Monteggia fracture associated with ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture with posterior interosseous nerve palsy: case report, medico-legal implications, and methodological assessment analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Monteggia fracture, defined as a fracture of the proximal third of the ulnar shaft associated with an anterior or posterior dislocation of the proximal radial epiphysis, is a serious injury accounting for 0.7% of all elbow fractures and dislocations in adults. For adult patients, good results can only be obtained through early diagnosis and adequate surgical treatment. Monteggia fracture-dislocations associated with distal humeral fracture are extremely rare injuries in adults and there are few cases described in the literature. Medico-legal implications arising from such conditions have a host of complexities that cannot be discounted. CASE REPORT: This case report revolves around a patient affected by a type I Monteggia fracture-dislocation, according to the Bado classification, associated with an ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture. To our knowledge, this combination of lesions has never been reported before in adult patients. A positive result was obtained due to early diagnosis, achievement of anatomical reduction, and optimal stabilization with internal fixation which made it possible to achieve early functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Monteggia fracture-dislocations associated with ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture are extremely rare in adults. In the case herein reported, a favorable outcome was obtained due to early diagnosis, achievement of anatomical reduction and management with internal fixation with plate and screws, as well as early functional training. Misdiagnosis makes such lesions risky in terms of potentially delayed treatment, increasing the need for surgical interventions and the possibility of high-risk complications and disabling sequelae, with possible medico-legal implications. In the case of unrecognized injuries under urgent circumstances, the injuries may become chronic, making the treatment more complex. The ultimate outcomes of a misdiagnosed Monteggia lesion can lead to very serious functional and aesthetic damage.

Improvement in health status and quality of life in patients with osteoporosis treated with denosumab: results at a mean follow-up of six years.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy and tolerability of denosumab in severe osteoporosis are well-known. However, the evaluation on general health and quality of life over time and compared to population norms is still lacking. We aimed at evaluating denosumab effectiveness in a real-world clinical sample with a 6-years average follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective-matched study with prospective data collection, a total of 101 patients affected by severe osteoporosis and treated with denosumab between 2014 and 2020 were evaluated. All patients completed the self-perceived quality of life (36-Item Short Form - SF-36) survey and visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 13 patients died of causes unrelated to the procedure, 12 stopped therapy with denosumab, and 30 did not participate in the follow-up; thus, 46 patients completed the study. There were 44 (95.7%) women and 93.4% of patients reported history of osteoporotic fractures. The mean follow-up was 59±17.8 months and the mean age at follow-up was 73.9±10.6 years. We found a significant improvement in bodily pain (baseline 53.8±33.4, follow-up 62.7±26.6; p=0.002) and in general health (baseline 35±25.4, follow-up 41.7±24.2; p=0.002) over time. The bodily pain score at follow-up was similar to the mean of the age-matched healthy population (62.7±26.6 vs. 67.6±26, p=0.374). The MCS-36 scores were higher than the normative values before treatment and at follow-up (51.6±9.8 vs. 45.8±9, p=0.004 and 50.6±11.7 vs. 45.8±9, p=0.030, respectively). The PCS-36 score at follow-up was comparable to the normative values (39.4±10.4 vs. 42.7±9, p=0.107). CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab is effective to improve bone health and global mental and physical wellbeing, and quality of life over time.

Tantalum monoblock cups in total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and outcome predictors.

This study aims to report the minimum 2-year follow-up results of the tantalum monoblock cup in primary THA and to identify possible outcome predictors. Eighty-eight porous tantalum monoblock acetabular cup in primary THA were reviewed. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used for the evaluation of outcomes. Radiographic evaluation included acetabular component orientation, presence of bone gaps, radiolucent lines, new bone formation and heterotopic ossifications. After a mean follow-up of 55.4±19.5 months, no component revision was noted. The HHS improved from 43.6±14.6 to 88.3±8.4 (P less than 0.001). The mean physical domain of the SF-36 did not significantly differ from that of age-matched, healthy subjects (P=0.072); the mean mental component of the SF-36 was significantly higher than that of age-matched, healthy subjects (P less than 0.001). Negative determinants of postoperative HHS (total adjusted R2=0.328) using tantalum monoblock cups were age at surgery (R2=0.164, P less than 0.001), female sex (R2=0.103, P less than 0.001), and acetabular inclination (R2=0.084, P equals 0.003).

Bilateral midshaft femoral fractures in an adolescent baseball player.

Bone disease, specifically low bone mineral density, is a common and undertreated complication that begins during childhood in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This case describes a male baseball player, aged 14years, with undiagnosed CF who sustained a left midshaft femoral fracture while running toward base; 8months later, he sustained a right midshaft femoral fracture under similar conditions. After the second fracture, further evaluation revealed low bone mineral density and CF. There is no previously published report of pathologic fractures occurring in the femoral shaft in an athlete with undiagnosed CF. Patients with CF have a higher fracture rate. Low-energy fractures of major bones in athletically active individuals should be viewed with suspicion for an underlying process.