Planned randomized conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Planned conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus was evaluated in de novo kidney transplant recipients. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label study, 297 patients were initially treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and prednisone. Of the 283 patients reaching 3 months, 97 were converted to sirolimus (SRL), 107 were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) and 79 were patients receiving TAC without criteria to undergo intervention at month 3 (TACex). The primary objective was to show superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the SRL group at month 24. Of the 258 patients who completed 24 months, 91 (94%) were in the SRL group, 101 (94%) in the TAC group and 66 (84%) in the TACex group. In the intention-to-treat population there were no differences in eGFR (66.2 ± 25.3 vs. 70.7 ± 25.1, p = 0.817) or in the severity of chronic sclerosing lesions scores in 24-month protocol biopsies. Higher mean urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (0.36 ± 0.69 vs. 0.15 ± 0.53, p = 0.03) and higher incidence of treated acute rejection between months 3-24 (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.047) were observed in SRL compared to TAC group. In this population planned conversion from TAC to SRL 3 months after kidney transplantation was not associated with improved renal function at 24 months.

Lipid profile changes during the first year after kidney transplantation: risk factors and influence of the immunosuppressive drug regimen.

AIM: This study analyzed the incidence, time course, and risk factors associated with dyslipidemia during the first year after kidney transplantation among patients receiving various immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: The analysis included 474 kidney transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) combined with sirolimus (SRL; n=137) or mycophenolate (MMF, n=58) or everolimus (EVR, n=47); or SRL combined with MMF (n=32); or tacrolimus (TAC) combined with SRL (n=86) or MMF (n=114). All patients received prednisone. We evaluated the influence of demographic features, clinical outcomes, and statin use on lipid profiles during the first year after transplantation. total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hdl-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ldl-C), non-HDL-C, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C:HDL-C, TG:HDL-C. RESULTS: Lipid profiles were within the recommended ranges in 28% of patients pretransplantation and in 10% at 1 year; 27% of them received statins. At 1 year, LDL-C<100 mg/dL was observed in 31.8% of patients but more than 35% of these patients still showed other lipid fractions or ratios outside recommended target concentrations. Among all patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL, almost 70% to 80% had other lipid fractions or ratios within target ranges. A logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, time on dialysis, diabetes, type of calcineurin inhibitor (CSA vs TAC), adjunctive therapy (SRL/EVR vs MMF) and prednisone dose to be associated with dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION: Dyslipidemia is frequent at 1 year after transplantation. The lack of agreement among changes observed in lipid fractions and ratios suggests that more studies are necessary to guide therapy besides targeting LDL-C concentrations as recommended by current guidelines.

The emerging role of Brazil in clinical trial conduct for transplantation.

Brazil is a country with over 190 000 000 inhabitants and a health system composed of a large public, government managed system. Between 1999 and 2010 the number of deceased donors increased by 161%, from 3.8 to 9.9 pmp, and the number of solid organ transplants increased by 121%, from 2891 to 6402. This growth was a consequence of the creation of a well-organized national transplant program. Government funding, decentralization and educational investment in transplant coordinators and related professional were decisive. In 2009 Brazil was the second largest country in the absolute number of kidney transplants (n = 4259). There are significant region disparities in performance which are mainly due to the development status. Improvements in transplant and research regulations resulted in an increasing participation of Brazilian transplant centers in multicenter trials, reaching over 44 studies during the last 11 years. Brazilian centers have been involved in clinical trials using everolimus, sirolimus, fingolimod, mycophenolate mofetyl, mycophenolate sodium, tacrolimus modified-release, sotrastaurin, belatacept, JAK3 inhibitor CP690,550 and valganciclovir. The still increasing number of transplants performed every year along with more efficient regulatory and sanitary analysis, organized clinical research programs and reduction in region performance disparities will eventually increase even more the participation of Brazil in trials worldwide.

Risk factors associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population. RESULTS: At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1). CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.

Exploratory calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in living-related kidney transplant recipients.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is among the major causes of graft loss even in low-risk kidney transplant recipients and correlates with acute nephrotoxic events during the first year post-transplant. Therefore, calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens may improve patient and graft survival among recipients of living-related kidney transplants. To confirm this hypothesis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of two calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in 92 low-risk recipients of one-haplotype living-related kidney transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, azathioprine and prednisone (group I, GI, N = 38), 2 doses of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (GII, N = 33) and 2 doses of daclizumab, MMF, sirolimus and prednisone (GIII, N = 21). At 12 months, treatment failure (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) was higher in GII compared to GIII and GI (54.5 vs 24.0 vs 13.1%, P < 0.01, respectively). In patients of black ethnicity the incidence of acute rejection was 25 vs 83.3 vs 20% (P = 0.055), respectively. Patient and graft survival was comparable. There were no differences in mean creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance at 12 months. Overall incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (3.3%) and cytomegalovirus disease (4.3%) was similar in all groups. Further development of effective calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens should exclude patients of black ethnicity and may need full-induction therapy, perhaps with depleting agents, and concentration-controlled use of sirolimus and MMF.

Exploratory calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in living-related kidney transplant recipients

Chronic allograft nephropathy is among the major causes of graft loss even in low-risk kidney transplant recipients and correlates with acute nephrotoxic events during the first year post-transplant. Therefore, calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens may improve patient and graft survival among recipients of living-related kidney transplants. To confirm this hypothesis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of two calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in 92 low-risk recipients of one-haplotype living-related kidney transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, azathioprine and prednisone (group I, GI, N = 38), 2 doses of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (GII, N = 33) and 2 doses of daclizumab, MMF, sirolimus and prednisone (GIII, N = 21). At 12 months, treatment failure (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) was higher in GII compared to GIII and GI (54.5 vs 24.0 vs 13.1 percent, P < 0.01, respectively). In patients of black ethnicity the incidence of acute rejection was 25 vs 83.3 vs 20 percent (P = 0.055), respectively. Patient and graft survival was comparable. There were no differences in mean creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance at 12 months. Overall incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (3.3 percent) and cytomegalovirus disease (4.3 percent) was similar in all groups. Further development of effective calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens should exclude patients of black ethnicity and may need full-induction therapy, perhaps with depleting agents, and concentration-controlled use of sirolimus and MMF.

Conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil followed by calcineurin inhibitor minimization or elimination in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) followed by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) elimination or minimization in patients with progressive chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). METHODS: Between November 6, 1999 and February 12, 2003, 169 patients receiving CNI/AZA/prednisone (153 CsA; 14 tacrolimus) were included in this study. Demographics, immunosuppression, graft function, hematology, and biochemistry were obtained before (-6, -3, and -1 month) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after and at last follow-up visit after conversion. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 +/- 12 years, 66% males, 51% Caucasian, and 72% living allograft recipients. Mean follow-up times before and after conversion were 32.4 and 19.4 months; 10 patients completed 3 years of follow-up. CNI elimination was performed in 39% and minimization in 61% of patients. Overall there was significantly improved graft function at 1 year after conversion (2.6 +/- 1.0 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mg/dL, P = .038). The slopes of the regression lines of 1/Cr vs time were significantly improved from preconversion to after conversion (-0.026 vs +0.007 mg(-1)/dL per day(-1), P = .001). There was a significant decrease in mean systolic (141 +/- 21 vs 135 +/- 22 mm Hg, P = .015) and diastolic (89 +/- 15 vs 84 +/- 14 mm Hg, P = .005) blood pressure values at 1 year. There were four episodes of acute rejection (Banff IA) treated with steroids. Three years after conversion, patient and graft survivals were 95% and 79%, respectively. One patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. CONCLUSION: Among patients with CAD, conversion from AZA to MMF followed by CNI minimization or elimination was a safe and effective strategy to preserve or improve graft function.

Relationship of cyclosporin and sirolimus blood concentrations regarding the incidence and severity of hyperlipidemia after kidney transplantation.

The influence of drug concentrations on the development of persistent posttransplant hyperlipidemia was investigated in 82 patients who received cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisone plus sirolimus (SRL) (52) or azathioprine (AZA) (30) during the first year after transplantation. Blood levels of CsA and SRL, daily doses of AZA and prednisone, and cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose concentrations were determined during each visit (pretransplant and 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 360 days posttransplant). Persistent hyperlipidemia was defined as one-year average steady-state cholesterol (CavCHOL) or triglyceride (CavTG) concentrations above 240 and 200 mg/dL, respectively. Mean cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations increased after transplantation (P < 0.01) and were higher in patients receiving SRL compared to AZA (P < 0.001). Patients receiving SRL showed a significantly higher number of cholesterol (> 229 or > 274 mg/dL) and triglyceride (> 198 or > 282 mg/dL) determinations in the upper interquartile ranges. CsA and SRL interquartile ranges correlated with cholesterol concentrations (P = 0.001) whereas only SRL interquartile ranges correlated with triglyceride concentrations (P < 0.0001). Only pretransplant cholesterol concentration > 205 mg/dL was independently associated with development of persistent hypercholesterolemia (CavCHOL > 240 mg/dL, relative risk (RR) = 20, CI 3.8-104.6, P = 0.0004) whereas pretransplant triglyceride concentration > 150 mg/dL (RR = 7.2, CI 1.6-32.4, P = 0.01) or > 211 mg/dL (RR = 19.8, CI 3.6-107.9, P = 0.0006) and use of SRL (RR = 3, CI 1.0-8.8, P = 0.0049) were independently associated with development of persistent hypertriglyceridemia (CavTG > 200 mg/dL). Persistent hypercholesterolemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant cholesterol concentrations and was dependent on both CsA and SRL concentrations. Persistent hypertriglyceridemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant triglyceride concentrations and was dependent on SRL concentrations.

Impact of initial exposure to calcineurin inhibitors on kidney graft function of patients at high risk to develop delayed graft function.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the influence of full doses of calcineurin inhibitors [8-10 mg kg-1 day-1 cyclosporine (N = 80), or 0.2-0.3 mg kg-1 day-1 tacrolimus (N = 68)] administered from day 1 after transplantation on the transplant outcomes of a high-risk population. Induction therapy was used in 13% of the patients. Patients also received azathioprine (2 mg kg(-1) day(-1), N = 58) or mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day, N = 90), and prednisone (0.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1), N = 148). Mean time on dialysis was 79 +/- 41 months, 12% of the cases were re-transplants, and 21% had panel reactive antibodies > 10%. In 43% of donors the cause of death was cerebrovascular disease and 27% showed creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL. The incidence of slow graft function (SGF) and delayed graft function (DGF) was 15 and 60%, respectively. Mean time to last dialysis and to nadir creatinine were 18 +/- 15 and 34 +/- 20 days, respectively. Mean creatinine at 1 year after transplantation was 1.48 +/- 0.50 mg/dL (DGF 1.68 +/- 0.65 vs SGF 1.67 +/- 0.66 vs immediate graft function (IGF) 1.41 +/- 0.40 mg/dL, P = 0.089). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 22% (DGF 31%, SGF 10%, IGF 8%). One-year patient and graft survival was 92.6 and 78.4%, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and malignancies was 28, 8.1, and 0%, respectively. Compared to previous studies, the use of initial full doses of calcineurin inhibitors without antibody induction in patients with SGF or DGF had no negative impact on patient and graft survival.

Impact of initial exposure to calcineurin inhibitors on kidney graft function of patients at high risk to develop delayed graft function

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the influence of full doses of calcineurin inhibitors [8-10 mg kg-1 day-1 cyclosporine (N = 80), or 0.2-0.3 mg kg-1 day-1 tacrolimus (N = 68)] administered from day 1 after transplantation on the transplant outcomes of a high-risk population. Induction therapy was used in 13 percent of the patients. Patients also received azathioprine (2 mg kg-1 day-1, N = 58) or mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day, N = 90), and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1, N = 148). Mean time on dialysis was 79 ± 41 months, 12 percent of the cases were re-transplants, and 21 percent had panel reactive antibodies >10 percent. In 43 percent of donors the cause of death was cerebrovascular disease and 27 percent showed creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL. The incidence of slow graft function (SGF) and delayed graft function (DGF) was 15 and 60 percent, respectively. Mean time to last dialysis and to nadir creatinine were 18 ± 15 and 34 ± 20 days, respectively. Mean creatinine at 1 year after transplantation was 1.48 ± 0.50 mg/dL (DGF 1.68 ± 0.65 vs SGF 1.67 ± 0.66 vs immediate graft function (IGF) 1.41 ± 0.40 mg/dL, P = 0.089). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 22 percent (DGF 31 percent, SGF 10 percent, IGF 8 percent). One-year patient and graft survival was 92.6 and 78.4 percent, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and malignancies was 28, 8.1, and 0 percent, respectively. Compared to previous studies, the use of initial full doses of calcineurin inhibitors without antibody induction in patients with SGF or DGF had no negative impact on patient and graft survival.

Relationship of cyclosporin and sirolimus blood concentrations regarding the incidence and severity of hyperlipidemia after kidney transplantation

The influence of drug concentrations on the development of persistent posttransplant hyperlipidemia was investigated in 82 patients who received cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisone plus sirolimus (SRL) (52) or azathioprine (AZA) (30) during the first year after transplantation. Blood levels of CsA and SRL, daily doses of AZA and prednisone, and cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose concentrations were determined during each visit (pretransplant and 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 360 days posttransplant). Persistent hyperlipidemia was defined as one-year average steady-state cholesterol (CavCHOL) or triglyceride (CavTG) concentrations above 240 and 200 mg/dL, respectively. Mean cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations increased after transplantation (P < 0.01) and were higher in patients receiving SRL compared to AZA (P < 0.001). Patients receiving SRL showed a significantly higher number of cholesterol (>229 or >274 mg/dL) and triglyceride (>198 or >282 mg/dL) determinations in the upper interquartile ranges. CsA and SRL interquartile ranges correlated with cholesterol concentrations (P = 0.001) whereas only SRL interquartile ranges correlated with triglyceride concentrations (P < 0.0001). Only pretransplant cholesterol concentration >205 mg/dL was independently associated with development of persistent hypercholesterolemia (CavCHOL >240 mg/dL, relative risk (RR) = 20, CI 3.8-104.6, P = 0.0004) whereas pretransplant triglyceride concentration >150 mg/dL (RR = 7.2, CI 1.6-32.4, P = 0.01) or >211 mg/dL (RR = 19.8, CI 3.6-107.9, P = 0.0006) and use of SRL (RR = 3, CI 1.0-8.8, P = 0.0049) were independently associated with development of persistent hypertriglyceridemia (CavTG >200 mg/dL). Persistent hypercholesterolemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant cholesterol concentrations and was dependent on both CsA and SRL concentrations. Persistent hypertriglyceridemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant triglyceride concentrations and was dependent on SRL concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of FTY720 in kidney transplant recipients.

FTY720 is a new and effective immunosuppressive agent, which produces peripheral blood lymphopenia through a lymphocyte homing effect. We investigated the relationship between the dose of FTY720 or blood concentration (pharmacokinetics, PK) and peripheral lymphopenia (pharmacodynamics, PD) in 23 kidney transplant recipients randomized to receive FTY720 (0.25-2.5 mg/day) or mofetil mycophenolate (2 mg/day) in combination with cyclosporine and steroids. FTY720 dose, blood concentrations and lymphocyte counts were determined weekly before and 4 to 12 weeks after transplantation. The effect of PD was calculated as the absolute lymphocyte count or its reductions. PK/PD modeling was used to find the best-fit model. Mean FTY720 concentrations were 0.36 +/- 0.05 (0.25 mg), 0.73 +/- 0.12 (0.5 mg), 3.26 +/- 0.51 (1 mg), and 7.15 +/- 1.41 ng/ml (2.5 mg) between 4 and 12 weeks after transplantation. FTY720 PK was linear with dose (r(2) = 0.98) and showed low inter- and intra-individual variability. FTY720 produced a dose-dependent increase in mean percent reduction of peripheral lymphocyte counts (38 vs 42 vs 56 vs 77, P < 0.01, respectively). The simple Emax model [E = (Emax * C)/(C + EC50)] was the best-fit PK/PD modeling for FTY720 dose (Emax = 87.8 +/- 5.3% and ED50 = 0.48 +/- 0.08 mg, r(2) = 0.94) or concentration (Emax = 78.3 +/- 2.9% and EC50 = 0.59 +/- 0.09 ng/ml, r(2) = 0.89) vs effect (% reduction in peripheral lymphocytes). FTY720 PK/PD is dose dependent and follows an Emax model (EC50 = 0.5 mg or 0.6 ng/ml). Using lymphopenia as an FTY720 PD surrogate marker, high % reductions (~80%) in peripheral lymphocytes are required to achieve best efficacy to prevent acute allograft rejection.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of FTY720 in kidney transplant recipients

FTY720 is a new and effective immunosuppressive agent, which produces peripheral blood lymphopenia through a lymphocyte homing effect. We investigated the relationship between the dose of FTY720 or blood concentration (pharmacokinetics, PK) and peripheral lymphopenia (pharmacodynamics, PD) in 23 kidney transplant recipients randomized to receive FTY720 (0.25-2.5 mg/day) or mofetil mycophenolate (2 mg/day) in combination with cyclosporine and steroids. FTY720 dose, blood concentrations and lymphocyte counts were determined weekly before and 4 to 12 weeks after transplantation. The effect of PD was calculated as the absolute lymphocyte count or its reductions. PK/PD modeling was used to find the best-fit model. Mean FTY720 concentrations were 0.36 ± 0.05 (0.25 mg), 0.73 ± 0.12 (0.5 mg), 3.26 ± 0.51 (1 mg), and 7.15 ± 1.41 ng/ml (2.5 mg) between 4 and 12 weeks after transplantation. FTY720 PK was linear with dose (r² = 0.98) and showed low inter- and intra-individual variability. FTY720 produced a dose-dependent increase in mean percent reduction of peripheral lymphocyte counts (38 vs 42 vs 56 vs 77, P < 0.01, respectively). The simple Emax model [E = (Emax * C)/(C + EC50)] was the best-fit PK/PD modeling for FTY720 dose (Emax = 87.8 ± 5.3 percent and ED50 = 0.48 ± 0.08 mg, r² = 0.94) or concentration (Emax = 78.3 ± 2.9 percent and EC50 = 0.59 ± 0.09 ng/ml, r² = 0.89) vs effect ( percent reduction in peripheral lymphocytes). FTY720 PK/PD is dose dependent and follows an Emax model (EC50 = 0.5 mg or 0.6 ng/ml). Using lymphopenia as an FTY720 PD surrogate marker, high percent reductions ( about 80 percent) in peripheral lymphocytes are required to achieve best efficacy to prevent acute allograft rejection.

Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine

The use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26 percent lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20 percent) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3 percent). There were no differences in mean ± SD creatinine (1.65 ± 0.46 vs 1.60 ± 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 ± 15 vs 62 ± 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean ± SD delta1/Cr (-11 ± 17 vs -14 ± 15 percent, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20 percent (26 vs 31 percent, P = 0.6) or >30 percent delta1/Cr (19 vs 17 percent, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.

Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine.

The use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26% lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20%) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3%). There were no differences in mean +/- SD creatinine (1.65 +/- 0.46 vs 1.60 +/- 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 +/- 15 vs 62 +/- 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean +/- SD delta1/Cr (-11 +/- 17 vs -14 +/- 15%, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20% (26 vs 31%, P = 0.6) or >30% delta1/Cr (19 vs 17%, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.

Long-term kidney transplant outcomes in patients receiving oil-based or microemulsion formulations of cyclosporine.

UNLABELLED: In the last 20 years long-term experience with cyclosporine use in kidney transplantation has increased, allowing a more precise identification of its benefits. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1619 kidney transplants that received cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. Patients were divided into three groups (1) oil-based cyclosporine (SIM) with trough monitoring (GI, n=617); (2) microemulsion formulation (NEO) with trough monitoring (GII, n=962); and (3) NEO with C2 monitoring (GIII, n=40). Information was obtained on transplant demography; adjunctive immunosuppressive agent; living (LD) versus cadaveric (CAD) recipients; delayed graft function; any treated acute rejection; graft function at 3, 6, and 12 months, patient and graft survival, as well as causes of graft loss and death. RESULTS: At 15 years follow-up, patient and graft survival were 67.5% and 41.6%, being superior, among LD versus CAD recipients (patient: 78.7% vs 57.7%, P<.001; graft: 56.4% vs 30.5%, P<.001). In LD (54% vs 32%, P<.001) and CAD (69% vs 55%, P<.001) NEO reduced the incidence of AR and improved 8-year patient (LD: 81.8% vs 94.7%; CAD: 66.4 vs 79.9%, P<.01) and graft survival (LD: 58.3 vs. 80%; CAD: 40.2% vs. 59.5%, P<.01), compared to SIM. Overall 8-year graft survival was inferior among patients with increased 1-year creatinine values (< or =1.5, 1.6-2.5 and >2.5 mg/dL) level (74% vs 63.9% vs 22.4%, P<.001) or change in Cr (< or =0.1, 0.2-0.4, >0.5 mg/dL) level (73.1% vs 61.9% vs 37.2%, P<.001). In patients at the same level of graft function, those receiving NEO showed superior 8-year patient and graft survival compared with SIM. CONCLUSION: Compared to SIM, NEO reduced the incidence of acute rejection and produced superior long-term patient and graft survival.

Predictive value of urinary retinol binding protein for graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation.

UNLABELLED: High concentrations of retinol binding protein (RBP) are found in the urine of patients with tubulointerstitial injury. We evaluated the predictive value of urinary RBP (RBPu) for development graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation. METHODS: Serum creatinine and RBPu were prospectively measured at months 3, 6, and 12 in 221 kidney transplant patients. Baseline graft function was defined as the lowest serum creatinine value during the first 3 months after transplantation. Graft dysfunction was assessed at 1 year as a >-20% or >-30% change in the inverse creatinine ((Delta)1/Cr) compared to baseline value at month 3. RESULTS: Among 183 patients with normal graft function (Cr 0.6 mg/L (95% CI = -13% to -1.3%, P =.018). The percentage of patients with >-20% or >-30% (Delta)1/Cr was higher among patients with RBPu > 0.6 mg/L (34% vs 47%, P =.042; 21% vs 34%, P =.035). RBPu > 0.6 mg/L was the only variable independently associated with >-30% (Delta)1/Cr at 1 year, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 (95% CI 0.99 to 3.80, P =.05). CONCLUSIONS: RBPu may serve as a surrogate marker for graft dysfunction early after transplantation for patients with normal graft function, allowing early institution of intervention therapies to prolong allograft survival.

Safety and efficacy of sirolimus in kidney transplant patients and in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing angioplasty.

UNLABELLED: We show the key results of our 4-year experience with sirolimus in kidney transplant patients and in nontransplanted patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. METHODS: Recipients of one-haplotype living-related kidney allografts were randomized to receive sirolimus (2 mg/d, n = 35) or azathioprine (2 mg/kg per day, n = 35). Recipients of fully mismatched living kidney allografts (n = 55) received sirolimus (2 mg/day). High-risk recipients of black ethnicity (n = 68) were randomized to target whole-blood trough sirolimus concentrations between 8 and 12 ng/mL or 15 to 20 ng/mL. All kidney transplant patients received cyclosporine and prednisone. Sirolimus/cyclosporine pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 40 patients receiving 2 mg (n = 20) or 5 mg (n = 20) of sirolimus 7 days after transplantation. In the coronary intervention study, 12 patients at high risk for in-stent restenosis received sirolimus for 28 days after angioplasty. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 11.4% in recipients of one-haplotype living-related kidney allografts, 16.4% in recipients of fully mismatched living kidney allografts, and 15% (8 to 12 ng/mL) and 4% (15 to 20 ng/mL) in high-risk recipients of black ethnicity. Cyclosporine exposure was higher after morning administration compared to evening administration. There were poor correlations between sirolimus and cyclosporine exposures. The 4-month follow-up angiography revealed no restenosis (stenosis diameter > 50%), a late loss of 0.56 +/- 0.40 mm, and a loss index of 0.33 +/- 0.30. The follow-up 3D-intravascular ultrasound restudy showed an in-stent relative volumetric obstruction of 9.9 +/- 5.5%. Sirolimus in highly effective in preventing kidney allograft acute rejection and in-stent coronary restenosis.