RESUMEN
Background and Objective: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy remains the standard of care for early breast cancers in Pakistan. We sought to compare the outcomes of BCS with oncoplastic surgery (OPS), a relatively infrequent approach to breast cancer treatment in the country. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital and Ziauddin Hospital in Karachi. Patients who had biopsy-proven Stage-I to III breast cancer and underwent either OPS or BCS between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were identified and followed for 30 days. Data were collected by reviewing patient files and electronic records. Results: A total of 481 patients were included in the study, where 204 (42.4%) underwent BCS and 277 (57.6%) underwent OPS. Mean tumor volume (146.8 vs. 90.4 cm3), and postoperative complications (2.2 % vs. 0%) were higher in OPS while the frequency of positive margins was greater in the BCS group (15.7 % vs. 2.2 %). There were no significant differences in the histologic type of tumor between the two groups. Conclusion: OPS is a valid alternative approach to breast cancer treatment that can be offered to women with early stage, locally advanced, multifocal or tumors at complex locations owing to the reduced occurrence of positive margins and thus lowered re-excision rates.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been historically linked with a high rate of re-excision. To address this issue, the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) developed consensus guidelines in 2014 to standardize practices and improve clinical outcomes for BCS patients. In our tertiary cancer care hospital, we assessed the impact of these guidelines on the re-excision rate following BCS. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on breast cancer patients who underwent BCS at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre in Lahore, Pakistan. The study compared the re-excision rate before the implementation of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines (November 2015-July 2017) and after the implementation (January 2018-August 2019). Margins were considered positive if "ink on tumor" was present and negative if "no ink on tumor" was present. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test was used to compare the re-excision rates between the pre- and post-guideline periods. Results: A total of 919 patients were identified, with 533 from the pre-guideline period and 386 from the post-guideline period. Of the 919 patients, 31 with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were excluded from the re-excision analysis because the guidelines were not implemented on the DCIS. Furthermore, the overall rate of re-excision in our data was 4.3%. The re-excision rate decreased from 71.1% to 28.9% (P ≤ 0.05) following the adoption of the guidelines. We observed a statistically significant decrease in the re-excision rate after implementing the SSO-ASTRO guidelines. Conclusion: Implementation of the SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines led to a notable decrease in the overall re-excision rate in our data set. These findings suggest that continued adherence to the guidelines may lead to a further reduction in the re-excision rate in the future.
RESUMEN
Introduction Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide, and even with all the screening and education, great numbers of diagnoses are made in advanced stages. Additionally, patients in remission always remain at risk of relapse and metastasis. Pakistan has the highest incidence of breast cancer among Asian countries. The purpose of this clinical audit was to compare data from the largest cancer hospital in Pakistan with international standards to provide room for quality improvement. Methods A retrospective review of patients with advanced breast carcinoma over a period of six months was done. Permission was obtained from the Quality Assurance and Patent Safety Department before the commencement of the audit. Standards Data obtained were audited against nine standards of four different categories from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on advanced breast carcinoma. Results For the diagnosis and assessment category, for which a target of 100% was set, 99.66% was achieved; for disease monitoring, for which a target of 100% was set, 91.8% was achieved; for systemic disease-modifying therapy, for which the majority was the target, only 1% was achieved; for managing complications, for which a target of 100% was set, 71.8% was achieved. Conclusion Continuous research and breakthrough advancements have made health care an ever-evolving field. Clinical audits like these that compare international standards with local data are beneficial and lead to quality improvement. They highlight issues that may be overlooked otherwise, raise questions that may never be asked, and may inspire prospective research studies. Limitations of the audit were that this clinical audit was conducted outside of the NHS where NICE guidelines are not followed and local guidelines differ from NICE guidelines.
RESUMEN
The earliest records of breast cancer (BC) date back to 3,000 - 2,500 B.C., ever since multiple curative options have been explored. First known wide margin excision was performed around 1st Century AD and a prototype of the modern-day BC surgery, Halsted radical mastectomy, was performed in the 20th Century. BC is the most common cancer in Pakistan accounting for up to 14.5% of the total cancer incidences. Accredited breast surgery fellowships were established in the UK and USA in 2002 and 2003, respectively. In Pakistan, the movement was delayed and the two-year College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) accredited breast surgery fellowship program started in 2019. The increasing annual incidence and changes in demands have led to an increased percentage of General Surgery graduates taking up specialty training. PubMed search from 1990 to 2021 showed a rising trend in the number of breast cancer publications from Pakistan; from almost no papers before 1990 to 615 between 2012 to 2021. This remarkable surge in BC-related research can be explained by the commencement of fellowship programs in breast surgery and related fields. An increase in specialist training will yield better results in the management of patients, improve clinical trials and help produce more meaningful publications from the country.
RESUMEN
Objective The objective of this study is to determine any association between mammographic density (MD) and breast cancer in Pakistani population. The study will also investigate relationship between mammographic breast density, clinical characteristics, and molecular tumor markers of the disease. Methods A retrospective review of data was carried out from January 2020 to December 2020 with stage 0-3 patients with histologically proven breast cancer included in the study. Mammograms were reviewed and density grade was recorded in accordance with "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS)" guidelines. Patient age, tumor, and receptor characteristics were studied and their association with mammographic density was investigated by using chi-square test. P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 361 patients were included with a mean age of 46 years. The frequencies of BIRAD categories were as follows: category A: 8.9%, category B: 43.2%, category C: 33.5%, and category D: 14.4%. Cumulative frequency of categories B and C was 76.7%. There is a statistically significant p-value ≤0.05 association observed between age, estrogen receptors (ER) status, and T-stage versus MD. Also, majority of our patients were in T-stage category 2 or 3, which can easily be picked on mammogram. Conclusion Most of the breast cancer patients in our population had a mammographic density of B or C, indicating that breast cancer is more common in dense breasts. Strong significant association of mammographic density with age, ER status, and tumor stage was found in our population. Future studies need to address and confirm MD and its association with subtypes and aggressiveness of breast cancer.
