Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 84(6): 1212-8, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25795195

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility and radiation dose of thoraco-abdominopelvic precontrast CT in polytrauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined retrospectively 125 patients who underwent a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT for trauma. Two radiologists, independently, evaluated precontrast CT acquisition and two other radiologists examined the contrast-enhanced scans. A further two radiologists assessed both the acquisitions. Mean value of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by each group of radiologists. For 104 patients, CTDIvol, DLP data and individual mean size were collected to calculate effective dose. RESULTS: Mean values of SE, SP, PPV and NPV of findings of radiologists who assessed contrast-enhanced acquisitions were respectively: SE=85%, SP=98%, PPV=86%, NPV=88% versus: SE=43%, SP=95%, PPV=69%, NPV=88% of radiologists who examined non-contrast-enhanced scans. Mean values of radiologists who analyzed both acquisitions were: SE=80%, SP=97%, PPV=80%, NPV=88%. Neither the precontrast scans nor the precontrast and postcontrast scans together provided additional useful information compared to the single contrast-enhanced acquisition. Patients received a mean dose of 12 mSv for the precontrast CT. CONCLUSIONS: Precontrast CT acquisition did not provide significant information in trauma patients, exposing them to an unjustified radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
2.
Dig Liver Dis ; 41(2): 143-9, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18436490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transarterial embolization using one permanent embolic agent alone enhances tumour ischaemia and spares patients with hepatocellular carcinoma form toxic chemotherapeutic drugs. PURPOSE: We assessed feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of transarterial embolization with microspheres in patients with a single node hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with compensated cirrhosis, hypervascularized single hepatocellular carcinoma, in whom liver transplantation was indicated (no.=3), or excluded from radical therapies (no.=15), received selective transarterial embolization with microspheres. Treatment was repeated every other month until complete devascularitazion was demonstrated by computed tomography, for a maximum of 3 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty transarterial embolization courses (mean: 2.8 courses, range 1-6) were administered, corresponding to a 100% applicability rates. Initial complete response was achieved in 16 (89%) patients and confirmed by histology in 2 transplanted patients. During 21-month follow-up (range 8-36), hepatocellular carcinoma recurred in 10 (62%) patients who achieved initial complete response, and de novo tumour nodes developed in 10 (56%). No patient required analgesics and none had liver function deteriorated following transarterial embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial embolization is a well-tolerated treatment for patients with early or intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma who are not suitable for radical treatment or await liver transplantation, but it allows to achieve a sustained complete response in a minority of patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Microesferas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarteriales/instrumentación , Inyecciones Intraarteriales/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 34(3): 197-203, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11990392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assessment of liver cell proliferation by immunodetection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen may predict regenerative potential and survival of liver and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. AIM: To evaluate proliferating cell nuclear antigen status and its clinical significance in a large cohort of patients with chronic viral hepatitis and different degree of liver damage by a computer assisted imaging analysis system. MATERIALS: Liver biopsies from 358 patients with chronic hepatitis (259 males, 49 years, 63% with hepatitis C infection, 27% with hepatitis B virus, 10% with multiple infections) were studied. METHODS: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen was localised by immunoperoxidase on microwave oven pre-treated formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded sections using PC10 monoclonal antibody. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index was calculated by an automated imaging system (Immagini e Computers, Milan, Italy). RESULTS: Mean proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index ranged from 0.1% for patients with minimal changes to 3.6% for those with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall, proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index was higher in males, in older patients, in multiple infections and in hepatitis C virus compared to hepatitis B virus related cases. By linear regression analysis, proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index correlated with older age, male gender; higher transaminase levels, hepatitis C virus, higher histological gradIng and staging: by multivariate analysis male gender, hepatitis C virus, higher grading and staging resulted as independent variables. Both hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus cirrhotics had similar liver cell proliferation rate but those with hepatitis B virus had higher prevalence of liver cell dysplasia with respect to those with hepatitis C virus. CONCLUSIONS: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index was a reliable assay for assessing liver cell proliferation rate in patients with chronic viral hepatitis and correlated with liver disease severity


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B Crónica/metabolismo , Hepatitis C Crónica/metabolismo , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/virología , Femenino , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis B Crónica/inmunología , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/inmunología , Hepatocitos/metabolismo , Hepatocitos/patología , Humanos , Hígado/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Hepatology ; 29(6): 1704-7, 1999 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10347111

RESUMEN

To see whether or not there is an association between the cause of cirrhosis and the number of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules, we analyzed 178 consecutive patients in whom HCC was detected during a prospective screening by abdominal ultrasound (US). The relevant information was obtained from the database of the screening programs operating at four hospitals in the Milan area. One hundred twenty-nine (72%) patients had a single tumor nodule detected by US and 49 (28%) patients had multinodular disease. Ninety-eight (55%) patients had normal serum values of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Tumor staging with biphasic computed tomography (CT) scan or hepatic arteriography with lipiodol revealed that 101 (57%) patients had single tumor nodules and 77 (43%) patients had more than one HCC nodule. After staging, multinodular HCC was more common in patients with multiple risk factors than in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers (56% vs. 38%, P =.05). Interestingly, single tumors were as common in the 126 patients undergoing 6-month interval screening as in the 52 patients who were studied at yearly intervals. The former patients, however, had more small tumors than the latter ones (91% vs. 74%, P =.04). The 22 patients who were alcohol abusers had normal levels of serum AFP more often than the hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HCV carriers or those with multiple risk factors (86% vs. 57%, P <.04; vs. 47%, P <.002; vs. 52%, P <.006, respectively). We concluded that multinodular HCC was underdetected by real time US; it prevailed among patients with multiple risk factors. In these patients, screening with US exams every 6 months may be inadequate for early detection of liver cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Estudios Longitudinales , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA