Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Econ ; 22(8): 806-813, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010349

RESUMEN

Aims: Several glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are available as weekly injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes. These medications vary in their injection devices, and these differences could impact quality-of-life and patient preference. The purpose of this study was to examine patient preferences and estimate health state utilities associated with injection devices for two weekly GLP-1 therapies. Materials and methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes in Italy (Milan, Rome) valued three health state vignettes in time trade-off interviews. The health states had identical descriptions of type 2 diabetes, but differed in description of the treatment process: (1) oral treatment regimen, (2) oral plus weekly dulaglutide injection, and (3) oral plus weekly semaglutide injection. Results: A total of 216 participants completed interviews (57.9% male; mean age = 60.5). Almost all patients (99.5%) preferred the oral health state over either injection health state. Comparing between the two injections, 88.4% preferred the dulaglutide health state, while 11.6% preferred the semaglutide state. Mean (SD) utilities were 0.907 (0.076) for oral, 0.894 (0.085) for dulaglutide, and 0.887 (0.087) for semaglutide. The mean (SD) utility difference between the injection device health states was 0.007 (0.019). Limitations: Although the health states were designed to match the injection device instructions for use as closely as possible, vignette-based methods are inherently limited because results are based on perceptions of the health states rather than actual patient experience with the devices. Conclusions: Results provide insight into patient preferences associated with injection devices for weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists. The majority of patients preferred the dulaglutide device over the semaglutide device, and for some patients, this difference had an impact on utility valuations. Patient preferences for injection devices could be an important factor to consider when selecting treatments for type 2 diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Prioridad del Paciente , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/administración & dosificación , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA