Laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Marginal ulcer perforation is a known complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and laparoscopic repair may be a feasible option minimizing the morbidity associated with a large laparotomy incision. We present our experience with laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcers in patients who have previously undergone RYGB. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from August 2005 to April 2007 was performed identifying all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcer after RYGB at one hospital. The perforation was repaired either by laparoscopic primary suture closure followed by application of an omental patch or by laparoscopic Graham patch without primary suture repair. Operative time, duration of hospitalization, postoperative follow-up, and postoperative complications were recorded. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Six patients underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated marginal ulcer. Operative time was 101.8 ± 50 minutes with a mean hospitalization of 5.3 ± 2.7 days. Follow-up was 6.2 ± 7.5 months. Postoperative complications included 2 patients with nausea and vomiting related to an exposed suture at the gastrojejunostomy, 1 patient with chronic gastritis, and 1 patient developed a stricture at the gastrojejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest series to date of laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcers utilizing an omental patch for repair. We demonstrate that a laparoscopic repair can be completed in a reasonable operative time, with minimal postoperative hospitalization, and low associated morbidity. Patients who develop a perforated marginal ulcer after RYGB can be safely and effectively treated with laparoscopic repair with an omental patch.

Management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass using self-expanding polyester stents.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the outcomes of a series of endoscopically placed polyester self-expanding polyflex stents (SEPSs) for the management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass. Anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass cause significant morbidity and mortality. Covered polyester SEPSs might have a role in the treatment of these leaks. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2006 to November 2006 that included all acute and chronic leaks treated with SEPSs. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients were treated with stents, with a mean procedure time of 22 minutes. Of these 6 patients, 5 had acute postoperative leaks and 1 had a chronic fistula. Five patients started oral intake 1-6 days after their procedure. All acute leaks had complete healing at a median of 44 days. The patient with a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula required revisional surgery for fistula closure. In addition, 5 patients had stent migration, and 3 required stent replacement. CONCLUSION: An endoscopically placed SEPS provides a less-invasive alternative to treat acute anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass while simultaneously allowing oral intake. The results of this case series have demonstrated this treatment to be safe and effective.

Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Complications after bariatric surgery often require longterm parenteral nutrition to achieve healing. Recently, endoscopic treatments have become available that provide healing while allowing for oral nutrition. The purpose of this study was to present outcomes of the largest series to date treating staple line complications after bariatric surgery with endoscopic covered stents. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation was performed of all patients treated for staple line complications after bariatric surgery at a single tertiary care bariatric center. Acute postoperative leaks, chronic gastrocutaneous fistulas, and anastomotic strictures refractory to endoscopic dilation after both gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were included. RESULTS: From January 2006 to June 2007, 19 patients (11 with acute leaks, 2 with chronic fistulas, and 6 with strictures) were treated with a total of 34 endoscopic silicone covered stents (23 polyester, 11 metal). Mean followup was 3.6 months. Immediate symptomatic improvement occurred in 90% (91% of acute leaks, 100% of fistulas, and 84% of strictures). Oral feeding was started in 79% of patients immediately after stenting. Resolution of leak or stricture after stent treatment occurred in 16 of 19 patients (84%). Healing of leak, fistula, and stricture occurred at means of 33 days, 46 days, and 7 days, respectively. Three patients (1 with leak, 1 with fistula, and 1 with stricture) had unsuccessful stent treatment. Migration of the stent occurred in 58% of 34 stents placed. Most migration was minimal, but three stents were removed surgically after distal small bowel migration. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery with endoscopic covered stents allows rapid healing while simultaneously allowing for oral nutrition. The primary morbidity is stent migration.

Use of decellularized human skin to repair esophageal anastomotic leak in humans.

Multiple surgical techniques have been described for repair of esophageal leaks. None of the repairs are optimal, and the morbidity and mortality of an esophageal leak remains high. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of use of AlloDerm (Lifecell Corp, Brachburg, NJ) to successfully repair a thoracic anastomotic esophageal leak.

Endovascular stent graft repair of a persistent sciatic artery aneurysm.

An 88-year-old female presented with a large, painful, pulsatile buttock mass. Computed tomographic angiogram with three-dimensional reconstruction and lower extremity arteriogram revealed a 5 cm sciatic artery aneurysm. We report a case of successful repair of a sciatic artery aneurysm with endovascular stent graft.

An evaluation of resident training in breast procedures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if senior residents are participating in advanced level breast cases. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,583 breast procedures on 1,213 patients over 2 years was performed. Each case was evaluated for the type of case: (1) junior level (PGY 1 and 2)--core needle biopsy, fine needle aspirate, excisional biopsy, needle localized biopsy, lumpectomy, partial mastectomy, and simple mastectomy; and (2) senior level--stereotactic breast biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary dissection, and modified radical mastectomy. All cases were reviewed for level of resident involved. RESULTS: Overall, seniors performed 31% of the cases, junior residents performed 42%, and 27% were unattended by any resident. Senior level breast cases were specifically examined to compare whether a senior or junior was present. Overall, 891 defined senior cases were performed. A senior level resident attended 34% of these, leaving 66% covered by junior residents or uncovered altogether. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear when evaluating breast procedures that senior residents are less involved than junior residents. Furthermore, the fact that many of the reported cases (28%) and, more significantly, senior level cases (26%) have no resident involved leads us to conclude that senior level residents are not taking advantage of the opportunity to gain experience in performing advanced level breast procedures in our surgical program.