Ketamine: A Practical Review for the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrist.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist often used for sedation and management of acute agitation in general hospital settings. Many hospitals now include ketamine as part of their standard agitation protocol, and consultation-liaison psychiatrists frequently find themselves treating patients who have received ketamine, despite lack of clear recommendations for management. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a nonsystematic narrative review regarding the use of ketamine for agitation and continuous sedation, including benefits and adverse psychiatric effects. Compare ketamine to more traditional agents of agitation control. Provide consultation-liaison psychiatrists with a summary of available knowledge and recommendations for managing patients receiving ketamine. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed, querying published articles from inception to March 2023 for articles related to use of ketamine for agitation or continuous sedation and side effects including psychosis and catatonia. RESULTS: A total of 37 articles were included. Ketamine was found to have multiple benefits, including shorter time to adequate sedation for agitated patients when compared to haloperidol ± benzodiazepines and unique advantages for continuous sedation. However, ketamine carries significant medical risks including high rates of intubation. Ketamine appears to induce a syndrome that mimics schizophrenia in healthy controls, and such effects are more pronounced and longer-lasting in patients with schizophrenia. Evidence regarding rates of delirium with ketamine for continuous sedation is mixed and requires further investigation before the agent is widely adopted for this purpose. Finally, the diagnosis of "excited delirium syndrome" and use of ketamine to treat this controversial syndrome warrants critical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine carries many potential benefits and can be an appropriate medication for patients with profound undifferentiated agitation. However, intubation rates remain high, and ketamine may worsen underlying psychotic disorders. It is essential that consultation-liaison psychiatrists understand the advantages, disadvantages, biased administration, and areas of limited knowledge regarding ketamine.

Community-based management of acute malnutrition for infants under 6 months of age is safe and effective: analysis of operational data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of outpatient management with ready-to-use and supplementary foods for infants under 6 months (u6m) of age who were unable to be treated as inpatients due to social and economic barriers. DESIGN: Review of operational acute malnutrition treatment records. SETTING: Twenty-one outpatient therapeutic feeding clinics in rural Malawi. PARTICIPANTS: Infants u6m with acute malnutrition treated as outpatients because of barriers to inpatient treatment. The comparison group consisted of acutely malnourished children 6-9 months of age who were being treated at the same time in the same location in the context of two different randomised clinical trials. RESULTS: A total of 323 infants u6m were treated for acute malnutrition (130 severe and 193 moderate). A total of 357 infants 6-9 months old with acute malnutrition (seventy-four severe and 283 moderate) were included as contemporaneous controls. Among infants u6m with severe acute malnutrition, 98 (75·4 %) achieved nutritional recovery; in comparison, 56 (75·7 %) of those with severe acute malnutrition 6-9 months old recovered. Among infants u6m with moderate acute malnutrition, 157 (81·3 %) recovered; in comparison, 241 (85·2 %) of those aged 6-9 months recovered. CONCLUSIONS: In a rural Malawian population of infants u6m who had generally already stopped exclusive breast-feeding and were now acutely malnourished, treatment with therapeutic or supplementary foods under the community management of acute malnutrition model was safe and effective. In settings where social and financial factors make hospital admission challenging, consideration should be given to lowering the recommended age of ready-to-use therapeutic and supplementary foods to infants u6m.

Physicians-in-training are not prepared to prescribe medical marijuana.

BACKGROUND: While medical marijuana use is legal in more than half of U.S. states, evidence is limited about the preparation of physicians-in-training to prescribe medical marijuana. We asked whether current medical school and graduate medical educational training prepare physicians to prescribe medical marijuana. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of U.S. medical school curriculum deans, a similar survey of residents and fellows at Washington University in St. Louis, and a query of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Curriculum Inventory database for keywords associated with medical marijuana. RESULTS: Surveys were obtained from 101 curriculum deans, and 258 residents and fellows. 145 schools were included in the curriculum search. The majority of deans (66.7%) reported that their graduates were not at all prepared to prescribe medical marijuana, and 25.0% reported that their graduates were not at all prepared to answer questions about medical marijuana. The vast majority of residents and fellows (89.5%) felt not at all prepared to prescribe medical marijuana, while 35.3% felt not at all prepared to answer questions, and 84.9% reported receiving no education in medical school or residency on medical marijuana. Finally, only 9% of medical school curriculums document in the AAMC Curriculum Inventory database content on medical marijuana. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights a fundamental mismatch between the state-level legalization of medical marijuana and the lack of preparation of physicians-in-training to prescribe it. With even more states on the cusp of legalizing medical marijuana, physician training should adapt to encompass this new reality of medical practice.