The Prevailing Preference for Left Nephrectomy in Living Donor Transplantation Does Not Adversely Affect Long-Term Donor and Recipient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In living donor renal transplantation, surgeons traditionally prefer the left kidney for donation. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the choice of laterality of donor nephrectomy on donor and recipient outcomes. METHODS: The data was obtained from the UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). During the study period, 7919 donor nephrectomy and transplantation were carried out in 24 transplant centers. Of these procedures, 6407 (80.9%) were left and 1512 (19.1%) were right kidney donors. RESULTS: Right kidney donation was associated with higher incidence of surgical site infection in the donor. Recipient outcome was superior for left-sided kidneys in terms of immediate graft function, delayed graft function, graft loss within 30 days, and graft survival at 3 years, but not at 1 and 5 years. Open donor nephrectomy (n = 2396, 30.2%) was associated with higher rates of pneumothorax and hemorrhage, longer hospital stay, and inferior graft survival at 3 and 5 years compared with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 5523, 69.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A right donor nephrectomy is associated with higher rate of wound infection in the donor and similar long-term graft outcomes in the recipients. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy offers lower rate of major complications in the donor and a better overall graft survival.

An international multicenter study of protocols for liver transplantation during a pandemic: A case for quadripartite equipoise.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The outbreak of COVID-19 has vastly increased the operational burden on healthcare systems worldwide. For patients with end-stage liver failure, liver transplantation is the only option. However, the strain on intensive care facilities caused by the pandemic is a major concern. There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources. METHODS: We performed an international multicenter study of transplant centers to understand the evolution of policies for transplant prioritization in response to the pandemic in March 2020. To describe the ethical tension arising in this setting, we propose a novel ethical framework, the quadripartite equipoise (QE) score, that is applicable to liver transplantation in the context of limited national resources. RESULTS: Seventeen large- and medium-sized liver transplant centers from 12 countries across 4 continents participated. Ten centers opted to limit transplant activity in response to the pandemic, favoring a "sickest-first" approach. Conversely, some larger centers opted to continue routine transplant activity in order to balance waiting list mortality. To model these and other ethical tensions, we computed a QE score using 4 factors - recipient outcome, donor/graft safety, waiting list mortality and healthcare resources - for 7 countries. The fluctuation of the QE score over time accurately reflects the dynamic changes in the ethical tensions surrounding transplant activity in a pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise addresses the ethical tensions in the current pandemic. It serves as a universally applicable framework to guide regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems. LAY SUMMARY: There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe a four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise that models these ethical tensions and can guide the regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems.

Current role of trisectionectomy for hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Trisectionectomy is a treatment option in extensive liver malignancy, including colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, the reported experience of this procedure is limited. Therefore, we present our experience with right hepatic trisectionectomy (RHT) for CRLM as an example and discuss the changing role of trisectionectomy in the context of modern treatment alternatives based on a literature review. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2014 all patients undergoing RHT at a single center in the UK for CRLM were included. Patient and tumor characteristics were reviewed and a multivariate analysis was done. Based on a literature review the role of trisectionectomy in the treatment of HPB malignancies was discussed. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients undergoing RHT were included. Overall perioperative morbidity was 40.3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 7.6% but reduced to 2.8% over time. Multivariate analysis identified additional organ resection (P = .040) and blood transfusion (P = .028) as independent risk factors for morbidity. Multiple tumors, total hepatic vascular exclusion, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for significantly decreased disease-free and disease-specific survival. Further surgery for recurrence after RHT significantly prolonged survival compared with palliative chemotherapy only. CONCLUSION: With the further development of surgical and multimodal treatment strategies in CRLM the indications for trisectionectomy are decreasing. Having being formerly associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality, this single-center experience clearly shows that these concomitant risks decrease with experience, liberal use of portal vein embolization and improved patient selection. Trisectionectomy remains relevant in selected patients.

Impact of Donor Hepatectomy Time During Organ Procurement in Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: The United Kingdom Experience.

BACKGROUND: No data exist to evaluate how hepatectomy time (HT), in the context of donation after cardiac death (DCD) procurement, impacts short- and long-term outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we analyze the impact of the time from aortic perfusion to end of hepatectomy on outcomes after DCD LT in the United Kingdom. METHODS: An analysis of 1112 DCD donor LT across all UK transplant centers between 2001 and 2015 was performed, using data from the UK Transplant Registry. Donors were all Maastricht Category III. Graft survival after transplantation was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and logistic regression to identify risk factors for primary nonfunction (PNF) and short- and long-term graft survivals after LT. RESULTS: Incidence of PNF was 4% (40) and in multivariate analysis only cold ischemia time (CIT) longer than 8 hours (hazard ratio [HR], 2.186; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.113-4.294; P = 0.023) and HT > 60 minutes (HR, 3.669; 95% CI, 1.363-9.873; P = 0.01) were correlated with PNF. Overall 90-day, 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survivals in DCD LT were 91.2%, 86.5%, 80.9%, and 77.7% (compared with a donation after brain death cohort in the same period [n = 7221] 94%, 91%, 86.6%, and 82.6%, respectively [P < 0.001]). In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with graft survival were HT longer than 60 minutes, donor older than 45 years, CIT longer than 8 hours, and recipient previous abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative impact of prolonged HT on outcomes on DCD LT and although HT is 60 minutes or longer is not a contraindication for utilization, it should be part of a multifactorial assessment with established prognostic donor factors, such as age (>45 y) and CIT (>8 h) for an appropriately selected recipient.

The evolution of donation after circulatory death renal transplantation: a decade of experience.

BACKGROUND: This study compared long-term outcomes of renal transplantation from donors following donation after circulatory death (DCD) with those following donation after brain death (DBD) from one of the largest centres in the UK. METHOD: Recipients of renal transplants from deceased donors between 2002 and 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes were compared between DCD (468) and DBD (905) donors and between standard criteria donors (SCDs) and extended criteria donors (ECDs). RESULTS: Graft survival (GS) and patient survival (PS) from DCD and DBD donors were comparable up to 10 years (GS: 61 versus 55%, P = 0.780; PS: 78 versus 71%, P = 0.285, respectively). Graft function was comparable after 3 months. GS and function were worse in the ECD groups, with no difference between EC-DBD and EC-DCD. PS in the ECD groups was worse than the SCD groups and PS in the EC-DCD group was worse than in the EC-DBD group. DCD donors were an independent risk factor for delayed graft function. Post-operative complications and EC-DCD donation were independent risk factors for reduced GS and PS. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of DCD renal grafts with comparable long-term survival and function to DBD grafts. The use of EC-DCD grafts is justified in selected recipients and provides acceptable function and survival advantages over dialysis.

Non-HLA-matched 3rd party vascular allograft in renal transplant may lead to sensitization against donor HLA.

3rd party donor vessels are often used for vascular reconstruction in organ transplantation. While current practice ensures that 3rd party vessels are blood group matched, HLA matching to the non-intended recipient is not performed. This practice potentially sensitizes the recipient and may reduce their future chance of renal transplant from a larger pool of donors. We examined our cohort of renal transplant recipients who received non-HLA-matched 3rd party vessels for the de-novo development of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Our institution's Human Tissue Authority (HTA) blood vessel registers were examined to identify stored donor vessels and their non-intended recipients. Donor vessel HLA status was cross-referenced with the recipient HLA status. Between 2004 and 2014, five patients were identified that received 3rd party non-HLA-matched vessels for vascular reconstruction during renal transplantation. Three patients (60%) subsequently developed donor-specific HLA antibodies. These data provide evidence that use of non-HLA-matched stored 3rd party vascular grafts may lead to sensitization in the recipient. Where time permits, HLA matching should be performed to avoid this allogeneic response. Laboratories monitoring DSA should be aware of any patient receiving a non-HLA-matched 3rd party vascular graft, and recipients may benefit from increased post-transplant immunological vigilance.

Inflammatory response related scoring systems in assessing the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Various scoring systems based on assessment of the systemic inflammatory response help assessing the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In the present systematic review we evaluated the validity of four pre-intervention scoring systems: Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and its modified version (mGPS), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI). DATA SOURCES: MOOSE guidelines were followed and EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for all published studies until September 2013 using comprehensive text word and MeSH terms. All identified studies were analyzed, and relevant studies were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: Six studies were identified for GPS/mGPS with 3 reporting statistical significance for GPS/mGPS on both univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA). Two studies suggested prognostic significance on UVA but not MVA, and in the final study UVA failed to show significance. Eleven studies evaluated the prognostic value of NLR. Six of them reported prognostic significance for NLR on UVA that persisted at MVA in 4 studies, and in the remaining 2 studies NLR was the only significant factor on UVA. In the remaining 5 studies, all in patients undergoing resection, there was no significance on UVA. Seven studies evaluated PLR, with only one study demonstrated its prognostic significance on both UVA and MVA, the rest did not show the significance on UVA. Of the two studies identified for PNI, one demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival on both UVA and MVA, and the other reported no significance for PNI on UVA. CONCLUSIONS: Both GPS/mGPS and NLR may be useful but further better-designed studies are required to confirm their value. PLR might be little useful, and there are at present inadequate data to assess the prognostic value of PNI. At present, no scoring system is reliable enough to be accepted into routine use for the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Outcomes of surgical resection in the management of colorectal pancreatic metastases.

CONTEXT: Colorectal pancreatic metastases (CRPM) are uncommon, thus the role of surgical resection is unclear. We present our experience of management outcomes of patients with CRPM in a regional pancreatic unit. METHODS: Electronic records of all patients with colorectal cancer (n = 8,228) held by the cancer network were searched for evidence of CRPM. Retrospective analysis of each case was undertaken in relation to diagnosis, management and outcome of CRPM. RESULTS: Four cases of CRPM underwent resection (operative group). The interval between diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and CRPM was 1, 6, 7 and 7 years. CRPM were identified on routine CT surveillance in asymptomatic patients. An additional 5 patients were managed palliatively (non-operative group). In the surgical cohort, median survival was 4 years. One patient remains disease free 4 years 3 months post-surgery. Of 3 patients with recurrent disease, 1 is alive with progressive disease 3 years 11 months post-operatively and 2 passed away at 18 months and 5 years 1 month respectively. Median survival in the palliative group from diagnosis of CRPM was 11 months. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with CRPM surgical resection does confer survival benefit. CRPM arise late in the disease course, with extra-pancreatic metastases frequently diagnosed in the interim. Surgeons outside of pancreatic units should refer cases to their local pancreatic multi-disciplinary team meeting for consideration of resection.

Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Data have indicated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) may be a better prognostic indicator than lymph node status in pancreatic cancer. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the value of the LNR in patients undergoing resection for periampullary carcinomas. METHODS: A cut off value of 0.2 was assigned to the LNR in accordance with published studies. The impact of histopathological factors including a LNR was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: In total, 551 patients undergoing a resection (January 2000 to December 2010) were analysed. The median lymph node yield was 15, and 198 (34%) patients had a LNR > 0.2. In patients with a LNR of > 0.2, the median overall survival (OS) was 18 versus 33 months in patients with an LNR < 0.2 (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a LNR > 0.2, T and N stage, vascular or perineural invasion, grade and resection margin status to be significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis, only a LNR > 0.2, vascular or perineural invasion and margin positivity remained significant. In N1 disease, a LNR was able to distinguish survival in patients with a similar lymph node burden, and correlated with more aggressive tumour pathological variables. CONCLUSION: A LNR > 0.2, and not lymph note status, is an independent prognostic factor for OS indicating the LNR should be utilized in outcome stratification.

Operative terminology and post-operative management approaches applied to hepatic surgery: Trainee perspectives.

Outcomes in hepatic resectional surgery (HRS) have improved as a result of advances in the understanding of hepatic anatomy, improved surgical techniques, and enhanced peri-operative management. Patients are generally cared for in specialist higher-level ward settings with multidisciplinary input during the initial post-operative period, however, greater acceptance and understanding of HRS has meant that care is transferred, usually after 24-48 h, to a standard ward environment. Surgical trainees will be presented with such patients either electively as part of a hepatobiliary firm or whilst covering the service on-call, and it is therefore important to acknowledge the key points in managing HRS patients. Understanding the applied anatomy of the liver is the key to determining the extent of resection to be undertaken. Increasingly, enhanced patient pathways exist in the post-operative setting requiring focus on the delivery of high quality analgesia, careful fluid balance, nutrition and thromboprophlaxis. Complications can occur including liver, renal and respiratory failure, hemorrhage, and sepsis, all of which require prompt recognition and management. We provide an overview of the relevant terminology applied to hepatic surgery, an approach to the post-operative management, and an aid to developing an awareness of complications so as to facilitate better confidence in this complex subgroup of general surgical patients.

Evolution of the surgical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Western centre demonstrates improved survival with endoscopic biliary drainage and reduced use of blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCCA) remains a surgical challenge for which few large Western series have been reported. The aims of this study were to investigate the results of surgical resection for PHCCA and assess how practice has evolved over the past 15 years. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was interrogated to identify all resections. Clinicopathological data were analysed for impact on survival. Subsequently, data for resections carried out during the periods 1994-1998, 1999-2003 and 2004-2008 were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent resection. Trisectionectomy was required in 67% of resections. Overall survival was 70%, 36% and 20% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Size of tumour, margin (R0) status, lymph node status, distant metastasis, tumour grade, portal vein resection, microscopic direct vascular invasion, T-stage and blood transfusion requirement significantly affected outcome on univariate analysis. Distant metastasis (P = 0.040), percutaneous biliary drainage (P = 0.015) and blood transfusion requirement (P = 0.026) were significant factors on multivariate analysis. Survival outcomes improved and blood transfusion requirement was significantly reduced in the most recent time period. DISCUSSION: Blood transfusion requirement and preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage were identified as independent indicators of a poor prognosis following resection of PHCCA. Longterm survival can be achieved following the aggressive surgical resection of this tumour, but the emergence of a clear learning curve in our analyses indicates that these patients should be managed in high-volume centres in order to achieve improved outcomes.