Spironolactone use and oocyte maturation in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between spironolactone use and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study, including patients who underwent COH. Oocyte yield and maturation rates were compared by categories of spironolactone use at the start of their cycle. RESULTS: 402 patients were included. 83 patients continued spironolactone, 44 patients discontinued spironolactone, and 275 matched control patients were spironolactone-naïve. No difference was observed in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 15 ± 13, p = 0.4) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 12 ± 11, p = 0.4) in patients who continued spironolactone use and spironolactone naïve patients, respectively. When comparing patients who continued spironolactone use and patients who discontinued spironolactone use, no difference was seen in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 17.5 ± 7.8, p = 0.9) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 13.5 ± 6.5, p = 0.5), respectively. There was no observed relationship between total daily spironolactone dose (< 100mg/day, 100mg/day, 150mg/day and > 200 mg/day) and the total number of mature oocytes vitrified (respectively, 14.0 ± 13.0, 16.0 ± 7.8, 14.0 ± 4.5, 11.0 ± 7.0 oocytes, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between spironolactone and oocyte yield and maturation rates during COH cycles. These findings can assist in counseling patients on the implications of continuing spironolactone during COH cycle.

Obstetric outcomes of nulliparous women with pelvic pain undergoing fertility treatment.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there any association between pelvic pain and primary caesarean delivery for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of nulliparous patients with singleton pregnancies who underwent ART treatment and achieved a live birth between 2012 and 2020. Cases included patients diagnosed with pelvic pain. A 3:1 ratio propensity-score-matched population of patients without a history of pelvic pain was included as the control group. Comparative statistics were performed using chi-squared test and Student's t-test. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between pelvic pain and mode of delivery. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four patients with pelvic pain were compared with 575 controls. Patients with pelvic pain reported a significantly longer duration of infertility compared with controls (18.98 ± 20.2 months versus 14.06 ± 14.06 months; P = 0.003). Patients with pelvic pain had a significantly higher rate of anxiety disorders (115 ± 21.9 versus 55 ± 31.6; P = 0.009) and use of anxiolytics at embryo transfer (17 ± 3.2 versus 12 ± 6.9; P = 0.03) compared with controls. In addition, patients with pelvic pain had a higher rate of primary caesarean delivery compared with controls (59.8% versus 49.0%; P = 0.01). After adjusting for multiple variables, a significant association was found between pelvic pain and increased odds of primary caesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.02-2.1). CONCLUSION: Patients with pelvic pain have significantly higher odds of primary caesarean delivery compared with patients without a history of pelvic pain. The infertility outpatient setting may be uniquely positioned to identify patients at risk for undergoing primary caesarean delivery, and could facilitate earlier intervention for pelvic floor physical therapy during the preconception and antepartum periods.

Rescue in vitro maturation using ovarian support cells of human oocytes from conventional stimulation cycles yields oocytes with improved nuclear maturation and transcriptomic resemblance to in vivo matured oocytes.

PURPOSE: Determine if the gene expression profiles of ovarian support cells (OSCs) and cumulus-free oocytes are bidirectionally influenced by co-culture during in vitro maturation (IVM). METHODS: Fertility patients aged 25 to 45 years old undergoing conventional ovarian stimulation donated denuded immature oocytes for research. Oocytes were randomly allocated to either OSC-IVM culture (intervention) or Media-IVM culture (control) for 24-28 h. The OSC-IVM culture condition was composed of 100,000 OSCs in suspension culture with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), androstenedione, and doxycycline supplementation. The Media-IVM control lacked OSCs and contained the same supplementation. A limited set of in vivo matured MII oocytes were donated for comparative evaluation. Endpoints consisted of MII formation rate, morphological and spindle quality assessment, and gene expression analysis compared to in vitro and in vivo controls. RESULTS: OSC-IVM resulted in a statistically significant improvement in MII formation rate compared to the Media-IVM control, with no apparent effect on morphology or spindle assembly. OSC-IVM MII oocytes displayed a closer transcriptomic maturity signature to IVF-MII controls than Media-IVM control MII oocytes. The gene expression profile of OSCs was modulated in the presence of oocytes, displaying culture- and time-dependent differential gene expression during IVM. CONCLUSION: The OSC-IVM platform is a novel tool for rescue maturation of human oocytes, yielding oocytes with improved nuclear maturation and a closer transcriptomic resemblance to in vivo matured oocytes, indicating a potential enhancement in oocyte cytoplasmic maturation. These improvements on oocyte quality after OSC-IVM are possibly occurring through bidirectional crosstalk of cumulus-free oocytes and ovarian support cells.

Walking the tightrope: Fertility preservation among hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer syndrome Previvors.

INTRODUCTION: Fertility-related concerns cause significant anxiety among patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC). The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommend patients diagnosed with HBOC receive early referral to a reproductive endocrinologist. However, evidence about fertility trends in this patient population are limited and guidelines are scarce. The aim of this study is to compare fertility preservation among patients with HBOC to control patients undergoing fertility treatment without a diagnosis of infertility. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who presented to a single academic institution for fertility preservation in the setting of diagnosis of HBOC. In this study, HBOC patients are referred to as those who had tested positive for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or were at high-risk for HBOC based on a strong family history (defined as >3 family members diagnosed with HBOC) without a genetic mutation. HBOC patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion to a control group undergoing fertility preservation without a diagnosis of infertility or HBOC. All analysis was done using SPSS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: Between August 1st, 2016 and August 1st, 2022, 81 patients presented to the study center for consultation in the setting of HBOC. Of those who presented, 48 (59.2%) ultimately underwent oocyte cryopreservation and 33 (40.7%) underwent embryo cryopreservation. Patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation due to BRCA1 status were more likely to present for fertility consultation at a younger age compared to control patients (32.6 vs. 34.7 years, p = 0.03) and were more likely to undergo oocyte cryopreservation at a younger age (32.1 vs. 34.6 years, p = 0.007). There was no difference in age at initial consultation or age at procedure for patients with BRCA2 or patients with a strong family history compared to control patients (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the mean age of patients with HBOC at presentation for consultation for embryo cryopreservation or the mean age the patient with HBOC underwent embryo cryopreservation compared to control patients (p > 0.05). Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 did not have expedited time from consultation to first cycle start (p > 0.05). After adjusting for factors including anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and age, patients considered in the HBOC group due to family history had less time between consultation and oocyte cryopreservation cycle compared to control patients. (179 vs. 317 days, p = 0.045). There was no difference in time from consultation to starting cycle for embryo cryopreservation for patients with HBOC compared to controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with HBOC did not undergo expedited fertility treatment compared to control patients undergoing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation for non-infertility reasons. Patients diagnosed with BRCA1 had more oocytes retrieved compared to the control population which is possibly due to earlier age of presentation in the setting of recommended age of risk reducing surgery being age 35-40. When age matched, cycle outcomes did not differ between HBOC and control patients. Given the known cancer prevention benefit and recommendations for risk-reducing surgery, future studies should focus on guidelines for fertility preservation for patients with HBOC.

Single Euploid Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Uterine Septum Resection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study pregnancy outcomes after single euploid embryo transfer (SEET) in patients who underwent prior uterine septum resection to those with uteri of normal contour, without Müllerian anomalies or uterine abnormalities including polyps or fibroids, and without a history of prior uterine surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic affiliated center. PATIENTS: 60 cycles of patients with prior hysteroscopic uterine septum resection who underwent an autologous SEET between 2012 and 2020 were used as the investigational cohort. A 3:1 ratio propensity score matched control cohort of 180 single euploid embryo transfer cycles from patients without a history of uterine septa were used as the control group. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions administered. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, ongoing clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates in patients with a history of uterine septum resection compared with matched patients without Müllerian anomalies or uterine surgeries. Patients with a prior uterine septum had significantly lower rates of chemical pregnancy (58.33% vs 77.2%, p = .004), implantation (41.67% vs 65.6%, p = .001), and live birth (33.33% vs 57.8%, p = .001) per transfer. No statistical difference in clinical pregnancy loss rates was found when comparing septum patients with controls (8.33% vs 7.8%, p = .89). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of hysteroscopic resection who undergo in vitro fertilization are more susceptible to suboptimal clinical outcomes compared with patients with normal uteri. Early pregnancy loss rates in patients with a uterine septum are higher than in those without; however, after resection, the rates are comparable. Patients born with septate uteri require assessment of surgical intervention prior to SEET, and to optimize their reproductive outcomes.

Fertility treatment outcomes in transgender men with a history of testosterone therapy.

Objective: To evaluate fertility treatment outcomes among transgender (TG) men with a history of gender-affirming hormone therapy with exogenous testosterone. Design: Descriptive, retrospective cohort study. Patients: Transgender men with a history of gender-affirming hormone therapy with exogenous testosterone underwent fertility treatments, including embryo cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization (IVF), co-IVF, oocyte cryopreservation, and intrauterine insemination (IUI), between 2013 and 2021. Intervention: Gender-affirming hormone therapy with testosterone. Main Outcome Measures: Live births (LBs), number of frozen embryos, and number of frozen oocytes. Other outcome measures included total gonadotropin used, peak estradiol levels, oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity rate, fertilization rate, and embryo grade. Results: A total of 77 TG men self-presented or were referred to care at a single academic fertility center, of which 46 (59.7%) TG men underwent fertility preservation and/or family-building counseling, with 16 (20.8%) patients proceeding to fertility treatment. Of those patients who underwent treatment, 11 (68.8%) had a history of gender-affirming hormone therapy with exogenous testosterone use. Cohort 1 included IVF (n = 1), co-IVF (n = 1), embryo cryopreservation (n = 2), cohort 2 included oocyte cryopreservation (n = 4), and cohort 3 included IUI (n = 3). In cohort 1, both the patients who underwent IVF and the patients who underwent co-IVF achieved LBs. All embryo cryopreservation cycles froze three or more embryos. In cohort 2, the average number of frozen mature oocytes was 19.3 ± 16.2 (range 6-43). All patients who underwent IUI cycles achieved LB. Conclusion: In this study, no correlation existed between patient age, time on or off gender-affirming hormone therapy with exogenous testosterone, total gonadotropin used, and number of oocytes retrieved. All patients who completed IVF or embryo cryopreservation produced high-quality blastocytes, and this is the first study to show successful IUI cycles in patients with a history of gender-affirming hormone therapy with exogenous testosterone. This study demonstrates that TG men who have used gender-affirming hormone therapy previously can successfully undergo fertility treatments to attain oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, pregnancy, and LBs.