Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Appl Gerontol ; 40(9): 958-962, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33980058

RESUMEN

While U.S. adults living in affordable senior housing represent a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic, affordable housing may provide a foundation for interventions designed to improve technology access to support health. To better understand technology access among residents of affordable senior housing, we surveyed members of a national association of resident service coordinators to assess their experiences working with residents during the pandemic (n = 1,440). While nearly all service coordinators report that most or all residents have reliable phone access, under a quarter report that most or all have reliable internet access; they also report limited access to technology for video calls. Lack of internet access and technology literacy are perceived as barriers to medical visits and food procurement for low-income older adult residents of affordable housing. Policies to expand internet access as well as training and support to enable use of online services are required to overcome these barriers.


Asunto(s)
Uso del Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Barreras de Comunicación , Hogares para Ancianos , Acceso a Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Anciano , COVID-19 , Alfabetización Digital , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hogares para Ancianos/economía , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Uso de Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Casas de Salud/economía , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/provisión & distribución , Poblaciones Vulnerables
2.
Value Health ; 17(5): 611-8, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128055

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Variation in care within and across geographic areas remains poorly understood. The goal of this article was to examine whether physician social networks-as defined by shared patients-are associated with rates of complications after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In five cities, we constructed networks of physicians on the basis of their shared patients in 2004-2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. From these networks, we identified subgroups of urologists who most frequently shared patients with one another. Among men with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy, we used multilevel analysis with generalized linear mixed-effect models to examine whether physician network structure-along with specific characteristics of the network subgroups-was associated with rates of 30-day and late urinary complications, and long-term incontinence after accounting for patient-level sociodemographic, clinical factors, and urologist patient volume. RESULTS: Networks included 2677 men in five cities who underwent radical prostatectomy. The unadjusted rate of 30-day surgical complications varied across network subgroups from an 18.8 percentage-point difference in the rate of complications across network subgroups in city 1 to a 26.9 percentage-point difference in city 5. Large differences in unadjusted rates of late urinary complications and long-term incontinence across subgroups were similarly found. Network subgroup characteristics-average urologist centrality and patient racial composition-were significantly associated with rates of surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of physician networks using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data provides insight into observed variation in rates of complications for localized prostate cancer. If validated, such approaches may be used to target future quality improvement interventions.


Asunto(s)
Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Red Social , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Value Health ; 16(4): 610-8, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23796296

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Trimodality bladder-preserving therapy (BPT) is an alternative to RC, but randomized comparisons of RC versus BPT have proven infeasible. To compare RC versus BPT, we undertook an observational cohort study using registry and administrative claims data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. METHODS: We identified patients age 65 years or older diagnosed between 1995 and 2005 who received RC (n = 1426) or BPT (n = 417). We examined confounding and stage misclassification in the comparison of RC and BPT by using multivariable adjustment, propensity score-based adjustment, instrumental variable (IV) analysis, and simulations. RESULTS: Patients who received BPT were older and more likely to have comorbid disease. After propensity score adjustment, BPT was associated with an increased hazard of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.53) and from bladder cancer (HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.97-1.77). Using the local area cystectomy rate as an instrument, IV analysis demonstrated no differences in survival between BPT and RC (death from any cause HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.78-1.31; death from bladder cancer HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.55-1.18). Simulation studies for stage misclassification yielded results consistent with the IV analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Survival estimates in an observational cohort of patients who underwent RC versus BPT differ by analytic method. Multivariable and propensity score adjustment revealed greater mortality associated with BPT relative to RC, while IV analysis and simulation studies suggest that the two treatments are associated with similar survival outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Simulación por Computador , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...