Improving Employee Safety Through a Comprehensive Patient Behavioral Program.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers in the United States are facing increasing rates of exposure to aggressive behavior, resulting in an increase in employee injuries related specifically to patient behavioral events. By leveraging interprofessional collaboration and system-level innovation, we aimed to reduce the rate of employee injuries related to patient behavioral events at a children's hospital by 50% over a 3-year period. METHODS: An interdisciplinary quality improvement team comprising physicians, behavior analysts, nursing, and other key stakeholders developed a comprehensive behavior program in our children's hospital. The team developed 5 key pillars: aggression mitigation tools, clinical resources, advanced training, screening and management, and behavior emergency response. The outcome measure was rate of reported employee safety events related to patient behavioral events. This was tracked via prospective time series analysis statistical process control chart using established rules to detect special cause variation. RESULTS: The average rate of employee injuries resulting from patient behavioral events decreased from 0.96 to 0.39 per 1000 adjusted patient-days, with special cause variation observed on a statistical process control U-chart. This improvement has been sustained for 16 months. Staff members who experienced injuries included nurses and patient technicians, with common antecedents to injuries including medical interventions or patient requests that could not be safely met. CONCLUSIONS: A unified and multimodal system aimed to address pediatric patient behavioral events can reduce employee injuries and foster a culture of employee safety in the pediatric inpatient setting.

Addressing Alert Fatigue by Replacing a Burdensome Interruptive Alert with Passive Clinical Decision Support.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing that alert fatigue poses risks to patient safety and clinician wellness, there is a growing emphasis on evaluation and governance of electronic health record clinical decision support (CDS). This is particularly critical for interruptive alerts to ensure that they achieve desired clinical outcomes while minimizing the burden on clinicians. This study describes an improvement effort to address a problematic interruptive alert intended to notify clinicians about patients needing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) precautions and how we collaborated with operational leaders to develop an alternative passive CDS system in acute care areas. OBJECTIVES: Our dual aim was to reduce the alert burden by redesigning the CDS to adhere to best practices for decision support while also improving the percent of admitted patients with symptoms of possible COVID who had appropriate and timely infection precautions orders. METHODS: Iterative changes to CDS design included adjustment to alert triggers and acknowledgment reasons and development of a noninterruptive rule-based order panel for acute care areas. Data on alert burden and appropriate precautions orders on symptomatic admitted patients were followed over time on run and attribute (p) and individuals-moving range control charts. RESULTS: At baseline, the COVID alert fired on average 8,206 times per week with an alert per encounter rate of 0.36. After our interventions, the alerts per week decreased to 1,449 and alerts per encounter to 0.07 equating to an 80% reduction for both metrics. Concurrently, the percentage of symptomatic admitted patients with COVID precautions ordered increased from 23 to 61% with a reduction in the mean time between COVID test and precautions orders from 19.7 to -1.3 minutes. CONCLUSION: CDS governance, partnering with operational stakeholders, and iterative design led to successful replacement of a frequently firing interruptive alert with less burdensome passive CDS that improved timely ordering of COVID precautions.

Increasing COVID-19 Immunization Rates through a Vaccination Program for Hospitalized Children.

Introduction: Inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination initiatives offer a novel strategy to eliminate barriers to care, provide access to interprofessional teams, and decrease COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Our inpatient vaccination initiative aimed to triple the baseline rate of eligible hospitalized children vaccinated against COVID-19 from 0.95% to 2.85% from December 2021 to June 2022. Methods: We implemented a COVID-19 vaccination program for pediatric inpatients eligible to receive a dose based on age, current guidelines, and prior doses received. Key drivers included immunization counseling training, identification of eligible patients, and a streamlined workflow. The outcome measure was the percentage of eligible patients who received a vaccine dose during hospitalization. The process measures included the percentage of age-eligible patients who were appropriately screened for prior doses on admission. We designed a clinical decision support system to enhance eligibility identification. The team performed a health equity analysis which stratified patients by social vulnerability index. Results: During the study period, the average percentage of eligible hospitalized patients vaccinated increased from 0.9% to 3.5%, representing special cause variation and a centerline shift. The average percentage of age-eligible patients screened for prior vaccine doses on admission increased from 66.5% to 81.5%. Patients were more likely to be vaccinated if their clinician was exposed to the clinical decision support system (P < 0.01). The social vulnerability index analysis showed no significant differences. Conclusions: This COVID-19 vaccination initiative highlights how an interprofessional approach can increase vaccination rates in hospitalized children; however, overall inpatient COVID-19 vaccination rates in this setting remained low.

Quality Improvement to Reduce High-Flow Nasal Cannula Overuse in Children With Bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is increasingly used to treat bronchiolitis. However, HFNC has not reduced time on supplemental oxygen, length of stay (LOS), or ICU admission. Our objective was to reduce HFNC use in children admitted for bronchiolitis from 41% to 20% over 2 years. METHODS: Using quality improvement methods, our multidisciplinary team formulated key drivers, including standardization of HFNC use, effective communication, knowledgeable staff, engaged providers and families, data transparency, and high-value care focus. Interventions included: (1) standardized HFNC initiation criteria, (2) staff education, (3) real-time feedback to providers, (4) a script for providers to use with families about expectations during admission, (5) team huddle for patients admitted on HFNC to discuss necessity, and (6) distribution of a bronchiolitis toolkit. We used statistical process control charts to track the percentage of children with bronchiolitis who received HFNC. Data were compared with a comparison institution not actively involved in quality improvement work around HFNC use to ensure improvements were not secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic alone. RESULTS: Over 10 months of interventions, we saw a decrease in HFNC use for patients admitted with bronchiolitis from 41% to 22%, which was sustained for >12 months. There was no change in HFNC use at the comparison institution. The overall mean LOS for children with bronchiolitis decreased from 60 to 45 hours. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully reduced HFNC use in children with bronchiolitis, improving delivery of high-value and evidence-based care. This reduction was associated with a 25% decrease in LOS.

Pediatric Residents' Sense of Meaning in Their Work: Is This Value Related to Higher Specialty Satisfaction and Reduced Burnout?

OBJECTIVE: Physician wellness is frequently measured as the absence of burnout, rather than the perception of meaningful work. This study of pediatric residents aimed to test the hypothesis that their sense of meaning at work is associated positively with specialty satisfaction and negatively with burnout. METHODS: In June 2018, we surveyed residents at a large urban pediatrics program, using the Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI), the Global Specialty Satisfaction measure, and a single-item burnout measure. Residents were surveyed at the end of their intern, second or third/fourth year. We compared resident responses to outcome measures by year, gender, race, and type of program (pediatrics and medicine-pediatrics). We assessed the associations between WAMI scores and specialty satisfaction using linear regression and between WAMI scores and burnout using logistic regression, both adjusted for residency year and characteristics. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 119/154 (77.3%) residents. Mean WAMI score was 40.6 ± 5.6 (standard deviation), mean specialty satisfaction score was 11.9 ± 2.4, and 48.7% (58/119) of residents reported burnout with no significant differences in scores by residency year, gender, race, or type of program (all P > .05). Residents' WAMI scores were positively associated with specialty satisfaction (r = +0.57, P < .001) and negatively associated with burnout (adjusted odds ratio  = 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents' sense of meaning at work was significantly positively associated with specialty satisfaction and negatively associated with burnout. We recommend that efforts to improve resident wellness focus on interventions to foster meaning in work, such as supporting team cohesion and autonomy in job design.

Major obstetric haemorrhage: Incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units.

OBJECTIVE: To assess major obstetric haemorrhage incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units. DESIGN: In collaboration with Irish maternity units the National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (Leitao et al., 2020) carried out a national clinical audit and surveillance of major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH). METHODS: MOH was defined as blood loss of at least 2500 ml, transfusion of five or more units of blood or documented treatment for coagulopathy. Co-ordinators in maternity units completed detailed case assessment forms. The denominator data obtained from the individual units was restricted to live births and stillbirths of babies weighing at least 500 g. International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes from hospital discharge records were used to identify cases of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and blood transfusion. RESULTS: During the time period, 2011-2018, there was a 54 % increase in MOH, a 60 % increase in PPH and a 54 % increase in blood transfusion. For 497 reported cases of MOH in 2011-2013, the median estimated blood loss was 3000 ml (range: 600-13,000 ml) and uterine atony was the most common cause. At least one uterotonic agent was used to arrest the bleeding in 94 % of the 477 MOH cases associated with a vaginal or caesarean delivery. A blood transfusion was received in 93 % of cases. Regarding quality of care, the vast majority of reported cases were described as receiving appropriate care and were well managed. CONCLUSION: Internationally, obstetric haemorrhage and especially PPH and its increasing trend remains a major challenge for service providers and clinical staff. A standardisation of definitions of PPH/severe PPH/MOH and agreed approaches to quantitation of blood loss would be valuable developments to allow better investigation and shared learning. Reducing the burden of this morbidity through improvements in care should be a real focus of maternity services.

The experiences of being a registered nurse prescriber within an acute service setting.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of nurse prescribers in an acute service setting. DESIGN: A descriptive phenomenological design underpinned by Husserl's philosophy was used as the guiding framework. METHODS: Data were collected using semistructured interviews and purposive sampling of 11 current registered nurse prescribers from two acute hospitals. Colaizzi's seven steps were employed to analyse the data and develop themes which reflected the participants' experiences of prescribing. RESULTS: The study identified three themes: Enhanced Patient Care, Impact on the Nurse as a Prescriber and the Challenges of Nurse Prescribing. The nurses interviewed were proud to be prescribers and perceived their prescribing practice as safe. This was a unique finding, not described by other research. Increased job satisfaction was also important to those interviewed as identified in previous studies pertaining to prescriptive authority. Ongoing challenges affecting prescribers included staff shortages, extra workload arising from prescribing and the need to educate colleagues about nurse prescribing. Those interviewed also suggested standardising both the prescribing course and local Drugs and Therapeutics Committees nationally, to overcome identified issues. CONCLUSIONS: Further research into the safety of nurse prescribing is recommended to ascertain if what was described locally applies nationally. A larger study into the experiences of nurse and midwife prescribers is also required, to promote and maintain this practice and to ensure future prescribers embrace this extended scope of practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Insight into how nurse prescribers feel about prescriptive authority. Highlights the advantages and disadvantages of this extended scope of practice. RNPs describe how to overcome some of the barriers they have encountered with useful suggestions being made for practice development and further research.

Revisiting task orientated care: Oral histories of former student nurses in Ireland (1960-2001).

The apprenticeship model of nurse training was in place in Ireland up to the end of the twentieth century. Task orientated care was a feature of this model. It is important to examine task allocation from the student's perspective, in light of current and on-going debates regarding student nurses' supernumerary status. Both approaches influence the status of the student; as a worker with task allocation and as a learner with supernumerary status. Oral history interviews were undertaken with twelve former student nurses (1960-2001) to explore their experiences of clinical learning and task allocation. Task allocation consisted of household tasks and tasks involving patient care. Students' experiences were influenced more by issues surrounding the task, particularly the 'task-person', than the task itself. Therefore, a learning environment that is inclusive, supportive and understanding of students' learning is recommended, regardless of the model of nurse training or education that might be in place. These findings can inform current debate on supernumerary status and task allocation for the student nurse within their clinical learning environment, but also on the history of nurse education in Ireland in the twentieth century.

Baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding.

BACKGROUND: Baby-led breastfeeding is recommended as best practice in determining the frequency and duration of a breastfeed. An alternative approach is described as scheduled, where breastfeeding is timed and restricted in frequency and duration. It is necessary to review the evidence that supports current recommendations, so that women are provided with high-quality evidence to inform their feeding decisions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding, for healthy newborns. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (23 February 2016), CINAHL (1981 to 23 February 2016), EThOS, Index to Theses and ProQuest database and World Health Organization's 1998 evidence to support the 'Ten Steps' to successful breastfeeding (10 May 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised trials with randomisation at both the individual and cluster level. Studies presented in abstract form would have been eligible for inclusion if sufficient data were available. Studies using a cross-over design would not have been eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all potential studies we identified as a result of the search strategy. We would have resolved any disagreement through discussion or, if required, consulted a third review author, but this was not necessary. MAIN RESULTS: No studies were identified that were eligible for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding, for healthy newborns. It is recommended that no changes are made to current practice guidelines without undertaking robust research, to include many patterns of breastfeeding and not limited to baby-led and scheduled breastfeeding. Future exploratory research is needed on baby-led breastfeeding that takes the mother's perspective into consideration.

Supporting Graduate Nurse Transition: Collaboration Between Practice and University.

Making the transition from student to RN is challenging and demanding. In Australia, where nurses commonly graduate after 3 years in a Bachelor of Nursing program, graduate transition programs have been established in the workplace to support and socialize new graduates to nursing practice. These programs vary in content, rigor, and available support mechanisms, and no nationally agreed upon standards of expected graduate performance exist. Providing a structured, evidence-based, and clinically focused education and support program specific to the needs of graduate nurses contributes to quality care and patient safety and has significant benefits for the individual graduate, the employing organizations, and health care. This article presents the development and implementation of the Bachelor of Nursing With Clinical Honors (Transition to Practice) program offered by the University of Tasmania, in collaboration with St. Vincent's Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Breastfeeding practices that support women with diabetes to breastfeed.

The aim of this literature review was to identify breastfeeding practices that support women with diabetes to breastfeed. A search was undertaken of CINAHL and Medline databases to identify studies that inform breastfeeding practice for women with diabetes. This resulted in 14 studies (19 records). Most studies focused on women with GDM and T1D with some consideration of T2D. The review has been organised using Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, to enable a clear focus on the needs of women while identifying supportive practices. The key findings of this review are that breastfeeding as the first feed and exclusive breastfeeding are beneficial to meeting physiological needs. Preparations such as having food nearby and having someone to call on can help meet the woman's safety and security needs. A sense of love and belonging is supported by the practice of an early first breastfeed, but antenatal breast milk expression is currently not recommended. The woman's self-esteem can be enhanced through informed multidisciplinary support. Finally, self-actualisation or success with breastfeeding has been achieved by women with diabetes. Common breastfeeding concerns rather than diabetes have been identified as reasons for cessation of breastfeeding. Practices that support women deal with these concerns are recommended.

Baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding.

BACKGROUND: Baby-led breastfeeding is recommended as best practice in determining the frequency and duration of a breastfeed. An alternative approach is described as scheduled, where breastfeeding is timed and restricted in frequency and duration. It is necessary to review the evidence that supports current recommendations, so that mothers are provided with high-quality evidence to inform their feeding decisions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding, for healthy newborns. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 November 2013), CINAHL (1981 to 13 November 2013), EThOS, Index to Theses and ProQuest database and World Health Organization's 1998 evidence to support the 'Ten Steps' to successful breastfeeding (6 November 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with randomisation at both the individual and cluster level. Studies presented in abstract form were eligible for inclusion if sufficient data were available. Studies using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently assessed for inclusion all the potential studies we identified as a result of the search strategy. We would have resolved any disagreement through discussion or, if required, consulted a third review author, but this was not necessary. MAIN RESULTS: No studies were identified that were eligible for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding, for healthy newborns, therefore no conclusions could be taken at this point. It is recommended that no changes are made to current practice guidelines without undertaking further robust research, to include many patterns of breastfeeding and not limited to baby-led and scheduled breastfeeding. Further research is needed to also evaluate the effects of baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding on successful breastfeeding, for healthy newborns. However, conducting such a study, particularly a randomised controlled trial is unlikely to receive ethical approval, as the issue of obtaining informed consent from new mothers or mothers-to-be for randomisation between baby-led and scheduled breastfeeding is a difficult one and it is likely that the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative practices would prohibit such a study.

Developments in neonatal care and nursing responses.

This article reviews the origins and evolution of neonatology and considers the role of the neonatal nurse within this specialty. Neonatal nurses are a vital part of the neonatal team that provides care for sick babies. The nursing care required by sick babies and their families on a neonatal unit can be variable and complex. The past century has seen significant changes in the role of the neonatal nurse. This has come about through dramatic technological developments on neonatal units, an increased understanding of neonatal physiology and pathology, changes in the education of neonatal nurses, and active and ongoing clinical research within the specialty. The resulting significant advances in neonatal care, including that provided by neonatal nurses, have made a crucial and steadfast contribution to marked improvements in neonatal outcomes.