Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Saudi Pharm J ; 30(11): 1659-1664, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36465854

RESUMEN

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is of paramount concern globally. Community pharmacists (CPs) play a vital role in supporting judicious antimicrobial use in the community as they are the key healthcare providers at a public level. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and perception of CPs towards antimicrobial stewardship at the community level in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to all community pharmacies in four major cities of Saudi Arabia. A simple random sampling approach was used to select pharmacies in each chain. Results: A total of 520 CPs responded to the survey with a response rate of 98.6 %. Most of the pharmacists (n = 479, 92.1 %) accepted that antimicrobial stewardship programs are essential tools to limit injudicious usage of antimicrobials at the community level. Interestingly, very few (n = 105, 21 %) agreed to recommend antibiotics for common illnesses, including upper respiratory tract infections, cold, and flu without a valid prescription. Further, we found a significant role of Saudi health authorities, e.g., Saudi food & drug authorities and the Ministry of Health, in restricting antimicrobials sale in community pharmacies without a valid prescription. Conclusion: Our study findings revealed that CPs had good knowledge about antimicrobial stewardship in Saudi Arabia. The CPs play an active role in the optimization of antimicrobial therapy and infections caused by different microbes. Strict policies by the Saudi health care authority regarding the restricted dispensing of antimicrobials are welcomed by the CPs and thus may contribute toward lowering of antimicrobial resistance burden on the patients and Saudi health care authorities.

2.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 964005, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36210807

RESUMEN

Background: ß-lactams remain the cornerstone of the empirical therapy to treat various bacterial infections. This systematic review aimed to analyze the data describing the dosing regimen of ß-lactams. Methods: Systematic scientific and grey literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of pre-defined exclusion and inclusion criteria. The cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and case reports that reported the dosing schedule of ß-lactams are included in this study. Results: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 40 were cohort studies, 2 were case reports and 10 were RCTs. The majority of the studies (34/52) studied the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a drug. A total of 20 studies proposed dosing schedule in pediatrics while 32 studies proposed dosing regimen among adults. Piperacillin (12/52) and Meropenem (11/52) were the most commonly used ß-lactams used in hospitalized patients. As per available evidence, continuous infusion is considered as the most appropriate mode of administration to optimize the safety and efficacy of the treatment and improve the clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic therapy is challenging due to pathophysiological changes among different age groups. The optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters is useful to support alternative dosing regimens such as an increase in dosing interval, continuous infusion, and increased bolus doses.

3.
Front Public Health ; 10: 847282, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35712310

RESUMEN

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination acceptance and reluctance among staff working in Saudi healthcare facilities. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during April - May 2021, among healthcare workers in five public hospitals under the National Guards Health Association located in Alahsa, Dammam, Jeddah, Madinah, and Riyadh. The study used a questionnaire in English language, which was distributed through official email communication among healthcare staff currently working at study venues. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS v23. An ethical approval was obtained. Results: A total of 1,031 responses were recorded. Most of the staff had both doses of COVID-19 vaccine (89%). The mean score for vaccine acceptance on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) was 3.55 ± 1.6. The mean score for vaccine reluctance on the same scale was 2.71 ± 1.05. Most participants mentioned safety (76.9%) and efficacy (56.3%) as vaccine concerns and believed that COVID-19 vaccine may not be effective because of changes in virus strain (55.5%). The variables of gender and nationality significantly affected vaccine acceptance, while age, gender, nationality, and profession significantly affected vaccine reluctance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most healthcare staff were vaccinated, and a high acceptance for COVID-19 vaccination was reported. Several demographic factors affected the vaccine acceptance and reluctance.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Arabia Saudita
4.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs ; 22(5): 567-575, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35739347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Digoxin is indicated for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation. Despite stronger guideline recommendations for other pharmacologic and device therapies, digoxin retains a role in select patients unable to tolerate or refractory to standard therapies. Contemporary utilization of and costs related to digoxin in the United States of America (USA) remain uncharacterized. The objective of this study was to estimate trends in digoxin use and expenditures across the USA from 2010 to 2017. METHODS: We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to estimate trends in digoxin use and expenditures across the USA from 2010 to 2017. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is an overlapping panel survey that interviews households in the USA to ascertain their healthcare utilization and expenditures. Complex sampling procedures allow for nationally representative estimates of utilization and expenditures. We report the number of digoxin users and expenditures across key subgroups in 2-year increments from 2010 to 2017. RESULTS: The number of digoxin users in the USA declined by 47% from 766 users per 100,000 adults in 2010-11 to 402 users per 100,000 adults in 2016-17. While digoxin use declined among women and self-identified White adults, adults living at or below the federal poverty level and those who self-identified as Asian or Hispanic represent an increasing proportion of overall digoxin users. While nationwide digoxin expenditures declined by 26% from 2010-11 to 2012-13, they peaked at $260.3 million in 2014-15 and remained elevated at $188.7 million in 2016-17. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a nationwide trend towards declining use, digoxin remains prevalent amongst people of Asian and Hispanic descent in the USA. After a spike in cost in 2013, digoxin prices have yet to return to pre-spike levels. The role of digoxin in contemporary heart failure and arrhythmia management will continue to evolve as additional randomized and observational analyses become available.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Adulto , Digoxina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
5.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(10): 1290-1299, 2021 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard blood pressure control metrics may not account for fluctuations in blood pressure over time. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to estimate the independent association between time in systolic blood pressure target range and major adverse cardiovascular events among adults with hypertension. METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), a randomized clinical trial that compared intensive (<120 mm Hg) and standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure treatment interventions in adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk. Target range was defined as 110 to 130 mm Hg and 120 to 140 mm Hg for the intensive and standard arms, respectively. Time in target range was estimated over the first 3 months of follow-up using linear interpolation. The association between time in target range with major adverse cardiovascular events was estimated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Participants with greater time in target range were younger, had lower 10-year cardiovascular risk and lower baseline systolic blood pressure, and were more likely women and statin users. Each 1-SD increase in time in target range was significantly associated with a decreased risk of first major adverse cardiovascular event in fully adjusted models. Time in target range remained significantly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events despite adjustment for mean systolic blood pressure or systolic blood pressure variability. Among participants with mean systolic blood pressure at or below target, time in target range remained associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Time in systolic blood pressure target range independently predicts major adverse cardiovascular event risk.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Clin Lipidol ; 14(3): 315-321.e4, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several advances in lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and changes in generic formulation availability occurred between 2013 and 2017. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine nationwide trends in Medicare Part D and Medicaid expenditures on lipid-lowering therapies from 2013 to 2017. METHODS: We aggregated 662.2 million Medicare Part D and Medicaid prescription claims with associated expense data for 2013 to 2017 from the Medicare and Medicaid Drug Spending Dashboards for nine therapeutic classes of lipid-lowering therapies. RESULTS: Total Medicare Part D expenditures on lipid-lowering therapies was $7.01 billion in 2013 and $5.07 billion in 2017. Total Medicaid lipid-lowering therapy expenditures decreased from $440.9 million in 2013 to $398.7 million in 2017. Annual Medicare expenditures on Crestor were $2.2 billion in 2013 and $0.31 billion in 2017. Annual Medicaid Crestor expenditures decreased from $92.4 million in 2013 to $30.1 million in 2017. From 2013 to 2016, Medicare expenditures on Zetia decreased from $0.89 billion to $0.70 billion, whereas Medicaid Zetia expenditures decreased from $38.6 million in 2013 to $25.4 million in 2017. In 2017, PCSK9 inhibitors accounted for $317.3 million and $14.2 million in Medicare and Medicaid expenditures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall Medicare and Medicaid expenditures on lipid-lowering therapies decreased by $2.5 billion from 2013 to 2017.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipolipemiantes/economía , Medicaid/economía , Medicare Part D/economía , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Inhibidores de Proteasas/economía , Anciano , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacología , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Med ; 132(1): 16-24, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30201240

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 205 deaths per 100,000 persons annually and is the leading cause of death worldwide. The public health burden of cardiovascular disease is expected to continue to grow as the prevalence of many cardiovascular risk factors increases. Several novel classes of glucose-lowering, lipid-lowering, and weight-loss therapeutics have shown mortality benefits in outcomes trials. However, a large proportion of subjects in those trials had established cardiovascular disease, so, as a result, the role of these novel therapeutics in primary cardiovascular prevention is controversial. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the pharmacotherapeutic management of the cardiovascular risk factors of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and obesity. We examine key subgroups within recent cardiovascular outcome trials, weigh the risks and benefits of several novel therapeutics, and provide practical insight into the use of these agents. Our article concludes with a look toward the future and provides the practitioner and scientist with an early view of emerging therapeutics that may play an important role in primary cardiovascular prevention.


Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacología , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Prevención Primaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...