Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Span. j. psychol ; 17: e22.1-e22.9, ene.-dic. 2014. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-130531

RESUMEN

The measurement invariance of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) questionnaire was investigated across four samples of non-clinical subjects (N = 222), dermatological patients (N = 458), psychiatric inpatients (N = 156), and patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (N = 101). The results provided evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance across groups. Overall, our findings provide further support to the reliability and validity of the ECR (AU)


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Sexualidad/psicología , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/métodos , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes , Pacientes/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/normas , Salud Mental/tendencias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Epilepsia/psicología
2.
Span J Psychol ; 17: E22, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25012389

RESUMEN

The measurement invariance of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) questionnaire was investigated across four samples of non-clinical subjects (N = 222), dermatological patients (N = 458), psychiatric inpatients (N = 156), and patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (N = 101). The results provided evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance across groups. Overall, our findings provide further support to the reliability and validity of the ECR.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Interpersonales , Psicometría/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Epilepsia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apego a Objetos , Enfermedades de la Piel/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Adulto Joven
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24155770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The literature suggests that dysfunctional parenting and insecure attachment may increase risk of anxiety-related psychopathology. This study aimed at testing the association between anxiety disorders, attachment insecurity and dysfunctional parenting while controlling for factors usually not controlled for in previous studies, such as gender, age, and being ill. METHODS: A sample of 32 non-psychotic inpatients with SCID-I diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, either alone or in comorbidity, was compared with two age- and sex-matched control groups consisting of 32 non-clinical participants and 32 in-patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Study measures included the Experience in Close Relationships questionnaire (ECR) and the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). RESULTS: The patients with anxiety disorders scored significantly higher on attachment-related anxiety and avoidance than patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and non-clinical participants. These findings were independent of comorbidity for mood disorders. ECR scores did not differ among diagnostic subgroups (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, other anxiety disorders). Patients with anxiety disorders scored significantly lower on PBI mother's care and borderline significantly lower on PBI father's care than patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: Although limitations such as the relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional nature suggest caution in interpreting these findings, they are consistent with the few previous adult studies performed on this topic and corroborate Bowlby's seminal hypothesis of a link between negative attachment-related experiences, attachment insecurity, and clinical anxiety. Attachment theory provides a useful theoretical framework for integrating research findings from several fields concerning the development of anxiety disorders and for planning therapeutic interventions.

4.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 124(8): 1536-40, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23583021

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the prognostic value of acute postoperative seizures (APOS) in patients surgically treated for drug-resistant extra-temporal lobe (ET) epilepsy. METHODS: We studied 77 consecutive patients with ET epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery and were followed up for at least 2 years (mean duration of follow-up 6.2 years, range 2-14). Medical charts were reviewed to identify APOS, defined as ictal events with the exception of auras occurring within the first 7 days after surgery. Seizure outcome was determined at annual intervals. Patients who were in Engel Class I at the last contact were classified as having a favourable outcome. RESULTS: Seizure outcome was favourable in 47 patients (61%). The occurrence of APOS and incompleteness of resection were found to be independently associated with unfavourable outcome in a multiple regression model including all preoperative factors identified as outcome predictors in univariate analysis. Duration of illness was the only independent preoperative predictor of APOS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that APOS may predict long-term outcome in patients undergoing resective surgery for ET epilepsy. Given some study limitations, our findings should be regarded as preliminary and need confirmation from future larger, prospective, multicentre studies. SIGNIFICANCE: Caution may be required in the clinical management of patients experiencing APOS.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Epilepsia/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Convulsiones/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Riv Psichiatr ; 47(4): 304-8, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23023080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most depression rating scales are characterized by negatively-phrased questions, exploring the presence of various symptoms. Questions such as those regarding suicidal ideation or painful experiences may reduce accept-ability or even lead the reader to withdraw participation in the study. Although positively-worded items may be useful, it should be acknowledged that without formal testing they cannot be assumed to be equivalent to negatively-worded ones. The aim of the present study was to test the reliability and validity of a depression rating scale including only positively-phrased items. METHODS: Two groups were enrolled in the study: the first comprised 104 adult psychiatric outpatients, the second 88 undergraduate students. All participants completed the depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, and the Positively-phrased Depression Scale (PDS), a 10-item self-report instrument in which the items are phrased in a positive way to reflect the absence of symptoms. Psychiatric outpatients also were rated by their clinician on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the PDS was satisfactory. The correlations between scores on the PDS and on the other depression scales were moderate to high. Mean PDS scores of patients with a diagnosis of depressive disorder were significantly higher than those of patients with other mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations, this study suggests that the PDS a valid and reliable instrument which might prove particularly useful for the assessment of depressive symptoms in studies where issues of acceptability are important, such as studies on non-clinical populations, occupational samples, and patients drawn from non-psychiatric settings.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
6.
Riv Psichiatr ; 47(3): 231-7, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22825439

RESUMEN

Studies have shown that psychological hardiness is an important stress resilience resource for individuals. The 15-items Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) is a short, reliable and valid self-report instrument to measure hardiness that is not available in Italian. The present study was undertaken to create an Italian version of the DRS-15, and evaluate its psychometric properties and validity in the Italian context. An Italian version was produced using multiple independent bilingual translators. This version was administered to a non-clinical sample of adults (N=150), along with measure o psychological well-being (PWB-18) and health. A sub-sample (N = 66) completed the DRS-15 again one month later. Results showed good reliability in terms of internal consistency and test-retest stability. With regard to the subscale, stability was high for all three subscales, whereas two subscales (Commitment and Control) showed marginal internal consistency. DRS-15 total and subscales scores showed a theoretically meaningful pattern of correlations with PWB-18 subscales, supporting the validity of the Italian DRS. Also, multiple regression analysis revealed a correlation between DRS-15 scores and self-rated general health, even after controlling for age and sex. The new Italian DRS-15 provides a valid, reliable and easy to use tool fr assessing stress resilience in clinical and research settings.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Lenguaje , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA