Susceptibility of Antibody CDR Residues to Chemical Modifications Can Be Revealed Prior to Antibody Humanization and Aid in the Lead Selection Process.

A critical part of the clinical development path for a therapeutic antibody involves evaluating the physical and chemical stability of candidate molecules throughout the manufacturing process. In particular, the risks of chemical liabilities that can impact antigen binding, such as deamidation, oxidation, and isomerization in the antibody CDR sequences, need to be controlled through formulation development or eliminated by replacing the amino acid motif displaying the chemical instability. Commonly, the antibody CDR sequence contains multiple sequence motifs (potential hotspots) for chemical instability. However, only a subset of these motifs results in actual chemical modification, and thus, experimental assessment of the extent of instability is necessary to identify positions for potential sequence engineering. Ideally, this information should be available prior to antibody humanization at the stage of parental rodent antibody identification. Early knowledge of liabilities allows for ranking of clones or the mitigation of liabilities by concurrent engineering with the antibody humanization process instead of time-consuming sequential activities. However, concurrent engineering of chemical liabilities and humanization requires translatability of the chemical modifications from the rodent parental antibody to the humanized. We experimentally compared the stability of all sequence motifs by mass spectrometric peptide mapping between the rodent parental antibody and the final humanized antibody and observed a linear correlation. These results have enabled a streamlined developability assessment process for therapeutic antibodies from lead discovery to clinical development.

Natural product libraries to accelerate the high-throughput discovery of therapeutic leads.

A high-throughput (HT) paradigm generating LC-MS-UV-ELSD-based natural product libraries to discover compounds with new bioactivities and or molecular structures is presented. To validate this methodology, an extract of the Indo-Pacific marine sponge Cacospongia mycofijiensis was evaluated using assays involving cytoskeletal profiling, tumor cell lines, and parasites. Twelve known compounds were identified including latrunculins (1-4, 10), fijianolides (5, 8, 9), mycothiazole (11), aignopsanes (6, 7), and sacrotride A (13). Compounds 1-5 and 8-11 exhibited bioactivity not previously reported against the parasite T. brucei, while 11 showed selectivity for lymphoma (U937) tumor cell lines. Four new compounds were also discovered including aignopsanoic acid B (13), apo-latrunculin T (14), 20-methoxy-fijianolide A (15), and aignopsane ketal (16). Compounds 13 and 16 represent important derivatives of the aignopsane class, 14 exhibited inhibition of T. brucei without disrupting microfilament assembly, and 15 demonstrated modest microtubule-stabilizing effects. The use of removable well plate libraries to avoid false positives from extracts enriched with only one or two major metabolites is also discussed. Overall, these results highlight the advantages of applying modern methods in natural products-based research to accelerate the HT discovery of therapeutic leads and/or new molecular structures using LC-MS-UV-ELSD-based libraries.

Assessing pressurized liquid extraction for the high-throughput extraction of marine-sponge-derived natural products.

In order to compare the utility of standard solvent partitioning (SSP) versus accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), a series of experiments were performed and evaluated. Overall yields, solvent consumption, processing time, and chemical stability of the fractions obtained by both methods were compared. Five marine sponges were selected for processing and analysis containing 12 structurally distinct, bioactive natural products. Extracts generated using SSP and ASE were assessed for chemical degradation using comparative LC MS-ELSD. The extraction efficiency (EE) of the ASE apparatus was 3 times greater than the SSP method on average, while the total extraction yields (TEY) were roughly equivalent. Furthermore, the ASE methodology required only 2 h to process each sample versus 80 h for SSP, and the LC MS-ELSD from extracts of both methods appeared comparable. These results demonstrate that ASE can serve as an effective high-throughput methodology for extracting marine organisms to streamline the discovery of novel and bioactive natural products.