A retrospective comparison between delayed and early hip fracture surgery in patients taking clopidogrel: same total bleeding but different timing of blood transfusion.

PURPOSE: Managing hip fracture surgery in patients taking clopidogrel is challenging. The optimal timing for surgery remains unclear. Early surgery in such patients potentially increases peri-operative bleeding, whereas delayed surgery has been shown to be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a delay to surgery affects total blood loss, bleeding kinetics, blood transfusion requirements, or post-operative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study including all hip fracture patients treated with clopidogrel between 2011 and 2016 (39 patients) was carried out. Patients who underwent delayed surgery after withholding clopidogrel for five days or more, from 2011 to 2013, were compared to patients who benefited from earlier surgical procedures (within 48 hours of admission) from 2014 to 2016. RESULTS: Total blood loss, amount of blood transfusion and rate of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the timing of bleeding was significantly different; blood loss occurred during the pre-operative phase in the delayed surgery group (p < 0.0001), whereas it occurred during the intra-operative phase in the early surgery group (p = 0.005). The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter for the early surgery group than for the delayed surgery group: 11 ± three versus 15 ± four days (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical treatment of hip fracture in patients receiving clopidogrel does not increase the overall red blood cell loss or the transfusion requirement, but may affect the timing of blood transfusion. Hip fracture surgery should preferably be performed without delay in patients taking clopidogrel.

Significance of antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas: a large French study.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies to soluble liver antigen (SLA)/liver pancreas (LP) are generally considered as highly specific diagnostic markers of type 1 auto-immune hepatitis (AIH-1), and are particularly useful in patients without conventional antibodies. However, the presence of anti-SLA/LP in type 2 auto-immune hepatitis (AIH-2), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and hepatitis C has recently been reported. The aim was thus to describe the characteristics of anti-SLA/LP-positive patients in the largest series reported to date. METHODS: Sera were selected from the period between 1998 and 2005, based on the presence of antibodies to SLA/LP detected by two methods. The clinical status of patients was determined from their medical records. RESULTS: Eighty-one anti-SLA/LP-positive patients with available clinical data were included: 89% (72/81) had a diagnosis of AIH-1, including 10 (12%) associated with cholestatic diseases (primary biliary cirrhosis in seven cases and PSC in three cases). Six patients (7%) suffered from another liver disease: hepatitis C (n=3) and drug-induced hepatitis (n=3). No specific diagnosis was made in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to SLA/LP are of a major diagnostic value for AIH-1, including paediatric forms and overlap syndromes with cholestatic diseases, but are not found in association with anti-liver/kidney/microsome type 1 or antibodies to liver cytosol type 1. They are rarely present in other liver diseases such as hepatitis C and drug-induced hepatitis.