Creatine Kinase MB Isoenzyme Is a Complementary Biomarker in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an invariably fatal neurodegenerative disease with limited therapeutic options. There is an urgent need for novel biomarkers to be used as surrogates for new therapeutic trials and disease monitoring. In this study, we sought to systematically study creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) in a real-world cohort of ALS patients, assess the diagnostic performance, and evaluate its association with other laboratory and clinical parameters. We reviewed data from 194 consecutive patients that included 130 ALS patients and 64 disease control patients (primary lateral sclerosis [PLS], benign fasciculations syndrome [BFS], Huntington's disease [HD] and Alzheimer's disease [AD]). CK-MB was elevated in the sera of more than half of all patients with ALS. In patients with spinal-onset ALS, CK-MB levels were significantly higher than in patients with other neurodegenerative diseases. Patients with slower rates of functional decline had a significantly higher baseline CK-MB. Furthermore, CK-MB elevations correlated with cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and with revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) bulbar subcategory. We posit that measuring CK-MB in ALS patients in a complimentary fashion could potentially aid in the diagnostic workup of ALS and help discriminate the disease from some ALS mimics and other neurodegenerative diseases. CK-MB levels also may provide valuable prognostic information regarding disease aggressiveness as well as correlations with specific phenotypic presentations.

Supervised, Self-Administered Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment in Neurodegenerative Disorders and Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, the prevalence of cognitive impairment is expanding. Given the recent pandemic, there is a need for remote testing modalities to assess cognitive deficits in individuals with neurological disorders. Self-administered, remote, tablet-based cognitive assessments would be clinically valuable if they can detect and classify cognitive deficits as effectively as traditional in-person neuropsychological testing. METHODS: We tested whether the Miro application, a tablet-based neurocognitive platform, measured the same cognitive domains as traditional pencil-and-paper neuropsychological tests. Seventy-nine patients were recruited and then randomized to either undergo pencil-and-paper or tablet testing first. Twenty-nine age-matched healthy controls completed the tablet-based assessments. We identified Pearson correlations between Miro tablet-based modules and corresponding neuropsychological tests in patients and compared scores of patients with neurological disorders with those of healthy controls using t tests. RESULTS: Statistically significant Pearson correlations between the neuropsychological tests and their tablet equivalents were found for all domains with moderate (r > 0.3) or strong (r > 0.7) correlations in 16 of 17 tests (p < 0.05). All tablet-based subtests differentiated healthy controls from neurologically impaired patients by t tests except for the spatial span forward and finger tapping modules. Participants reported enjoyment of the tablet-based testing, denied that it provoked anxiety, and noted no preference between modalities. CONCLUSIONS: This tablet-based application was found to be widely acceptable to participants. This study supports the validity of these tablet-based assessments in the differentiation of healthy controls from patients with neurocognitive deficits in a variety of cognitive domains and across multiple neurological disease etiologies.

Validation of a Mobile, Sensor-based Neurobehavioral Assessment With Digital Signal Processing and Machine-learning Analytics.

BACKGROUND: The Miro Health Mobile Assessment Platform consists of self-administered neurobehavioral and cognitive assessments that measure behaviors typically measured by specialized clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Miro Health Mobile Assessment Platform's concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) classification performance. METHOD: Sixty study participants were evaluated with Miro Health version V.2. Healthy controls (HC), amnestic MCI (aMCI), and nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) ages 64-85 were evaluated with version V.3. Additional participants were recruited at Johns Hopkins Hospital to represent clinic patients, with wider ranges of age and diagnosis. In all, 90 HC, 21 aMCI, 17 naMCI, and 15 other cases were evaluated with V.3. Concurrent validity of the Miro Health variables and legacy neuropsychological test scores was assessed with Spearman correlations. Reliability was quantified with the scores' intraclass correlations. A machine-learning algorithm combined Miro Health variable scores into a Risk score to differentiate HC from MCI or MCI subtypes. RESULTS: In HC, correlations of Miro Health variables with legacy test scores ranged 0.27-0.68. Test-retest reliabilities ranged 0.25-0.79, with minimal learning effects. The Risk score differentiated individuals with aMCI from HC with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0.97; naMCI from HC with an AUROC of 0.80; combined MCI from HC with an AUROC of 0.89; and aMCI from naMCI with an AUROC of 0.83. CONCLUSION: The Miro Health Mobile Assessment Platform provides valid and reliable assessment of neurobehavioral and cognitive status, effectively distinguishes between HC and MCI, and differentiates aMCI from naMCI.

Is Aphasia Treatment Beneficial for the Elderly? A Review of Recent Evidence.

PURPOSE: We review recent literature regarding aphasia therapy in the elderly. Relevant articles from the last 5 years were identified to determine whether or not there is evidence to support that various therapeutic approaches can have a positive effect on post-stroke aphasia in the elderly. RECENT FINDINGS: There were no studies examining the effects of aphasia therapy specifically in the elderly within the timeframe searched. Therefore, we briefly summarize findings from 50 relevant studies that included large proportions of participants with post-stroke aphasia above the age of 65. A variety of behavioral and neuromodulation therapies are reported. SUMMARY: We found ample evidence suggesting that a variety of behavioral and neuromodulatory therapeutic approaches can benefit elderly individuals with post-stroke aphasia.