Multidisciplinary care use in neurodegenerative complex diseases: The example of progressive supranuclear palsy and advanced Parkinson's disease in real-life.

BACKGROUND: In spite of being considered the gold-standard of care, little is known about the real-life use of in-home and multidisciplinary care in atypical parkinsonism. OBJECTIVE: Primary: Examine real-life multidisciplinary care use for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Secondary: a) Compare PSP care to advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) care; (b) Explore demographic and clinical variables associated with care needs in both groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study enrolled 129 PSP patients and 65 APD patients (Hoehn and Yahr ≥3), matched for sex and age. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Over the previous year, 40 % of PSP patients did not encounter a physical therapist, while only one-third met a speech and language therapist and 5 % an occupational therapist. More than 20 % received in-home care and 32 % needed home structural changes. Compared to APD, PSP patients required more day-time, night-time and home structural changes. When considering both PSP and APD in multivariate analysis, reduced functional autonomy and living without a family caregiver were both related to day-time home assistance and to the need of at least one home care service. A PSP diagnosis compared to APD was a risk factor for having at least four multidisciplinary visits in a year. Finally, PSP diagnosis and being from the Northern Italy were significantly related with home structural changes. CONCLUSIONS: There's a significant gap in providing multidisciplinary care for PSP patients. Our findings emphasize the need for a shared, integrated care plan at a national level for patients with atypical parkinsonism.

Personality and quality-of-life improvement after apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease.

People with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations can be treated by continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) to reduce their symptoms. Nonetheless, factors are lacking to predict patients' quality-of-life amelioration after CSAI. This pilot study aimed to evaluate associations between personality dimensions and quality-of-life improvement after 6 months of CSAI. Thirty-nine people with Parkinson's disease awaiting CSAI were included. Linear regression models between 'Temperament and Character Inventory' personality dimensions at baseline and percentage of change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 scores after 6 months of CSAI were realized (n = 35). The Temperament and Character Inventory was also compared between patients awaiting CSAI and patients awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus (n = 39 from the PREDI-STIM study). Higher reward dependence scores were associated with a better quality-of-life outcome after 6 months of CSAI, while self-directedness scores were associated with a better quality of life before CSAI (as opposed to harm avoidance, reward dependence and self-transcendence scores associated with a worse quality of life). Moreover, people with Parkinson's disease awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus had similar Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions compared to patients awaiting CSAI. People with Parkinson's disease with higher reward dependence scores at baseline had the best quality-of-life improvement after 6 months of CSAI. This finding could be used to better prepare and accompany people with Parkinson's disease during CSAI establishment. Moreover, this result could serve as an orientation factor to second-line treatments.

Oxycodone or Higher Dose of Levodopa for the Treatment of Parkinsonian Central Pain: OXYDOPA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Among the different types of pain related to Parkinson's disease (PD), parkinsonian central pain (PCP) is the most disabling. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the analgesic efficacy of two therapeutic strategies (opioid with oxycodone- prolonged-release (PR) and higher dose of levodopa/benserazide) compared with placebo in patients with PCP. METHODS: OXYDOPA was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel-group trial run at 15 centers within the French NS-Park network. PD patients with PCP (≥30 on the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) were randomly assigned to receive oxycodone-PR (up to 40 mg/day), levodopa/benserazide (up to 200 mg/day) or matching placebo three times a day (tid) for 8 weeks at a stable dose, in add-on to their current dopaminergic therapy. The primary endpoint was the change in average pain intensity over the previous week rated on VAS from baseline to week-10 based on modified intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: Between May 2016 and August 2020, 66 patients were randomized to oxycodone-PR (n = 23), levodopa/benserazide (n = 20) or placebo (n = 23). The mean change in pain intensity was -17 ± 18.5 on oxycodone-PR, -8.3 ± 11.1 on levodopa/benserazide, and -14.3 ± 18.9 in the placebo groups. The absolute difference versus placebo was -1.54 (97.5% confidence interval [CI], -17.0 to 13.90; P = 0.8) on oxycodone-PR and +7.79 (97.5% CI, -4.99 to 20.58; P = 0.2) on levodopa/benserazide. Similar proportions of patients in each group experienced all-cause adverse events. Those leading to study discontinuation were most frequently observed with oxycodone-PR (39%) than levodopa/benserazide (5%) or placebo (15%). CONCLUSIONS: The present trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of oxycodone-PR or a higher dose of levodopa in patients with PCP, while oxycodone-PR was poorly tolerated. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Advantages and Challenges of Platform Trials for Disease Modifying Therapies in Parkinson's Disease.

Traditional drug development in Parkinson's disease (PD) faces significant challenges because of its protracted timeline and high costs. In response, innovative master protocols are emerging and designed to address multiple research questions within a single overarching protocol. These trials may offer advantages such as increased efficiency, agility in adding new treatment arms, and potential cost savings. However, they also present organizational, methodological, funding, regulatory, and sponsorship challenges. We review the potential of master protocols, focusing on platform trials, for disease modifying therapies in PD. These trials share a common control group and allow for the termination or addition of treatment arms during a trial with non-predetermined end. Specific issues exist for a platform trial in the PD field considering the heterogeneity of patients in terms of phenotype, genotype and staging, the confounding effects of symptomatic treatments, and the choice of outcome measures with no consensus on a non-clinical biomarker to serve as a surrogate and the slowness of PD progression. We illustrate these aspects using the examples of the main PD platform trials currently in development with each one targeting distinct goals, populations, and outcomes. Overall, platform trials hold promise in expediting the evaluation of potential therapies for PD. However, it remains to be proven whether these theoretical benefits will translate into increased production of high-quality trial data. Success also depends on the willingness of pharmaceutical companies to engage in such trials and whether this approach will ultimately hasten the identification and licensing of effective disease-modifying drugs. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Incidence and predictors of postural abnormalities in Parkinson's disease: a PPMI cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Axial postural abnormalities (PA) are invalidating symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Risk factors for PA are unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate PA incidence and risk factors over the first 4-6 years of PD. METHODS: We included 441 PD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort with data at diagnosis and after 4-year follow-up. PA was defined according to a posture item ≥ 2 at the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored-revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) in Off therapeutic condition. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare characteristics of patients without PA ('no-PA'), with PA at disease onset ('baseline-PA'), and PA developed during follow-up ('develop-PA'). To identify predictors of PA development, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed considering demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables. RESULTS: 10.9% of patients showed PA at baseline and 23.7% developed PA within the first 4-6 years since diagnosis. Older age, malignant phenotype, higher MDS-UPDRS part III, Hoehn & Yahr, and dysautonomia (SCOPA-AUT) score, and lower levels of physical activity were predictors of PA development at the univariate analysis. Older age (Hazard ratio [HR] per year: 1.041) and higher MDS-UPDRS part III score (HR per point: 1.035) survived as PA development predictors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: PPMI cohort data show that > 30% of PD patients present PA within the first 4-6 years of disease. Older age at onset and higher motor burden are associated with a higher risk for PA development. The protective role of physical activity merits to be further investigated.

Trial of Lixisenatide in Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of diabetes, has shown neuroprotective properties in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the effect of lixisenatide on the progression of motor disability in persons with Parkinson's disease. Participants in whom Parkinson's disease was diagnosed less than 3 years earlier, who were receiving a stable dose of medications to treat symptoms, and who did not have motor complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to daily subcutaneous lixisenatide or placebo for 12 months, followed by a 2-month washout period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III (range, 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor disability), which was assessed in patients in the on-medication state at 12 months. Secondary end points included other MDS-UPDRS subscores at 6, 12, and 14 months and doses of levodopa equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 156 persons were enrolled, with 78 assigned to each group. MDS-UPDRS part III scores at baseline were approximately 15 in both groups. At 12 months, scores on the MDS-UPDRS part III had changed by -0.04 points (indicating improvement) in the lixisenatide group and 3.04 points (indicating worsening disability) in the placebo group (difference, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.30; P = 0.007). At 14 months, after a 2-month washout period, the mean MDS-UPDRS motor scores in the off-medication state were 17.7 (95% CI, 15.7 to 19.7) with lixisenatide and 20.6 (95% CI, 18.5 to 22.8) with placebo. Other results relative to the secondary end points did not differ substantially between the groups. Nausea occurred in 46% of participants receiving lixisenatide, and vomiting occurred in 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease, lixisenatide therapy resulted in less progression of motor disability than placebo at 12 months in a phase 2 trial but was associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effects and safety of lixisenatide in persons with Parkinson's disease. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and others; LIXIPARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03439943.).

Amantadine use in the French prospective NS-Park cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess amantadine use and associated factors in the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Immediate-release amantadine is approved for the treatment of PD and is largely used in clinical practice to treat "levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LIDs). Its use varies according to countries and PD stages. The prospective NS-Park cohort collects features of PD patients followed by 26 French PD Expert Centres. METHODS: Variables used for the analyses included demographics, motor and non-motor PD symptoms and motor complications [motor fluctuations (MFs), LIDs)], antiparkinsonian pharmacological classes and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We evaluated: (i) prevalence of amantadine use and compared clinical features of amantadine users vs. non-users (cross-sectional analysis); (ii) factors associated with amantadine initiation (longitudinal analysis); (iii) amantadine effect on LIDs, MFs, apathy, impulse control disorders and freezing of gait (Fog) (longitudinal analysis). RESULTS: Amantadine use prevalence was 12.6% (1,585/12,542, median dose = 200 mg). Amantadine users were significantly younger, with longer and more severe PD symptoms, greater LEDD and more frequent use of device-aided/surgical treatment. Factors independently associated with amantadine initiation were younger age, longer PD duration, more frequent LIDs, MFs and FoG, higher LEDD and better cognitive function. 9 of the 658 patients on amantadine had stopped it at the following visit, after 12-18 months (1.3%). New users of amantadine presented a higher improvement in LIDs and MF compared to amantadine never users. CONCLUSIONS: About 12% of PD patients within the French NS-Park cohort used amantadine, mostly those with younger age and more severe PD. Amantadine initiation was associated with a subsequent reduction in LIDs and MFs.

Patient-perceived progression in multiple system atrophy: natural history of quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (Hr-QoL) scales provide crucial information on neurodegenerative disease progression, help improve patient care and constitute a meaningful endpoint for therapeutic research. However, Hr-QoL progression is usually poorly documented, as for multiple system atrophy (MSA), a rare and rapidly progressing alpha-synucleinopathy. This work aimed to describe Hr-QoL progression during the natural course of MSA, explore disparities between patients and identify informative items using a four-step statistical strategy. METHODS: We leveraged the data of the French MSA cohort comprising annual assessments with the MSA-QoL questionnaire for more than 500 patients over up to 11 years. A four-step strategy (1) determined the subdimensions of Hr-QoL, (2) modelled the subdimension trajectories over time, (3) mapped item impairments with disease stages and (4) identified most informative items. RESULTS: Four dimensions were identified. In addition to the original motor, non-motor and emotional domains, an oropharyngeal component was highlighted. While the motor and oropharyngeal domains deteriorated rapidly, the non-motor and emotional aspects were already impaired at cohort entry and deteriorated slowly over the disease course. Impairments were associated with sex, diagnosis subtype and delay since symptom onset. Except for the emotional domain, each dimension was driven by key identified items. CONCLUSION: The multidimensional Hr-QoL deteriorates progressively over the course of MSA and brings essential knowledge for improving patient care. As exemplified with MSA, the thorough description of Hr-QoL over time using the four-step strategy can provide perspectives on neurodegenerative diseases' management to ultimately deliver better support focused on the patient's perspective.

The impact of subthalamic deep-brain stimulation in restoring motor symmetry in Parkinson's disease patients: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of subthalamic deep-brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on motor asymmetry and its influence on both motor and non-motor outcomes remain unclear. The present study aims at assessing the role of STN-DBS on motor asymmetry and how its modulation translates into benefits in motor function, activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Postoperative motor asymmetry has been assessed on the multicentric, prospective Predictive Factors and Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease cohort. Asymmetry was evaluated at both baseline (pre-DBS) and 1 year after STN-DBS. A patient was considered asymmetric when the right-to-left MDS-UPDRS part III difference was ≥ 5. In parallel, analyses have been carried out using the absolute right-to-left difference. The proportion of asymmetric patients at baseline was compared to that in the post-surgery evaluation across different medication/stimulation conditions. RESULTS: 537 PD patients have been included. The proportion of asymmetric patients was significantly reduced after both STN-DBS and medication administration (asymmetric patients: 50% in pre-DBS MedOFF, 35% in MedOFF/StimON, 26% in MedON/StimOFF, and 12% in MedON/StimON state). Older patients at surgery and with higher baseline UPDRS II scores were significantly less likely to benefit from STN-DBS at the level of motor asymmetry. No significant correlation between motor asymmetry and ADLs (UPDRS II) or overall QoL (PDQ-39) score was observed. Asymmetric patients had significantly higher mobility, communication, and daily living PDQ-39 sub-scores. CONCLUSIONS: Both STN-DBS and levodopa lead to a reduction in motor asymmetry. Motor symmetry is associated with improvements in certain QoL sub-scores.

Recent Advances in Clinical Trials in Multiple System Atrophy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes previous and ongoing neuroprotection trials in multiple system atrophy (MSA), a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by parkinsonism, cerebellar, and autonomic dysfunction. It also describes the preclinical therapeutic pipeline and provides some considerations relevant to successfully conducting clinical trials in MSA, i.e., diagnosis, endpoints, and trial design. RECENT FINDINGS: Over 30 compounds have been tested in clinical trials in MSA. While this illustrates a strong treatment pipeline, only two have reached their primary endpoint. Ongoing clinical trials primarily focus on targeting α-synuclein, the neuropathological hallmark of MSA being α-synuclein-bearing glial cytoplasmic inclusions. The mostly negative trial outcomes highlight the importance of better understanding underlying disease mechanisms and improving preclinical models. Together with efforts to refine clinical measurement tools, innovative statistical methods, and developments in biomarker research, this will enhance the design of future neuroprotection trials in MSA and the likelihood of positive outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: An analysis of survival and disability milestones.

BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term survival and incidence of disability milestones after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is limited. OBJECTIVES: To estimate mortality and assess the frequency/time-to-development of disability milestones (falls, freezing, hallucinations, dementia, and institutionalization) among PD patients post STN-DBS. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective study of patients undergoing STN-DBS. For mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. For disease milestones, competing risk analyses were performed and cumulative incidence functions reported. The strength of association between baselines features and event occurrence was calculated based on adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS: The overall mortality for the 109 patients was 16 % (62.1 ± 21.3 months after surgery). Falls (73 %) and freezing (47 %) were both the earliest (40.4 ± 25.4 and 39.6 ± 28.4 months, respectively) and most frequent milestones. Dementia (34 %) and hallucinations (32 %) soon followed (56.2 ± 21.2 and mean 60.0 ± 20.7 months after surgery, respectively). Higher ADL scores in the OFF state and higher age at surgery were associated with falls, freezing, dementia and institutionalization. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality rate is low after STN-DBS. Disease milestones occur later during the disease course, with motor milestones appearing first and at a higher frequency than cognitive ones.

Progressive Brain Atrophy in Multiple System Atrophy: A Longitudinal, Multicenter, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of brain atrophy progression in vivo in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). BACKGROUND: Surrogate biomarkers of disease progression are a major unmet need in MSA. Small-scale longitudinal studies in patients with MSA using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess progression of brain atrophy have produced inconsistent results. In recent years, novel MRI post-processing methods have been developed enabling reliable quantification of brain atrophy in an automated fashion. METHODS: Serial 3D-T1-weighted MRI assessments (baseline and after 1 year of follow-up) of 43 patients with MSA were analyzed and compared to a cohort of early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and healthy controls (HC). FreeSurfer's longitudinal analysis stream was used to determine the brain atrophy rates in an observer-independent fashion. RESULTS: Mean ages at baseline were 64.4 ± 8.3, 60.0 ± 7.5, and 59.8 ± 9.2 years in MSA, PD patients and HC, respectively. A mean disease duration at baseline of 4.1 ± 2.5 years in MSA patients and 2.3 ± 1.4 years in PD patients was observed. Brain regions chiefly affected by MSA pathology showed progressive atrophy with annual rates of atrophy for the cerebellar cortex, cerebellar white matter, pons, and putamen of -4.24 ± 6.8%, -8.22 ± 8.8%, -4.67 ± 4.9%, and - 4.25 ± 4.9%, respectively. Similar to HC, atrophy rates in PD patients were minimal with values of -0.41% ± 1.8%, -1.47% ± 4.1%, -0.04% ± 1.8%, and -1.54% ± 2.2% for cerebellar cortex, cerebellar white matter, pons, and putamen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MSA show significant brain volume loss over 12 months, and cerebellar, pontine, and putaminal volumes were the most sensitive to change in mid-stage disease. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Overview on wearable sensors for the management of Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is affecting about 1.2 million patients in Europe with a prevalence that is expected to have an exponential increment, in the next decades. This epidemiological evolution will be challenged by the low number of neurologists able to deliver expert care for PD. As PD is better recognized, there is an increasing demand from patients for rigorous control of their symptoms and for therapeutic education. In addition, the highly variable nature of symtoms between patients and the fluctuations within the same patient requires innovative tools to help doctors and patients monitor the disease in their usual living environment and adapt treatment in a more relevant way. Nowadays, there are various body-worn sensors (BWS) proposed to monitor parkinsonian clinical features, such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, tremor, bradykinesia, freezing of gait (FoG) or gait disturbances. BWS have been used as add-on tool for patients' management or research purpose. Here, we propose a practical anthology, summarizing the characteristics of the most used BWS for PD patients in Europe, focusing on their role as tools to improve treatment management. Consideration regarding the use of technology to monitor non-motor features is also included. BWS obviously offer new opportunities for improving management strategy in PD but their precise scope of use in daily routine care should be clarified.

UMSARS Versus Laryngoscopy-Based Assessment of Dysphagia.

Background: Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) dysphagia is routinely assessed by the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) part I-item 2. Objective: To compare the UMSARS part I-item 2 with an ear/nose/throat (ENT) expert physician assessment. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of MSA patients who underwent an ENT assessment (nasofibroscopic and radioscopic exam) and an annual UMSARS assessment. Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) and pulmonary/nutrition complications were collected. Results: Seventy-five MSA patients were included. The ENT assessment revealed more severe dysphagia compared to the UMSARS part I-item 2 score (P = 0.003). A higher proportion of patients with impaired protective mechanisms showed severe UMSARS-based dysphagia (P = 0.005). Patients with choking and oral/pharyngeal transit defects and nutritional complications were equally distributed across UMSARS part I-item 2 scores. Worse UMSARS part I-item 2 scores had worse DHI scores. Conclusions: The UMSARS-based assessment of dysphagia does not capture key aspects of pharyngo-laryngeal dysfunction reflecting swallowing efficiency.