High fever after sublingual administration of misoprostol for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a hospital-based, prospective observational study in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the occurrence of fever (≥38.0°C) after treatment for post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) with sublingual misoprostol 800 mcg in Latin America, where elevated rates of misoprostol's thermoregulatory effects and recipients' increased susceptibility to high fever have been documented. METHODS: A prospective observational study in hospitals in Argentina enrolled consenting women with atonic PPH after vaginal delivery, eligible to receive misoprostol. Corporal temperature was assessed at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min post-treatment; other effects were recorded. The incidence of high fever ≥ 40.0°C (primary outcome) was compared to the rate observed previously in Ecuador. Logistic regressions were performed to identify clinical and population-based predictors of misoprostol-induced fever. RESULTS: Transient shivering and fever were experienced by 75.5% (37/49) of treated participants and described as acceptable by three-quarters of women interviewed (35/47). The high fever rate was 12.2% (6/49), [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.6, 24.8], compared to Ecuador's rate following misoprostol treatment (35.6% (58/163) [95% CI 28.3, 43.5], P = 0.002). Significant predictors of misoprostol-induced fever (model dependent) were as follows: pre-delivery haemoglobin < 11.0g/dl, rapid placental expulsion, and higher age of the woman. No serious outcomes were reported prior to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol to treat PPH in Argentina resulted in a significantly lower rate of high fever than in Ecuador, although both are notably higher than rates seen elsewhere. A greater understanding of misoprostol's side effects and factors involved in their occurrence, including genetics, will help alleviate concerns. The onset of shivering may be the simplest way to know if fever can also be expected.

OBJECTIF: Caractériser la survenue de fièvre (≥ 38,0°C) après traitement d'une hémorragie post-partum (HPP) avec du misoprostol sublingual à 800 mcg en Amérique latine, où des taux élevés d'effets thermorégulateurs du misoprostol et une sensibilité accrue des receveurs à une forte fièvre ont été documentés. MÉTHODES: Une étude observationnelle prospective dans des hôpitaux en Argentine a recruté des femmes consentantes atteintes d'HPP atonique après un accouchement vaginal éligibles pour recevoir du misoprostol. La température corporelle a été évaluée 30, 60, 90 et 120 minutes après le traitement; d'autres effets ont été enregistrés. L'incidence d'une fièvre élevée ≥40,0°C (critère principal) a été comparée au taux observé précédemment en Equateur. Des régressions logistiques ont été effectuées pour identifier les prédicteurs cliniques et ceux basés sur la population de la fièvre induite par le misoprostol . RÉSULTATS: Des frissons transitoires et de la fièvre ont été ressentis par 75% (37/49) des participantes traitées et décrits comme acceptables par les trois quarts des femmes interrogées (35/47). Le taux de fièvre élevé était de 12% (6/49), [intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95%: 4,6, 24,8] contre 35,6% en Equateur après traitement au misoprostol (58/163) [IC95%: 28,3, 43,5], p = 0,002). Les prédicteurs significatifs de la fièvre induite par le misoprostol (selon le modèle) étaient: hémoglobine avant l'accouchement <11,0 g/dL, expulsion placentaire rapide et âge plus élevé de la femme. Aucun résultat sévère n'a été signalé avant le sortie d'hôpital. CONCLUSIONS: Le misoprostol pour traiter l'HPP en Argentine a entraîné un taux de fièvre élevée significativement plus bas qu'en Equateur, bien que les taux dans les deux pays soient notablement plus élevés que les taux observés ailleurs. Une meilleure compréhension des effets secondaires du misoprostol et des facteurs impliqués dans leur apparition, y compris la génétique, aidera à atténuer les inquiétudes. L'apparition de frissons peut être le moyen le plus simple de savoir si l'on peut également s'attendre à de la fièvre.

Does route matter? Impact of route of oxytocin administration on postpartum bleeding: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of intravenous (IV) infusion versus intramuscular (IM) oxytocin on postpartum blood loss and rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) when administered during the third stage of labor. While oxytocin is recommended for prevention of PPH, few double-blind studies have compared outcomes by routes of administration. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at a hospital in Argentina. Participants were assigned to receive 10 IU oxytocin via IV infusion or IM injection and a matching saline ampoule for the other route after vaginal birth. Blood loss was measured using a calibrated receptacle for a 1-hour minimum. Shock index (SI) was also calculated, based on vital signs measurements, and additional interventions were recorded. Primary outcomes included: the frequency of blood loss ≥500ml and mean blood loss. RESULTS: 239 (IV infusion) and 241 (IM) women were enrolled with comparable baseline characteristics. Mean blood loss was 43ml less in the IV infusion group (p = 0.161). Rates of blood loss ≥500ml were similar (IV infusion = 21%; IM = 24%, p = 0.362). Women in the IV infusion group received significantly fewer additional uterotonics (5%), than women in the IM group (12%, p = 0.007). Women with PPH in the IM group experienced a larger increase in SI after delivery, which may have influenced recourse to additional interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The route of oxytocin administration for PPH prevention did not significantly impact measured blood loss after vaginal birth. However, differences were observed in recourse to additional uterotonics, favoring IV infusion over IM. In settings where IV lines are routinely placed, oxytocin infusion may be preferable to IM injection.