Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;49(3): e5092, Mar. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-771932

RESUMEN

Intracutaneous sterile water injection (ISWI) is used for relief of low back pain during labor, acute attacks of urolithiasis, chronic neck and shoulder pain following whiplash injuries, and chronic myofascial pain syndrome. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of ISWI for relief of acute low back pain (aLBP). A total of 68 patients (41 females and 27 males) between 18 and 55 years old experiencing aLBP with moderate to severe pain (scores ≥5 on an 11-point visual analogue scale [VAS]) were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either ISWIs (n=34) or intracutaneous isotonic saline injections (placebo treatment; n=34). The primary outcome was improvement in pain intensity using the VAS at 10, 45, and 90 min and 1 day after treatment. The secondary outcome was functional improvement, which was assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) 1 day after treatment. The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the ISWI group than in the control group at 10, 45, and 90 min, and 1 day after injection (P<0.05, t-test). The mean increment in PSFS score of the ISWI group was 2.9±2.2 1 day after treatment, while that in the control group was 0.9±2.2. Our study showed that ISWI was effective for relieving pain and improving function in aLBP patients at short-term follow-up. ISWI might be an alternative treatment for aLBP patients, especially in areas where medications are not available, as well as in specific patients (e.g., those who are pregnant or have asthma), who are unable to receive medications or other forms of analgesia because of side effects.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Agua/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Inyecciones Intradérmicas/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 49(3)2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26840703

RESUMEN

Intracutaneous sterile water injection (ISWI) is used for relief of low back pain during labor, acute attacks of urolithiasis, chronic neck and shoulder pain following whiplash injuries, and chronic myofascial pain syndrome. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of ISWI for relief of acute low back pain (aLBP). A total of 68 patients (41 females and 27 males) between 18 and 55 years old experiencing aLBP with moderate to severe pain (scores ≥5 on an 11-point visual analogue scale [VAS]) were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either ISWIs (n=34) or intracutaneous isotonic saline injections (placebo treatment; n=34). The primary outcome was improvement in pain intensity using the VAS at 10, 45, and 90 min and 1 day after treatment. The secondary outcome was functional improvement, which was assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) 1 day after treatment. The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the ISWI group than in the control group at 10, 45, and 90 min, and 1 day after injection (P<0.05, t-test). The mean increment in PSFS score of the ISWI group was 2.9±2.2 1 day after treatment, while that in the control group was 0.9±2.2. Our study showed that ISWI was effective for relieving pain and improving function in aLBP patients at short-term follow-up. ISWI might be an alternative treatment for aLBP patients, especially in areas where medications are not available, as well as in specific patients (e.g., those who are pregnant or have asthma), who are unable to receive medications or other forms of analgesia because of side effects.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Agua/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intradérmicas/métodos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;48(2): 186-190, 02/2015. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-735855

RESUMEN

Myoclonus induced by etomidate during induction of general anesthesia is undesirable. This study evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) pretreatment on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Ninety patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly allocated to three groups (n=30 each) for intravenous administration of 10 mL isotonic saline (group I), 0.5 µg/kg DEX in 10 mL isotonic saline (group II), or 1.0 µg/kg DEX in 10 mL isotonic saline (group III) over 10 min. All groups subsequently received 0.3 mg/kg etomidate by intravenous push injection. The incidence and severity of myoclonus were recorded for 1 min after etomidate administration and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events that occurred between the administration of the DEX infusion and 1 min after tracheal intubation was recorded. The incidence of myoclonus was significantly reduced in groups II and III (30.0 and 36.7%), compared with group I (63.3%). The incidence of severe sinus bradycardia was significantly increased in group III compared with group I (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in heart rate in groups I and II. There were no significant differences in the incidence of low blood pressure among the 3 groups. Pretreatment with 0.5 and 1.0 µg/kg DEX significantly reduced the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction; however, 0.5 µg/kg DEX is recommended because it had fewer side effects.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anestésicos Generales/efectos adversos , Bradicardia/epidemiología , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Etomidato/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Mioclonía/inducido químicamente , Mioclonía/prevención & control , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Incidencia , Mioclonía/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 48(2): 186-90, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351237

RESUMEN

Myoclonus induced by etomidate during induction of general anesthesia is undesirable. This study evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) pretreatment on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Ninety patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly allocated to three groups (n=30 each) for intravenous administration of 10 mL isotonic saline (group I), 0.5 µg/kg DEX in 10 mL isotonic saline (group II), or 1.0 µg/kg DEX in 10 mL isotonic saline (group III) over 10 min. All groups subsequently received 0.3 mg/kg etomidate by intravenous push injection. The incidence and severity of myoclonus were recorded for 1 min after etomidate administration and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events that occurred between the administration of the DEX infusion and 1 min after tracheal intubation was recorded. The incidence of myoclonus was significantly reduced in groups II and III (30.0 and 36.7%), compared with group I (63.3%). The incidence of severe sinus bradycardia was significantly increased in group III compared with group I (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in heart rate in groups I and II. There were no significant differences in the incidence of low blood pressure among the 3 groups. Pretreatment with 0.5 and 1.0 µg/kg DEX significantly reduced the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction; however, 0.5 µg/kg DEX is recommended because it had fewer side effects.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Generales/efectos adversos , Bradicardia/epidemiología , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Etomidato/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Mioclonía/inducido químicamente , Mioclonía/prevención & control , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mioclonía/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Genet Mol Res ; 13(1): 152-9, 2014 Jan 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24446298

RESUMEN

Microarray expression analysis was used to forecast the roles of differentially co-expressed genes (DCG) and DCG and links in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. In addition, we demonstrate that the relationship between transcriptional factors (TFs) and their targets can be considered a key factor in determining the difference between primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Regulatory impact factors were adopted to calculate the impact of TF. We identified 5 TFs and 29 target genes important in the transition between normal prostate and primary prostate cancer and 2 TFs and 7 target genes important in the transition between primary and metastatic prostate cancer. These results suggest that it may be possible to predict the clinical behavior of prostate cancer based on gene expression analysis.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA