RESUMEN
Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (MPL) is an extremely rare adipocytic tumor, recently recognized as a distinct entity in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors. Predominantly found in the mediastinum of young women, MPLs exhibit a combination of histological features characteristic of myxoid liposarcoma and pleomorphic (lipo)sarcoma. Their unique molecular features distinguish MPLs from other liposarcomas. Unlike myxoid liposarcomas and well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas, MPLs lack specific FUS/EWSR1::DDIT3 gene fusions and MDM2/CDK4 gene amplifications, respectively. MPLs are associated with complex karyotypes, further highlighting their distinct genetic profile. They demonstrate aggressive growth patterns, high recurrence rates, and a high tendency to metastasize. These factors contribute to a poor prognosis, with a median survival of approximately 22.6 months. The aim of this review article is to provide a comprehensive summary of previously documented case reports and studies related to MPLs. By shedding light on the intricate details of MPLs, researchers and clinicians can gain valuable insights that may pave the way for improvements in diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes in the future.
RESUMEN
Objectives: Diverse cases of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) in the lung (pleural, endobronchial, and parenchymal) are presented while discussing the (preoperative) diagnostic challenges and treatment modalities. Other objectives include emphasizing the significance of gene rearrangements and highlighting the multidisciplinary approach in addressing IMTs. Methods: Four cases of IMT in the lung are presented, including a young adolescent girl with an ETV6-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase 3 (NTRK3) gene rearrangement, a 5-year-old boy with challenging preoperative diagnosis, and 2 middle-aged women with respectively pleural and endobronchial tumors with one peribronchial relapse. Results: The cases demonstrate the diverse clinical presentations and diagnostic complexities associated with IMT in the lung. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality, with complete resection leading to a cure in most patients. Unfortunately, aggressive relapse can occur, as in our last case of an endobronchial tumor. Frozen section may confirm the presence of malignant cells perioperatively and impact further treatment. The presence of gene rearrangements, such as ETV6-NTRK3, suggests potential therapeutic implications. Conclusions: Early detection and complete surgical removal of IMT are crucial for effective treatment. Identifying gene rearrangements such as ETV6-NTRK3 holds promise for targeted therapies. Diagnostic challenges, including the controversy of biopsies and preoperative evaluations, underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Anatomopathological recognition of IMT stays demanding. Close surveillance is necessary due to potential relapse, whereas frozen section perioperatively can help further treatment. This case series emphasizes the diagnostic challenges and therapeutic considerations for IMT in the lung.
RESUMEN
AIMS: PRRX1-rearranged mesenchymal tumours are a recently identified and rare subgroup of soft tissue neoplasms with distinct morphological features and genetic alterations. This study aims to further investigate the immunohistochemical profile and underlying genetic alterations in these tumours in order to get more insight on their underlying biology and the unique profile of these tumours. METHODS: Two new molecular confirmed cases of PRRX1-rearranged mesenchymal tumours were thoroughly studied with immunohistochemical stainings (RB1, CD34, ALK and pan-TRK), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) RB1/13q12 and RNA-based next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Both cases exhibited typical morphological and molecular features, confirming the diagnosis of PRRX1-rearranged mesenchymal tumours. Immunohistochemistry revealed RB1 loss in both cases, which was subsequently confirmed through FISH analysis. Additionally, one case showed focal positivity for CD34, ALK and pan-TRK on immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: We identified loss of RB1 in two cases of PRRX1-rearranged mesenchymal tumours. This could suggest a potential association with RB1-deficient soft tissue tumours, although further research is necessary. Furthermore, the finding of focal positivity for CD34, ALK and pan-TRK on immunohistochemistry enriches the immunohistochemical profile of these tumours.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of BRAF/MEK inhibitors has significantly improved overall survival of patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Most patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors will experience adverse events during the course of their treatment. Kidney impairment, however, was rarely reported in the pivotal trials. To date, there are only three cases of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis associated with dabrafenib and trametinib reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic melanoma was hospitalized in August 2021, 5 months after treatment initiation with dabrafenib and trametinib. He presented with acute kidney injury, with serum creatinine of 3.34 mg/dL and eGFR of 20.3 mL/min/m². Kidney biopsy revealed acute interstitial nephritis. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: He was treated with methylprednisolone 16 mg qd, and both dabrafenib and trametinib were permanently discontinued, with recuperation of his kidney function. Another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination, encorafenib and binimetinib, was introduced, with preserved kidney function and excellent disease control. DISCUSSION: We report the first case of biopsy-proven interstitial nephritis in a patient treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, with successful introduction of another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination. Although rare, clinicians should be aware of the risk of renal adverse events associated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Renal biopsy is mandatory in the absence of a clear explanation or rapid recovery of renal failure. In case of proven interstitial nephritis, corticosteroids should be initiated. Switching to another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination can be considered for patients with complete recovery of renal function and limited treatment options.
