Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 13(3): e13677, 2021 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33824828

RESUMEN

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) are a group of disorders characterized by an autoimmune response against the nervous system due to cross-reactivity between malignant and normal neural tissue. The most commonly associated malignancies include small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and lymphoma. Multiple PNS have been reported including paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, retinopathy, sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy, encephalopathy, opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, and stiff-person syndrome. We report a case of a 67-year-old woman with breast cancer who presented with a history of progressive oropharyngeal dysphagia as a paraneoplastic neurologic complication. She was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma, nuclear grade 3 with moderate peritumoral lymphoid infiltrate. Hormone receptors were weakly positive for estrogen receptor (ER) (H score 15), weakly positive for progesterone receptor (PR) (H score 30), and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/NEU). The patient underwent a localized segmental mastectomy but declined any further adjuvant treatment. Three years after being diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, she developed progressive oropharyngeal dysphagia that warranted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. Testing for onconeural antibodies was positive for voltage-gated calcium channel antibody. An extensive workup was negative for any alternative etiology that would explain her neurological symptoms. The patient declined further treatment and eventually succumbed to her illness.

2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 5(1): 92, 2017 11 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29157306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. There is evidence that immunotherapy may play a role in the eradication of residual disease. Peptide vaccines for immunotherapy are capable of durable immune memory, but vaccines alone have shown sparse clinical activity against breast cancer to date. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists and helper peptides are excellent adjuvants for vaccine immunotherapy and they are examined in this human clinical trial. METHODS: A vaccine consisting of 9 MHC class I-restricted breast cancer-associated peptides (from MAGE-A1, -A3, and -A10, CEA, NY-ESO-1, and HER2 proteins) was combined with a TLR3 agonist, poly-ICLC, along with a helper peptide derived from tetanus toxoid. The vaccine was administered on days 1, 8, 15, 36, 57, 78. CD8+ T cell responses to the vaccine were assessed by both direct and stimulated interferon gamma ELIspot assays. RESULTS: Twelve patients with breast cancer were treated: five had estrogen receptor positive disease and five were HER2 amplified. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Toxicities were limited to Grade 1 and Grade 2 and included mild injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms, which occurred in most patients. The most common toxicities were injection site reaction/induration and fatigue, which were experienced by 100% and 92% of participants, respectively. In the stimulated ELIspot assays, peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses were detected in 4 of 11 evaluable patients. Two patients had borderline immune responses to the vaccine. The two peptides derived from CEA were immunogenic. No difference in immune response was evident between patients receiving endocrine therapy and those not receiving endocrine therapy during the vaccine series. CONCLUSIONS: Peptide vaccine administered in the adjuvant breast cancer setting was safe and feasible. The TLR3 adjuvant, poly-ICLC, plus helper peptide mixture provided modest immune stimulation. Further optimization is required for this multi-peptide vaccine/adjuvant combination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (posted 2/15/2012): NCT01532960. Registered 2/8/2012. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01532960.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Carboximetilcelulosa de Sodio/análogos & derivados , Inductores de Interferón/uso terapéutico , Poli I-C/uso terapéutico , Polilisina/análogos & derivados , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Adulto , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/farmacología , Carboximetilcelulosa de Sodio/farmacología , Carboximetilcelulosa de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Inductores de Interferón/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Poli I-C/farmacología , Polilisina/farmacología , Polilisina/uso terapéutico
3.
Oncology ; 91(3): 135-42, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27355204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The predominant breast cancer subtypes, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), have similar recurrence and survival rates but differing patterns of metastatic recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective review of breast cancers treated at an academic medical center from 1999 to 2012 was performed. Demographic, pathologic, treatment, and follow-up data were collected for 179 ILC and 358 IDC patients (1:2 stage-matched). The median follow-up was 4.7 years. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. ILC was more likely to be hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative and mammographically occult. The number of surgical resections, breast conservation rate, systemic treatment, and taxane use was similar between the groups. The overall recurrence rate was the same. ILC recurred more often in the abdominal cavity (24.3% in ILC vs. 4.1% in IDC, p = 0.001). The disease-free survival and overall survival were equal. On multivariate analysis, age, stage of disease, hormone receptor status, and systemic therapy were associated with survival, but histology was not. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ductal breast cancers, lobular breast cancers recur more often in the abdominal cavity. Both ILC and IDC have comparable surgical and medical treatment outcomes and survival. Our data suggest that enhanced surveillance and imaging might be useful in ILC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundario , Carcinoma Lobular/secundario , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Abdominales/terapia , Factores de Edad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Lobular/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA