Six-week antibiotic therapy after one-stage replacement arthroplasty for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection.

OBJECTIVES: One-stage replacement arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) results in similar cure rate than two-stage (around 85-92%), but antibiotic therapy duration is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a short six-week antibiotic course in periprosthetic joint infections after onstage exchange. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational study conducted at Orthopaedic Department of Cochin Hospital, Paris, between 1st January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Patients with a microbiologically proven PJI, treated with one-stage replacement and 6 weeks (+/1week) of antimicrobial therapy were included. Pearson's-χ2 and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. RESULTS: Fifty patients with periprosthetic joint infections (42 hip, 8 knee PJI) treated with one-stage replacement arthroplasty were included. Median age was 69.3 years (IQR 24.5-97.4). Infections occurred after a mean of 36 months (IQR 1-216). Bone biopsy cultures were positive for Staphylococcus spp. in 29 patients (58%), Cutibacterium acnes in 19 (38%), Gram-negative bacilli in 6 (12%). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 12 (24%). Intravenous antibiotics were administered for a median of 11 days (IQR 4-45) and 46 patients (92%) were switched to an oral therapy. Medium follow-up was of 32 months (IQR 12-101). Overall remission rate was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: A six-week course of antibiotics in knee and hip PJIs treated with one-stage RA has a satisfactory remission rate in this open study.

The hip fracture surgery in elderly patients (HIPELD) study to evaluate xenon anaesthesia for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a multicentre, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium occurs frequently in elderly hip fracture surgery patients and is associated with poorer overall outcomes. Because xenon anaesthesia has neuroprotective properties, we evaluated its effect on the incidence of delirium and other outcomes after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This was a phase II, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial conducted in hospitals in six European countries (September 2010 to October 2014). Elderly (≥75yr-old) and mentally functional hip fracture patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either xenon- or sevoflurane-based general anaesthesia during surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium diagnosed through postoperative day 4. Secondary outcomes were delirium diagnosed anytime after surgery, postoperative sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 256 enrolled patients, 124 were treated with xenon and 132 with sevoflurane. The incidence of delirium with xenon (9.7% [95% CI: 4.5 -14.9]) or with sevoflurane (13.6% [95% CI: 7.8 -19.5]) were not significantly different (P=0.33). Overall SOFA scores were significantly lower with xenon (least-squares mean difference: -0.33 [95% CI: -0.60 to -0.06]; P=0.017). For xenon and sevoflurane, the incidence of serious AEs and fatal AEs was 8.0% vs 15.9% (P=0.05) and 0% vs 3.8% (P=0.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Xenon anaesthesia did not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium after hip fracture surgery. Nevertheless, exploratory observations concerning postoperative SOFA-scores, serious AEs, and deaths warrant further study of the potential benefits of xenon anaesthesia in elderly hip fracture surgery patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2009-017153-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01199276.

[Surveillance of operative site infections in an orthopedic and traumatology surgery department: an example of methodology]. / Proposition d'un protocole de suivi des infections avérées de site opératoire en chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: A program for the prevention of nosocomial infections, including operative site infections (OSI) is a legal obligation in France. According to the CDC, in orthopedic surgery, nosocomial infection is defined as any infection occurring within 30 days of operation, or within one year in the event of material implantation. No surveillance system has been validated and the rate of OSI is unknown in orthopedic surgery. We report the number of OSI observed during a three year period in our unit and describe the characteristic features. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from the bacteriology reports on operative site samples with a positive culture. A group of specialists determined the infective nature of the germ and the nosocomial nature of the OSI. Clinical and bacteriological data were noted on a standard datasheet used for prospective follow-up of the number of cases and data processing. During a three-year period (2000, 2001, 2002), among 9397 orthopedic and traumatology operations performed, 86 OSI were identified. Mean patient age was 58 years and mean body mass index was 25.7. The ASA score was >or=II for 72% of patients. RESULTS: The OSI involved an arthroplasty in 23 cases, a traumatology procedure in 21, and tumor treatment in 24. The diagnosis was established within 30 days of operation for 75% and after discharge from hospital in 65.4%. Single-germ infections predominated (n=59). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 80.23% of infections. For tumor surgery, the statistically more frequent multiple-germ infections associated coagulase negative Staphylococcus and Gram-negative bacilli. There were six OSI-related deaths. DISCUSSION: Two criticisms can be formulated concerning our surveillance system. First, infections with no identified germ could be missed. The frequency of such infections has been estimated at 2.8 to 19% by different authors. Although patients are automatically recalled for consultation, we were unable to determine the number of patients lost to follow-up at one year. It was thus not possible to determine a precise rate of OSI. Data in the literature have not demonstrated any system providing an exhaustive surveillance, particularly because of the long postoperative period after material implantation. Excepting tumor surgery, Staphylococcus aureus infections predominated. Factors of risk of OSI include the patient's general status, particularly for arthroplasty. We had a mortality rate of 7% for our OSI, corroborating earlier studies and illustrating the severity of such infections. CONCLUSION: Surveillance of OSI in orthopedic surgery requires the development of a system responding to the problem of a long observation period. It would be important to know the precise number of OSI and their characteristic features in order to develop comparison tools.

[Medical environment of total hip prosthesis]. / L'environnement médical de la prothése totale de hanche.

Total hip replacement is an extremely frequent operation for the treatment of degenerative joint disease. Indication for surgery must take into account the patient's general status, associated diseases, multiple joint involvement, and the efficacy and tolerance to medical treatments. The decision to operate is taken together by the physician and the patient. The degree of functional impairment and the patient's age are important factors. The patient must be informed that the period of hospitalization will be approximately 15 days and that good results are obtained in approximately 98% of the cases. Preoperative consultation with the anesthesist will focus on associated diseases with special attention to possible infectious foyers. Early post operative care includes a 48 hour antibiotic reginien, thromboprophylaxy with low molecular weight heparin for 3 days followed by anti-vitamin K for 6 weeks, and non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs for 5 days of up to 6 weeks in case of suspected risk of ossification. At mid-term, complications may include hematomas, infection and luxation. The fixation may also fail in certain cases where transtrochanter access was used. Long-term follow-up monitors for possible late onset infection and late luxations which usually result from prosthesis wear and more rarely from muscular causes.

[Preoperative hemodilution by erythrocytapheresis with homologous blood saving in total hip arthroplasty]. / Contribution de l'hémodilution préopératoire par érythrophérèse à l'épargne de sang homologue au cours de l'arthroplastie totale de hanche.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three techniques for decreasing homologous blood requirements in total hip arthroplasty (THA), including preoperative autologous donation (PAD), preoperative acute normovolaemic haemodilution with erythrocytapheresis (erythro) and intraoperative normovolaemic haemodilution (haemo). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. PATIENTS: The study included 45 patients scheduled for THA, under general anaesthesia and operated on by the same surgeon. The patients were allocated into three groups of 15 each. METHODS: Blood loss was assessed, during surgical procedure, by the weight of sponges and, the amount of blood collected in the suction bottles during and after surgery. The haemoglobin concentration was measured at the time of preoperative assessement (d-30), just prior to surgery (d-1), in the recovery room (d+3h), and 1, 3, and 8 days later (d8). The transfusion end-point in the three groups was to obtain a haemoglobin concentration of 100 g.L-1 from d+3h until d8. Every pack of red blood cells transfused was weighed and its haematocrit assessed to determine the accurate volume of red blood cells. RESULTS: In the three groups haemoglobin concentration was similar from d+3h until d8. In the PAD group, no patient required homologous blood transfusion. There was no significant difference between the two other groups in the mean volume of homologous red blood cells required (308 +/- 197 mL in erythro group and 331 +/- 202 mL in the haemo group, respectively). The intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in the erythro group: 914 +/- 305 mL vs 665 +/- 263 in the PAD group and 512 +/- 146 mL in the haemo group, respectively. There was an inverse correlation between haematocrit at d-1 and intraoperative bleeding (r = -0.7) (P = 0.0001). The distribution of the points was fitted as an exponential curve. CONCLUSIONS: In THA, PAD is obviously the best technique to avoid homologous blood transfusion. However, when PAD is not feasible, removal of blood prior to surgery does not decrease requirements of homologous blood, as intraoperative blood loss is higher. Our results strongly question the use of major haemodilution during a surgical procedure exposing a major blood loss.