Is Digital Animation Superior to Text Resources for Facial Transplantation Education? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Facial transplantation is a complex surgical procedure that requires education of medical professionals, patients, and the general public. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the educational efficacy of facial transplantation digital animation versus text resources for teaching medical students a complex surgical procedure and its applicable anatomical and surgical principles. METHODS: Medical student volunteers were recruited and prospectively randomized to an animation or a text group. Students completed preintervention and postintervention assessments of confidence and knowledge of head and neck anatomy and facial transplantation. Student Evaluations of Educational Quality survey assessed student satisfaction with both tools following study crossover. Knowledge assessment was developed using National Board of Medical Examiners guidelines and content validated by four experts. The Cohen d statistic was used to measure the effect size of each intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-six students were assigned randomly to the animation group (n = 19) or the text (n = 17) group. Postintervention analysis demonstrated significantly higher performance scores in the animation group compared to the text group (p = 0.029). The animation group had a larger effect size (Cohen d = 1.96 versus 1.27). Only students in the animation group reported significantly improved confidence in head and neck anatomy after the intervention (p = 0.002). Both groups demonstrated significantly increased postintervention confidence in knowledge of facial transplantation (p < 0.001). Satisfaction scores revealed that students significantly favored the animation resource (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Animation can be an effective tool for facial transplantation education and results in improved student knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction compared to text resources. Facial transplantation can also be used as an educational framework for teaching medical students anatomical and surgical principles.

Have We Achieved Optimal Skin Color Matching in Partial Facial Transplantation? A Survey Study of the General Public and Medical Professionals.

BACKGROUND: Skin color matching is an essential factor in achieving optimal aesthetic outcome in partial facial transplantation. However, there is no published literature evaluating the success of color matching to date. Furthermore, a medical professional's perception of an optimal color match may not necessarily translate to that of the general public. The purpose of our study was to evaluate skin color matching between the donor allograft and recipient native tissue in partial facial transplantations to determine the level of success perceived by the general public and medical professionals. METHODS: Published photographs of partial face transplant recipients were used to create a survey where recipient native and donor allograft skin samples were juxtaposed. Thirty-three members of the general public and 30 medical professionals were asked to rate skin color match on a scale from "excellent match" to "not a match." RESULTS: Overall, 47% of given ratings were positive, indicating an "excellent" or "good match," and 53% of ratings were negative, indicating a "poor match" or "lack of match" between the skin sample pairings shown. Of the 19 partial face transplant patients who were rated, 9 patients received >50% positive ratings, and 10 patients received <50% positive ratings. Medical professionals consistently gave more positive ratings, with statistically significant differences in 7 of the 19 rated patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there is need for improvement in color matching in partial facial transplantation, and that the general public is more critical of skin color matching compared to medical professionals.

Guiding Strategies for the Future of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review of Organ Donation Campaigns.

BACKGROUND: Since the 1990s, the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation has gained momentum, offering unprecedented solutions for patients with defects not amenable to autologous reconstruction. As with solid organ donation, the vascularized composite allotransplant donor pool remains limited. This systematic review identifies past successes and failures in organ donation campaigns to guide future strategies for expanding vascularized composite allotransplant donation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) were searched through July 31, 2019. The study compiled solid organ and vascularized composite allotransplant campaigns that aimed to increase donor registration. Articles depicting the current state of vascularized composite allotransplant donation were also assessed. RESULTS: Of an initial 3318 articles identified, 40 were included. Six articles described direct mail or print interventions, 10 depicted Web-based interventions, 13 dealt with interpersonal interventions, and seven used multimodal interventions. Four articles described the current state of vascularized composite allotransplant donation. A qualitative synthesis was conducted. The authors found that social media campaigns can have a robust but fleeting effect on registration trends and that interpersonal interventions are effective at increasing registration rates. In addition, the opportunity for participants to immediately register as organ donors, by means of either return mail, in-person, or online, is vital to campaign success. CONCLUSIONS: Public organ donation campaigns have had success in increasing organ donor registration rates, particularly through the use of social media and interpersonal interventions that allow for immediate registration. Synthesizing this information, we propose a multimodal campaign to expand the vascularized composite allotransplant donor pool.

Public Perceptions of Cross-Sex Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation has been performed in cadaveric facial transplantation and clinical extremity transplantation. Understanding the challenge of appropriate donor-recipient matching, this study sought to characterize the public's perception of cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation. METHODS: Participants were surveyed in New York City. Data collected included demographics and willingness to donate vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) of various types. Similar questions were asked in the context of same-sex and cross-sex donation. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants (male: 56.4%; age ≤35 years: 62.4%) were surveyed. The majority expressed willingness to donate to recipients of a different sex (hand: 78.2%, face: 56.4%, penis or uterus: 69.3%, lower limb: 81.2%, abdominal wall: 80.2%, larynx: 81.2%, and solid organs: 85.2%). Among VCAs, willingness to donate facial allografts was significantly different in same-sex versus cross-sex contexts (64.4% vs 56.4%; P = 0.008). Participants were also significantly more likely to donate VCAs to same-sex recipients on behalf of themselves versus loved ones (P < 0.05). There was significantly lower willingness to receive cross-sex versus same-sex facial (P = 0.022) and genital allografts (P = 0.022). Education on the preservation of recipient masculinity or femininity in cross-sex facial transplantation increased participants' willingness to receive a cross-sex face transplant from 56.4% to 71.3% (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the urban public's acceptance of VCA donation or reception regardless of sex mismatch. There is increased willingness to receive a cross-sex face transplant after education, highlighting opportunities for future focused interventions to increase public awareness and ultimately the donor pool.

Establishing a Clinically Applicable Methodology for Skin Color Matching in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

Skin color matching in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is an important determinant of aesthetic outcomes. The process of color matching is infrequently described in the literature. The Pantone SkinTone Guide (PSTG) is a handheld tool comprised of realistic skin tone swatches with a corresponding virtual swatch system. A color match acceptability threshold (AT) is defined as the point beyond which >50% of observers deem a given skin tone pairing as unacceptable. In this study, color match acceptability thresholds were developed using the PSTG to help standardize donor-recipient color matching. Four representative colors were chosen across the skin tone spectrum. These standard colors were used to develop a survey asking participants to determine the acceptability of color pairings. Using survey results, ATs were determined for changes in lightness, undertone, and lightness and undertone combined for each of the standard colors. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were determined using Fleiss's Kappa. Participants were more critical of skin tone pairings on the darker versus the lighter end of the spectrum, as evidenced by higher thresholds observed for lighter sample pairs. Additionally, observers were more critical of differences in skin lightness compared with differences in undertone. Intra-rater reliability was fair to substantial, and inter-rater reliability was fair to moderate. The PSTG can be used as a clinical tool to improve the aesthetic outcomes of skin-containing vascularized composite allotransplantation procedures by optimizing donor-recipient skin color matching. This can allow clinicians to complement visual judgment with quantitative reference.