Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Periodontol ; 85(12): 1792-8, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25102269

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus constellatus and Streptococcus intermedius in subgingival dental plaque biofilms may contribute to forms of periodontitis that resist treatment with conventional mechanical root debridement/surgical procedures and may additionally participate in some extraoral infections. Because systemic antibiotics are often used in these clinical situations, and little is known of the antibiotic susceptibility of subgingival isolates of these two bacterial species, this study determined the in vitro susceptibility to six antibiotics of fresh S. constellatus and S. intermedius clinical isolates from human periodontitis lesions. METHODS: A total of 33 S. constellatus and 17 S. intermedius subgingival strains, each recovered from separate patients with severe chronic periodontitis (n = 50) before treatment, were subjected to antibiotic gradient strip susceptibility testing with amoxicillin, azithromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, and doxycycline on blood-supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar and to the inhibitory effects of metronidazole at 16 mg/L in an enriched Brucella blood agar dilution assay. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing interpretative standards were used to assess the results. RESULTS: Clindamycin was the most active antibiotic against S. constellatus (minimum inhibitory concentration at 90% [MIC90] 0.25 mg/L), and amoxicillin was most active against S. intermedius (MIC90 0.125 mg/L). A total of 30% of the S. constellatus and S. intermedius clinical isolates were resistant in vitro to doxycycline, 98% were only intermediate in susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, and 90% were resistant to metronidazole at 16 mg/L. CONCLUSION: Subgingival S. constellatus and S. intermedius exhibited variable antibiotic susceptibility profiles, potentially complicating empirical selection of periodontitis antibiotic therapy in patients who are species positive.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Periodontitis Crónica/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Streptococcus intermedius/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Amoxicilina/farmacología , Azitromicina/farmacología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Clindamicina/farmacología , Doxiciclina/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resistencia a las Penicilinas , Streptococcus/clasificación , Resistencia a la Tetraciclina
2.
J Periodontol ; 84(7): 1026-33, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23106507

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis may contribute to periodontal breakdown in heavily infected subgingival sites, particularly in patients responding poorly to mechanical forms of periodontal therapy. Because only limited data are available on the antimicrobial sensitivity of enterococci of subgingival origin, this study evaluates the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of E. faecalis isolated from periodontitis patients in the United States. METHODS: Pure cultures of 47 subgingival E. faecalis clinical isolates were each inoculated onto specially prepared broth microdilution susceptibility panels containing vancomycin, teicoplanin, and six oral antibiotics of potential use in periodontal therapy. After incubation in ambient air for 18 to 20 hours, minimal inhibitory drug concentrations were determined using applicable Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria and interpretative guidelines. The organisms were additionally evaluated for in vitro resistance to metronidazole at 4 µg/mL. RESULTS: Periodontal E. faecalis exhibited substantial in vitro resistance to tetracycline (53.2% resistant), erythromycin (80.8% resistant or intermediate resistant), clindamycin (100% resistant to 2 µg/mL), and metronidazole (100% resistant to 4 µg/mL). In comparison, the clinical isolates were generally sensitive to ciprofloxacin (89.4% susceptible; 10.6% intermediate resistant) and 100% susceptible in vitro to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. CONCLUSIONS: Tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, and metronidazole revealed poor in vitro activity against human subgingival E. faecalis clinical isolates, and would likely be ineffective therapeutic agents against these species in periodontal pockets. Among orally administered antibiotics, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin exhibited marked in vitro inhibitory activity against periodontal E. faecalis, and may be clinically useful in treatment of periodontal infections involving enterococci.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Periodontitis/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/farmacología , Ampicilina/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Periodontitis Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodontitis Crónica/microbiología , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Clindamicina/farmacología , Placa Dental/microbiología , Enterococcus faecalis/clasificación , Eritromicina/farmacología , Femenino , Encía/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bolsa Periodontal/tratamiento farmacológico , Bolsa Periodontal/microbiología , Teicoplanina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Tetraciclina , Vancomicina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA