The landscape of global research on diabetic neuropathy.

Introduction: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a prevalent and debilitating complication of diabetes, imposing a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the global research landscape in DN, aiming to provide scientists, funders, and decision-makers with valuable insights into the current state of research and future directions. Methods: Through a systematic review of published articles, key trends in DN research, including epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and gaps in knowledge, are identified and discussed. Results: The analysis reveals an increasing prevalence of DN alongside the rising incidence of diabetes, emphasizing the urgent need for effective prevention and management strategies. Furthermore, the study highlights the geographical imbalance in research activity, with a majority of studies originating from high-income countries. Discussion: This study underscores the importance of fostering international collaboration to address the global impact of DN. Key challenges and limitations in DN research are also discussed, including the need for standardized diagnostic criteria, reliable biomarkers, and innovative treatment approaches. By addressing these gaps, promoting collaboration, and increasing research funding, we can pave the way for advancements in DN research and ultimately improve the lives of individuals affected by this debilitating condition.

Reversing painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy with the capsaicin 8% patch: Clinical evidence for pain relief and restoration of function via nerve fiber regeneration.

Introduction: Current oral treatments for pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) do not affect the progression of DPN i.e., "disease modification." We assessed whether Capsaicin 8% patch treatment can provide pain relief and also restore nerve density and function via nerve regeneration, in both painful (PDPN) and non-painful (NPDPN) diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods: 50 participants with PDPN were randomized to receive Capsaicin 8% patch Qutenza with Standard of Care (SOC) (PDPN Q+SOC group), or SOC alone (PDPN SOC group). Pain symptoms were assessed with a diary (Numerical Pain Rating Scale, NRPS) and questionnaires. Investigations included quantitative sensory testing (QST) and distal calf skin biopsies, at baseline and 3 months after baseline visit; subsequent options were 3-monthly visits over 1 year. 25 participants with NPDPN had tests at baseline, and 3 months after all received Capsaicin 8% patch treatment. Results: At 3 months after baseline, PDPN Q+SOC group had reduction in NPRS score (p = 0.0001), but not PDPN SOC group. Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) showed significant reductions in scores for overall and other pain descriptors only in the PDPN Q+SOC group. Warm perception thresholds were significantly improved only in the PDPN Q+SOC group (p = 0.02), and correlated with reduction in SF-MPQ overall pain score (p = 0.04). NPDPN Q+SOC group did not report pain during the entire study. Density of intra-epidermal nerve fibers (IENF) with PGP9.5 was increased at 3 months in PDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.0002) and NPDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.002) groups, but not in the PDPN SOC group. Increased sub-epidermal nerve fibers (SENF) were observed with GAP43 (marker of regenerating nerve fibers) only in PDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.003) and NPDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.0005) groups. Pain relief in the PDPN Q+SOC group was correlated with the increased PGP9.5 IENF (p = 0.0008) and GAP43 (p = 0.004), whereas those with lack of pain relief showed no such increase; in some subjects pain relief and increased nerve fibers persisted over months. PGP9.5 IENF increase correlated with axon-reflex vasodilatation in a NPDPN Q+SOC subset (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Capsaicin 8% patch can provide pain relief via nerve regeneration and restoration of function in DPN (disease modification). It may thereby potentially prevent diabetic foot complications, including ulcers.

Neurodegeneration of the cornea and retina in patients with type 1 diabetes without clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy.

Aim: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is widely considered the earliest and most common microvascular complication of diabetes. However, recent studies have shown that retinal nerve fiber layer and corneal nerve abnormalities may be present in diabetic patients without retinopathy. This preliminary study aimed to establish if structural and functional changes in the nerve fiber layer of the retina and cornea occur in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) without retinopathy. Methods: Twenty patients with T1DM, without clinical evidence of retinopathy (Age: 47.0 ± 2.5 years; Duration diabetes: 27.0 ± 3 years) and 15 age-matched healthy control subjects underwent detailed medical neurological examinations. Ophthalmic examinations using Spectral Domain Optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP), Flicker Defined Form High Edge Perimetry (FDF), Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) and Non-contact corneal Aesthesiometry (NCCA) were performed to quantify the structure and function of the nerves in the retina and cornea, respectively. Results: At the structural level, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) was significantly reduced in the superior nasal (p=0.001) and inferior temporal (p=0.004) sectors, in diabetic patients. Retinal ganglion layer function was reduced in the patient group when assessed using Flicker Defined Form Perimetry (FDF), but this was not significant. The function of the cornea assessed by corneal sensitivity, using a non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA), was significantly reduced (p=0.001). Structural assessment of corneal nerves using corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) showed reduction at corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) (p=0.01), branch density (CNBD) (p=0.006) and length (CNFL) (p=0.01) in patients with diabetes. Compared to control subjects, the percentage of abnormality in patients with T1DM for RNFL was 32% while the FDF was abnormal in 61% of patients. Corneal abnormality was observed in 47% for NCCA, 28% for CNFD, and 17% for CNFL. There was no correlation between neuronal damage in the retina and cornea. Conclusions: Neuronal abnormalities were observed in both the retina and cornea of diabetic patients without evidence of retinopathy. The prevalence of structural and functional changes was higher in the retina compared to the cornea. This preliminary study suggests that structural neuronal changes may occur in parallel and correlate with functional changes. The assessment of corneal and retinal nerve structure may be clinically useful for detecting and monitoring the earliest stages of diabetic microvascular abnormalities.

Implementation of corneal confocal microscopy for screening and early detection of diabetic neuropathy in primary care alongside retinopathy screening: Results from a feasibility study.

Objective: Screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is essential for early detection and timely intervention. Quantitative assessment of small nerve fiber damage is key to the early diagnosis and assessment of its progression. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a non-invasive, in-vivo diagnostic technique that provides an accurate surrogate biomarker for small-fiber neuropathy. In this novel study for the first time, we introduced CCM to primary care as a screening tool for DPN alongside retinopathy screening to assess the level of neuropathy in this novel cohort. Research design and methods: 450 consecutive subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending for annual eye screening in primary care optometry settings underwent assessment with CCM to establish the prevalence of sub-clinical diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Subjects underwent assessment for neurological and ocular symptoms of diabetes and a history of diabetic foot disease, neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Results: CCM examination was completed successfully in 427 (94.9%) subjects, 22% of whom had neuropathy according to Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score. The prevalence of sub-clinical neuropathy as defined by abnormal corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) was 12.9%. In the subjects with a short duration of type 2 diabetes, 9.2% had abnormal CNFL. CCM showed significant abnormalities in corneal nerve parameters in this cohort of subjects with reduction of corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD, p<0.001), CNFL (p<0.001) and corneal nerve branch density (CNBD, p<0.001) compared to healthy subjects. In subjects who had no evidence of DR (67% of all subjects), 12.0% had abnormal CNFL. Conclusions: CCM may be a sensitive biomarker for early detection and screening of DPN in primary care alongside retinopathy screening.

Ophthalmic Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by neuronal loss, extracellular amyloid-ß (Aß) plaques, and intracellular neurofibrillary tau tangles. A diagnosis is currently made from the presenting symptoms, and the only definitive diagnosis can be done post-mortem. Over recent years, significant advances have been made in using ocular biomarkers to diagnose various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. As the eye is an extension of the central nervous system (CNS), reviewing changes in the eye's biology could lead to developing a series of non-invasive, differential diagnostic tests for AD that could be further applied to other diseases. Significant changes have been identified in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), cornea, ocular vasculature, and retina. In the present paper, we review current research and assess some ocular biomarkers' accuracy and reliability that could potentially be used for diagnostic purposes. Additionally, we review the various imaging techniques used in the measurement of these biomarkers.

Advances in Screening, Early Diagnosis and Accurate Staging of Diabetic Neuropathy.

The incidence of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is among the most distressing and costly of all the chronic complications of diabetes and is a cause of significant disability and poor quality of life. This incurs a significant burden on health care costs and society, especially as these young people enter their peak working and earning capacity at the time when diabetes-related complications most often first occur. DPN is often asymptomatic during the early stages; however, once symptoms and overt deficits have developed, it cannot be reversed. Therefore, early diagnosis and timely intervention are essential to prevent the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy. The diagnosis of DPN, the determination of the global prevalence, and incidence rates of DPN remain challenging. The opinions vary about the effectiveness of the expansion of screenings to enable early diagnosis and treatment initiation before disease onset and progression. Although research has evolved over the years, DPN still represents an enormous burden for clinicians and health systems worldwide due to its difficult diagnosis, high costs related to treatment, and the multidisciplinary approach required for effective management. Therefore, there is an unmet need for reliable surrogate biomarkers to monitor the onset and progression of early neuropathic changes in DPN and facilitate drug discovery. In this review paper, the aim was to assess the currently available tests for DPN's sensitivity and performance.

Explanations for less small fibre neuropathy in South Asian versus European subjects with type 2 diabetes in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Low foot ulcer risk in South Asian, compared with European, people with type 2 diabetes in the UK has been attributed to their lower levels of neuropathy. We have undertaken a detailed study of corneal nerve morphology and neuropathy risk factors, to establish the basis of preserved small nerve fibre function in South Asians versus Europeans. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, population-based study, age- and sex-matched South Asians (n = 77) and Europeans (n = 78) with type 2 diabetes underwent neuropathy assessment using corneal confocal microscopy, symptoms, signs, quantitative sensory testing, electrophysiology and autonomic function testing. Multivariable linear regression analyses determined factors accounting for ethnic differences in small fibre damage. RESULTS: Corneal nerve fibre length (22.0 ± 7.9 vs. 19.3 ± 6.3 mm/mm2 ; P = 0.037), corneal nerve branch density (geometric mean (range): 60.0 (4.7-246.2) vs. 46.0 (3.1-129.2) no./mm2 ; P = 0.021) and heart rate variability (geometric mean (range): 7.9 (1.4-27.7) vs. 6.5 (1.5-22.0); P = 0.044), were significantly higher in South Asians vs. Europeans. All other neuropathy measures did not differ, except for better sural nerve amplitude in South Asians (geometric mean (range): 10.0 (1.3-43.0) vs. 7.2 (1.0-30.0); P = 0.006). Variables with the greatest impact on attenuating the P value for age- and HbA1C -adjusted ethnic difference in corneal nerve fibre length (P = 0.032) were pack-years smoked (P = 0.13), BMI (P = 0.062) and triglyceride levels (P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: South Asians have better preserved small nerve fibre integrity than equivalent Europeans; furthermore, classic, modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease are the main contributors to these ethnic differences. We suggest that improved autonomic neurogenic control of cutaneous blood flow in Asians may contribute to their protection against foot ulcers.

Greater corneal nerve loss at the inferior whorl is related to the presence of diabetic neuropathy and painful diabetic neuropathy.

We assessed whether a measure of more distal corneal nerve fibre loss at the inferior whorl(IW) region is better than proximal measures of central corneal nerve damage in relation to the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy(DPN), painful DPN and quality of life(QoL). Participants underwent detailed assessment of neuropathy, QoL using the SF36 questionnaire, pain visual analogue score(VAS), and corneal confocal microscopy(CCM). Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), branch density (CNBD) and length (CNFL) at the central cornea and inferior whorl length (IWL) and average(ANFL) and total(TNFL) nerve fibre length were compared in patients with and without DPN and between patients with and without painful DPN and in relation to QoL. All CCM parameters were significantly reduced, but IWL was reduced ~three-fold greater than CNFL in patients with and without DPN compared to controls. IWL(p = 0.001), ANFL(p = 0.01) and TNFL(p = 0.02) were significantly lower in patients with painful compared to painless DPN. The VAS score correlated with IWL(r = -0.36, P = 0.004), ANFL(r = -0.32, P = 0.01) and TNFL(r = -0.32, P = 0.01) and QoL correlated with CNFL(r = 0.35, P = 0.01) and IWL(r = 0.4, P = 0.004). Corneal nerve fibre damage is more prominent at the IW, lower in patients with painful compared to painless neuropathy and relates to their QoL. IWL may provide additional clinical utility for CCM in patients with DPN.

Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). RESULTS: Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.

Small-fibre neuropathy in men with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to identify the contribution of small- and large-fibre neuropathy to erectile dysfunction in men with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 70 participants (29 without and 41 with erectile dysfunction) with type 1 diabetes and 34 age-matched control participants underwent a comprehensive assessment of large- and small-fibre neuropathy. RESULTS: The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in participants with type 1 diabetes was 58.6%. After adjusting for age, participants with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction had a significantly higher score on the Neuropathy Symptom Profile (mean ± SEM 5.3 ± 0.9 vs 1.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.03), a higher vibration perception threshold (18.3 ± 1.9 vs 10.7 ± 2.4 V, p = 0.02), and a lower sural nerve amplitude (5.0 ± 1.1 vs 11.7 ± 1.5 mV, p = 0.002), peroneal nerve amplitude (2.1 ± 0.4 vs 4.7 ± 0.5 mV, p < 0.001) and peroneal nerve conduction velocity (34.8 ± 1.5 vs 41.9 ± 2.0 m/s, p = 0.01) compared with those without erectile dysfunction. There was also evidence of a marked small-fibre neuropathy with an impaired cold threshold (19.7 ± 1.4°C vs 27.3 ± 1.8°C, p = 0.003), warm threshold (42.9 ± 0.8°C vs 39.0 ± 0.9°C, p = 0.005) and heart rate variability (21.5 ± 3.1 vs 30.0 ± 3.7 beats/min, p = 0.001) and reduced intraepidermal nerve fibre density (2.8 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.7/mm, p = 0.008), corneal nerve fibre density (12.6 ± 1.5 vs 23.9 ± 2.0/mm2, p < 0.001), corneal nerve branch density (12.7 ± 2.5 vs 31.6 ± 3.3/mm2, p < 0.001) and corneal nerve fibre length (8.3 ± 0.7 vs 14.5 ± 1.0 mm/mm2, p < 0.001) in participants with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction correlated significantly with measures of both large- and small-fibre neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Small-fibre neuropathy is prominent in patients with type 1 diabetes, and is associated with erectile dysfunction and can be objectively quantified using corneal confocal microscopy. This may allow the identification of patients who are less likely to respond to conventional therapies such as phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

Spinal Disinhibition in Experimental and Clinical Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Impaired rate-dependent depression (RDD) of the Hoffman reflex is associated with reduced dorsal spinal cord potassium chloride cotransporter expression and impaired spinal γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function, indicative of spinal inhibitory dysfunction. We have investigated the pathogenesis of impaired RDD in diabetic rodents exhibiting features of painful neuropathy and the translational potential of this marker of spinal inhibitory dysfunction in human painful diabetic neuropathy. Impaired RDD and allodynia were present in type 1 and type 2 diabetic rats but not in rats with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin supplementation that did not restore normoglycemia. Impaired RDD in diabetic rats was rapidly normalized by spinal delivery of duloxetine acting via 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A receptors and temporally coincident with the alleviation of allodynia. Deficits in RDD and corneal nerve density were demonstrated in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy compared with healthy control subjects and patients with painless diabetic neuropathy. Spinal inhibitory dysfunction and peripheral small fiber pathology may contribute to the clinical phenotype in painful diabetic neuropathy. Deficits in RDD may help identify patients with spinally mediated painful diabetic neuropathy who may respond optimally to therapies such as duloxetine.

COL6A5 variants in familial neuropathic chronic itch.

Itch is thought to represent the peculiar response to stimuli conveyed by somatosensory pathways shared with pain through the activation of specific neurons and receptors. It can occur in association with dermatological, systemic and neurological diseases, or be the side effect of certain drugs. However, some patients suffer from chronic idiopathic itch that is frequently ascribed to psychological distress and for which no biomarker is available to date. We investigated three multigenerational families, one of which diagnosed with joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type (JHS/EDS-HT), characterized by idiopathic chronic itch with predominantly proximal distribution. Skin biopsy was performed in all eight affected members and revealed in six of them reduced intraepidermal nerve fibre density consistent with small fibre neuropathy. Whole exome sequencing identified two COL6A5 rare variants co-segregating with chronic itch in eight affected members and absent in non-affected members, and in one unrelated sporadic patient with type 1 painless diabetic neuropathy and chronic itch. Two families and the diabetic patient carried the nonsense c.6814G>T (p.Glu2272*) variant and another family carried the missense c.6486G>C (p.Arg2162Ser) variant. Both variants were predicted as likely pathogenic by in silico analyses. The two variants were rare (minor allele frequency < 0.1%) in 6271 healthy controls and absent in 77 small fibre neuropathy and 167 JHS/EDS-HT patients without itch. Null-allele test on cDNA from patients' fibroblasts of both families carrying the nonsense variant demonstrated functional haploinsufficiency due to activation of nonsense mediated RNA decay. Immunofluorescence microscopy and western blotting revealed marked disorganization and reduced COL6A5 synthesis, respectively. Indirect immunofluorescence showed reduced COL6A5 expression in the skin of patients carrying the nonsense variant. Treatment with gabapentinoids provided satisfactory itch relief in the patients carrying the mutations. Our findings first revealed an association between COL6A5 gene and familiar chronic itch, suggesting a new contributor to the pathogenesis of neuropathic itch and identifying a new candidate therapeutic target.

NerveCheck for the Detection of Sensory Loss and Neuropathic Pain in Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Accurate and economic detection of nerve damage in diabetes is key to more widespread diagnosis of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and painful diabetic neuropathy. This study examined the diagnostic performance of NerveCheck, an inexpensive ($500) quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. METHODS: One hundred forty-four subjects (74 with and 70 without diabetes) underwent assessment with NerveCheck, neuropathy disability score (NDS), nerve conduction studies (NCS), intraepidermal and corneal nerve fiber density (IENFD and CNFD), and McGill questionnaire for neuropathic pain. RESULTS: Of the 74 subjects with diabetes, 41 were diagnosed with DPN based on the NDS. The NerveCheck scores for vibration perception threshold (VPT), cold perception threshold (CPT), and warm perception threshold (WPT) were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.0001) in diabetic patients with DPN compared to patients without DPN. The diagnostic accuracy of VPT was high with reference to NCS (area under the curve [AUC]: 82%-84%) and moderate for IENFD, CNFD, and neuropathic pain (AUC: 60%-76%). The diagnostic accuracy of CPT and WPT was moderate with reference to NCS, IENFD, and CNFD (AUC: 69%-78%) and low for neuropathic pain (AUC: 63%-65%). CONCLUSIONS: NerveCheck is a low-cost QST device with good diagnostic utility for identifying sensory deficits, comparable to established tests of large and small fiber neuropathy and for the severity of neuropathic pain.

Corneal Confocal Microscopy Detects Small Fibre Neuropathy in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer and Nerve Regeneration in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

There are multiple neurological complications of cancer and its treatment. This study assessed the utility of the novel non-invasive ophthalmic technique of corneal confocal microscopy in identifying neuropathy in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer before and after platinum based chemotherapy. In this study, 21 subjects with upper gastrointestinal (oesophageal or gastric) cancer and 21 healthy control subjects underwent assessment of neuropathy using the neuropathy disability score, quantitative sensory testing for vibration perception threshold, warm and cold sensation thresholds, cold and heat induced pain thresholds, nerve conduction studies and corneal confocal microscopy. Patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer had higher heat induced pain (P = 0.04) and warm sensation (P = 0.03) thresholds with a significantly reduced sural sensory (P<0.01) and peroneal motor (P<0.01) nerve conduction velocity, corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), nerve branch density (CNBD) and nerve fibre length (CNFL) (P<0.0001). Furthermore, CNFD correlated significantly with the time from presentation with symptoms to commencing chemotherapy (r = -0.54, P = 0.02), and CNFL (r = -0.8, P<0.0001) and CNBD (r = 0.63, P = 0.003) were related to the severity of lymph node involvement. After the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy, there was no change in any measure of neuropathy, except for a significant increase in CNFL (P = 0.003). Corneal confocal microscopy detects a small fibre neuropathy in this cohort of patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer, which was related to disease severity. Furthermore, the increase in CNFL after the chemotherapy may indicate nerve regeneration.

Automated Quantification of Neuropad Improves Its Diagnostic Ability in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy.

Neuropad is currently a categorical visual screening test that identifies diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. The diagnostic performance of Neuropad was compared between the categorical and continuous (image-analysis (Sudometrics)) outputs to diagnose diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). 110 subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes underwent assessment with Neuropad, Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV), sural nerve action potential (SNAP), Deep Breathing-Heart Rate Variability (DB-HRV), intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD), and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). 46/110 patients had DPN according to the Toronto consensus. The continuous output displayed high sensitivity and specificity for DB-HRV (91%, 83%), CNFD (88%, 78%), and SNAP (88%, 83%), whereas the categorical output showed high sensitivity but low specificity. The optimal cut-off points were 90% for the detection of autonomic dysfunction (DB-HRV) and 80% for small fibre neuropathy (CNFD). The diagnostic efficacy of the continuous Neuropad output for abnormal DB-HRV (AUC: 91%, P = 0.0003) and CNFD (AUC: 82%, P = 0.01) was better than for PMNCV (AUC: 60%). The categorical output showed no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy for these same measures. An image analysis algorithm generating a continuous output (Sudometrics) improved the diagnostic ability of Neuropad, particularly in detecting autonomic and small fibre neuropathy.

Corneal Confocal Microscopy Identifies Small-Fiber Neuropathy in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance Who Develop Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) through to type 2 diabetes is thought to confer a continuum of risk for neuropathy. Identification of subjects at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and, hence, worsening neuropathy would allow identification and risk stratification for more aggressive management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty subjects with IGT and 17 age-matched control subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test, assessment of neuropathic symptoms and deficits, quantitative sensory testing, neurophysiology, skin biopsy, and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), branch density (CNBD), and fiber length (CNFL) at baseline and annually for 3 years. RESULTS: Ten subjects who developed type 2 diabetes had a significantly lower CNFD (P = 0.003), CNBD (P = 0.04), and CNFL (P = 0.04) compared with control subjects at baseline and a further reduction in CNFL (P = 0.006), intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (P = 0.02), and mean dendritic length (MDL) (P = 0.02) over 3 years. Fifteen subjects who remained IGT and 5 subjects who returned to normal glucose tolerance had no significant baseline abnormality on CCM or IENFD but had a lower MDL (P < 0.0001) compared with control subjects. The IGT subjects showed a significant decrease in IENFD (P = 0.02) but no change in MDL or CCM over 3 years. Those who returned to NGT showed an increase in CNFD (P = 0.05), CNBD (P = 0.04), and CNFL (P = 0.05), but a decrease in IENFD (P = 0.02), over 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: CCM and skin biopsy detect a small-fiber neuropathy in subjects with IGT who develop type 2 diabetes and also show a dynamic worsening or improvement in corneal and intraepidermal nerve morphology in relation to change in glucose tolerance status.

Corneal confocal microscopy detects neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes without retinopathy or microalbuminuria.

OBJECTIVE: Corneal innervation is increasingly used as a surrogate marker of human diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) however its temporal relationship with the other microvascular complications of diabetes is not fully established. In this cross-sectional, observational study we aimed to assess whether neuropathy occurred in patients with type 1 diabetes, without retinopathy or microalbuminuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants underwent detailed assessment of peripheral neuropathy [neuropathy disability score (NDS), vibration perception threshold (VPT), peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV), sural sensory nerve conduction velocity (SSNCV) and in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM)], retinopathy (digital fundus photography) and albuminuria status [albumin: creatinine ratio (ACR)]. RESULTS: 53 patients with Type 1 diabetes with (n=37) and without retinopathy (n=16) were compared to control subjects (n=27). SSNCV, corneal nerve fibre (CNFD) and branch (CNBD) density and length (CNFL) were reduced significantly (p<0.001) in diabetic patients without retinopathy compared to control subjects. Furthermore, CNFD, CNBD and CNFL were also significantly (p<0.001) reduced in diabetic patients without microalbuminuria (n=39), compared to control subjects. Greater neuropathic severity was associated with established retinopathy and microalbuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: IVCCM detects early small fibre damage in the absence of retinopathy or microalbuminuria in patients with Type 1 diabetes.