RESUMEN
Peptide hormones control Drosophila gut motility, but the intestinal stimuli and the gene networks coordinating this trait remain poorly defined. Here, we customized an assay to quantify female Drosophila defecation rate as a proxy of intestinal motility. We found that bacterial infection with the human opportunistic bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain PA14) increases defecation rate in wild-type female flies, and we identified specific bacteria of the fly microbiota able to increase defecation rate. In contrast, dietary stress, imposed by either water-only feeding or high ethanol consumption, decreased defecation rate and the expression of enteroendocrine-produced hormones in the fly midgut, such as Diuretic hormone 31 (Dh31). The decrease in defecation due to dietary stress was proportional to the impact of each stressor on fly survival. Furthermore, we exploited the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel wild type strain collection and identified strains displaying high and low defecation rates. We calculated the narrow-sense heritability of defecation rate to be 91%, indicating that the genetic variance observed using our assay is mostly additive and polygenic in nature. Accordingly, we performed a genome-wide association (GWA) analysis revealing 17 candidate genes linked to defecation rate. Downregulation of four of them (Pmp70, CG11307, meso18E and mub) in either the midgut enteroendocrine cells or in neurons reduced defecation rate and altered the midgut expression of Dh31, that in turn regulates defecation rate via signaling to the visceral muscle. Hence, microbial and dietary stimuli, and Dh31-controlling genes, regulate defecation rate involving signaling within and among neuronal, enteroendocrine, and visceral muscle cells.
RESUMEN
Physiology, fitness and disease phenotypes are complex traits exhibiting continuous variation in natural populations. To understand complex trait gene functions transgenic lines of undefined genetic background are often combined to assess quantitative phenotypes ignoring the impact of genetic polymorphisms. Here, we used inbred wild-type strains of the Drosophila Genetics Reference Panel to assess the phenotypic variation of six physiological and fitness traits, namely, female fecundity, survival and intestinal mitosis upon oral infection, defecation rate and fecal pH upon oral infection, and terminal tracheal cell branching in hypoxia. We found continuous variation in the approximately 150 strains tested for each trait, with extreme values differing by more than four standard deviations for all traits. In addition, we assessed the effects of commonly used Drosophila UAS-RNAi transgenic strains and their backcrossed isogenized counterparts, in the same traits plus baseline intestinal mitosis and tracheal branching in normoxia, in heterozygous conditions, when only half of the genetic background was different among strains. We tested 20 non-isogenic strains (10 KK and 10 GD) from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center and their isogenized counterparts without Gal4 induction. Survival upon infection and female fecundity exhibited differences in 50% and 40% of the tested isogenic vs. non-isogenic pairs, respectively, whereas all other traits were affected in only 10-25% of the cases. When 11 isogenic and their corresponding non-isogenic UAS-RNAi lines were expressed ubiquitously with Gal4, 4 isogenic vs. non-isogenic pairs exhibited differences in survival to infection. Furthermore, when a single UAS-RNAi line was crossed with the same Gal4 transgene inserted in different genetic backgrounds, the quantitative variations observed were unpredictable on the basis of pure line performance. Thus, irrespective of the trait of interest, the genetic background of commonly used transgenic strains needs to be considered carefully during experimentation.
