels for worst and average daily pain from baseline after two treatments by 19.5 - 24 points (p < 0.05), and pain alleviation was maintained in the etanercept group, with no significant change in the control group. Thirty percent of etanercept participants had near complete pain abatement after first treatment. Goniometry of the paretic arm showed improved mean shoulder rotation by 55 degrees in active forward flexion for the etanercept group (p = 0.003) only.Conclusions: Perispinal etanercept can provide significant and ongoing benefits for the chronic post-stroke management of pain and greater shoulder flexion by the paretic arm. Effects are rapid and highly significant, supporting direct action on brain function.Trial registration: ACTRN12615001377527 and Universal Trial Number U1111-1174-3242.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Alzheimers Dis Rep ; 2(1): 1-26, 2018 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480245

RESUMEN

It is almost ten years since the Banerjee 2009 report established that inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotics in the elderly was occurring in the UK and such patients had an 85% increased risk of adverse events and greater mortality. This report was a critical analysis addressing the outcomes of treatment practices for dementia in UK patients and globally, aimed at reducing prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for dementia. Since 2009, many significant studies worldwide (including several more recent large retrospective studies) provide more extensive longitudinal data for the adverse impacts of antipsychotic drugs in dementia. We have used the data in these studies including from over 380,000 dementia patients, with 85,069 prescribed antipsychotic agents as well as from 359,235 non-dementia antipsychotic drug users to provide an up-dated meta-analysis. This is the first meta-analysis to include evidence from general mental health studies showing that antipsychotic drugs precipitate excessive mortality across the spectrum. Prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for dementia or for other mental health care should be avoided and alternative means sought for handling behavioral disorders of such patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...