Sources of variation and establishment of Russian reference intervals for major hormones and tumor markers.

OBJECTIVES: A multicenter study was organized to explore sources of variation (SVs) of reference values (RVs) for 22 major immunochemistry analytes and to determine reference intervals (RIs) for the Russian population. METHODS: According to IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL) protocol, 758 healthy volunteers were recruited in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Yekaterinburg. Serum samples were tested for five tumor markers, 17 hormones and related tests by Beckman Coulter's UniCel DxI 800 immunochemistry analyzer. SVs were explored using multiple regression analysis and ANOVA. Standard deviation ratio (SDR) of 0.4 was used as primary guide for partitioning RIs by gender and age. RESULTS: SDR for between-city difference was <0.4 for all analytes. Secondary exclusion of individuals was done under the following conditions: for female sex-hormones, those with contraceptives (8%); for CA19-9, those supposed to have negative Lewis blood-group (10.5% males and 11.3% females); for insulin, those with BMI≥28 kg/m2 (31%); for the thyroid panel, those with anti-thyroid antibodies (10.3% males; 24.5% females), for CEA those with smoking habit (30% males and 16% females). Gender-specific RIs were required for all analytes except CA19-9, CA15-3, thyroid-related tests, parathyroid hormone, and insulin. Age-specific RIs were required for alpha-fetoprotein, CEA, all sex-hormones for females, FSH and progesterone for both sexes. RIs were generally derived by parametric method after Gaussian transformation using modified Box-Cox formula. Exceptions were growth hormone, estradiol for females in postmenopause, and progesterone for females in premenopause, for which nonparametric method was required due to bimodal distribution and/or insufficient detection limit. CONCLUSION: RIs for major hormones and tumor markers specific for the Russian population were derived based on the up-to-date internationally harmonized protocol by careful consideration of analyte-specific SVs.

Establishing reference intervals for major biochemical analytes for the Russian population: a research conducted as a part of the IFCC global study on reference values.

OBJECTIVES: Because reference intervals (RIs) for biochemistry analytes matched to the Russian population are not well defined, we joined the global study on reference values (RVs) coordinated by the IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL). METHODS: According to the C-RIDL harmonized protocol, 793 healthy volunteers were recruited in Saint-Petersburg, Moscow, and Yekaterinburg. Serum samples were tested for 34 biochemistry analytes. Sources of variation of RVs were explored using multiple regression analysis. The need for partitioning RVs by sex and age were judged using standard deviation ratio based on ANOVA. Latent abnormal values exclusion (LAVE) method was applied to reduce the influence of individuals with metabolic syndrome and/or inappropriate sampling conditions. RIs were computed by the parametric method. RESULTS: No appreciable between-city differences were observed. Partition of RVs by sex was required for 17 analytes. Age-related changes in RVs were observed in many analytes, especially in females. The trend was exaggerated in nutritional and inflammatory markers that were closely associated with body mass index (BMI), because BMI increases prominently with age. Therefore, for those analytes, volunteers with BMI > 28 kg/m2 were excluded in determining RIs for age-specific RIs. The LAVE method was effective in lowering the upper limits of the RIs for nutritional and inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: RIs matched to the Russian population were established for 34 biochemical analytes using up-to-date methods in detailed consideration of sources of variation of RVs. The majority of Russian RIs are similar to those of Caucasian populations among the participating countries.

A global multicenter study on reference values: 1. Assessment of methods for derivation and comparison of reference intervals.

OBJECTIVES: The IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits coordinated a global multicenter study on reference values (RVs) to explore rational and harmonizable procedures for derivation of reference intervals (RIs) and investigate the feasibility of sharing RIs through evaluation of sources of variation of RVs on a global scale. METHODS: For the common protocol, rather lenient criteria for reference individuals were adopted to facilitate harmonized recruitment with planned use of the latent abnormal values exclusion (LAVE) method. As of July 2015, 12 countries had completed their study with total recruitment of 13,386 healthy adults. 25 analytes were measured chemically and 25 immunologically. A serum panel with assigned values was measured by all laboratories. RIs were derived by parametric and nonparametric methods. RESULTS: The effect of LAVE methods is prominent in analytes which reflect nutritional status, inflammation and muscular exertion, indicating that inappropriate results are frequent in any country. The validity of the parametric method was confirmed by the presence of analyte-specific distribution patterns and successful Gaussian transformation using the modified Box-Cox formula in all countries. After successful alignment of RVs based on the panel test results, nearly half the analytes showed variable degrees of between-country differences. This finding, however, requires confirmation after adjusting for BMI and other sources of variation. The results are reported in the second part of this paper. CONCLUSION: The collaborative study enabled us to evaluate rational methods for deriving RIs and comparing the RVs based on real-world datasets obtained in a harmonized manner.