COST EFFECTIVENESS OF USING TERLIPRESSIN TO TREAT HEPATORENAL SYNDROME.

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most severe form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it is associated with high mortality. It is usually diagnosed according to criteria defined by the International Ascites Club. Currently, the most frequently indicated pharmacological therapy for the treatment of HRS is a combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors (terlipressin or norepinephrine) in combination with albumin. With the progressive increase in healthcare spending, it is important to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacological treatment in patients who are diagnosed with HRS. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for the use of terlipressin in combination with albumin to treat HRS in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on secondary data from studies showed the efficacy of terlipressin therapy compared with norepinephrine combined with albumin or albumin alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a sensitivity analysis was developed by varying the values of therapies and probabilities. The Brazilian real was the currency used in the analysis, and the results were converted to US dollars. RESULTS: After selection, eligibility, and evaluation of the quality of publications, the results demonstrated that administration of terlipressin or norepinephrine in combination with albumin in patients diagnosed with HRS type 1 was efficacious. The cost of treatment with terlipressin in combination with albumin was USD $1,644.06, administration of albumin alone was USD $912.02, and norepinephrine plus albumin was USD $2,310.78. Considering that the combination therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the incremental cost of terlipressin and norepinephrine in combination with albumin was USD $666.73, and an effectiveness of 0.570 was found for terlipressin in combination with albumin and 0.200 for norepinephrine in combination with albumin. The incremental effectiveness was 0.370, and the ICER was USD $1,801.97. Thus, the parameters of increasing cost per therapy and ICER indicated that the combined therapy of terlipressin plus albumin was cost effective compared to albumin alone or norepinephrine plus albumin in a public single-payer healthcare system. CONCLUSION: A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that terlipressin in combination with albumin when administered concomitantly to patients who were diagnosed with type 1 HRS is cost-effective compared to norepinephrine in combination with albumin administered in a controlled environment.

Custo efetividade do uso da terlipressina no tratamento da síndrome hepatorrenal / Cost effectiveness of using terlipressin to treat hepatorenal syndrome

ABSTRACT Background Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most severe form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it is associated with high mortality. It is usually diagnosed according to criteria defined by the International Ascites Club. Currently, the most frequently indicated pharmacological therapy for the treatment of HRS is a combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors (terlipressin or norepinephrine) in combination with albumin. With the progressive increase in healthcare spending, it is important to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacological treatment in patients who are diagnosed with HRS. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for the use of terlipressin in combination with albumin to treat HRS in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on secondary data from studies showed the efficacy of terlipressin therapy compared with norepinephrine combined with albumin or albumin alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a sensitivity analysis was developed by varying the values of therapies and probabilities. The Brazilian real was the currency used in the analysis, and the results were converted to US dollars. Results: After selection, eligibility, and evaluation of the quality of publications, the results demonstrated that administration of terlipressin or norepinephrine in combination with albumin in patients diagnosed with HRS type 1 was efficacious. The cost of treatment with terlipressin in combination with albumin was USD $1,644.06, administration of albumin alone was USD $912.02, and norepinephrine plus albumin was USD $2,310.78. Considering that the combination therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the incremental cost of terlipressin and norepinephrine in combination with albumin was USD $666.73, and an effectiveness of 0.570 was found for terlipressin in combination with albumin and 0.200 for norepinephrine in combination with albumin. The incremental effectiveness was 0.370, and the ICER was USD $1,801.97. Thus, the parameters of increasing cost per therapy and ICER indicated that the combined therapy of terlipressin plus albumin was cost effective compared to albumin alone or norepinephrine plus albumin in a public single-payer healthcare system. Conclusion: A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that terlipressin in combination with albumin when administered concomitantly to patients who were diagnosed with type 1 HRS is cost-effective compared to norepinephrine in combination with albumin administered in a controlled environment.

RESUMO Contexto: A Síndrome Hepatorrenal (SHR) é a forma mais grave de lesão renal aguda em pacientes com cirrose avançada, estando diretamente associada a alta taxa de mortalidade. Normalmente é diagnosticada seguindo critérios definidos pela International Ascites Club (IAC). Atualmente, as terapias farmacológicas mais indicadas no tratamento da SHR são a combinação de vasoconstritores esplâncnicos (terlipressina ou norepinefrina) associados à albumina. Com o aumento progressivo dos gastos em saúde, torna-se relevante realizar uma análise de custo-efetividade do tratamento farmacológico em pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR. Objetivo: Realizar avaliação de custo-efetividade do uso da terlipressina associada à albumina no tratamento da SHR em pacientes com cirrose. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-efetividade, com base em dados secundários de estudos publicados com resultado da eficácia da terapia com terlipressina, em comparação com norepinefrina combinada com albumina ou apenas albumina. A análise de custo-efetividade foi calculada usando a razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) e uma análise de sensibilidade foi desenvolvida variando os valores das terapias e probabilidades. O real foi a moeda utilizada na análise. Resultados: Após a seleção, elegibilidade e avaliação da qualidade das publicações, os resultados demonstraram que a administração da associação de terlipressina ou norepinefrina com albumina em pacientes diagnosticados com SHR tipo 1 possui eficácia comprovada. Os custos do tratamento com a terapia combinada de terlipressina com albumina foram de USD $1,644.06, administração de somente albumina USD $912.02 e norepinefrina mais albumina USD $2,310.78. Considerando as terapias combinadas com efetividade terapêutica comprovada, isto é, terlipressina e norepinefrina associada a albumina, o custo incremental foi de USD $666.73 e efetividade de 0,570 para o grupo da terlipressina associada a albumina e de 0,200 para o grupo da norepinefrina associada a albumina. A efetividade incremental foi de 0,370 e o valor da RCEI foi de USD $1,801.97. Assim, os fatores de incremento do custo por terapia e razão de custo-efetividade incremental definem que a terapia combinada de terlipressina mais albumina é custo efetiva quando comparada a administração de somente albumina ou norepinefrina no cenário do sistema único de saúde. Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou por meio de uma análise de custo-efetividade que a terlipressina associada à albumina quando administrada concomitantemente a pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR tipo 1 é custo-efetiva quando comparada à albumina sozinha e com norepinefrina associada à albumina administrada em um ambiente controlado.

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy: Effect on conventional coagulation tests and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion in enhancing thrombin generation in patients with cirrhosis and impaired conventional coagulation tests has not been sufficiently explored. Thus, we aimed to assess the effect of FFP transfusion on thrombin generation in these patients. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients receiving a standard dose of FFP to treat bleeding and/or before invasive procedures - if international normalized ratio (INR)/prothrombin time (PT) ratio were ≥1.5 - were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was the amelioration of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) with thrombomodulin (ETP-TM) after transfusion, which corresponds to the total amount of generated thrombin. INR/PT ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were also assessed before and after transfusion. RESULTS: FFP enhanced ETP-TM by 5.7%, from 973 (731-1,258) to 1,028 (885-1,343 nM × min; p = 0.019). Before transfusion, evidence of normal or high ETP-TM was found in 94% of patients, even in those with bacterial infections. Only 1 (1.9%) patient had ETP-TM values reverting to the normal range after transfusion. Notably, no patients with low ETP-TM had bleeding. The median decrease in ETP-TM was 8.3% and the mean was 12.8% in 18 (34%) patients after transfusion (from 1,225 [1,071-1,537] to 1,124 [812-1,370] nM × min; p ≤0.0001). Similar responses to FFP transfusion were observed in patients with compensated and acute decompensated cirrhosis, acute-on-chronic liver failure, infection or shock. FFP significantly ameliorated INR and aPTT values (p <0.0001), but in a minority of patients the values were reduced to less than the cut-off point of 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: FFP transfusion enhanced thrombin generation and ameliorated conventional coagulation tests to normal values in a limited number of patients, and slightly decreased thrombin generation in 34% of cases. LAY SUMMARY: Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in patients with cirrhosis only slightly improves coagulation test values in a limited number of patients and even appears to worsen them in a third of cases. Transfusion for the purpose of preventing or treating bleeding events could cause inherent risks and costs without clear benefits.