Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV Myasthenia Gravis.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MG patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine between June 2011 and January 2017 with grade III and grade IV according to the modified Osserman scale were recruited and received a telephone follow-up in September 2017. Patients treated with tacrolimus plus prednisone were compared with those treated without tacrolimus. The efficacy of tacrolimus was assessed using MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score, Osserman classification, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status (PIS), the number of hospitalizations, the number of myasthenic crises and deaths. The adverse drug effects of tacrolimus were monitored. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included. The tacrolimus group had a significantly lower MG-ADL score than the control group at follow-up (1.90 ± 2.27vs 2.97 ± 2.78, p = 0.029). The difference of MG-ADL score between baseline and after follow-up was significantly greater in the tacrolimus group than the control group (-7.20 ± 2.95 vs -5.52 ± 2.91, p = 0.003). Fewer patients were hospitalized in the tacrolimus group (p = 0.011). The Osserman classification, MGFA PIS, the number of myasthenic crises and deaths did not differ significantly between the two groups. Nineteen patients in the tacrolimus group had adverse drug reactions, but no severe adverse effects appeared. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that tacrolimus could be an effective and safe treatment for Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV MG patients.

[Adult-to-adult living-related donor liver transplantation: report of 2 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of adult-to-adult living-related donor liver transplantation using a right lobe graft. METHODS: The clinical data of 2 cases of living-related donor liver transplantation performed between July, 2010 and November, 2010 were analyzed. RESULTS: Liver transplantation was performed using a right lobe graft including the middle hepatic vein in one case and a right lobe graft without the middle hepatic vein in the other. The ratio of graft volume to standard liver volume was 46.2% and 47.3% in the two cases, with GR/WR of 0.83 and 0.80, and donor residue liver of 42.1% and 39.5%, respectively. The donor operation lasted for 6.5 h and 5 h in the two cases with blood loss of about 200-250 ml without blood transfusion. The donors recovered uneventfully without any surgical complications, whose liver function was normal 7 days after the operation, and were discharged 14 days and 16 days after the surgery, respectively. The recipient operation lasted for 8 h and 7 h with blood loss of about 800-1000 ml. The right hepatic vein, hepatic artery, portal vein and bile duct reconstruction were performed by end-to-end anastomoses in the 2 recipients. Bile duct anastomosis stricture occurred in the first recipient 2 months after transplantation and was treated with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage. The second recipient recovered smoothly without any complications. The recipients have so far survived 9 months and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adult-to-adult living-related donor liver transplantation is a safe and effective option for treatment of end-stage liver diseases in the context of cadaveric liver graft shortage.