Venous distensibility is more important than venous diameter in primary survival of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Many studies suggested that the optimal cephalic vein diameter for wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula construction should be at least 2 mm to predict successful maturation and primary patency. However, our experience has shown that many patients with smaller cephalic vein diameter (≤2 mm) in the neutral state (without a tourniquet) also have good clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify predictors that affect primary survival of new wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula in patients with cephalic vein diameter ≤2 mm. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 50 patients with preoperative cephalic vein diameters ≤2 mm in the neutral state who underwent wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula construction between September 2016 and October 2019. Internal diameters of the cephalic vein and radial artery, venous distensibility, peak systolic velocity, and resistance index of the radial artery were determined by ultrasound examination before wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula placement. Patients were divided into two groups: failure and survival. RESULTS: The radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival rate was 68% from the time of radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation until the end of the study. Univariate analysis showed that larger venous distensibility (p < 0.001), non-diabetic kidney disease (p = 0.009), and slower peak systolic velocity of the radial artery (p = 0.033) were predictive factors for primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. Multivariate regression analysis revealed good venous distensibility (odds ratio = 9.637, 95% confidence interval = 1.893-49.050, p = 0.006) and non-diabetic kidney disease (odds ratio = 0.148, 95% confidence interval = 0.033-0.660, p = 0.012) to be independent predictors for primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that venous distensibility >0.52 mm (sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 68.8%) was the best cut-off value to predict primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. CONCLUSION: When cephalic veins with diameter ≤2 mm are found, venous distensibility should be used to aid in the surgery decision-making process. The outcome of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival would be significantly improved through the use of cephalic vein with venous distensibility >0.52 mm.

Preoperative cephalic vein diameter and diabetes do not limit the choice of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula.

AIM: To identify predictors that affect initial maturation of new wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula and evaluate the clinical effects of the ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas creation in the event of first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation between September 2016 and May 2018. Currently, we prefer to re-create an ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula when the first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula fails. Predictors of successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula rates. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that predictive factors for successful wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula include larger preoperative cephalic vein diameter (p = 0.001) and non-diabetic kidney disease (p = 0.007). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed cephalic vein diameter ⩾2 mm (odds ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval = (1.49-13.92), p = 0.008) and non-diabetic kidney disease (odds ratio = 4.22, 95% confidence interval = (1.38-12.88), p = 0.011) to be independent predictors for successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. We re-created ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas in 15 patients among the 21 failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas; all these arteriovenous fistulas maintained clinical maturation following up for 1-2 years. CONCLUSION: Small cephalic vein diameter (<2 mm) and diabetes were independent risk factors for failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas, but this risk could be overcome by aggressive ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula to address a failed first attempt. Cephalic vein diameter is more important during the maturation stage, and once maturation has occurred, diabetes has an additive role in determining the patency of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. The "wrist RCAVF first, ipsilateral mid-forearm RCAVF second" strategy is the most clinically significant message of our study.