Non-HDL cholesterol predicts coronary heart disease in primary prevention: findings from an Italian 40-69 year-old cohort in general practice.

OBJECTS: Non-HDL cholesterol is now recommended as an index of risk associated with combined dyslipidemia, and it has also been found useful in predicting coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in patients with diabetes. We studied the association between known CHD risk factors, enclosed non-HDL cholesterol, and a "high CHD risk condition", i.e. a "5-years CHD risk >15%" in general practice. METHODS: We studied 4,085 40-69 year-old diabetic (no. 489) and non-diabetic (no. 3,596) individuals from an opportunistic cohort. Cross-sectional descriptive statistics, and age- and gender-adjusted multiple logistic exponential betas have been calculated. RESULTS: About 12% of the participants had diabetes. Age- and gender-adjusted comparison showed that all the study variables were significantly worse in diabetic vs. non-diabetic individuals (except cigarette smoking, total blood cholesterol and the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol). They had a mean "5-year CHD-risk" significantly higher than non-diabetic individuals (18.8+/-11.9% vs 7.5+/-6.9%, P<0.01), and a four-fold prevalence of "5-years CHD risk >15%" (55.4% vs 11.1%, P<0.01). As to diabetic individuals, the study variables associated to a "high CHD risk condition" were cigarette smoking, systolic blood pressure, and non-HDL blood cholesterol levels. As to non-diabetic individuals cigarette smoking, systolic blood pressure, and HDL (inversely) and non-HDL blood cholesterol levels were associated to a "high CHD risk condition". CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL cholesterol--and cigarette smoking and systolic blood pressure--strongly predicted a "high CHD risk condition" both in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.

Characteristics of Type 2 diabetic patients cared for by general practitioners either with medical nutrition therapy alone or with hypoglycaemic drugs.

The essential role of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) for people with diabetes is widely recognised, and its exclusive use is recommended in mild diabetes according to a stepwise therapeutic approach. We describe the characteristics of MNT-treated Type 2 diabetic patients (vs drugs) cared for by general practitioners (GPs) in order to check that appropriate differences did exist between the two groups, by auditing the data from our local shared-care program for diabetes. We had 16,000 diabetic patients (out of 630,000 inhabitants); 6,800 of them (42.5%) cared for by GPs. Thirty-one percent (2,079 out of 6,800 patients cared for by GPs) were treated with MNT and 69% with drugs. The MNT-treated patients (vs drugs) were younger (66.1 +/- 10.7 vs 67.7 +/- 11.0 yr, p<0.01), had shorter disease duration (8.2 +/- 6.6 vs 11.2 +/- 7.6 yr, p<0.01), lower HbA1c (7.0 +/- 1.1 vs 7.8 +/- 1.6%, p<0.01) and body mass index (BMI) (28.6 +/- 4.6 vs 29.0 +/- 4.9 kg/m2, p<0.01). They had less prevalence of high blood triglycerides (25.4% vs 29.0%, p<0.01). MNT-treated patients had less micro-albuminuria (5.3% vs 8.8%, p<0.01); less retinopathy both non-proliferant (6.5% vs 11.1%, p<0.01), and pre-proliferant (6.8% vs 12.7%, p<0.01), and proliferant (7.0% vs 12.9%, p<0.01); less peripheral neuropathy (3.9% vs 8.3%, p<0.01); and diabetic foot (1.0% vs 2.0%, p<0.01). They had less chronic heart failure (2.7% vs 4.6%, p<0.01), and claudicatio intermittens (3.3% vs 5.3%, p<0.01). In conclusion, the Type 2 diabetic patients cared for by GPs using MNT appropriately had a less severe form of diabetes.

Audit of a shared-care program for persons with diabetes: baseline and 3 annual follow-ups.

In Italy, data on shared-care programs for diabetes are lacking. We described the characteristics of type 2 diabetic population assisted in general practice and evaluated 3 years of follow-up outcomes and performance indicators in a shared-care program in Modena, Italy (1998-2001); only well-controlled diabetic patients were considered. Forty-nine percent of territorial GPs adhered to the project (257 out of 521) and 77% of them sent 6409 paired baseline and follow-up datasheets. Altogether, 97.8% patients had type 2 diabetes, mean age 68.6+/-11.7 years, disease duration 9.6+/-7.5 years, BMI 28.6+/-4.8 kg/m2, HbA(1c) 7.6%+/-1.6%, 16.1% of them were disabled. Among the non-disabled patients, 23.6% had optimal glycemic control (HbA(1c) < or =6.5%); at baseline the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular diabetic complications was: 8.2% microalbuminuria and 2.4% macroalbuminuria plus nephropathy, 11.0% nonproliferative and 3.0% preproliferative retinopathy, 7.0% neuropathy, 1.8% diabetic foot; 8.5% angina, 6.9% TIA or stroke, 6.3% infarction, 5.2% intermittent claudication, 4.1% heart failure. Among the disabled patients 27.9% had optimal glycemic control, but they had more diabetic complications. The performance indicators significantly improved over the 3-year study period: glycemic control indicators increased from 66%-75% to 83%-90% and micro- and macrovascular indicators from 59%-65% to 75%-81%. The outcome indicators also improved: mean HbA(1c) value changed from 7.6%+/-1.6% to 7.3%+/-1.3% and the percentage of people with HbA(1c)< or =6.5% significantly improved over time. Similar trends were observed in both disabled and non-disabled diabetic patients.

Changes in long-term glycemic control and performance indicators in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients cared for by general practitioners: findings from the "Modena Diabetes Project".

BACKGROUND AND AIM: General practitioners (GPs) are being increasingly asked to play a key role in the shared care of people with diabetes mellitus, but data concerning the effects of this in Italy are still scarce. We therefore evaluated the 4-year follow-up changes in outcomes and performance indicators in type 2 diabetic patients cared for by GPs in the framework of the "Modena Diabetes Project". METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the local GPs participating in the project (387 out of 521) sent 5260 paired baseline and follow-up datasheets. The baseline characteristics of the type 2 diabetic patients (49.6% male) were a mean age of 67.3+/-11.2 years, a mean disease duration of 10.9+/-7.4 years, a mean BMI of 28.7+/-4.8 kg/m2, and a mean HbA1c level 7.56+/-1.52%. After four years follow-up, the individual before/after match-paired outcomes revealed an improvement in glycemic control: HbA1c levels significantly decreased to 7.39+/-1.31%, and the percentage of patients with HbA1c level of <6.5% significantly increased from 15.7% to 22.1%. There was also a significant decrease in body weight (from 78.3+/-14.8 to 77.6+/-14.6 kg) and BMI (from 28.8+/-4.8 to 28.5+/-4.9 kg/m2). The time trends of glycemic control significantly improved during the 4-year follow up, but those of the body weight and BMI values did not. Furthermore, the percentages of performance indicators matching the expected rate of recurrence per each year of follow-up significantly improved during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term glycemic control and the performance indicators relating to the type 2 diabetic patients participating in our shared care programme progressively improved.