RESUMEN
Background: According to international guidelines, standard treatment (ST) with curative intent in cervical cancer (CC) comprises radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stages (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IB1, IIA1), adjuvant chemoradiation is recommended based on risk factors upon final pathology. Definitive chemoradiation is recommended in locally advanced stages (FIGO 2009 IB2, IIA2, IIB). Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) with therapeutic lymph node dissection (tLND) without adjuvant radiation has emerged as a promising treatment. Here we compare oncologic outcome by TMMR + tLND or ST. Methods: In this observational cohort study, women treated according to international guidelines were identified in the population-based registries from Sweden and women treated with TMMR were identified in the Leipzig Mesometrial Resection (MMR) Study Database (DRKS 0001517) 2011-2020. Relevant clinical and tumour related variables were extracted. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) by ST or TMMR was analysed with log-rank test, cumulative incidence function and proportional hazard regression yielding hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for relevant confounders. Findings: Between 2011 and 2020, 1007 women were included in the final analysis. 733 women were treated according to ST and 274 with TMMR. RFS at five years was 77.9% (95% CI 74.3-81.1) and 82.6% (95% CI 77.2-86.9) for the ST and TMMR cohorts respectively (p = 0.053). In early-stage CC, RFS was higher after TMMR as compared to ST, 91.2% vs 81.8% (p = 0.002). In the adjusted analysis, TMMR was associated with a lower hazard of recurrence (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.22-0.69) and death (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.86) compared to ST. The absolute difference in risk of recurrence at 5 years was 9.4% (95% CI 3.2-15.7) in favor of TMMR. In locally advanced CC, no significant differences in RFS or OS was observed. Interpretation: Compared to ST, TMMR without radiation therapy was associated with superior oncologic outcomes in women with early-stage cervical cancer whereas no difference was observed in locally advanced disease. Our findings together with previous evidence suggest that TMMR may be considered the primary option for both early-stage and locally advanced cervical cancer confined to the Müllerian compartment. Funding: This study was supported by grants from Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland (Sweden) and Region Stockholm (Sweden).
RESUMEN
Importance: The risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis therapy after cancer surgery are debated. Studies that determine thrombosis risk after cancer surgery with high accuracy are needed. Objectives: To evaluate 1-year risk of venous thromboembolic events after major cancer surgery and how these events vary over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This register-based retrospective observational matched cohort study included data on the full population of Sweden between 1998 and 2016. All patients who underwent major surgery for cancer of the bladder, breast, colon or rectum, gynecologic organs, kidney and upper urothelial tract, lung, prostate, or gastroesophageal tract were matched in a 1:10 ratio with cancer-free members of the general population on year of birth, sex, and county of residence. Data were analyzed from February 13 to December 5, 2023. Exposure: Major surgery for cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incidence of venous thromboembolic events within 1 year after the surgery. Crude absolute risks and risk differences of events within 1 year and adjusted time-dependent cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of postdischarge events were calculated. Results: A total of 432â¯218 patients with cancer (median age, 67 years [IQR, 58-75 years]; 68.7% women) and 4â¯009â¯343 cancer-free comparators (median age, 66 years [IQR, 57-74 years]; 69.3% women) were included in the study. The crude 1-year cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism was higher among the cancer surgery population for all cancers, with the following absolute risk differences: for bladder cancer, 2.69 percentage points (95% CI, 2.33-3.05 percentage points); for breast cancer, 0.59 percentage points (95% CI 0.55-0.63 percentage points); for colorectal cancer, 1.57 percentage points (95% CI, 1.50-1.65 percentage points); for gynecologic organ cancer, 1.32 percentage points (95% CI, 1.22-1.41 percentage points); for kidney and upper urinary tract cancer, 1.38 percentage points (95% CI, 1.21-1.55 percentage points); for lung cancer, 2.61 percentage points (95% CI, 2.34-2.89 percentage points); for gastroesophageal cancer, 2.13 percentage points (95% CI, 1.89-2.38 percentage points); and for prostate cancer, 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.49-0.66 percentage points). The cause-specific HR of pulmonary embolism comparing patients who underwent cancer surgery with matched comparators peaked just after discharge and generally plateaued 60 to 90 days later. At 30 days after surgery, the HR was 10 to 30 times higher than in the comparison cohort for all cancers except breast cancer (colorectal cancer: HR, 9.18 [95% CI, 8.03-10.50]; lung cancer: HR, 25.66 [95% CI, 17.41-37.84]; breast cancer: HR, 5.18 [95% CI, 4.45-6.05]). The hazards subsided but never reached the level of the comparison cohort except for prostate cancer. Similar results were observed for deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found an increased rate of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer surgery. The risk persisted for about 2 to 4 months postoperatively but varied between cancer types. The increased rate is likely explained by the underlying cancer disease and adjuvant treatments. The results highlight the need for individualized venous thromboembolism risk evaluation and prophylaxis regimens for patients undergoing different surgery for different cancers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Posteriores , Anticoagulantes , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Alta del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to investigate the trajectories of anxiety, depression, emotional and social functioning in women with newly diagnosed vulvar cancer from the time of diagnosis to 12 months after treatment. A further aim was to identify risk factors for high levels of anxiety. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PROVE (PROspective Vulvar Cancer Evaluation) is a nationwide longitudinal cohort study investigating quality of life in women with newly diagnosed vulvar cancer by the following validated patient-reported outcome measures at diagnosis, and 3 and 12 months after treatment: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Vulvar module VU34. Mean scores, changes over time and associations were analyzed by generalized estimated equations and log-linear regression models, adjusted for possible confounders. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2021, 105 (69%) women completed the questionnaires at all three time points. At diagnosis, 42% of the women reported elevated anxiety levels, decreasing significantly to 30% during the first 12 months. Insomnia, persisting vulvar symptoms and high information needs were significantly associated with a high level of anxiety (relative risk [RR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7 for insomnia; RR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.6 for vulvar symptoms, RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.9 for information needs). We found a trend towards a higher level of anxiety in younger women (<65 years: RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.5). Participants reported a low and stable prevalence of depression (14%) and high social functioning throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Women with newly diagnosed vulvar cancer report a high level of anxiety at diagnosis. Despite a significant improvement, anxiety remains widely prevalent during the first year of follow-up. Targeting insomnia, vulvar symptoms and unmet needs may decrease anxiety during surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Neoplasias de la Vulva , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Depresión/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Neoplasias de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vulva/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ansiedad/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for ischemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) is done routinely before surgery, but the increase in risks associated with surgery is not known. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of arterial ischemic events during the first year after oncological surgery. METHODS: We used Swedish healthcare databases to identify 443,300 patients who underwent cancer surgery between 1987 and 2016 and 4,127,761 matched comparison subjects. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the hospitalization with logistic regression and calculated 1-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes after discharge. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the first postoperative year were 1.33% and 1.25%, respectively. In the comparison cohort, the corresponding 1-year cumulative incidences were 1.04% and 1.00%. During the hospitalization, the OR for myocardial infarction was 8.81 (95% CI 8.24-9.42) and the OR for ischemic stroke was 6.71 (95% CI 6.22-7.23). After discharge, the average HR during follow-up for 365 days was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) for myocardial infarction and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05) for ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: We found an overall increased risk of IS and MI during the first year after cancer surgery that was attributable to events occurring during the hospitalization period. After discharge from the hospital, the overall risk of myocardial infarction was lower among the cancer surgery patients than among matched comparison subjects.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Infarto del Miocardio , Neoplasias , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Isquemia/complicaciones , Neoplasias/complicacionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Women with advanced ovarian cancer commonly present with peritoneal disease both at primary diagnosis and relapse, with risk of subsequent bowel obstruction. The aims of this study were to assess the cumulative incidence of and survival after intervention for bowel obstruction in women with advanced ovarian cancer, to identify factors predictive of survival and the extent to which the intended outcome of the intervention was achieved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer stages III and IV in 2009-2011 and 2014-2016 in the Stockholm-Gotland Region in Sweden were identified in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer. Through hospital records, types of intended and executed interventions for bowel obstruction were assessed, and as well as when in the course of oncologic treatment, the intervention was performed. Time from first intervention to death was analyzed with survival methodology and proportional hazard regression was used. RESULTS: Of 751 identified women, 108 had an intervention for bowel obstruction. Laparotomy was the most prevalent intervention and was used in 87% (94/108) of all women, with a success rate of 87% (82/94). An intervention for bowel obstruction was performed before or during first line treatment in 32% (35/108) with a cumulative incidence in the whole cohort of 14% (108/751, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11-16). Median survival after intervention for bowel obstruction was 4 months (95% CI 3-6). The hazard of death increased when the intervention was performed after completion of primary treatment (HR 4.46, 95% CI 1.61-12.29, P < 0.01), with a median survival of 3 months. In women subjected to radical surgery during primary treatment, the hazard of death after intervention for bowel obstruction decreased (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.91, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Women with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing intervention for bowel obstruction have a dismal prognosis, regardless of which line of oncologic treatment the intervention was performed. In the majority of women an intervention for bowel obstruction was performed in a relapse situation with an even worse survival. Our findings emphasize the importance of a holistic approach in the decision-making before an intervention for bowel obstruction in women with advanced ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Intestinal , Neoplasias Ováricas , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Incidencia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/complicaciones , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy according to the known preoperative tumor characteristics in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether increased radicality had an effect on 5-year disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. The secondary aims were 5-year overall survival and pattern of recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study from the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative cohort. Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IB1 and IIA1 who underwent open type B/C1/C2 radical hysterectomy according to Querleu-Morrow classification between January 2007 and December 2016, who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who had negative lymph nodes and free surgical margins at final histology, were included. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Patients were stratified according to pathologic tumor diameter. Propensity score match analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 1257 patients were included. Of note, 883 patients (70.2%) underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, and 374 patients (29.8%) underwent non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Baseline differences between the study groups were found for tumor stage and diameter (higher use of non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for tumors >2 cm or with vaginal involvement; P<.0001). The use of adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 27.3% vs 28.6%, respectively (P=.63). Five-year disease-free survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-92.2) vs 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-96.5), respectively (P=.047). Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was independently associated with better disease-free survival at multivariable analysis performed on the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P=.004). Furthermore, 5-year overall survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 94.1-97.2) vs non-nerve-sparing 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.7), respectively (P=.78). In patients with a tumor diameter ≤20 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 94.7% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 96.2% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.22). In patients with tumors between 21 and 40 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 90.3% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 83.1% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.016) (no significant difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment in this subgroup, P=.47). This was confirmed after propensity match score analysis (balancing the 2 study groups). The pattern of recurrence in the propensity-matched population did not demonstrate any difference (P=.70). CONCLUSION: For tumors ≤20 mm, no survival difference was found with more radical hysterectomy. For tumors between 21 and 40 mm, a more radical hysterectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease-free survival. No difference in the pattern of recurrence according to the extent of radicality was observed. Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was associated with better 5-year disease-free survival than nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy after propensity score match analysis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lymph node metastases (pN+) in presumed early-stage cervical cancer negatively impact prognosis. Using federated learning, we aimed to develop a tool to identify a group of women at low risk of pN+, to guide the shared decision-making process concerning the extent of lymph node dissection. METHODS: Women with cervical cancer between 2005 and 2020 were identified retrospectively from population-based registries: the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database, Swedish Quality Registry for Gynaecologic Cancer and Netherlands Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria were: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma; The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 IA2, IB1 and IIA1; treatment with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node assessment. We applied privacy-preserving federated logistic regression to identify risk factors of pN+. Significant factors were used to stratify the risk of pN+. RESULTS: We included 3606 women (pN+ 11%). The most important risk factors of pN+ were lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.59-5.79), tumour size 21-40 mm (OR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.89-2.43) and depth of invasion>10 mm (OR 1.81, 95% CI, 1.59-2.08). A group of 1469 women (41%)-with tumours without LVSI, tumour size ≤20 mm, and depth of invasion ≤10 mm-had a very low risk of pN+ (2.4%, 95% CI, 1.7-3.3%). CONCLUSION: Early-stage cervical cancer without LVSI, a tumour size ≤20 mm and depth of invasion ≤10 mm, confers a low risk of pN+. Based on an international privacy-preserving analysis, we developed a useful tool to guide the shared decision-making process regarding lymph node dissection.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Estadificación de Neoplasias , HisterectomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine oncologic outcome in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC) receiving an intestinal stoma (IS) at the time of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), probability of stoma reversal (SR) and variables affecting odds of SR. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with aEOC between 2009 and 2018 in the Stockholm/Gotland Region of Sweden. The association between IS formation at CRS and survival was analyzed with proportional hazards regression yielding hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for predefined confounders. Cumulative incidence functions, with death or recurrence as competing risk, were used to estimate chance of SR. The association between clinical factors and SR was analyzed with logistic regression yielding odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: The final analysis included 888 women undergoing CRS for aEOC. Of these, 129 (14,5%) received an IS of which 74% (n = 95) were defunctioning and 26% (n = 34) permanent. IS was associated with an increased hazard of death (HR 1.30, CI 95%, 1.05-1.61; p = 0.02) in the univariate analysis, however not in the adjusted analysis. The probability of SR of defunctioning IS within 2 years was 48% (95% CI, 38-58). Median time to SR was 10 months. High surgical complexity score (SCS) was associated with increased odds of reversal (OR 3.43, 95% CI, 1.06-11.05; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IS formation does not seem to affect prognosis in women with aEOC. We could not identify any factor, known at time of CRS, that may predict the odds of SR except a high SCS.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Cohortes , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of number of radical hysterectomies performed per year in each center with disease-free survival and overall survival. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients previously included in the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer collaborative studies. Individuals with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and had negative lymph nodes at final histology were included. Patients were treated at referral centers for gynecologic oncology according to updated national and international guidelines. Optimal cutoffs for surgical volume were identified using an unadjusted Cox proportional hazard model, with disease-free survival as the outcome and defined as the value that minimizes the P-value of the split in groups in terms of disease-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to create statistically similar cohorts at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 2,157 patients were initially included. The two most significant cutoffs for surgical volume were identified at seven and 17 surgical procedures, dividing the entire cohort into low-volume, middle-volume, and high-volume centers. After propensity score matching, 1,238 patients were analyzed-619 (50.0%) in the high-volume group, 523 (42.2%) in the middle-volume group, and 96 (7.8%) in the low-volume group. Patients who underwent surgery in higher-volume institutions had progressively better 5-year disease-free survival than those who underwent surgery in lower-volume centers (92.3% vs 88.9% vs 83.8%, P=.029). No difference was noted in 5-year overall survival (95.9% vs 97.2% vs 95.2%, P=.70). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that FIGO stage greater than IB1, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, grade greater than 1, tumor diameter greater than 20 mm, minimally invasive surgical approach, nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology, and lower-volume centers represented independent risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Surgical volume of centers represented an independent prognostic factor affecting disease-free survival. Increasing number of radical hysterectomies performed in each center every year was associated with improved disease-free survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Hospitales , Histerectomía/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer. METHODS: We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study. RESULTS: Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; PDFS = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; POS = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT- and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort: PDFS = 0.365; POS = 0.282). CONCLUSION: Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Histerectomía , Terapia Combinada , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In cervical cancer, presence of lymph-node macrometastases (MAC) is a major prognostic factor and an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, since clinical impact of micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor-cells (ITC) remains controversial, we sought to identify a cut-off value for the metastasis size not associated with negative prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 967 cervical cancer patients (T1a1L1-T2b) registered in the SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer) database, who underwent primary surgical treatment, including sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy with pathological ultrastaging. The size of SLN metastasis was considered a continuous variable and multiple testing was performed for cut-off values of 0.01-1.0 mm. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between N0 and subgroups of N1 patients defined by cut-off ranges. RESULTS: LN metastases were found in 172 (18%) patients, classified as MAC, MIC, and ITC in 79, 54, and 39 patients, respectively. DFS was shorter in patients with MAC (HR 2.20, P = 0.003) and MIC (HR 2.87, P < 0.001), while not differing between MAC/MIC (P = 0.484). DFS in the ITC subgroup was neither different from N0 (P = 0.127) nor from MIC/MAC subgroups (P = 0.449). Cut-off analysis revealed significantly shorter DFS compared to N0 in all subgroups with metastases ≥0.4 mm (HR 2.311, P = 0.04). The significance of metastases <0.4 mm could not be assessed due to limited statistical power (<80%). We did not identify any cut-off for the size of metastasis with significantly better prognosis than the rest of N1 group. CONCLUSIONS: In cervical cancer patients, the presence of LN metastases ≥0.4 mm was associated with a significant negative impact on DFS and no cut-off value for the size of metastasis with better prognosis than N1 was found. Traditional metastasis stratification based on size has no clinical implication.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Micrometástasis de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patologíaRESUMEN
Tumor cells release fragments of their DNA into the circulation, so called cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA), allowing for analysis of tumor DNA in a simple blood test, that is, liquid biopsy. Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the cause of the majority of cases. HR-HPV integrates into the host genome and is often present in multiple copies per cell and should thus also be released as ctDNA. Such ctHPV DNA is therefore a possible biomarker in cervical cancer. In this review, we first give a background on ctDNA in general and then a comprehensive review of studies on ctHPV DNA in cervical cancer and pre-malignant lesions that may develop in cervical cancer. Furthermore, studies on ctHPV DNA in other HPV related malignancies (eg, head-and-neck and anogenital cancers) are briefly reviewed. We conclude that detection of ctHPV DNA in plasma from patients with cervical cancer is feasible, although optimized protocols and ultra-sensitive techniques are required for sufficient sensitivity. Results from retrospective studies in both cervical cancer and other HPV-related malignancies suggests that ctHPV DNA is a promising prognostic biomarker, for example, for detecting relapses early. This paves the way for larger, preferably prospective studies investigating the clinical value of ctHPV DNA as a biomarker in cervical cancer. However, there are conflicting results whether ctHPV DNA can be found in blood from patients with pre-malignant lesions and further studies are needed to fully elucidate this question.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , ADN Viral/genética , ADN Viral/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Papillomaviridae/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Tumor cells release fragments of their DNA into the circulation, so called cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) or liquid biopsy. Here, we analyze if cell-free human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPV DNA) is detectable before, during and after treatment, in patients with cervical cancer or pre-malignant lesions that may develop into cervical cancer, and whether ctHPV DNA levels were correlated to patient or tumor characteristics and outcome. Furthermore, total cell-free DNA load is studied using cfAlbumin DNA as a surrogate marker. METHODS: 18 patients with locally advanced CC (LACC), 15 patients with early stage CC (ESCC) and 21 patients with pre-malignant lesions, all with verified HPV16, 18 or 45-positive lesions, were included. Pre- during- and post-treatment plasma were tested for HPV16, 18 & 45 and total cfDNA load using droplet digital PCR. RESULTS: ctHPV DNA was found in 94.4% and 26.7% of pre-treatment plasma of patients with LACC and ESCC respectively, while all samples from patients with pre-malignant lesions were negative. Higher levels of ctHPV DNA were correlated to higher FIGO2018 stage. Patients with LACC and persistent ctHPV DNA at end-of-treatment had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who had cleared the ctHPV DNA (p = 0.007). Patients with total ctDNA-levels above median in pre-treatment plasma had a worse PFS (p = 0.026), compared to patients with total ctDNA-levels below median. CONCLUSION: ctHPV DNA is a promising prognostic biomarker in locally advanced cervical cancer that should be studied further for clinical use.
Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Femenino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether objective bladder function after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) for early-stage cervical cancer is correlated with subjective patient-reported outcomes and quality of life during the first year after RRH. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. PATIENTS: Women with early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2-IB1) between July 2017 and May 2019 were assessed for eligibility. INTERVENTIONS: RRH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjective bladder function was evaluated with the Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life modules of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Objective urinary function was characterized with urodynamic tests, and the nerves ablated at RRH were quantified by using immunohistochemical staining of biopsies from the resected paracervix, vesicouterine, and sacrouterine ligaments. Twenty-seven women were included for analysis at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. RRH caused hypotonia of the urinary bladder (p <.05). Patient-reported outcomes of voiding and filling dysfunction were most significant 2 weeks after surgery (p <.05) but for most of the women, bladder function recovered within 3 months. No correlations were found with either subjective or objective urinary function and the number of ablated nerves. CONCLUSION: For most women, objective and subjective urinary bladder dysfunction recovered within 3 months after RRH. The absence of correlation between functional outcomes and ablated autonomous nerves suggests that other underlying causes play a significant role. Early detection of bladder overextension after RRH is paramount, and the role of postoperative bladder catheterization needs further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Robótica , Incontinencia Urinaria , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Vejiga Urinaria/inervación , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Long term outcomes following fertility sparing robot-assisted radical trachelectomy (RRT). METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive women selected for RRT between 2007 and 2019 at five referral centres. Generally used selection criteria for fertility-sparing surgery were applied. Oncologic, reproductive and long-term clinical data were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 166 included women, 149 completed a RRT. Median tumor size was 9 mm (range 3-20 mm), 111 women (75%) had FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cancer and 4.8% were node positive. At a median follow up of 58 months, 12 of all women (7.2%) and 9 of 149 women (6%) who underwent completed RRT with fertility preservation had recurred and two had died. 70 of 88 women (80%) who attempted to conceive succeeded, resulting in 81 pregnancies that progressed beyond the first trimester and 76 live births of which 54 (70%) were delivered at term and 65 (86%) delivered after gestational week 32. A short postoperative cervical length was associated with impaired fertility. A late secondary hysterectomy was necessary in four women due to persistent bleeding (n = 2), hematometra due to a cervical stenosis (n = 1) and recurrent dysplasia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up of RRT the recurrence rate is comparable to larger individual studies of minimally invasive or vaginal radical trachelectomy with similar risk profile and follow up. The high pregnancy rate and low rate of premature delivery before 32 weeks GA may promote the use of robot-assisted approach.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Robótica , Traquelectomía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traquelectomía/efectos adversos , Traquelectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS. METHODS: Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS. RESULTS: The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidad , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/fisiopatología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/fisiopatología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/fisiopatología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Tasa de Supervivencia , Traquelectomía , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/fisiopatología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy has emerged as an alternative to open radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer desiring future fertility. Recent data suggest worse oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than after open radical hysterectomy in stage I cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare 4.5-year disease-free survival after open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a collaborative, international retrospective study (International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study) of patients treated during 2005-2017 at 18 centers in 12 countries. Eligible patients had squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; had a preoperative tumor size of ≤2 cm; and underwent open or minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy with nodal assessment (pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy). The exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant chemotherapy or preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, previous lymphadenectomy or pelvic retroperitoneal surgery, pregnancy, stage IA1 disease with lymphovascular space invasion, aborted trachelectomy (conversion to radical hysterectomy), or vaginal approach. Surgical approach, indication, and adjuvant therapy regimen were at the discretion of the treating institution. A total of 715 patients were entered into the study database. However, 69 patients were excluded, leaving 646 in the analysis. Endpoints were the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate (primary), 4.5-year overall survival rate (secondary), and recurrence rate (secondary). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival. A post hoc weighted analysis was performed, comparing the recurrence rates between surgical approaches, with open surgery being considered as standard and minimally invasive surgery as experimental. RESULTS: Of 646 patients, 358 underwent open surgery, and 288 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The median (range) patient age was 32 (20-42) years for open surgery vs 31 (18-45) years for minimally invasive surgery (P=.11). Median (range) pathologic tumor size was 15 (0-31) mm for open surgery and 12 (0.8-40) mm for minimally invasive surgery (P=.33). The rates of pelvic nodal involvement were 5.3% (19 of 358 patients) for open surgery and 4.9% (14 of 288 patients) for minimally invasive surgery (P=.81). Median (range) follow-up time was 5.5 (0.20-16.70) years for open surgery and 3.1 years (0.02-11.10) years for minimally invasive surgery (P<.001). At 4.5 years, 17 of 358 patients (4.7%) with open surgery and 18 of 288 patients (6.2%) with minimally invasive surgery had recurrence (P=.40). The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval, 91.6-97.0) for open surgery and 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.6-95.6) for minimally invasive surgery (log-rank P=.37). Post hoc propensity score analysis of recurrence risk showed no difference between surgical approaches (P=.42). At 4.5 years, there were 6 disease-related deaths (open surgery, 3; minimally invasive surgery, 3) (log-rank P=.49). The 4.5-year overall survival rates were 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 97.6-99.7) for open surgery and 99.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.0-99.8) for minimally invasive surgery. CONCLUSION: The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates did not differ between open radical trachelectomy and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. However, recurrence rates in each group were low. Ongoing prospective studies of conservative management of early-stage cervical cancer may help guide future management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidad , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Traquelectomía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile. METHODS: Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated. RESULTS: Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five. CONCLUSION: The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally.