Intravascular imaging-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-risk patients and complex coronary anatomies.

BACKGROUND: Despite a large body of evidence supporting the use of intravascular imaging (IVI) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), concerns exist about its universal recommendation. The selective use of IVI to guide PCI of complex lesions and patients is perceived as a rational approach. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane were systematically searched for RCTs that compared IVI-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in high-risk patients and complex coronary anatomies. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs with 14,109 patients were included and followed for a weighted mean duration of 15.8 months. IVI-guided PCI was associated with a decrease in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.56-0.77; p < 0.01), target vessel failure (TVF) (RR: 0.66; 95 % CI: 0.52-0.84; p < 0.01), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.55-0.91; p < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.34-0.65; p < 0.01), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.55; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.79; p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.67-0.98; p = 0.03), and repeated revascularizations (RR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.58-0.85; p < 0.01) compared with angiography. There was no significant difference in procedure-related complications (RR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.75-1.42; p = 0.84) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiographic guidance alone, IVI-guided PCI of complex lesions and high-risk patients significantly reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, MACE, TVF, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.

Impact of Neurological Complications on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Infective Endocarditis.

Neurological complications are frequent during the active course of infective endocarditis (IE), and they are associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. However, limited data exist on the prognostic value of these complications for late outcomes. This study aimed to assess the long-term impact of neurological complications in patients surviving an IE episode. A total of 263 consecutive IE patients admitted to a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2022 were prospectively included. Neurological complications at admission included transient ischemic attack (TIA), ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, intracerebral abscess, and meningitis. The primary outcome was a composite of overall mortality or heart valve surgery. Of the patients, 34.2% died in the hospital, leaving 173 survivors for long-term follow-up. Over a median of 3.5 years, 29 patients died, and 13 (9%) underwent cardiac surgery, resulting in an overall adverse event rate of 30%. Neurological complications independently predicted long-term adverse outcomes (hazard ratio (HR) 2.237; 95% CI 1.006-4.976), after adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure (HF) development. In an IE patient cohort, neurological complications at admission, which is a complication directly related to the IE process, were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.