RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to evaluate whether the Workshop on Basic Principles for Clinical Gynaecological Exploration, offered to medical students, improves theoretical-practical knowledge, safety, confidence, global satisfaction and the achievement of the proposed objectives in the area of gynaecological clinical examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental pre-post-learning study carried out at the Gynaecology and Obstetrics department of Gregorio Marañón Hospital in Madrid (Spain). The volunteer participants were 4th-year students earning a degree in Medicine during the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 academic years. The study period was divided into the following stages: pre-workshop, intra-workshop and 2 weeks post-workshop. In the pre-workshop stage, students completed a brief online course to prepare for the workshop. The effectiveness of the workshop was evaluated through multiple-choice tests and self-administered questionnaires to assess self-assurance, self-confidence, self-satisfaction and the achievement of the objectives. RESULTS: Of the 277 students invited in both academic years, 256 attended the workshop (92.4%), with a total participation in the different stages of the study greater than 70%. A total of 82.5% of the students in the 2020-2021 academic year and 80.6% of students in the 2021-2022 academic year did not have any type of experience performing gynaecological clinical examinations. Between the pre-workshop and 2 weeks post-workshop stages, there was significant improvement in theoretical-practical knowledge (improvement mean = 1.38 and 1.21 in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 academic years, respectively). The security and confidence of the students prior to the workshop were low (average scores less than 5 points) in both academic years. However, post-workshop scores for satisfaction and the achievement of objectives were high in the two academic years; all the values approached or exceeded 8 points. CONCLUSIONS: Our students, after outstanding participation, evaluated the BPCGE, and improved their theoretical and practical knowledge, as well as their skills in a gynaecological clinical examination. Moreover, in their view, after the workshop, they felt very satisfied, far outreaching the proposed aims. In addition, excellent results were maintained over time, year after year.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the early diagnosis of uterine incarceration before 20 weeks of gestation improves maternal-perinatal prognoses. METHODS: A systematic review of all of the cases published in the past 30 years that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria was performed and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. A comparative analysis of diagnoses before and after 20 weeks of gestation was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine studies with a total of 146 cases of uterine incarceration during pregnancy were included. For cases of incarceration diagnosed before 20 weeks of gestation, a higher proportion of clinical symptoms was observed; however, a lower proportion of complications, such as premature delivery, need for cesarean section, and poor perinatal outcomes, were observed (P < 0.05). The proportion of spontaneous resolution and minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of incarceration was significantly higher among patients diagnosed with this pathology before 20 weeks (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The literature indicates that uterine incarceration is a rare complication during pregnancy with better maternal-perinatal results if diagnosed earlier than 20 weeks.
