Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 72(2): 101582, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934479

RESUMEN

AIMS: Few studies have assessed the prevalence and significance of right bundle branch block in athletes. Aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of incomplete right bundle branch block and its correlation with the nature of sports practice and to compare the athlete with right bundle branch block and the one with a normal electrocardiogram. METHODS: It was a retrospective study of the electrocardiogram and echocardiography of competitive athletes recruited in the medical-sports center of Sousse RESULTS: A total of 554 athletes were included. Mean age was 16.1 ± 2.9 years and 69 % were male. The mean training duration was 5.8 hours per week. The prevalence of incomplete right bundle branch block was 13.9 % (77 cases). Endurance sports were practiced in 71.4 % of cases among subjects with right bundle branch block versus 55.4 % in the rest of the population (p < 0.001). The basal diameter of the right ventricle was larger in athletes with right bundle branch block compared to athletes without right bundle branch block: 28 ± 3.6 mm versus 24 ± 2.4 mm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that right bundle branch block is a marker of incomplete right ventricular remodeling. This remodeling represents a form of adaptation to sustained elevation of volumetric load observed mainly in endurance sports.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Bloqueo de Rama/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Túnez/epidemiología , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Atletas
2.
Tunis Med ; 100(2): 143-148, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852249

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is known to be associated with worse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIM: To assess prognostic impact of DM on patients managed by urgent PCI following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In a retrospective study, STEMI patients admitted to our department from January 2016 to December 2019 and treated with urgent PCI (primary or rescue PCI) were included. They were divided in two groups: Diabetic and non-diabetic patients. They were followed-up for a period of 12 months. Major cardiac adverse event (MACE) was a composite outcome of the following events: myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization or cardiovascular death. MACEs were collected during follow-up. RESULTS: Our population consisted of 225 patients. DM was observed in 104 STEMI patients (46.2%). Diabetic patients had higher frequency of hypertension (p 1.4mmol/l (p 75 years, hyperglycemia at admission (>10mmol/l), extensive anterior infarction and procedure failure were associated with in-hospital mortality in the non-diabetic group. Factors associated with 12-months mortality and MACEs among diabetic patients were age > 75 years, anemia, CKD and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modern era of STEMI treatment, diabetic patients still have a poor prognosis. These results highlight the need for coronary risk factors treatment among these patients.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Egypt Heart J ; 74(1): 42, 2022 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains relatively common despite the use of drug-eluting stents. Outcomes and prognostic factors following ISR revascularization are still being investigated. We aimed to describe the outcomes following different ISR treatment strategies in order to identify prognostic factors associated with worse outcomes. RESULTS: In a retrospective cohort study, we included patients who were admitted to our department and treated for ISR, from January 2017 to December 2018. All patients were followed up for a median period of 24 months. Major cardiac adverse event (MACE) was a composite outcome of the following events: myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization or cardiovascular death. MACEs were collected during follow-up. Our population consisted of 116 patients. Mean age was 60 years old with a sex ratio of 2.8. During follow-up, 44 patients (37.9%) had at least one MACE. Independent factors identified by multivariate logistic regression were ISR of the proximal left anterior descending artery [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.29; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.16-1.81; p = 0.05], diffuse ISR [OR = 2.16; 95% CI 1.1-3.47; p = 0.022], double or triple vessel disease [OR = 2.97; 95% CI 1.2-6.8; p = 0.008], two or more stents per lesion [OR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.14-2.21, p = 0.031] and absence of post-dilatation in the initial angioplasty [OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1-1.35; p = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that ISR is related to poor outcomes. Identifying prognostic factors would play a key role in the refinement of interventional techniques.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA