Equal but Separate: The Slow Assimilation of Osteopathic Surgery Residents Two Years After the Unified Match.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to monitor the integration of general surgery residency programs before and after the 2020 unified match. We hypothesized that integration of osteopathic (DO) surgery residents would increase. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgery residency programs between 2019 and 2021 utilizing data provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Program composition (2021) and changes in composition (2019-2021) were compared by program type. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed variables associated with DO presence (2021) and integration (2019-2021). SETTING: General surgery residency programs across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Civilian surgery residencies that completed the 2019-2021 program survey. RESULTS: Out of 320 programs, DO residents were integrated at 69% (221/320), including 52% (63/122) university programs, 78% (101/129) university-affiliated programs and 83% (57/69) community programs (p < 0.01). Overall, 23 (8%) programs integrated DO residents from 2019 to 2021, and 9 (21%) ex-American Osteopathic Association programs integrated MD residents (both p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents was 1 (interquartile range, IQR 0-2) at university programs, 2 (IQR 1-7) at university-affiliated programs, and 5 (IQR 2-12) at community programs (p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents at all programs increased from 1 (IQR 0-5) to 2 (IQR 0-6) since 2019 (p < 0.01). Community (OR 2.6, p = 0.04), university-affiliated (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and programs with DOs in 2019 (OR 19.0, p < 0.01) were associated with increased odds of DOs present in 2021, while DO faculty (OR 2.6, p = 0.02) was the only factor independently associated with integrating DOs after 2019. CONCLUSIONS: While some programs have integrated DO residents, progress is slow, median numbers of DO residents remain low, and familiarity with DOs is most associated with integration. We explore barriers to integration, and advance recommendations to eliminate potential disparities.

On the Eve of Integration: Community and Affiliated Residency Programs Pave the Way Towards the Assimilation of Osteopathic Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: The 2020 match integrated former osteopathic and allopathic residency programs under single Graduate Medical Education accreditation. We describe the composition of general surgery residency programs prior to the 2020 integration and provide a baseline to monitor future progress. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional data provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges for the 2018 academic year were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize the characteristics of residents by program type and program location. Logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with the presence of osteopathic (DO) residents. An alpha of 0.05 defined statistical significance. SETTING: Data were collected and analyzed at a United States osteopathic medical school. PARTICIPANTS: All civilian surgery residencies that approved the 2018 Program Survey. RESULTS: Out of 285 programs, the percentages with at least one DO resident were significantly different among university (44.0%), university-affiliated (62.7%) and community (78.4%) programs (p < 0.001). DO residents made up 41.4% of community residents, 13.3% of university-affiliated residents, and 2.8% of university residents (p < 0.001). A significant regional difference was observed, as DO residents made up 16.9% of residents in the central region, compared to 10.4% in the northeast, 7.0% in the south and 8.9% in the west (p = 0.004). The logistic regression analysis found that the presence of DO residents at a program was significantly related to the type of program (Affiliated vs University OR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.5; Community vs University OR = 5.2, 95% CI 1.9-14.4) and the presence of DO faculty (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.8) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant differences in the presence of DO residents in different program types. As surgical education transitions to single accreditation, this study identifies opportunities for greater integration between osteopathic and allopathic surgery training programs.

Broad Needs Assessment of Pain Education in Graduate Medical Education.

This article describes a survey-based study of graduate medical residents and fellows in an integrated health system. The study explores pain curricula, learner perspectives about pain education, and learner knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Results indicate that pain education in the graduate medical setting is inadequate to meet learner needs.

Multi-institutional Surgical Education Interventions: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify and evaluate scholarship in multi-institutional interventional surgical education trials. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Most research on interventions in surgical education occurs at individual institutions. These studies typically involve a small number of learners in a unique environment, thereby limiting their generalizability. The status of multi-institutional studies in surgical education remains unknown. METHODS: We searched the Pubmed, ERIC, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases for all English language articles published from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 using the keywords "medical education," "surgical education," "multi-institutional," "multi-center," and related terms. Articles published in an English language peer-reviewed journal that described an educational intervention conducted at more than one institution and involving surgeons were included. RESULTS: Of 3511 identified articles, 53 met criteria for full-text review and inclusion in this review. The median number of institutional sites was 4, with a range of 2 to 54. The 2 most common areas of focus were technical skills (43% of studies) and clinical knowledge (32% of studies). These were also the 2 most commonly measured outcomes (technical skills 32% of studies, clinical knowledge 21% of studies). Thirteen percentage of studies measured only learner attitudes and perceptions rather than learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-institutional surgical education studies do not uniformly incorporate characteristics of high quality research, particularly related to study design, measurable outcomes, and assessment tools used. Coordinated support, including grant funding, that addresses the challenging nature of multi-institutional surgical education research may improve the quality of these studies.

A 15-year residency program report card: Differences between the crème of the crop and the bottom of the barrel on the American Board of Surgery examinations.

BACKGROUND: American Board of Surgery examination performance represents an important residency metric. The hypothesis is that demographic differences exist between the most and least successful programs. METHODS: This was a retrospective fifteen-year study. Data focused on program Examination Index (EI). The first and tenth decile programs were compared across demographics, using an α = 0.05. RESULTS: The first decile had a higher EI than the tenth decile (91.0% ±â€¯2 .6% vs 51.4% ±â€¯5.4% [p < 0.001]). The first decile programs were larger (p = 0.001). The first decile had more military and academic programs, with fewer community programs (p = 0.01). More first decile programs were in the West with fewer in the Northeast (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There are clear differences in ABS examination performance based on program size, type, and location. These results essentially perform a national needs-assessment, and may evoke a spirit of competition and collaboration.

Are the kids alright? Review books and the internet as the most common study resources for the general surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: To define resources deemed most important to medical students on their general surgery clerkship, we evaluated their material utilization. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted amongst third-year medical students using a 20-item survey. Descriptive statistics were performed on the demographics. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney analyses were performed on the Likert responses (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Survey response was 69.2%. Use of review books and Internet was significantly higher compared to all other resources (p < 0.05). Wikipedia was the most used Internet source (39.1%). 56% never used textbooks. Analyses of surgery subject exam (NBME) results or intended specialty with resources used showed no statistical relationship (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Resources used by students reflect access to high-yield material and increased Internet use. The Internet and review books were used more than the recommended textbook; NBME results were not affected. Understanding study habits and resource use will help guide curricular development and students' self-regulated learning.

Surgery residents recognized less frequently over time by medical students: A twelve year study of the Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Award.

BACKGROUND: There is a decreasing institutional percentage of surgical resident recipients of The Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Award over time. The hypothesis was that this trend was a national phenomenon. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 2004 - 2015, utilizing data from the Arnold P. Gold Foundation. Multiple regression was performed using the estimated ratio of eligible surgical to non-surgical residents and the year as explanatory variables, utilizing an α = 0.05. RESULTS: The percentage of surgical award winners was lower in the second study half compared to the first half (40.2% vs. 47.2%) (p = 0.02). Multiple regression showed that when controlling for the number of eligible residents, the number of resident awardees decreased over time (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: There is a clear national trend that surgical residents are receiving the Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Award less over time.

The American Board of Surgery examinations: how are the Southwestern Surgical Congress programs performing compared to the rest of the United States?

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared with the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). METHODS: A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examination (QE), Certifying Examination (CE), and QE/CE index from 2005 to 2015 was conducted. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2010, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (88% vs 85%, P < .02), CE (86% vs 82%, P < .01), and QE/CE (77% vs 72%, P < .01). From 2010 to 2015, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (91% vs 86%, P < .01) and QE/CE (77% vs 71%, P < .01) but did not achieve statistical significance in CE (83% vs 81%, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: SWSC programs outperformed Non-SWSC across QE and CE in the early period, but only on QE in the late period. We encourage SWSC states and regional surgical societies to evaluate performance on ABS examinations and collaborate to improve surgical training.

A Sensitivity Analysis and Opportunity Cost Evaluation of the Surgical Council on Resident Education Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: The study purpose is to evaluate the Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) Curriculum regarding American Board of Surgery Qualifying Examination (ABS QE) outcomes. The goal is to perform effect size analyses, sensitivity analyses, and sample size analyses with opportunity cost estimates required to favor the SCORE Curriculum subscription regarding ABS QE outcomes. METHODS: Published data were used to construct 2 × 2 matrices regarding ABS QE outcome (pass/fail) and SCORE subscription status (subscriber/nonsubscriber). Post hoc analyses of effect sizes and sample sizes, with opportunity cost estimates, were performed to evaluate ABS QE outcomes favoring SCORE subscription (2-tailed and 1-tailed tests) using an α = 0.05. RESULTS: The absolute risk increase of SCORE subscription on ABS QE outcome was 1.6% (number needed to treat = 63). Sensitivity analyses showed that a pass rate difference of 4.9% to 7.5% was required to favor SCORE subscription (all p < 0.05). Sample size analyses required an 8- to 18-fold increase to favor SCORE subscription to achieve statistical significance with an opportunity cost of $6.0 to $13.5 million ($30,000-$67,000/program), not adjusting for inflation. CONCLUSIONS: The number needed to treat and pass rate differences required to favor SCORE subscription are large. The opportunity costs of SCORE subscription are substantial. Residency programs with more limited resources should determine if the subscription costs are financially sound.

Surgical Specialty Residents More Likely to Receive the Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Award.

OBJECTIVE: The Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Awards are given by medical students to residents. The aim of this study is to evaluate the distribution of this award based on residency specialty. The hypothesis is that surgical residents more commonly receive this award. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 2004 to 2013. All award recipients were obtained from the Arnold P. Gold Foundation website. The specialties of award recipients were tabulated. The number of award winners per thousand specialty residents was estimated using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Data Resource Book, adjusting for the number of awarding schools and resident specialties. All statistics used an α = 0.05. RESULTS: There were 2489 awards given during the study period, with 52.6% in medical specialties and 47.4% in surgical specialties (p = 0.45). The specialties most commonly awarded were General Surgery (22.3%), Internal Medicine (20.9%), and Obstetrics/Gynecology (20.4%). Adjusting for the number of eligible residents, there were 59.9 awards/1000 Obstetrics/Gynecology residents, 43.1 awards/1000 General Surgery residents, and 20.2 awards/1000 Internal Medicine residents (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Controlling for the number of eligible residents, the Arnold P. Gold Humanism and Excellence in Teaching Awards are more commonly given to surgical specialty residents.

Favorable Trends for a Decade: Increasing Pass Rates on The American Board of Anesthesiology Examinations.

BACKGROUND: There have been some apparent increasing pass rates on the American Board of Anesthesiology Part 1 (written) and Part 2 (oral) examinations in the setting of a transition in examination format. The aim of the study is to evaluate the nature of these trends, hypothesizing that these increasing pass rate trends are significant. METHODS: In this retrospective study from 2003-2012, the first-attempt examinee pass rates on the Part 1 and Part 2 examinations were obtained from the American Board of Anesthesiology website. To evaluate the cohort of examinees, the mean United States Medical Licensing Examination scores of residents matched to anesthesia programs were also obtained. To evaluate trends over time, simple linear regression was performed with the academic year as the independent variable and examination outcome as the dependent variable, using an α = 0.05. RESULTS: The median annual pass rate on the Part 1 examination was 85.5% (Interquartile range [82.75% - 87.75%]). Regression analysis showed that the slope of the least-squares regression line was greater than zero (p = 0.008). The median annual pass rate on the Part 2 examination was 81.5% (Interquartile range [77.25% - 84.75]). Regression analysis showed that the slope of the least-squares regression line was greater than zero (p < 0.001). Regression analysis also showed increasing United States Medical Licensing Examination scores for the incoming anesthesia residents (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There have been significant increasing trends on the American Board of Anesthesiology Part 1 and Part 2 examinations over the last ten years.

The role of gender and distance mentoring in the surgical education research fellowship.

OBJECTIVE: The nature of the mentor-mentee relationship is important in the pursuit of successful research projects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mentor-mentee relationships in the Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF) based on gender and geographical distances regarding program completion. We hypothesize that there are no differences for SERF program completion rates based on gender pairs and distances between pairs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 2006 to 2011. Mentor-mentee rosters were retrospectively reviewed for program completion, demographics, and PubMeD indexing. Time zone differences and geographic distances between pairs were found with online applications. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and nonparametric statistics were carried out using α = 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 82 individuals accepted into the SERF program, 43 (52%) completed the SERF program during the study period. There were no differences in program completion rates based on fellow gender and gender pairing (all p > 0.05). Different-gender pairs that completed the program (n = 17) were indexed more frequently on PubMed than same-gender pairs that completed the program (n = 24) (41% vs 12%, p = 0.04). There were no differences in program completion based on time zone differences (p = 0.20). The median distance between pairs completing the program (n = 35) was greater than that for pairs not completing the program (n = 36) (1741 km [IQR: 895-3117 km] vs 991 km [IQR: 676-2601 km]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Completion of the SERF program was independent of mentor-mentee gender pairs and time zone differences. There was greater geographical distance separating mentor-mentee pairs that completed the SERF program compared with pairs that did not complete the program. Distance mentoring is a successful and crucial element of the SERF program.

Relationship between internal medicine program board examination pass rates, accreditation standards, and program size.

OBJECTIVE: To determine Internal Medicine residency program compliance with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 80% pass-rate standard and the correlation between residency program size and performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design from 2010-2012 American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination data of all Internal Medicine residency pro-grams, comparisons were made between program pass rates to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pass-rate standard. To assess the correlation between program size and performance, a Spearman's rho was calculated. To evaluate program size and its relationship to the pass-rate standard, receiver operative characteristic curves were calculated. RESULTS: Of 372 Internal Medicine residency programs, 276 programs (74%) achieved a pass rate of =80%, surpassing the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education minimum standard. A weak correlation was found between residency program size and pass rate for the three-year period (p=0.19, p<0.001). The area underneath the receiver operative characteristic curve was 0.69 (95% Confidence Interval [0.63-0.75]), suggesting programs with less than 12 examinees/year are less likely to meet the minimum Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pass-rate standard (sensitivity 63.8%, specificity 60.4%, positive predictive value 82.2%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of Internal Medicine residency programs complied with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pass-rate standards, a quarter of the programs failed to meet this requirement. Program size is positively but weakly associated with American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination performance, suggesting other unidentified variables significantly contribute to program performance.

Residencies with dual internal medicine and pediatrics programs outperform others on the American Board of Pediatrics Certifying Examination.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to evaluate American Board of Pediatrics Certifying Examination performance based on if a residency offers a dual internal medicine-pediatrics program, hypothesizing that having a dual-accreditation program is associated with higher exam performance. METHODS: Pediatric residency programs in the United States were retrospectively evaluated from 2010 to 2012. The accreditation status was determined. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for continuous variables, and χ(2) tests were performed for categorical variables, using an α = .05. RESULTS: For 190 residencies, 75 (39%) had dual Med-Peds accreditation whereas 115 (61%) did not. The median overall residency pass rate for Med-Peds accredited programs (83%; interquartile range = 74% to 91%) was higher than other programs (78%; interquartile range = 65% to 89%; P = .02). The pass rate for examinees from Med-Peds accredited programs (n = 4,108; 84.2%) was higher than examinees from other programs (n = 4,310; 79.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a dual-accreditation residency program should be a consideration of future applicants.