Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991101

RESUMEN

This review synthesizes the evidence on associations between antidepressant use and gut microbiota composition and function, exploring the microbiota's possible role in modulating antidepressant treatment outcomes. Antidepressants exert an influence on measures of gut microbial diversity. The most consistently reported differences were in ß-diversity between those exposed to antidepressants and those not exposed, with longitudinal studies supporting a potential causal association. Compositional alterations in antidepressant users include an increase in the Bacteroidetes phylum, Christensenellaceae family, and Bacteroides and Clostridium genera, while a decrease was found in the Firmicutes phylum, Ruminococcaceae family, and Ruminococcus genus. In addition, antidepressants attenuate gut microbial differences between depressed and healthy individuals, modulate microbial serotonin transport, and influence microbiota's metabolic functions. These include lyxose degradation, peptidoglycan maturation, membrane transport, and methylerythritol phosphate pathways, alongside gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolism. Importantly, baseline increased α-diversity and abundance of the Roseburia and Faecalibacterium genera, in the Firmicutes phylum, are associated with antidepressant response, emerging as promising biomarkers. This review highlights the potential for gut microbiota as a predictor of treatment response and emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying antidepressant-microbiota interactions. More homogeneous studies and standardized techniques are required to confirm these initial findings.

2.
medRxiv ; 2024 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826220

RESUMEN

The brain's default mode network (DMN) plays a role in social cognition, with altered DMN function being associated with social impairments across various neuropsychiatric disorders. In the present study, we examined the genetic relationship between sociability and DMN-related resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) traits. To this end, we used genome-wide association summary statistics for sociability and 31 activity and 64 connectivity DMN-related rs-fMRI traits (N=34,691-342,461). First, we examined global and local genetic correlations between sociability and the rs-fMRI traits. Second, to assess putatively causal relationships between the traits, we conducted bi-directional Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses. Finally, we prioritised genes influencing both sociability and rs-fMRI traits by combining three methods: gene-expression eQTL MR analyses, the CELLECT framework using single-nucleus RNA-seq data, and network propagation in the context of a protein-protein interaction network. Significant local genetic correlations were found between sociability and two rs-fMRI traits, one representing spontaneous activity within the temporal cortex, the other representing connectivity between the frontal/cingulate and angular/temporal cortices. Sociability affected 12 rs-fMRI traits when allowing for weakly correlated genetic instruments. Combing all three methods for gene prioritisation, we defined 17 highly prioritised genes, with DRD2 and LINGO1 showing the most robust evidence across all analyses. By integrating genetic and transcriptomics data, our gene prioritisation strategy may serve as a blueprint for future studies. The prioritised genes could be explored as potential biomarkers for social dysfunction in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders and as drug target genes.

3.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 85: 45-57, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936143

RESUMEN

An estimated 30 % of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients exhibit resistance to conventional antidepressant treatments. Identifying reliable biomarkers of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a major goal of precision psychiatry, which is hampered by the clinical and biological heterogeneity. To uncover biologically-driven subtypes of MDD, we applied an unsupervised data-driven framework to stratify 102 MDD patients on their neuroimaging signature, including extracted measures of cortical thickness, grey matter volumes, and white matter fractional anisotropy. Our novel analytical pipeline integrated different machine learning algorithms to harmonize data, perform data dimensionality reduction, and provide a stability-based relative clustering validation. The obtained clusters were characterized for immune-inflammatory peripheral biomarkers, TRD, history of childhood trauma and depressive symptoms. Our results indicated two different clusters of patients, differentiable with 67 % of accuracy: one cluster (n = 59) was associated with a higher proportion of TRD, and higher scores of energy-related depressive symptoms, history of childhood abuse and emotional neglect; this cluster showed a widespread reduction in cortical thickness (d = 0.43-1.80) and volumes (d = 0.45-1.05), along with fractional anisotropy in the fronto-occipital fasciculus, stria terminalis, and corpus callosum (d = 0.46-0.52); the second cluster (n = 43) was associated with cognitive and affective depressive symptoms, thicker cortices and wider volumes. Multivariate analyses revealed distinct brain-inflammation relationships between the two clusters, with increase in pro-inflammatory markers being associated with decreased cortical thickness and volumes. Our stratification of MDD patients based on structural neuroimaging identified clinically-relevant subgroups of MDD with specific symptomatic and immune-inflammatory profiles, which can contribute to the development of tailored personalized interventions for MDD.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neuroimagen/métodos , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/patología , Aprendizaje Automático , Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Blanca/patología
4.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 84: 59-68, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678879

RESUMEN

The clinical phenotype of the so-called late-onset depression (LOD) affecting up to 30% of older adults and yielding heterogeneous manifestations concerning symptoms, severity and course has not been fully elucidated yet. This European, cross-sectional, non-interventional, naturalistic multicenter study systematically investigated socio-demographic and clinical correlates of early-onset depression (EOD) and LOD (age of onset ≥ 50 years) in 1410 adult in- and outpatients of both sexes receiving adequate psychopharmacotherapy. In a total of 1329 patients (94.3%) with known age of disease onset, LOD was identified in 23.2% and was associated with unemployment, an ongoing relationship, single major depressive episodes, lower current suicidal risk and higher occurrence of comorbid hypertension. In contrast, EOD was related to higher rates of comorbid migraine and additional psychotherapy. Although the applied study design does not allow to draw any causal conclusions, the present results reflect broad clinical settings and emphasize easily obtainable features which might be characteristic for EOD and LOD. A thoughtful consideration of age of onset might, hence, contribute to optimized diagnostic and therapeutic processes in terms of the globally intended precision medicine, ideally enabling early and adequate treatment allocations and implementation of respective prevention programs.


Asunto(s)
Edad de Inicio , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Comorbilidad , Enfermedades de Inicio Tardío/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Inicio Tardío/terapia
5.
medRxiv ; 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38496672

RESUMEN

The co-occurrence of insulin resistance (IR)-related metabolic conditions with neuropsychiatric disorders is a complex public health challenge. Evidence of the genetic links between these phenotypes is emerging, but little is currently known about the genomic regions and biological functions that are involved. To address this, we performed Local Analysis of [co]Variant Association (LAVA) using large-scale (N=9,725-933,970) genome-wide association studies (GWASs) results for three IR-related conditions (type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and metabolic syndrome) and nine neuropsychiatric disorders. Subsequently, positional and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL)-based gene mapping and downstream functional genomic analyses were performed on the significant loci. Patterns of negative and positive local genetic correlations (|rg|=0.21-1, pFDR<0.05) were identified at 109 unique genomic regions across all phenotype pairs. Local correlations emerged even in the absence of global genetic correlations between IR-related conditions and Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and Tourette's syndrome. Genes mapped to the correlated regions showed enrichment in biological pathways integral to immune-inflammatory function, vesicle trafficking, insulin signalling, oxygen transport, and lipid metabolism. Colocalisation analyses further prioritised 10 genetically correlated regions for likely harbouring shared causal variants, displaying high deleterious or regulatory potential. These variants were found within or in close proximity to genes, such as SLC39A8 and HLA-DRB1, that can be targeted by supplements and already known drugs, including omega-3/6 fatty acids, immunomodulatory, antihypertensive, and cholesterol-lowering drugs. Overall, our findings underscore the complex genetic landscape of IR-neuropsychiatric multimorbidity, advocating for an integrated disease model and offering novel insights for research and treatment strategies in this domain.

6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367896

RESUMEN

Mood disorders have a genetic and environmental component and interactions (GxE) on the risk of psychiatric diseases have been investigated. The same GxE interactions may affect wellbeing measures, which go beyond categorical diagnoses and reflect the health-disease continuum. We evaluated GxE effects in the UK Biobank, considering as outcomes subjective wellbeing (feeling good and functioning well) and objective measures (education and income). We estimated the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Stressful/traumatic events during adulthood or childhood were considered as E variables, as well as social support. The addition of the PRSxE interaction to PRS and E variables was tested in linear or multinomial regression models, adjusting for confounders. We included 33 k-380 k participants, depending on the variables considered. Most PRSs and E factors showed additive effects on outcomes, with effect sizes generally 3-5 times larger for E variables than PRSs. We found some interaction effects, particularly when considering recent stress, history of a long illness/disability/infirmity, and social support. Higher PRSs increased the negative effects of stress on wellbeing, but they also increased the positive effects of social support, with interaction effects particularly for the outcomes health satisfaction, loneliness, and income (p < Bonferroni corrected threshold of 1.92e-4). PRSxE terms usually added ∼0.01-0.02% variance explained to the corresponding additive model. PRSxE effects on wellbeing involve both positive and negative E factors. Despite small variance explained at the population level, preventive/therapeutic interventions that modify E factors could be beneficial at the individual level.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Adulto , Niño , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Puntuación de Riesgo Genético , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Biobanco del Reino Unido , Herencia Multifactorial/genética , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 11(3): 210-220, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360024

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations based on the efficacy of specific drugs for the treatment of psychotic depression. To address this evidence gap, we did a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for psychotic depression. METHODS: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 23, 2023 for randomised controlled trials published in any language that assessed pharmacological treatments for individuals of any age with a diagnosis of a major depressive episode with psychotic features, in the context of major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder in any setting. We excluded continuation or maintenance trials. We screened the study titles and abstracts identified, and we extracted data from relevant studies after full-text review. If full data were not available, we requested data from study authors twice. We analysed treatments for individual drugs (or drug combinations) and by grouping them on the basis of mechanisms of action. The primary outcomes were response rate (ie, the proportion of participants who responded to treatment) and acceptability (ie, the proportion who discontinued treatment for any reason). We calculated risk ratios and did separate frequentist network meta-analyses by using random-effects models. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the confidence in the evidence with the Confidence-In-Network-Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023392926. FINDINGS: Of 6313 reports identified, 16 randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review, and 14 were included in the network meta-analyses. The 16 trials included 1161 people with psychotic depression (mean age 50·5 years [SD 11·4]). 516 (44·4%) participants were female and 422 (36·3%) were male; sex data were not available for the other 223 (19·2%). 489 (42·1%) participants were White, 47 (4·0%) were African American, and 12 (1·0%) were Asian; race or ethnicity data were not available for the other 613 (52·8%). Only the combination of fluoxetine plus olanzapine was associated with a higher proportion of participants with a treatment response compared with placebo (risk ratio 1·91 [95% CI 1·27-2·85]), with no differences in terms of safety outcomes compared with placebo. When treatments were grouped by mechanism of action, the combination of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with a second-generation antipsychotic was associated with a higher proportion of treatment responses than was placebo (1·89 [1·17-3·04]), with no differences in terms of safety outcomes. In head-to-head comparisons of active treatments, a significantly higher proportion of participants had a response to amitriptyline plus perphenazine (3·61 [1·23-10·56]) and amoxapine (3·14 [1·01-9·80]) than to perphenazine, and to fluoxetine plus olanzapine compared with olanzapine alone (1·60 [1·09-2·34]). Venlafaxine, venlafaxine plus quetiapine (2·25 [1·09-4·63]), and imipramine (1·95 [1·01-3·79]) were also associated with a higher proportion of treatment responses overall. In head-to-head comparisons grouped by mechanism of action, antipsychotic plus antidepressant combinations consistently outperformed monotherapies from either drug class in terms of the proportion of participants with treatment responses. Heterogeneity was low. No high-risk instances were identified in the bias assessment for our primary outcomes. INTERPRETATION: According to the available evidence, the combination of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a second-generation antipsychotic-and particularly of fluoxetine and olanzapine-could be the optimal treatment choice for psychotic depression. These findings should be taken into account in the development of clinical practice guidelines. However, these conclusions should be interpreted cautiously in view of the low number of included studies and the limitations of these studies. FUNDING: None.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Metaanálisis en Red , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
PCN Rep ; 1(2): e6, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868637

RESUMEN

Psychiatric disorders and related traits have a demonstrated genetic component, with heritability estimated by twin studies generally between 80% and 40%. Their pathogenesis is complex and multi-determined: environmental factors interact with a polygenic architecture, making difficult the development of models able to stratify patients or predict mental health outcomes. Despite this difficult challenge, relevant progress has been made in the field of psychiatric genetics in recent years. This review aims to present the main current methods in psychiatric genetics, their output, limitations, clinical applications, and possible future developments. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) performed in increasingly large samples have led to the identification of replicated genetic loci associated with the risk of major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and mood disorders. Statistical and biological approaches have been developed to improve our understanding of the etiopathogenetic mechanisms behind genome-wide significant associations, as well as for estimating the cumulative effect of risk variants at the individual level and the genetic overlap between different disorders, as pleiotropy is the rule rather than the exception. Clinical applications are available in the pharmacogenetics field. The main issues that remain to be addressed include improving ethnic diversity in genetic studies and the optimization of statistical power through methodological improvements, such as the definition of dimensional phenotypes with specific biological correlates and the integration of different types of omics data.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA