RESUMEN
Background: Both, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and SARS-COV-2 infection cause a set of immunologic changes that respectively vary during the course of the treatment or the disease. Objective: To review immune changes brought along by each of these entities and how they might interrelate. Methods: We start presenting a brief review of the structure of the new coronavirus and how it alters the functioning of the human immune system. Subsequently, we describe the immune changes induced by AIT and how these changes could be favorable or unfavorable in the allergic patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a particular point of time during the evolving infection. Results: We describe how a healthy immune response against SARS-CoV-2 develops, versus an immune response that is initially suppressed by the virus, but ultimately overactivated, leading to an excessive production of cytokines (cytokine-storm-like). These changes are then linked to the clinical manifestations and outcomes of the patient. Reviewing the immune changes secondary to AIT, it becomes clear how AIT is capable of restoring a healthy innate immunity. Investigators have previously shown that the frequency of respiratory infections is reduced in allergic patients treated with AIT. On the other hand it also increases immunoregulation. Conclusion: As there are many variables involved, it is hard to predict how AIT could influence the allergic patient's reaction to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In any case, AIT is likely to be beneficial for the patient with allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as controlling allergic diseases leads to a reduced need for contact with healthcare professionals. The authors remind the reader that everything in this article is still theoretical, since at the moment, there are no published clinical trials on the outcome of COVID-19 in allergic patients under AIT.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos , COVID-19/terapia , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Modelos InmunológicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Influenza is a costly disease for the population. It is a cause of seasonal morbidity and mortality, epidemics and pandemics or syndemics. Given the variability of the virus, surveillance systems are implemented in order to update the strains and include them in the annual influenza vaccine. This vaccine is currently recommended in some high-risk groups. However, universal vaccination remains controversial. To evaluate the evidence and describe the position of a panel of experts on the relevance of universal vaccination against influenza virus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five clinical questions were asked, whereby a systematic search of the literature in electronic sources and a Delphi panel were carried out. The evidence was analyzed, and recommendations were issued by the experts. RESULTS: The group of experts recommends vaccinating the population starting at six months of age and include people who live with egg protein allergy, with comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, cancer), health workers and pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination, starting with vulnerable groups, is a necessary, ethical and cost-effective strategy. However, expanding the coverage to achieve universal vaccination could reduce the transmission of the disease and its consequences in the population.
OBJETIVO: La influenza es una enfermedad costosa para la población. Es causa de morbimortalidad estacional, epidemias y pandemias o sindemias. Debido a la variabilidad del virus, se implementan sistemas de vigilancia para actualizar las cepas e incluirlas en la vacuna antiinfluenza anual. Actualmente se recomienda esta vacuna en algunos grupos de alto riesgo. Sin embargo, la vacunación universal es aún controvertida. Evaluar la evidencia y describir la posición de un panel de expertos sobre la pertinencia de la vacunación universal contra el virus de influenza. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizaron cinco preguntas clínicas, con las que se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura en fuentes electrónicas y un panel Delphi. Se analizó la evidencia y se emitieron recomendaciones por los expertos. RESULTADOS: El grupo de expertos recomienda vacunar a la población desde los seis meses de edad e incluir a personas que viven con alergia a la proteína del huevo, con comorbilidades (diabetes, obesidad, cáncer), trabajadores de la salud y embarazadas. CONCLUSIONES: La vacunación, iniciando con los grupos vulnerables, es una estrategia necesaria, ética y costo-efectiva. Sin embargo, extender la cobertura para lograr la vacunación universal podría disminuir la transmisión de la enfermedad y sus consecuencias en la población.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , VacunaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a primary immunodeficiency characterized by an inability of phagocytes to produce reactive oxygen species, impairing their killing of various bacteria and fungi. We summarize here the 93 cases of CGD diagnosed in Mexico from 2011 to 2019. METHODS: Thirteen Mexican hospitals participated in this study. We describe the genetic, immunological, and clinical features of the 93 CGD patients from 78 unrelated kindreds. RESULTS: Eighty-two of the patients (88%) were male. All patients developed bacterial infections and 30% suffered from some kind of fungal infection. Fifty-four BCG-vaccinated patients (58%) presented infectious complications of BCG vaccine. Tuberculosis occurred in 29%. Granulomas were found in 56% of the patients. Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases were present in 15% of patients. A biological diagnosis of CGD was made in 89/93 patients, on the basis of NBT assay (n = 6), DHR (n = 27), and NBT plus DHR (n = 56). The deficiency was complete in all patients. The median age of biological diagnosis was 17 months (range, 0-186 months). A genetic diagnosis was made in 83/93 patients (when material was available), corresponding to CYBB (n = 64), NCF1 (n = 7), NCF2 (n = 7), and CYBA (n = 5) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations in these Mexican CGD patients were similar to those in patients elsewhere. This cohort is the largest in Latin America. Mycobacterial infections are an important cause of morbidity in Mexico, as in other countries in which tuberculosis is endemic and infants are vaccinated with BCG. X-linked CGD accounted for most of the cases in Mexico, as in other Latin American countries. However, a significant number of CYBA and NCF2 mutations were identified, expanding the spectrum of known causal mutations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/inmunología , Mutación/genética , Infecciones por Mycobacterium/epidemiología , Mycobacterium/fisiología , NADPH Oxidasa 2/genética , NADPH Oxidasas/genética , Adolescente , Autoinmunidad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Genes Ligados a X , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Inflamación , Masculino , México/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
DNA repair defects are inborn errors of immunity that result in increased apoptosis and oncogenesis. DNA Ligase 4-deficient patients suffer from a wide range of clinical manifestations since early in life, including: microcephaly, dysmorphic facial features, growth failure, developmental delay, mental retardation; hip dysplasia, and other skeletal malformations; as well as a severe combined immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, and progressive bone marrow failure; or, they may present later in life with hematological neoplasias that respond catastrophically to chemo- and radiotherapy; or, they could be asymptomatic. We describe the clinical, laboratory, and genetic features of five Mexican patients with LIG4 deficiency, together with a review of 36 other patients available in PubMed Medline. Four out of five of our patients are dead from lymphoma or bone marrow failure, with severe infection and massive bleeding; the fifth patient is asymptomatic despite a persistent CD4+ lymphopenia. Most patients reported in the literature are microcephalic females with growth failure, sinopulmonary infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, very low B-cells, and radiosensitivity; while bone marrow failure and malignancy may develop at a later age. Dysmorphic facial features, congenital hip dysplasia, chronic liver disease, gradual pancytopenia, lymphoma or leukemia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal bleeding have been reported as well. Most mutations are compound heterozygous, and all of them are hypomorphic, with two common truncating mutations accounting for the majority of patients. Stem-cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning regimes may be curative.
RESUMEN
Mutations in the genes coding for cytokines, receptors, second messengers, and transcription factors of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) immunity cause Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease (MSMD). We report the case of a 7-year-old male patient with partial dominant (PD) IFN-γ receptor 1 deficiency who had suffered from multifocal osteomyelitis attributable to bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination since the age of 18 months. He developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a hyper-inflammatory complication, and died with multiorgan dysfunction, despite having been diagnosed and treated relatively early. Patients with PD IFN-γR1 deficiency usually have good prognosis and might respond to human recombinant subcutaneous IFN-γ. Several monogenic congenital defects have been linked to HLH, a catastrophic "cytokine storm" that is usually ascribed to lymphocyte dysfunction and thought to be triggered by interferon gamma. This is the sixth patient with both MSMD and HLH of whom we are aware. The fact that patients with macrophages that cannot respond to IFN-γ still develop HLH, bring these assumptions into question.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized mainly by recurrent infections. Late diagnosis remains as one of the main issues to solve. We aimed to increase PID diagnosis in Aguascalientes, a 1.3 million inhabitants state in the center of Mexico, and to describe the clinical features of such patients. METHODS: We developed an educational program for health personnel and general public; patients with possible PID were referred to a State University clinical center from December 2011 to December 2012. The patients were evaluated at the clinic and their definitive diagnosis pursued through laboratory, molecular and genetic assays. We describe the findings of those patients and analyze the impact of the program in terms of number of referrals. RESULTS: After 41 talks and 12 media appearances 151 patients were referred for evaluation. Fifteen (9.9%) were diagnosed with PID: five (33%) had antibody deficiencies, seven (47%) Well-defined syndromes, two (13%) Severe combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) and one case (7%) of an innate immune deficiency. All of the 15 PID patients had been referred by physicians, as opposed to the public. We estimated a "number needed to teach" of 75 physicians to get one PID patient referral. CONCLUSION: Educational programs are a fundamental part of the global efforts to increase PID diagnosis and care. To be successful, such programs should include public relations, reach for first-contact physicians, and aim to develop an efficient referral network with molecular diagnostic capability. Enhancing medical knowledge on PID is a successful strategy to improve early diagnosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Femenino , Humanos , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/inmunología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Prevalencia , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The hallmark of Primary immunodeficiencies (PID) is unusual infection, although other immunological non-infectious manifestations such as autoimmunity, allergy and cancer are often present. Most published reports focus on one disease or defect groups, so that a global prevalence of non-infectious manifestations of PID is hard to find. We aimed to describe the clinical features of our pediatric patients with PID, as well as the frequency and evolution of allergy, cancer and autoimmunity. METHODS: We reviewed all the available charts of patients being followed for PID from 1991 to the spring of 2012 at the National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, to describe their demographic, clinical and laboratory features. Their diagnoses were established by pediatric immunologists in accordance to ESID criteria, including routine immunological workup and specialized diagnostic assays. We divided patients by decade of diagnosis to analyze their survival curves. RESULTS: There were 168 charts available, from which we excluded one duplicate and six equivocal diagnoses. We studied the charts of 161 PID patients (68% male, 86% alive), mostly from the center of the country, with a positive family history in 27% and known consanguinity in 11%. Eighty percent of the patients were diagnosed during the last decade. Current median age was 124 months; median age at onset of infections, 12 months; median age at diagnosis, 52 months; median age at death, 67.5 months. Severe infection and bleeding were the cause of 22 deaths. Eighty-six percent of all patients had at least one infection, while non-infectious manifestations had a global prevalence of 36%, namely: autoimmunity 19%, allergies 17%, and cancer 2.4%. Survival curves were not significantly different when compared by decade of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other registry reports, we found a lower prevalence of antibody defects, and of associated allergy and cancer. We could only locate two isolated IgA deficiencies and four cases of cancer among our PID patients. Although antibody defects are the most prevalent group (30%), the distribution we found is similar to that reported in Iran, Kuwait, Egypt and Taiwan, with a close 27% share for phagocyte defects, and 26% for the formerly called "well-defined" syndromes. Of note, autoimmune and inflammatory complications are high among our patients with chronic granulomatous disease, as has been reported in both the United States and Japan, but not in Europe.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/epidemiología , Infecciones/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/mortalidad , Niño , Consanguinidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/mortalidad , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/mortalidad , Infecciones/diagnóstico , Infecciones/mortalidad , Masculino , México , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Fenotipo , Prevalencia , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine response by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from XLA patients. METHODS: Thirteen patients with XLA were included in the study. LPS-induced TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-10 production was determined in PBMCs from patients and matched healthy controls by ELISA. Cytokine production was correlated with the severity of mutation, affected domain and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In response to LPS, PBMCs from XLA patients produced significantly higher amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and IL-10 compared to controls, and this production was influenced neither by the severity of the mutation nor the affected domain. PBMCs from patients with a history of more hospital admissions before their diagnosis produced higher levels of TNF-α. PBMCs from patients with lower serum IgA levels showed a higher production of TNF-α and IL-1ß. Less severe (punctual) mutations in the Btk gene were associated with higher serum IgG levels at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a predominantly inflammatory response in XLA patients after LPS stimulation and suggest a deregulation of TLR signaling in the absence of Btk. This response may be influenced by environmental factors.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/inmunología , Citocinas/inmunología , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/inmunología , Leucocitos Mononucleares/inmunología , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa , Agammaglobulinemia/genética , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Células Cultivadas , Niño , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/genética , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/efectos de los fármacos , Lipopolisacáridos/inmunología , Masculino , Mutación , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/inmunología , Receptor Toll-Like 4/inmunología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inhaled glucocorticoids are the most effective and potent drugs used to control the inflammatory bronchial reaction in patients with asthma. There are several research projects evaluating the use of immune modulators in the treatment of the asthma related inflammatory process. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of transfer factor in the treatment of pediatric patients with moderate persistent allergic asthma in terms of inhaled glucocorticoid dosing and time of using. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled pilot clinical trial in a cohort of pediatric patients (6-17 years old) with moderate persistent allergic asthma. Two groups were formed. Group one received transfer factor and group two was given placebo. Both groups received conventional therapy with inhaled budesonide and formoterol. Daily respiratory symptoms (cough during day, or at night, and wheezing episodes) were recorded in a personal diary. Spirometric evaluations were performed before enrolling patients, and at 1, 3 and 6 months after. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled in each group. Patients in the transfer factor group showed a statistical significant reduction in the inhaled glucocorticoid doping since month 3, and this difference was maintained until the end of study. Patients on TF group showed also a non statistical significant improvement in spirometrical findings and also showed a better asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer factor helps to reduce inhaled glucocorticoids dose in patients with allergic rhinitis; however, studies with a larger number of patients should be done in order to obtain better results.