Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 13(11): 1755-1766, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30078152

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is the state of the art in prenatal diagnosis to depict fetal heart diseases. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has been proposed as a complementary diagnostic tool. Currently, only trigger-based methods allow the temporal and spatial resolutions necessary to depict the heart over time. Of these methods, only Doppler US (DUS)-based triggering is usable with higher field strengths. DUS is sensitive to motion. This may lead to signal and, ultimately, trigger loss. If too many triggers are lost, the image acquisition is stopped, resulting in a failed imaging sequence. Moreover, losing triggers may prolong image acquisition. Hence, if no actual trigger can be found, injected triggers are added to the signal based on the trigger history. METHOD: We use model checking, a technique originating from the computer science domain that formally checks if a model satisfies given requirements, to simultaneously model heart and respiratory motion and to decide whether respiration has a prominent effect on the signal. Using bounds on the physiological parameters and their variability, the method detects when changes in the signal are due to respiration. We use this to decide when to inject a trigger. RESULTS: In a real-world scenario, we can reduce the number of falsely injected triggers by 94% from more than 87% to less than 5%. On a subset of motion that would allow CMRI, the number can be further reduced to below 0.2%. In a study using simulations with a robot, we show that our method works for different types of motions, motion ranges, starting positions and heartbeat traces. CONCLUSION: While DUS is a promising approach for fetal CMRI, correct trigger injection is critical. Our model checking method can reduce the number of wrongly injected triggers substantially, providing a key prerequisite for fast and artifact free CMRI.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Embarazo , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
2.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ; 20(1): 17, 2018 03 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Doppler ultrasound (DUS) device in humans for fetal CMR gating. METHODS: Fifteen fetuses (gestational age 30-39 weeks) were examined using 1.5 T CMR scanners at three different imaging sites. A newly developed CMR-compatible DUS device was used to generate gating signals from fetal cardiac motion. Gated dynamic balanced steady-state free precession images were acquired in 4-chamber and short-axis cardiac views. Gating signals during data acquisition were analyzed with respect to trigger variability and sensitivity. Image quality was assessed by measuring endocardial blurring (EB) and by image evaluation using a 4-point scale. Left ventricular (LV) volumetry was performed using the single-plane ellipsoid model. RESULTS: Gating signals from the fetal heart were detected with a variability of 26 ± 22 ms and a sensitivity of trigger detection of 96 ± 4%. EB was 2.9 ± 0.6 pixels (4-chamber) and 2.5 ± 0.1 pixels (short axis). Image quality scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (overall), 3.4 ± 0.7 (mitral valve), 3.4 ± 0.7 (foramen ovale), 3.6 ± 0.7 (atrial septum), 3.7 ± 0.5 (papillary muscles), 3.8 ± 0.4 (differentiation myocardium/lumen), 3.7 ± 0.5 (differentiation myocardium/lung), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (systolic myocardial thickening). Inter-observer agreement for the scores was moderate to very good (kappa 0.57-0.84) for all structures. LV volumetry revealed mean values of 2.8 ± 1.2 ml (end-diastolic volume), 0.9 ± 0.4 ml (end systolic volume), 1.9 ± 0.8 ml (stroke volume), and 69.1 ± 8.4% (ejection fraction). CONCLUSION: High-quality dynamic fetal CMR was successfully performed using a newly developed DUS device for direct fetal cardiac gating. This technique has the potential to improve the utility of fetal CMR in the evaluation of congenital pathologies.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Imagen Sincronizada Cardíacas , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Boston , Técnicas de Imagen Sincronizada Cardíacas/instrumentación , Ecocardiografía Doppler/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Corazón Fetal/fisiopatología , Alemania , Edad Gestacional , Cardiopatías Congénitas/embriología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Volumen Sistólico , Suecia , Transductores , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/instrumentación , Función Ventricular Izquierda
3.
Magn Reson Med Sci ; 17(4): 308-317, 2018 Oct 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29467359

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Fetal cardiac MRI has the potential to play an important role in the assessment of fetal cardiac pathologies, but it is up to now not feasible due to a missing gating method. The purpose of this work was the evaluation of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) for external fetal cardiac gating with regard to compatibility, functionality, and reliability. Preliminary results were assessed performing fetal cardiac MRI. METHODS: An MRI conditional DUS device was developed to obtain a gating signal from the fetal heart. The MRI compatibility was evaluated at 1.5T and 3T using B1 field maps and gradient echo images. The quality and sensitivity of the DUS device to detect the fetal heart motion for cardiac gating were evaluated outside the MRI room in 15 fetuses. A dynamic fetal cardiac phantom was employed to evaluate distortions of the DUS device and gating signal due to electromagnetic interferences at 1.5T and 3T. In the first in vivo experience, dynamic fetal cardiac images were acquired in four-chamber view at 1.5T and 3T in two fetuses. RESULTS: The maximum change in the B1 field and signal intensity with and without the DUS device was <6.5% for 1.5T and 3T. The sensitivity of the DUS device to detect the fetal heartbeat was 99.1%. Validation of the DUS device using the fetal cardiac phantom revealed no electromagnetic interferences at 1.5T or 3T and a high correlation to the simulated heart frequencies. Fetal cardiac cine images were successfully applied and showed good image quality. CONCLUSION: An MR conditional DUS gating device was developed and evaluated revealing safety, compatibility, and reliability for different field strengths. In a preliminary experience, the DUS device was successfully applied for in vivo fetal cardiac imaging at 1.5T and 3T.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Doppler/instrumentación , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...